Design and development of a multiplex microsatellite panel for the genetic characterisation and diversity assessment of domestic turkey (Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo)

References

• Adeyemi M, Oseni S. 2017. Canonical discriminant analysis applied to biometric data of nigerian indigenous turkeys. Arch Zootec. 67(257):7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson G. 2018. Conservation of breeds and maintenance of biodiversity: justification and methodology for the conservation of Animal Genetic Resources. Arch Zootec. 67(258):300–309.
   Google Scholar
• Belkhir K. 1999. GENETIX. version 4.02 a windows program for population genetic analysis. Laboratoire Genome, Populations, Interactions UPR. 9060.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn HD, Paiva SR, Wildeus S, Getz W, Waldron D, Stobart R, Bixby D, Purdy PH, Welsh C, Spiller S, et al. 2011. Genetic structure and diversity among sheep breeds in the United States: identification of the major gene pools. J Anim Sci. 89(8):2336–2348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutin-Ganache I, Raposo M, Raymond M, Deschepper CF. 2001. M13-tailed primers improve the readability and usability of microsatellite analyses performed with two different allele-sizing methods. BioTechniques. 31(1):25–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt DW, Morrice DR, Sewalem A, Smith J, Paton IR, Smith EJ, Bentley J, Hocking PM. 2003. Preliminary linkage map of the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) based on microsatellite markers. Anim Genet. 34(6):399–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccobelli S, Di Lorenzo P, Lancioni H, Monteagudo Ibáñez LV, Tejedor MT, Castellini C, Landi V, Martínez Martínez A, Delgado Bermejo JV, Vega Pla JL, et al. 2015. Genetic diversity and phylogeographic structure of sixteen Mediterranean chicken breeds assessed with microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA. Livest Sci. 175:27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves LD, Rowe JA, Reed KM. 2005. Survey of a cDNA library from the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Genome. 48(1):12–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho G, Cho B. 2004. Microsatellite DNA typing using 16 markers for parentage verification of the Korean native horse. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 17(6):750–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo E, Strillacci MG, Cozzi MC, Madeddu M, Mangiagalli MG, Mosca F, Zaniboni L, Bagnato A, Cerolini S. 2014. Feasibility study on the FAO chicken microsatellite panel to assess genetic variability in the Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Ital J Anim Sci. 13(4):3334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford R. 1992. Introduction to Europe and diffusion of domesticated turkeys from the America. Arch Zootec. 41(154):2.
   Google Scholar
• Granevitze Z, Hillel J, Chen G, Cuc NTK, Feldman M, Eding H, Weigend S. 2007. Genetic diversity within chicken populations from different continents and management histories. Anim Genet. 38(6):576–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson A. 1994. The effectiveness of using co-dominant polymorphic allelic series for (1) checking pedigrees and (2) distinguishing full-sib pair members. Anim Genet. 25(S1):37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol. 16(5):1099–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong HS, Oh JD, Lee JH, Jo KJ, Sang BD, Choi CH, Kim SD, Lee SJ, Yeon SH, Jeon GJ, et al. 2006. Genetic variation and relationships of Korean native chickens and foreign breeds using 15 microsatellite markers. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 19(11):1546–1550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XH, Yao YG. 2013. Characterization of 12 polymorphic microsatellite markers in the Chinese tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri chinensis). Zool Res. 34(E2):E62–E68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopez-Zavala R, Cano-Camacho H, Chassin-Noria O, Oyama K, Vazquez-Marrufo G, Zavala-Paramo MG. 2013. Genetic diversity and population structure of Mexican domesticated turkeys. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias. 4(4):417–434. English.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro M, Llambi S, Castro G, Barlocco N, Vadell A, Landi V, Delgado JV, Martinez A. 2015. Genetic characterization of Uruguayan Pampa Rocha pigs with microsatellite markers. Genet Mol Biol. 38(1):48–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada A, Tamate HB. 2000. Pedigree analysis of the sika deer (Cervus nippon) using microsatellite markers. Zool Sci. 17(3):335–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olowofeso O, Wheto M, Durosaro S, Bankole K, Adepoju D, Folarin O. 2016. Combined exclusion probabilities of ten microsatellite markers used with Nigerian chicken populations. Eur Int J Sci Technol. 5(4):21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ott J. 1992. Strategies for characterizing highly polymorphic markers in human gene mapping. Am J Hum Genet. 51(2):283–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S. 2001. Trypanotolerance in west african cattle and the population genetics effects of selection [PhD dissertation]. Dublin, Ireland: University of Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Reed KM, Roberts MC, Murtaugh J, Beattie CW, Alexander LJ. 2000. Eight new dinucleotide microsatellite loci in turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Anim Genet. 31(2):140–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousset F. 2008. genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour. 8(1):103–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozen S, Skaletsky H. 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Misener S., Krawetz S.A. (eds.), Bioinformatics methods and protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 132. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Schnabel R, Ward T, Derr J. 2000. Validation of 15 microsatellites for parentage testing in North American bison, Bison bison and domestic cattle. Anim Genet. 31(6):360–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel SA, Comer CE, Conway WC, Deyoung RW, Hardin JB, Calkins GE. 2013. Influence of translocations on eastern wild turkey population genetics in Texas. J Wildlife Manage. 77(6):1221–1231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith EJ, Geng TY, Long E, Pierson FW, Sponenberg DP, Larson C, Gogal R. 2005. Molecular analysis of the relatedness of five domesticated turkey strains. Biochem Genet. 43(1–2):35–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speller CF, Kemp BM, Wyatt SD, Monroe C, Lipe WD, Arndt UM, Yang DY. 2010. Ancient mitochondrial DNA analysis reveals complexity of indigenous North American turkey domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107(7):2807–2812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic J, Stanimirovic Z, Dimitrijevic V, Maletic M. 2010. Evaluation of 11 microsatellite loci for their use in paternity testing in Yugoslav Pied cattle (YU Simmental cattle). Czech J Anim Sci. 55(6):221–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton EK, Emery KF, Steadman DW, Speller C, Matheny R, Yang D. 2012. Earliest Mexican Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in the Maya region: implications for pre-hispanic animal trade and the timing of Turkey domestication. PLoS One. 7(8):e42630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira MLC, Santini L, Diniz AL, Munhoz C. de F. 2016. Microsatellite markers: what they mean and why they are so useful. Genet Mol Biol. 39(3):312–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar