Estimates of genetic and crossbreeding parameters for 305-day milk yield of Girolando cows

References

• Balancin Júnior A, Prata MA, Moreira HL, Vercesi Filho AE, Cardoso VL, El Faro L. 2014. Avaliação de desempenho produtivo e reprodutivo de animais mestiços do cruzamento. Bol Ind Anim. 71:357–364.
   Google Scholar
• Bangar YC, Verma MR. 2017. Non-linear modelling to describe lactation curve in Gir crossbred cows. J Anim Sci Technol. 59:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical-theoretic approach, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Canaza-Cayo AW, Lopes PS, Cobuci JA, Martins MF, Silva M. 2018. Genetic parameters of milk production and reproduction traits of Girolando cattle in Brazil. Ital J Anim Sci. 17:22–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canaza-Cayo AW, Lopes PS, Silva M, Cobuci JA, Torres RA, Martins MF, Arbex WA. 2014. Estrutura populacional da raça Girolando. Cienc Rural. 44:2072–2077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobuci JA, Euclydes RF, Teodoro RL, Verneque RS, Lopes PS, Silva MA. 2001. Aspectos genéticos e ambientais da curva de lactação de vacas da raça Guzerá. R Bras Zootec. 30:1204–1211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz GRB, Ribeiro MN, Pimenta Filho EC. 2009. Estimativas de parâmetros de curvas de lactação de bovinos. Arch Zootec. 58:695–704.
   Google Scholar
• Dangar N, Vataliya P. 2017. Heritability of production and reproduction traits in Gir cattle. Int J Livest Res. 94:46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson G.E. 1973. Inbreeding and heterosis in animals. In: Lush JL; American Dairy Science Association; American Society of Animal Science; Poultry Science Association, editors. Proceedings of the Animal Breeding and Genetics Symposium in honor of Dr. Jay L. Lush. Champaign (IL): American Society of Animal Science. p. 54–77.
   Google Scholar
• Facó O, Lôbo R.N.B, Martins Filho R, Martins GA, Oliveira SMP, Azevêdo D. 2008. Efeitos genéticos aditivos e não-aditivos para características produtivas e reprodutivas em vacas mestiças Holandês × Gir. R Bras Zootec. 37:48–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facó O, Lôbo RNB, Martins Filho R, Moura AA. 2002. Análise do desempenho produtivo de diversos grupos genéticos Holandês × Gir no Brasil. R Bras Zootec. 31:1944–1952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantner V, Jovanovac S, Raguz N, Solic D, Kuterovac K. 2010. Nonlinear vs. Linear Regression models in lactation curve prediction. BJAS. 16:794–800.
   Google Scholar
• Gradiz L, Alvarado L, Kahi AK, Hirooka H. 2009. Fit of Wood’s function to daily milk records and estimation of environmental and additive and non-additive genetic effects on lactation curve and lactation parameters of crossbred dual purpose cattle. Livest Sci. 124:321–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Z, Swalve HH. 1995. Modelling of the lactation curve as a sub-model in the evaluation of test day records. Proceedings of the Interbull Meeting; Sep 7–8; Prague. Interbull Bulletin No. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Hossein-Zadeh G|N. 2017. Application of growth models to describe the lactation curves for test-day milk production in Holstein cows. J Appl Anim Res. 45:145–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BW, Lee D, Jeon J, Lee J. 2009. Estimation of genetic parameters for milk production traits using a random regression test-day model in Holstein cows in Korea. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 22:923–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macciotta NPP, Dimauro C, Rassu SPG, Steri R, Pulina G. 2011. The mathematical description of lactation curves in dairy cattle. Ital J Animal Sci. 10:e51–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macciotta N.P.P, Vicario D, Cappio-Borlino A. 2005. Detection of different shapes of lactation curve for milk yield in dairy cattle by empirical mathematical models. J. Dairy Sci. 88:1178–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus C, Teixeira RA, Dias LT, Louvandini H, Oliveira E. 2008. Características produtivas e reprodutivas de vacas Holandesas e mestiças Holandês × Gir no Planalto Central. R Bras Zootec. 37:819–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Lourenco D, Aguilar I, Legarra A, Viterizica Z. 2014. Manual for BLUPF90 family of programs. http://nce.ads.uga.edu/wiki/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=blupf90_all2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira VC, Fontes CAA, Siqueira JG, Fernandes AM, Sant´Ana AF, Chambela Neto A. 2007. Produção de leite e desempenho dos bezerros de vacas nelores e mestiças. R Bras Zootec. 36:2074–2081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penasa M, De Marchi M, Dal Zotto R, De Jong G, Bittante G, Cassandro M. 2010. Heterosis effects in a black and white dairy cattle population under different production environments. Livest Sci. 131:52–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos DJA, Peixoto M, Borquis RRA, Verneque RS, Panetto JCC, Tonhati H. 2013. Genetic parameters for test-day milk yield, 305-day milk yield, and lactation length in Guzerat cows. Livest Sci. 152:114–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şeahin A, Ulutaş Z, Arda Y, Yüksel A, Serdar G. 2015. Lactation curve and persistency of anatolian buffaloes. Ital J Anim Sci. 14:150–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva M, Canazo-Cayo AW, Lopes OS, Cobuci JA, Martins MF, Paiva LC, Cembranelli MAR, Ferreira MBD, Panetto J. 2015. Programa de Melhoramento Genético da Raça Girolando: do teste de progênie às avaliações genômicas. Inf Agropec. 36:35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Silva M, Martins MF, Cembranelli MAR, Paiva LC, Panetto JCC, Alves BRC, Campos MM, Carvalho BC. 2016. Programa de Melhoramento Genético da Raça Girolando– Sumário de Touros – Resultado do Teste de Progênie – Junnho/2016. Juiz De Fora: Embrapa Gado De Leite, 2016. 50 (Embrapa Gado de Leite, Documentos, 190). https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes//publicacao/1050998/girolandobreed-genetic-improvement-program—sire-summary—progeny-test-results—june-2016
   Google Scholar
• Singh R, Arora VK, Goel R. 2001. Genetic studies on first lactation traits of Sahiwal Cattle. Indian J Anim Res. 35:147–149.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen A, Muir DD, Knight CH. 2008. Extended lactation in dairy cows: effects of milking frequency, calving season and nutrition on lactation persistency and milk quality. J Dairy Res. 75:90–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornley JHM, France J. 2007. Mathematical models in agriculture. 2nd ed. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Torshizi EM, Aslamenejad AA, Nassiri MR, Farhangfar H. 2011. Comparison and evaluation of mathematical lactation curve functions of Iranian primiparous Holsteins. S Afr J Anim Sci. 41:104–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmek BR. 1990. Genetic studies of production traits in Gir Cattle [dissertation]. Sardar Krushinagar: Gujarat Agricultural University.
   Google Scholar
• Wentworth EN. 1927. Practical considerations in crossbreeding. J Anim Sci. 1:42–49.
   Google Scholar
• Wilmink J.B.M. 1987. Adjustment of test-day milk, fat and protein yields for age, season and stage of lactation. Livest Sci. 16:335–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood P. 1967. Algebraic model of the lactation curve in cattle. Nature. 216:164–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar