Improvements to dairy farms for environmental sustainability in Grana Padano and Parmigiano Reggiano production systems

References

• ARPA. 2016. Meteorological data. [Accessed 2019 Mar 14]. http://www.arpalombardia.it/siti/arpalombardia/meteo/richiesta-dati-misurati/Pagine/RichiestaDatiMisurati.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Bacenetti J, Bava L, Zucali M, Lovarelli D, Sandrucci A, Tamburini A, Fiala M. 2016. Anaerobic digestion and milking frequency as mitigation strategies of the environmental burden in the milk production system. Sci Total Environ. 539:450–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacenetti J, Lovarelli D, Tedesco D, Pretolani R, Ferrante V. 2018. Environmental impact assessment of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) hay production. Sci Total Environ. 635:551–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldini C, Gardoni D, Guarino M. 2017. A critical review of the recent evolution of life cycle assessment applied to milk production. J Clean Prod. 140:421–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bava L, Bacenetti J, Gislon G, Pellegrino L, D'Incecco P, Sandrucci A, Tamburini A, Fiala M, Zucali M. 2018. Impact assessment of traditional food manufacturing: the case of Grana Padano cheese. Sci Total Environ. 626:1200–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bava L, Sandrucci A, Zucali M, Guerci M, Tamburini A. 2014. How can farming intensification affect the environmental impact of milk production? J Dairy Sci. 97:4579–4593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berton M, Cesaro G, Gallo L, Ramanzin M, Sturaro E. 2018. Sources of variation of the environmental impact of cereal-based intensive beef finishing herds. Ital J Anim Sci. 17:767–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *CLAL. 2019. Italy Milk Dairy Market. [Accessed 2019 Mar 14]. https://www.clal.it/?section=formaggi_dop; https://www.clal.it/?section=consegne_reg_it; https://www.clal.it/?section=riepilogo_istat
   Google Scholar
• Conte G, Ciampolini R, Cassandro M, Lasagna E, Calamari L, Bernabucci U, Abeni F. 2018. Feeding and nutrition management of heat-stressed dairy ruminants. Ital J Anim Sci. 17:604–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalla Riva A, Burek J, Kim D, Thoma G, Cassandro M, De Marchi M. 2018. The environmental analysis of asiago PDO cheese: a case study from farm gate-to-plant gate. Ital J Anim Sci. 17:250–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalla Riva A, Burek J, Kim D, Thoma G, Cassandro M, De Marchi M. 2017. Environmental life cycle assessment of Italian mozzarella cheese: hotspots and improvement opportunities. J Dairy Sci. 100:7933–7952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danieli PP, Ronchi B. 2018. Developing a predictive model for the energy content of goat milk as the basis for a functional unit formulation to be used in the life cycle assessment of dairy goat production systems. Animal. 12:408–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer IJM, Cederberg C, Eady S, Gollnow S, Kristensen T, Macleod M, Meul M, Nemecek T, Phong LT, Thoma G, et al. 2011. Greenhouse gas mitigation in animal production: towards an integrated life cycle sustainability assessment. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 3:423–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EDA European Dairy Association. 2018. Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules for dairy products. [Accessed 2019 Mar 14]. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/pdf/PEFCR-DairyProducts_2018-04-25_V1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gaudino S, Goia I, Grignani C, Monaco S, Sacco D. 2014. Assessing agro-environmental performance of dairy farms in northwest Italy based on aggregated results from indicators. J Environ Manage. 140:120–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G. 2013. Tackling climate change through livestock – a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Roma (Italy): Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO).
   Google Scholar
• Gollnow S, Lundie S, Moore AD, McLaren J, van Buuren N, Stahle P, Christie K, Thylmann D, Rehl T. 2014. Carbon footprint of milk production from dairy cows in Australia. Int Dairy J. 37:31–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerci M, Bava L, Zucali M, Sandrucci A, Penati C, Tamburini A. 2013. Effect of farming strategies on environmental impact of intensive dairy farms in Italy. J Dairy Res. 80:300–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Dairy Federation (IDF). 2015. A common carbon footprint approach for dairy. The IDF guide to standard lifecycle assessment methodology for the dairy sector. In the Bulletin of the IDF No 479/2010. International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD). 2011. Handbook- Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European context, 2011. EUR 24571 EN. Luxemburg. Publications Office of the EU.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2006a. Emissions from livestock and manure management. In: IPCC, Eggleston H, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, editors. IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Volume 4: Agriculture, forestry and other land use. Chapter 10. Hayama, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2006b. N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application. In: IPCC, Eggleston H, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, editors. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Volume 4: Agriculture, forestry and other land use. Chapter 11. Hayama, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14040 series. 2006. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines. Geneva (Switzerland): International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Lovarelli D, Bacenetti J. 2017. Seedbed preparation for arable crops: environmental impact of alternative mechanical solutions. Soil Tillage Res. 174:156–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovarelli D, Fiala M, Larsson G. 2018. Fuel consumption and exhaust emissions during on-field tractor activity: a possible improving strategy for the environmental load of agricultural mechanisation. Comput Electron Agric. 151:238–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes LE, Strathe AB, Fadel JG, Casper DP, Kebreab E. 2014. Prediction of enteric methane emissions from cattle. Global Change Biol. 20:2140–2148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostert PF, van Middelaar CE, de Boer IJM, Bokkers E. 2018. The impact of foot lesions in dairy cows on greenhouse gas emissions of milk production. Agric Syst. 167:206–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemecek T, Kägi T. 2007. Life cycle inventories of agricultural production systems. Final Report Ecoinvent v2.0 No. 15aAgroscope FAL Reckenholz and FAT Taenikon. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Zürich and Dübendorf, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien D, Hennessy T, Moran B, Shalloo L. 2015. Relating the carbon footprint of milk from Irish dairy farms to economic performance. J Dairy Sci. 98:7394–7407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirlo G. 2012. Cradle-to-farm gate analysis of milk carbon footprint: a descriptive review. Ital J Anim Sci. 11:109–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirlo G, Carè S. 2013. A simplified tool for estimating Carbon Footprint of dairy cattle milk. Ital J Anim Sci. 12:497–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRé Consultants. 2016. SimaPro 8.4.0.0. Amersfoort (the Netherlands). LCA Software.
   Google Scholar
• Provolo G, Mattachini G, Finzi A, Cattaneo M, Guido V, Riva E. 2018. Global warming and acidification potential assessment of a collective manure management system for bioenergy production and nitrogen removal in Northern Italy. Sustainability. 10:3653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS 9.4 (TS1M3). 2012. SAS Inst. Inc. Cary, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomisto HL, Hodge ID, Riordan P, MacDonald DW. 2012. Comparing energy balances, greenhouse gas balances and biodiversity impacts of contrasting farming systems with alternative land uses. Agric Syst. 108:42–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Werf HMG, Garnett T, Corson MS, Hayashi K, Huisingh D, Cederberg C. 2014. Towards eco-efficient agriculture and food systems: theory, praxis and future challenges. J Clean Prod. 73:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellinga TV, de Haan MHA, Schils RLM, Evers A, van den Pol–van Dasselaar A. 2011. Implementation of GHG mitigation on intensive dairy farms: farmers' preferences and variation in cost effectiveness. Livest Sci. 137:185–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, Mutel C, Nemecek T, Reinhard J, Vadenbo CO, Wernet G. 2013. Overview and methodology. Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Ecoinvent Report 1(v3). St. Gallen: The Ecoinvent Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Zucali M, Bacenetti J, Tamburini A, Nonini L, Sandrucci A, Bava L. 2018. Environmental impact assessment of different cropping systems of home-grown feed for milk production. J Clean Prod. 172:3734–3746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucali M, Battelli G, Battini M, Bava L, Decimo M, Mattiello S, Povolo M, Brasca M. 2016. Multi-dimensional assessment and scoring system for dairy farms. Ital J Anim Sci. 15:492–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar