Evaluating the need for an animal welfare assurance programme in South Tyrolean dairy farming

References

• Alvergnas M, Strabel T, Rzewuska K, Sell-Kubiak E. 2019. Claw disorders in dairy cattle: effects on production, welfare and farm economics with possible prevention methods. Livest Sci. 222:54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson M, Schaar J, Wiktorsson H. 1984. Effects of drinking water flow rates and social rank on performance and drinking behaviour of tied-up dairy cows. Livest Prod Sci. 11(6):599–610.
   Google Scholar
• Autonome Provinz Bozen – Südtirol. 2009. Erschwernispunkte in der Berglandwirtschaft [Aggravating factors in mountain farming]. Bozen: Autonome Provinz Bozen – Südtirol.
   Google Scholar
• Autonome Provinz Bozen – Südtirol. 2019. Agrar- und Forstbericht 2018 [Agricultural and forestry report 2018]. Bozen: Autonome Provinz Bozen – Südtirol.
   Google Scholar
• Battaglini L, Bovolenta S, Gusmeroli F, Salvador S, Sturaro E. 2014. Environmental sustainability of Alpine livestock farms. Ital J Anim Sci. 13:431–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmilch Südtirol. 2020. Die Genossenschaft. [accessed 2020 Mar 23]. https://www.mila.it/de/deine-mila/die-genossenschaft.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bielfeldt JC, Badertscher R, Tolle KH, Krieter J. 2005. Risk factors influencing lameness and claw disorders in dairy cows. Livest Prod Sci. 95(3):265–271.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann J, Ivemeyer S, Pelzer A, Winckler C, Zapf R. 2016. Milchkühe. In: Tierschutzindikatoren: Leitfaden für die Praxis – Rind [Animal welfare indicators: practical guide – cattle]. 1st ed. Darmstadt: Silber Druck; p. 10–29.
   Google Scholar
• Compassion in World Farming, OneKind. 2012. Farm Assurance Schemes & Animal Welfare: How the standards compare. Executive summary. Godalming: Compassion in World Farming.
   Google Scholar
• Cook NB. 2002. The influence of barn design on dairy cow hygiene, lameness and udder health. In: American Association of Bovine Practitioners, editor. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners; Sep 26–28; Madison, WI. Fort Collins (CO): Frontier Printers, Inc. p. 97–103.
   Google Scholar
• Cook NB, Bennett TB, Nordlund KV. 2004. Effect of free stall surface on daily activity patterns in dairy cows with relevance to lameness prevalence. J Dairy Sci. 87(9):2912–2922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corazzin M, Piasentier E, Dovier S, Bovolenta S. 2010. Effect of summer grazing on welfare of dairy cows reared in mountain tie-stall barns. Ital J Anim Sci. 9:304–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries M, Bokkers EAM, van Reenen CG, Engel B, van Schaik G, Dijkstra T, de Boer IJM. 2015. Housing and management factors associated with indicators of dairy cattle welfare. Prev Vet Med. 118(1):80–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2009. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from European Commission on the overall effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease. EFSA J. 1143:1–38.
   Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2012. Statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. EFSA J. 10:2767–2796.
   Google Scholar
• [EFSA] European Food Safety Authority. 2015. Scientific Opinion on the assessment of dairy cow welfare in small-scale farming systems. EFSA J. 13:4137–4239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016. Attitudes of Europeans towards animal welfare. Eurobarometer. Special Eurobarometer 442. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser D. 2006. Animal welfare assurance programs in food production: a framework for assessing the options. Anim Welf. 15:93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French Livestock Institute. 2009. Dairy production in 2015 in France, to an accentuation of regional contrasts. Dossi Econ Élevag. 391:1–71.
   Google Scholar
• Götz M. 2012. Kalk-Stroh-Matratze: Wie die Praxis urteilt [Straw-lime beds: How the practitioner judges]. LANDfreund. 12:44–48.
   Google Scholar
• Haskell MJ, Rennie LJ, Bowell VA, Bell MJ, Lawrence AB. 2006. Housing system, milk production, and zero-grazing effects on lameness and leg injury in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 89(11):4259–4266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley JN, Whay HR. 2006. Current attitudes of cattle practitioners to pain and the use of analgesics in cattle. Vet Rec. 159(20):662–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ISO] International Organization for Standardization. 2016. Animal welfare management – General requirements and guidance for organizations in the food supply chain. 1st ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. Chapter 7.11, Animal welfare and dairy cattle production systems. Report No.: ISO/TS 34700:2016.l
   Google Scholar
• Keil NM, Wiederkehr TU, Friedli K, Wechsler B. 2006. Effects of frequency and duration of outdoor exercise on the prevalence of hock lesions in tied Swiss dairy cows. Prev Vet Med. 74(2–3):142–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landesinstitut für Statistik ASTAT. 2019. Statistisches Jahrbuch 2018 [Statistical yearbook 2018]. Bozen: Autonome Provinz Bozen – Südtirol. Chapter 13, Land- und Forstwirtschaft; p. 317–337.
   Google Scholar
• Leach KA, Dippel S, Huber J, March S, Winckler C, Whay HR. 2009. Assessing lameness in cows kept in tie-stalls. J Dairy Sci. 92(4):1567–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main DCJ, Webster AJF, Green LE. 2001. Animal welfare assessment in farm assurance schemes. Acta Agric Scand A. 51(030):108–113.
   Google Scholar
• Mattiello S. 2008. Punti critici e approccio alla valutazione del benessere nei sistemi zootecnici alpini. Quad SoZooAlp. 5:30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Mattiello S, Battini M, Andreoli E, Barbieri S. 2011. Short communication: breed differences affecting dairy cattle welfare in traditional alpine tie-stall husbandry systems. J Dairy Sci. 94(5):2403–2407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattiello S, Klotz C, Baroli D, Minero M, Ferrante V, Canali E. 2009. Welfare problems in alpine dairy cattle farms in Alto Adige (Eastern Italian Alps). Ital J Anim Sci. 8(2):628–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Food Authorities. 2004. Forskrift om hold av storfe. [accessed 2020 Mar 4]. https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2004-04-22-665.
   Google Scholar
• [OIE] World Organisation for Animal Health. 2015. Terrestrial Animal Health Code. 24th ed. Vol. I. Paris: World Organisation for Animal Health. Chapter 7.11, Animal welfare and dairy cattle production systems.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu S, Borda C, Diugan EA, Spinu M, Groza IS, Sandru CD. 2013. Dairy cows welfare quality in tie-stall housing system with or without access to exercise. Acta Vet Scand. 55:43–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potterton SL, Green MJ, Harris J, Millar KM, Whay HR, Huxley JN. 2011. Risk factors associated with hair loss, ulceration, and swelling at the hock in freestall-housed UK dairy herds. J Dairy Sci. 94(6):2952–2963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regula G, Danuser J, Spycher B, Wechsler B. 2004. Health and welfare of dairy cows in different husbandry systems in Switzerland. Prev Vet Med. 66(1–4):247–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reneau JK, Seykora AJ, Heins BJ, Bey RF, Farnsworth RJ. 2003. Relationship of cow hygiene scores and SCC. In: National Mastitis Council, editor. Proceedings of the 42nd National Mastitis Council Meeting; Jan 26–29; Forth Worth, TX. Madison (WI): National Mastitis Council. p. 362–363.
   Google Scholar
• Rushen J, Haley D, de Passillé AM. 2007. Effect of softer flooring in tie stalls on resting behavior and leg injuries of lactating cows. J Dairy Sci. 90(8):3647–3651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruud LE, Boe KE, Østeras O. 2010. Risk factors for dirty dairy cows in Norwegian freestall systems. J Dairy Sci. 93(11):5216–5224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennereiverband Südtirol. 2017. Unsere Milch. Unsere Zukunft. Nachhaltigkeit in der Südtiroler Milchwirtschaft. [accessed 2019 Dec 2]. https://www.suedtirolermilch.com/CustomerData/655/files/Documents/nachhaltigkeitsbericht_de-ds-low.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sennereiverband Südtirol. 2020. Tätigkeitsbericht 2019. [accessed 2020 Jun 20]. https://www.suedtirolermilch.com/CustomerData/655/Files/Documents/2019_taetigkeitsbericht_milchsektor.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sogstad AM, Fjeldaas T, Østeras O, Forshell KP. 2005. Prevalence of claw lesions in Norwegian dairy cattle housed in tie stalls and free stalls. Prev Vet Med. 70(3–4):191–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton PK. 2010. Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 365(1554):2853–2867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veissier I, Andanson S, Dubroeucq H, Pomiès D. 2008a. The motivation of cows to walk as thwarted by tethering. J Anim Sci. 86(10):2723–2729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veissier I, Butterworth A, Bock B, Roe EJ. 2008b. European approaches to ensure good animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 113(4):279–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waiblinger S, Menke C, Coleman G. 2002. The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stockpeople and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 79(3):195–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waiblinger S, Mülleder C, Schmied C, Dembele I. 2007. Assessing the animals‘ relationship to humans in tied dairy cows: between-experimenter repeatability of measuring avoidance reactions. Anim Welf. 16:143–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welfare Quality. 2009. Welfare Quality assessment protocol for cattle. Lelystad: Welfare Quality Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Whay HR, Main DCJ, Green LE, Webster AJF. 2003. Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records. Vet Rec. 153(7):197–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildman EE, Jones GM, Wagner PE, Boman RL, Troutt HF, Lesch TN. 1982. A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics. J Dairy Sci. 65(3):495–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winckler C, Brill G. 2004. Lameness prevalence and behavioural traits in cubicle housed dairy herds – A field study. In: Zemljič B, editor. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium and 5th Conference on Lameness in Ruminants; Feb 11–15; Maribor, Slovenija. Ormoz: Ungula, Zemljič & Company D.N.O. p. 160–161.
   Google Scholar
• Zuliani A, Mair M, Kraševec M, Lora I, Brscic M, Cozzi G, Leeb C, Zupan M, Winckler C, Bovolenta S. 2018. A survey of selected animal-based measures of dairy cattle welfare in the Eastern Alps: toward context-based thresholds. J Dairy Sci. 101(2):1428–1436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurbrigg K, Kelton D, Anderson N, Millman S. 2005. Tie-stall design and its relationship to lameness, injury and cleanliness on 317 Ontario dairy farms. J Dairy Sci. 88(9):3201–3210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar