Evaluation of the systematic recording of diagnostic data in the Valdostana cattle

References

• [ANABORAVA] Associazione Nazionale Allevatori Bovini Razza Valdostana. 2020. Descrizione fenologica della razza Valdostana; [accessed 2020 June 04]. http://www.anaborava.it/rzz_duplice.html.
   Google Scholar
• Barbat-Leterrier A, Leclerc H, Philippe M, Fritz S, Daviere JB, Manciaux L, Guillaume F, Bretagne T de Boichard D, Mattalia S. 2016. GénoSanté: improving productive health of dairy cows by genomic selection and management: a first step with ketosis. Interbull Bullettin No 50. Puerto Varas, Chile. October 24–28:54–56.
   Google Scholar
• Barker ZE, Leach KA, Whay HR, Bell NJ, Main DCJ. 2010. Assessment of lameness prevalence and associated risk factors in dairy herds in England and Wales. J Dairy Sci. 93(3):932–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicalho RC, Oikonomou G. 2013. Control and prevention of lameness associated with claw lesions in dairy cows. Livestock Sci. 156(1–3):96–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijmholt S, Müller K, Leiding C, Hoedemaker M, Bollwein H, Kaske M. 2012. Laktationsinzidenzen von Produktionskrankheiten bei Fleckviehkühen in sechs bayerischen Milchviehbetrieben. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G. 40(06):347–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlier J, Höglund J, Morgan ER, Geldhof P, Vercruysse J, Claerebout E. 2020. Biology and epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematodes in cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 36(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremonesi P, Ceccarani C, Curone G, Severgnini M, Pollera C, Bronzo V, Riva F, Addis MF, Filipe J, Amadori M, et al. 2018. Milk microbiome diversity and bacterial group prevalence in a comparison between healthy Holstein Friesian and Rendena cows. PLoS One. 13(10):e0205054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curone G, Zanini M, Panseri S, Colombani C, Moroni P, Riva F, Faustini M. 2016. Milk ketone bodies assessment in a local Italian cow breed (Modenese) vs. Holstein and characterization of its physiological, reproductive and productive performances. Int J Environ Agric Res. 2:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Derakhshani H, Plaizier JC, Buck J, Barkema HW, Khafipour E. 2018. Composition of the teat canal and intramammary microbiota of dairy cows subjected to antimicrobial dry cow therapy and internal teat sealant. J Dairy Sci. 101(11):10191–10205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries M, Bokkers EAM, van Reenen CG, Engel B, van Schaik G, Dijkstra T, de Boer IJM. 2015. Housing and management factors associated with indicators of dairy cattle welfare. Prev Vet Med. 118(1):80–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger-Danner C, Fuerst-Waltl B, Holzhacker W, Janacek R, Lederer J, Litzllachner C, Mader C, Mayerhofer M, Miesenberger J, Obritzhauser W, et al. 2007. Establishing a health monitoring system for cattle in Austria: first experiences. Book of abstracts of the 58th Annual Meeting of the EAAP, 26–29 August 2007, Dublin, Ireland: p. 363.
   Google Scholar
• Egger-Danner C, Fuerst-Waltl B, Obritzhauser W, Fuerst C, Schwarzenbacher H, Grassauer B, Mayerhofer M, Koeck A. 2012. Recording of direct health traits in Austria-experience report with emphasis on aspects of availability for breeding purposes. J Dairy Sci. 95(5):2765–2777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espetvedt M, Lind AK, Wolff C, Rintakoski S, Virtala AM, Lindberg A. 2013. Nordic dairy farmers' threshold for contacting a veterinarian and consequences for disease recording: mild clinical mastitis as an example. Prev Vet Med. 108(2–3):114–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2016. Development of integrated multipurpose animal recording systems. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 167 p. (FAO animal production and health guidelines; vol. 19). ISBN: 9251092567. eng.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischer P, Metzner M, Beyerbach M, Hoedemaker M, Klee W. 2001. The relationship between milk yield and the incidence of some diseases in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 84(9):2025–2035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernand E, Rehbein P, von BUU, König S. 2012. Incidences of and genetic parameters for mastitis, claw disorders, and common health traits recorded in dairy cattle contract herds. J Dairy Sci. 95(4):2144–2156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernand E, König S. 2014. Random regression test-day model for clinical mastitis: genetic parameters, model comparison, and correlations with indicator traits. J Dairy Sci. 97(6):3953–3963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govignon-Gion A, Dassonneville R, Baloche G, Ducrocq V. 2016. Multiple trait genetic evaluation of clinical mastitis in three dairy cattle breeds. Animal. 10(4):558–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green LE, Hedges VJ, Schukken YH, Blowey RW, Packington AJ. 2002. The impact of clinical lameness on the milk yield of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 85(9):2250–2256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulliksen SM, Lie KI, Østerås O. 2009. Calf health monitoring in Norwegian dairy herds. J Dairy Sci. 92(4):1660–1669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heringstad B, Klemetsdal G, Ruane J. 2000. Selection for mastitis resistance in dairy cattle: a review with focus on the situation in the Nordic countries. Livest Prod Sci. 64(2–3):95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Heringstad B, Chang YM, Gianola D, Klemetsdal G. 2005. Genetic analysis of clinical mastitis, milk fever, ketosis, and retained placenta in three lactations of Norwegian Red cows. J Dairy Sci. 88(9):3273–3281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooijer GA, Lubbers RB, Ducro BJ, van Arendonk JA, Kaal- Lansbergen LM, van der Lende T. 2001. Genetic parameters for cystic ovarian disease in Dutch Black and White Dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 84(1):286–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ICAR] International Committee for Animal Recording. 2020a. ICAR Claw Health Atlas. Second Edition, 2020. Rome: ICAR. 46 p. (ICAR technical series). ISBN: 92-95014-14-6. eng; [accessed 2020 Oct 17]. http://www.icar.org/Documents/ICAR_Claw_Health_Atlas.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• [ICAR] International Committee for Animal Recording 2020b. ICAR Central Health Key; [accessed 2020 May 28]. https://www.icar.org/index.php/publications-technical-materials/amendments-recording-guidelines/diseases-codes-for-cows/.
   Google Scholar
• Jamrozik J, Kistemaker GJ, van Doormaal BJ, Fleming A, Koeck A, Miglior F. 2016. Genetic evaluation for resistance to metabolic diseases in Canadian dairy breeds. Interbull Bullettin No. 50. Puerto Varas, Chile, October 24–28:9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kelton DF, Lissemore KD, Martin RE. 1998. Recommendations for recording and calculating the incidence of selected clinical diseases of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 81(9):2502–2509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauen-Q-Wohl. 2020. Decription of the project. 2017–2020. Vienna. Rinderzucht Austria; [accessed 2020 June 04]. https://zar.at/Projekte/Klauen-Q-Wohl.html.
   Google Scholar
• Koeck A, Egger-Danner C, Fuerst C, Obritzhauser W, Fuerst-Waltl B. 2010. Genetic analysis of reproductive disorders and their relationship to fertility and milk yield in Austrian Fleckvieh dual-purpose cows. J Dairy Sci. 93(5):2185–2194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koeck A, Heringstad B, Egger-Danner C, Fuerst C, Winter P, Fuerst-Waltl B. 2010. Genetic analysis of clinical mastitis and somatic cell count traits in Austrian Fleckvieh cows. J Dairy Sci. 93(12):5987–5995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koeck A, Miglior F, Kelton DF, Schenkel FS. 2012. Health recording in Canadian Holsteins: data and genetic parameters. J Dairy Sci. 95(7):4099–4108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclerc H, Croué I, Vallée R, Baur A, Barbat A, Fritz S, Philippe M, Brochard M, Guillaume F, Thomas G, et al. 2020. Proceedings of the ICAR 2019 Annual Conference, held in Prague (CZ) on 17-21 June 2019: French regional genetic collaborative projects to improve welfare and resilience of dairy cows. ICAR Technical Series. 24:p. 373–381.
   Google Scholar
• Levison LJ, Miller-Cushon EK, Tucker AL, Bergeron R, Leslie KE, Barkema HW, DeVries TJ. 2016. Incidence rate of pathogen-specific clinical mastitis on conventional and organic Canadian dairy farms. J Dairy Sci. 99(2):1341–1350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud M, Zeng Y, Shirali M, Yin T, Brügemann K, König S, Haley C. 2018. Genome-wide pleiotropy and shared biological pathways for resistance to bovine pathogens. PLoS ONE. 13(4):e0194374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Ministry of Health] Ministry of Health, Instituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise. 2020. Ricetta Veterinaria Elettronica; [accessed 2020 May 28]. https://www.ricettaveterinariaelettronica.it/.
   Google Scholar
• Molino F. 2013. In Valle d’Aosta la ricetta veterinaria diventa elettronica. 30giorni. September: 34–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mörk M, Lindberg A, Alenius S, Vågsholm I, Egenvall A. 2009. Comparison between dairy cow disease incidence in data registered by farmers and in data from a disease-recording system based on veterinary reporting. Prev Vet Med. 88(4):298–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris MJ, Kaneko K, Walker SL, Jones DN, Routly JE, Smith RF, Dobson H. 2011. Influence of lameness on follicular growth, ovulation, reproductive hormone concentrations and estrus behavior in dairy cows. Theriogenology. 76(4):658–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuenschwander TFO, Miglior F, Jamrozik J, Berke O, Kelton DF, Schaeffer LR. 2012. Genetic parameters for producer-recorded health data in Canadian Holstein cattle. Animal. 6(4):571–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norring M, Häggman J, Simojoki H, Tamminen P, Winckler C, Pastell M. 2014. Short communication: lameness impairs feeding behavior of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 97(7):4317–4321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olde Riekerink RGM, Barkema HW, Kelton DF, Scholl DT. 2008. Incidence rate of clinical mastitis on Canadian dairy farms. J Dairy Sci. 91(4):1366–1377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østerås O, Solbu H, Refsdal AO, Roalkvam T, Filseth O, Minsaas A. 2007. Results and evaluation of thirty years of health recordings in the Norwegian dairy cattle population. J Dairy Sci. 90(9):4483–4497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otranto D. 2001. The immunology of myiasis: parasite survival and host defense strategies. Trends Parasitol. 17(4):176–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cabal MA, Charfeddine N. 2013. Genetic relationship between clinical mastitis and several traits of interest in Spanish Holstein dairy cattle. Interbull Bullettin No 47. Nantes, France, August 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzi R, Vevey M, Faccin C, Pedron O, Cerutti F. 2003. Reproductive disease occurrence in Valdostana cows. Ital J Anim Sci. 2:175–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori C, Mazza S, Guzzo N, Mantovani R. 2015. Evolution of increased competitiveness in cows trades off with reduced milk yield, fertility and more masculine morphology. Evolution. 69(8):2235–2245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnieder T, Kaup FJ, Drommer W. 1991. Morphological investigations on the pathology of Dictyocaulus viviparus infections in cattle. Parasitol Res. 77(3):260–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney T, Hanrahan JP, Ryan MT, Good B. 2016. Immunogenomics of gastrointestinal nematode infection in ruminants – breeding for resistance to produce food sustainably and safely. Parasite Immunol. 38(9):569–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaarst M, Paarup-Laursen B, Houe H, Fossing C, Andersen HJ. 2002. Farmers’ choice of medical treatment of mastitis in Danish dairy herds based on qualitative research interviews. J Dairy Sci. 85(4):992–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigel KA, Pralle RS, Adams H, Cho K, Do C, White HM. 2017. Prediction of whole-genome risk for selection and management of hyperketonemia in Holstein dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet. 134(3):275–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff C, Espetvedt M, Lind A-K, Rintakoski S, Egenvall A, Lindberg A, Emanuelson U. 2012. Completeness of the disease recording systems for dairy cows in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden with special reference to clinical mastitis. BMC Vet Res. 8:131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwald NR, Weigel KA, Chang YM, Welper RD, Clay JS. 2004. Genetic selection for health traits using producer-recorded data. I. incidence rates, heritability estimates, and sire breeding values. J Dairy Sci. 87(12):4287–4294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar