Non-parametric analysis of the effects of αS1-casein genotype and parturition non-genetic factors on milk yield and composition in Murciano-Granadina goats

References

• Bevilacqua C, Ferranti P, Garro G, Veltri C, Lagonigro R, Leroux C, Pietrola E, Addeo F, Pilla F, Chianese L. 2002. Interallelic recombination is probably responsible for the occurrence of a new αs1‐casein variant found in the goat species. Febs J. 269:1293–1303.
   Google Scholar
• Boldman KG, Kriese LA, Vleck LD, Tassell CP, Kachman SD. 1995. A manual for use of MTDFREML. A set of programs to obtain estimates of variances and covariances. 1st ed. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Bonanno A, Di Grigoli A, Montalbano M, Bellina V, Mazza F, Todaro M. 2013. Effects of diet on casein and fatty acid profiles of milk from goats differing in genotype for αS1-casein synthesis. Eur Food Res Technol. 237:951–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito L, Silva F, Melo A, Caetano G, Torres R, Rodrigues M, Menezes G. 2011. Genetic and environmental factors that influence production and quality of milk of Alpine and Saanen goats. Genet Mol Res. 10:3794–3802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broucek J, Mihina S, Kisac P, Hanus A, Uhrincat M, Foltys V, Marencak S, Benc F. 2005. Environmental factors and progeny affecting milk yield and composition during the first lactation. J Anim Feed Sci. 14:461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JD. 2008. Effect size and eta squared. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG News. 12:38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Caravaca F, Carrizosa J, Urrutia B, Baena F, Jordana J, Amills M, Badaoui B, Sánchez A, Angiolillo A, Serradilla J. 2009. Short communication: effect of alphaS1-casein (CSN1S1) and kappa-casein (CSN3) genotypes on milk composition in Murciano-Granadina goats. J Dairy Sci. 92:2960–2964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carillier-Jacquin C, Larroque H, Robert-Granié C. 2016. Including α s1 casein gene information in genomic evaluations of French dairy goats. Genet Sel Evol. 48:54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnicella D, Dario M, Ayres MCC, Laudadio V, Dario C. 2008. The effect of diet, parity, year and number of kids on milk yield and milk composition in Maltese goat. Small Rumin Res. 77:71–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damián J, Sacchi I, Reginensi S, De Lima D, Bermúdez J. 2008. Cheese yield, casein fractions and major components of milk of Saanen and Anglo-Nubian dairy goats. Arq Bras Med Vet Zoo. 60:1564–1569.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado JV, Landi V, Barba CJ, Fernández J, Gómez MM, Camacho ME, Martínez MA, Navas FJ, León JM. 2017. Sustainable goat production in adverse environments: Volume II. Murciano-Granadina Goat: A spanish local breed ready for the challenges of the twenty-first century. Cham (Switzerland): Springer. Chapter 18; p. 205–219.
   Google Scholar
• Deroide CAS, Jacopini LA, Delgado JV, Léon JM, Brasil LHA, Ribeiro MN. 2016. Inbreeding depression and environmental effect on milk traits of the Murciano-Granadina goat breed. Small Rumin Res. 134:44–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galina MA, Silva E, Morales R, Lopez B. 1995. Reproductive performance of Mexican dairy goats under various management systems. Small Rumin Res. 18:249–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgio D, Di Trana A, Claps S. 2018. Oligosaccharides, polyamines and sphingolipids in ruminant milk. Small Rumin Res. 160:23–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedrick PW. 2015. Heterozygote advantage: the effect of artificial selection in livestock and pets. J Hered. 106:141–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hristov JP, Teofanova D, Georgieva A, Radoslavov G. 2018. Effect of genetic polymorphism of α±S1-casein gene on qualitative and quantitative milk traits in native Bulgarian Rhodopean cattle breed. Genet Mol Res. 17:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inbaraj S, Kundu A, De AK, Sunder J, Sejian V. 2018. Seasonal changes in blood biochemical and endocrine responses of different indigenous goat breeds of tropical island agro-ecological environment. Biol Rhythm Res. 49:412–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaafar SHS, Hashim R, Hassan Z, Arifin N. 2018. A comparative study on physicochemical characteristics of raw goat milk collected from different farms in Malaysia. Trop Life Sci Res. 29:195–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadri NK, Sahana G, Charlier C, Iso-Touru T, Guldbrandtsen B, Karim L, Nielsen US, Panitz F, Aamand GP, Schulman N, et al. 2014. A 660-Kb deletion with antagonistic effects on fertility and milk production segregates at high frequency in Nordic Red cattle: additional evidence for the common occurrence of balancing selection in livestock. PLoS Genet. 10:e1004049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kljajevic NV, Tomasevic IB, Miloradovic ZN, Nedeljkovic A, Miocinovic JB, Jovanovic ST. 2018. Seasonal variations of Saanen goat milk composition and the impact of climatic conditions. J Food Sci Technol. 55:299–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens D. 2013. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol. 4:863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maga E, Daftari P, Kültz D, Penedo M. 2009. Prevalence of alphas1-casein genotypes in American dairy goats. J Anim Sci. 87:3464–3469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin P, Leroux C. 2000. Le gène caprin spécifiant la caséine αs1: un suspect tout désigné aux effets aussi multiples qu’inattendus. Prod Anim, Special Issue, Molecular genetics: principles and applications in animal populations 125–132 http://granit.jouy.inra.fr/productions-animales/2000_hors-serie/Prod_Anim_2000_hs_hs_19.pdf (accessed 10 October 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Milewski S, Ząbek K, Antoszkiewicz Z, Tański Z, Sobczak A. 2018. Impact of production season on the chemical composition and health properties of goat milk and rennet cheese. Emir J Food Agric. 30:107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy KR, Myors B, Wolach A. 2014. Statistical power analysis: a simple and general model for traditional and modern hypothesis tests. London (UK): Routledge; p. 226.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan S, Heinzen T. 2017. Statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York (NY): Macmillan Learning; p. 783.
   Google Scholar
• Pal M, Dudhrejiya TP, Pinto S, Brahamani D, Vijayageetha V, Reddy YK, Roy P, Chhetri A, Sarkar S, Kate P. 2017. Goat milk products and their significance. Beverage Food World. 44:22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez MJ, Leroux C, Bonastre AS, Martin P. 1994. Occurrence of a LINE sequence in the 3′ UTR of the goat αs1-casein E-encoding allele associated with reduced protein synthesis level. Gene. 147:179–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson T, Olajumoke O. 2017. Genetic and non-genetic factors affecting yield and milk composition in goats. J Adv Dairy Res. 5:175.
   Google Scholar
• Spanish Ministry of Agriculture. 2005. Real Decreto 368/2005, de 8 de abril, por el que se regula el control oficial del rendimiento lechero para la evaluación genética en las especies bovina, ovina y caprina. [Royal Decree 368/2005, of 8th April, which regulates the official control of the milk yield for the genetic evaluation in the bovine, ovine and caprine species]. Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. BOE, núm. 97, de 23 de abril de 2005. BOE-A-2005-6564. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• The MathWorks, Inc. 2015. 'MATLAB' release R2015a, Natick (MA): The MathWorks, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vacca GM, Stocco G, Dettori ML, Pira E, Bittante G, Pazzola M. 2018. Milk yield, quality, and coagulation properties of 6 breeds of goats: environmental and individual variability. J Dairy Sci. 101:7236–7247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vleck LD. 1993. Selection Index and introduction to mixed model methods. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; p. 481.
   Google Scholar
• Vassal L, Delacroix-Buchet A, Bouillon J. 1994. Influence des variants AA, EE et FF de la caséine αs1 caprine sur le rendement fromager et les caractéristiques sensorielles de fromages traditionnels: premières observations. Le Lait. 74:89–103.
   Google Scholar
• Verdier-Metz I, Coulon J-B, Pradel P. 2001. Relationship between milk fat and protein contents and cheese yield. Anim Res. 50:365–371.
   Google Scholar
• Yang H, Huck SW. 2010. The importance of attending to underlying statistical assumptions. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 10:44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Young AL. 2017. Analysis of lactation curves using probability distributions and non-linear analysis. Utah: Utah State University, State Agricultural Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar