The effect of chilled storage on the quality of meat from the feral wild boar (Sus scrofa)

References

• Aaslyng MD, Meinert L. 2017. Meat flavour in pork and beef - from animal to meal. Meat Sci. 132:112–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC International. 2000. Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists international. 17th ed. Gaithersburg (MD): AOAC.
   Google Scholar
• Atanassova V, Apelt J, Reich F, Klein G. 2008. Microbiological quality of freshly shot game in Germany. Meat Sci. 78:414–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babicz M, Kropiwiec-Domańska K, Szyndler-Nędza M, Grzebalska AM, Łuszczewska- Sierakowska I, Wawrzyniak A, Hałabis M. 2018. Physiochemical parameters of selected internal organs of fattening pigs and wild boars. Ann Anim Sci. 18:575–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodnar ES, Bodnar K. 2015. Main traits of the wild boar meat in the marketing. Lucrari Stiintifice. 16:81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Boers RH, Dijkmann KE, Wijngaards G. 1994. Shelf-life of vacuum-packaged wild boar meat in relation to that of vacuum-packaged pork: relevance of intrinsic factors. Meat Sci. 37:91–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borilova G, Hulankova R, Svobodova I, Jezek F, Hutarova Z, Vecerek V, Steinhauserova I. 2016. The effect of storage conditions on the hygiene and sensory status of wild boar meat. Meat Sci. 118:71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Statistical Office. 2017. Warsaw. Available from: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rolnictwo-lesnictwo/lesnictwo/lesnictwo-2017,1,13.html
   Google Scholar
• Cifuni GF, Amici A, Contò M, Viola P, Failla S. 2014. Effects of hunting method on meat quality from fallow deer and wild boar and preliminary studies for predicting lipid oxidation using visible reflectance spectra. Eur J Wildlife Res. 60:519–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council Regulation No 853/2004 of 29 April 2004. Laying down specific hygiene rules for the hygiene of foodstuffs.
   Google Scholar
• Council Directive 92/45/EEC of 16 June 1992. On public health and animal health problems relating to the killing of wild game and the placing on the market of wild game meat.
   Google Scholar
• Daszkiewicz T, Hnatyk N, Dąbrowski D, Janiszewski P, Gugołek A, Kubiak D, Śmiecińska K, Winarski R, Koba-Kowalczyk M. 2015. A comparison of the quality of the Longissimus lumborum muscle from wild and farmer-raised fallow deer (Dama dama L.). Small Rumin Res. 129:77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farouk MM, Mustafa NM, Wu G, Krsinic G. 2012. The ‘sponge effect’ hypothesis: an alternative explanation of the improvement in the water holding capacity of meat with ageing. Meat Sci. 90:670–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florek M, Skałecki P, Domaradzki P, Wolan Ł, Ryszkowska-Siwko M. 2017. Nutritional value and physicochemical properties of red deer and wild boar meat after frozen storage under vacuum. J Cent Eur Agric. 18:278–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornowicz E, Lewko L, Zwierzyński R, Kryza A. 2016. Selected texture parameters of breast muscles national geese. Postępt Nauki i Technologii Przemysłu Rolno-Spożywczego. 71:89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Grau R, Hamm G. 1953. Eineeinfachemetode zur bestimmung di wasserbindung in muskel. Naturwissenschafen. 40:277–279.
   Google Scholar
• Górecka J, Szmańko T, Hyla N, Juszczak M. 2012. Comparing meat structure of wild boars and domestic pigs stored at near to cryoscopic temperature or in a frozen state. Żywność Nauka Technologia Jakość. 2:143–160.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera-Mendez CH, Becila S, Boudjellal A, Ouali A. 2006. Meat ageing: reconsideration of the current concept. Trends Food Sci Technol. 17:394–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honikel KO. 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci. 49:447–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honikel KO. 2004. Water-holding capacity of meat. In Te Pas MF, Everts ME, Haagsman HP, editors. Muscle development of livestock animals: physiology, genetics and meat quality. Cambridge (MA): CABI Publishing, p. 389–400.
   Google Scholar
• Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan SM. 2005. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: the role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci. 71:194–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchiori AF, Felício PE. 2003. Quality of wild boar meat and commercial pork. Sci Agric. 60:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Marsico G, Rasulo A, Dimatteo S, Tarricone S, Pinto F, Ragni M. 2007. Pig, F1 (wild boar x pig) and wild boar meat quality. Ital J Anim Sci. 6:701–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirceta J, Petrovic J, Malesevic M, Blagojevic B, Antic D. 2017. Assessment of microbal carcass contamination of hunted wild boars. Eur J Wildlife Res. 63:7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngapo TM, Babare IH, Reynolds J, Mawson RF. 1999. Freezing and thawing rate effects on drip loss from samples of pork. Meat Sci. 53:149–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen P. 2011. Hygiene and microbiology of meat from wild game: an Austrian view. In: Paulsen P, Bauer A, Vodnansky M, Winkelmayer R, Smulders FJM, editors. Game meat hygiene in focus: microbiology, epidemiology, risk analysis and quality assurance. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; p. 19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce KL, Rosenvold K, Andersen HJ, Hopkins DL. 2011. Water distribution and mobility in meat during the conversion of muscle to meat and ageing and the impacts on fresh meat quality attributes – a review. Meat Sci. 89:111–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedrazzoli M, Dal Bosco A, Castellini C, Ranucci D, Mattioli S, Pauselli M, Roscini V. 2017. Effect of age and feeding area on meat quality of wild boars. Ital J Anim Sci. 16:353–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohja MS, Niinivaara FP. 1957. Die Bestimmung der Wasserbindund des Fleishesmittels der Konstantdruckmethode. Fleischwirtschaft. 9:193–195.
   Google Scholar
• Polish Law Gazette. 2017. Item 1485. On the detailed conditions of hunt harvesting animals and marking their carcasses (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Polish Law Gazette. 2013. Item 889. On the detailed conditions of hunt harvesting animals and marking their carcasses (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Polish Law Gazette. 2011. No 257, Item 1548. On the detailed conditions of hunt harvesting animals and marking their carcasses (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Polish Law Gazette. 2010. No 186, Item 1250. On the detailed conditions of hunt harvesting animals and marking their carcasses (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Polish Law Gazette. 2005. No 61, Item 548. On the detailed conditions of hunt harvesting animals and marking their carcasses (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Popczyk B. 2016. Management of wild boar population (Sus scrofa) in Poland. In: Management of game populations, Warsaw, p. 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Russo C, Balloni S, Altomonte I, Martini M, Nuvoloni R, Cecchi F, Pedonese F, Salari F, Sant’ana Da Silva AM, Torracca B, et al. 2017. Fatty acid microbiological profile of the meat (Longissimus dorsi muscle) of wild boar (Sus scropha scropha) hunted in Tuscany. Ital J Anim Sci. 16:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sales J, Kotrba R. 2013. Meat from wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): a review. Meat Sci. 94:187–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS. 2012. User's Guide, v. 6.12, 4th Edition, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 2, 846.
   Google Scholar
• Savage AWJ, Warriss PD, Jolley PD. 1990. The amount and composition of the proteins in drip from stored pig meat. Meat Sci. 27:289–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soriano A, Cruz B, Gómez L, Mariscal C, Ruiz AG. 2006. Proteolysis, physiochemical characteristics and free fatty acid composition of dry sausages made with deer (Cervus elaphus) or wild boar (Sus scrofa) meat: a preliminary study. Food Chem. 96:173–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szmańko T, Górecka J, Korzeniowska M, Malicki A, Eeremenko E. 2007. Comparison of chosen quality parameters of meat from Wild boar and domestic pigs. Pol J Food Nutr Sci. 57:532–528.
   Google Scholar
• Zochowska J, Lachowicz K, Gajowiecki L, Sobczak M, Kotowicz M, Zych A. 2005. Effects of carcass weight and muscle on texture, structure and myofibre characteristics of Wild boar meat. Meat Sci. 71:244–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zochowska-Kujawska J, Lachowicz K, Sobczak M, Gajowiecki L, Kotowicz M, Zych A, Mędrala D. 2007. Effects of massaging on hardness, rheological properties, and structure of four wild boar muscles of different fibre type content and age. Meat Sci. 75:595–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar