Fine-scale analysis of six beef cattle breeds revealed patterns of their genomic diversity

References

• Arias JA, Keehan M, Fisher P, Coppieters W, Spelman R. 2009. A high density linkage map of the bovine genome. BMC Genet. 10:1471–2156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbato M, Orozco-terWengel P, Tapio M, Bruford MW. 2015. SNeP: a tool to estimate trends in recent effective population size trajectories using genome-wide SNP data. Front Genet. 6:109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barendse W, Harrison B, Bunch R, Thomas M, Turner L. 2009. Genome wide signatures of positive selection: the comparison of independent samples and the identification of regions associated to traits. BMC Genomics. 10:178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghain J, Boitard S, Weiss B, Boussaha M, Gut I, Rocha D. 2013. Genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in the Blonde d'Aquitaine cattle breed. J Anim Breed Genet. 130:294–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biscarini F, Cozzi P, Gaspa G, Marras G. 2018. detectRUNS: detect runs of homozygosity and runs of heterozygosity in diploid genomes. CRAN (The Comprehensive R Archive Network).
   Google Scholar
• Bohmanova J, Sargolzaei M, Schenkel FS. 2010. Characteristics of linkage disequilibrium in North American Holsteins. BMC Genomics. 11:421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattle Network – EAAP Working Group. 2005. Rome (Italy): EAAP; [accessed 2019 Oct 10]. http://www.cattlenetwork.net/Breeds/piemontese.htm
   Google Scholar
• Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. 2015. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 4:7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates DJ, Byrne M, Moritz C. 2018. Genetic diversity and conservation Units: dealing with the species-population continuum in the age of genomics. Front Ecol E. 6:165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin LJ, Liu AYH, Bishop SC, Woolliams JA. 2012. Estimation of historical effective population size using linkage disequilibrium with marker data. J Anim Breed Genet. 129:257–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curik I, Ferenčaković M, Sölkner J. 2014. Inbreeding and runs of homozygosity: a possible solution to an old problem. Livestock Sci. 166:26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curik I, Ferenčaković M, Sölkner J. 2017. Genomic dissection of inbreeding depression: a gate to new opportunities. R Bras Zootec. 46:773–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker JE, Pires JC, Conant GC, McKay SD, Heaton MP, Chen K, Cooper A, Vilkki J, Seabury CM, Caetano AR, et al. 2009. Resolving the evolution of extant and extinct ruminants with high-throughput phylogenomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106:18644–18649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 14:2611–2620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2015. The Second Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome (Italy): FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments; [accessed 2019 Oct 10]. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4787e/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Ferenčaković M, Hamzić E, Gredler B, Solberg TR, Klemetsdal G, Curik I, Sölkner J. 2013. Estimates of autozygosity derived from runs of homozygosity: empirical evidence from selected cattle populations. J Anim Breed Genet. 130:286–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferenčaković M, Sölkner J, Curik I. 2013. Estimating autozygosity from high-throughput information: effects of SNP density and genotyping errors. Genet Sel Evol. 45:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flury C, Tapio M, Sonstegard C, Drogemuller C, Leeb T, Simianer H, Hanotte O, Rieder S. 2010. Effective population size of an indigenous Swiss cattle breed estimated from linkage disequilibrium. J Anim Breed Genet. 127:339–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin IR. 1980. Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Soule ME, Wilcox BA, editors. Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; p. 135–149.
   Google Scholar
• Gautier M, Laloë D, Moazami-Goudarzi K. 2010. Insights into the genetic history of French cattle from dense SNP data on 47 worldwide breeds. PLoS One. 5:e13038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, McPartlan HC, Goddard ME. 2003. Novel multilocus measure of linkage disequilibrium to estimate past effective population size. Genome Res. 13:635–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill WG, Robertson A. 1968. Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor Appl Genet. 38:226–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howrigan DP, Simonson MA, Keller MC. 2011. Detecting autozygosity through runs of homozygosity: A comparison of three autozygosity detection algorithms. BMC Genomics. 12:460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jombart T, Ahmed I. 2011. Adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics. 1:3070–3071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jombart T, Collins C. 2015. A tutorial for discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) using adegenet 2.0.0. London (UK): MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling.
   Google Scholar
• Kasarda R, Moravčíková N, Candrák J, Mészároš G, Vlček M, Kukučková V, Kadlečík O. 2017. Genome-wide mixed model association study in population of Slovak Pinzgau cattle. Agric Conspec Sci. 82:267–271.
   Google Scholar
• Kasarda R, Moravčíková N, Kadlečík O, Trakovická A, Žitný J, Terpaj VP, Mindeková S, Neupane Mlyneková L. 2019. Common origin of local cattle breeds in western region of Carpathians. Danubian Anim Genet Resour. 4:84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kasarda R, Moravčíková N, Mészároš G, Trakovická A, Kadlečík O. 2016. Genetic divergence of cattle populations based on genomic information. Sci Agric Bohem. 47:113–117.
   Google Scholar
• Kharzinova VR, Sermyagin AA, Gladyr EA, Okhlopkov IM, Brem G, Zinovieva NA. 2015. A study of applicability of SNP chips developed for Bovine and Ovine species to whole-genome analysis of Reindeer Rangifer tarandus. J Hered. 106:758–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Cho S, Caetano-Anolles K, Kim H, Ryu YC. 2015. Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in Korean native black pig from Jeju Island. BMC Genet. 16:3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukučková V, Moravčíková N, Ferenčaković M, Simčič M, Mészáros G, Sölkner J, Trakovická A, Kadlečík O, Curik I, Kasarda R. 2017. Genomic characterization of Pinzgau cattle: genetic conservation and breeding perspectives. Conserv Genet. 18:893–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashmar SF, Visser C, van Marle-Köster E, Muchadeyi FC. 2018. Genomic diversity and autozygosity within the SA Drakensberger beef cattle breed. Livest Sci. 212:111–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Cho YM, Lim D, Kim HC, Choi BH, Park HS, Kim OH, Kim S, Kim TH, Yoon D, et al. 2011. Linkage disequlibrium and effective population size in Hanwoo Korean cattle. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 24:1660–1665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makina SO, Muchadeyi FC, van Marle-Köster E, Taylor JF, Makgahlela ML, Maiwashe A. 2015. Genome-wide scan for selection signatures in six cattle breeds in South Africa. Genet Sel E. 47:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marras G, Gaspa G, Sorbolini S, Dimauro C, Ajmone-Marsan P, Valentini A, Williams JL, Macciotta NP. 2015. Analysis of runs of homozygosity and their relationship with inbreeding in five cattle breeds farmed in Italy. Anim Genet. 46:110–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrangelo S, Ciani E, Ajmone Marsan P, Bagnato A, Battaglini L, Bozzi R, Carta A, Catillo G, Cassandro M, Casu S, et al. 2018. Conservation status and historical relatedness of Italian cattle breeds. Genet Sel Evol. 50:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrangelo S, Saura M, Tolone M, Salces-Ortiz J, Di Gerlando R, Bertolini F, Fontanesi L, Sardina MT, Serrano M, Portolano B. 2014. The genome-wide structure of two economically important indigenous Sicilian cattle breeds. J Anim Sci. 92:4833–4842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrangelo S, Tolone M, Di Gerlando R, Fontanesi L, Sardina MT, Portolano B. 2016. Genomic inbreeding estimation in small populations: evaluation of runs of homozygosity in three local dairy cattle breeds. Animal. 10:746–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrangelo S, Tolone M, Sardina MT, Sottile G, Sutera AM, Di Gerlando R, Portolano B. 2017. Genome-wide scan for runs of homozygosity identifies potential candidate genes associated with local adaptation in Valle del Belice sheep. Genet Sel Evol. 49:84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure MC, McCarthy J, Flynn P, McClure JC, Dair E, O'Connell DK, Kearney JF. 2018. SNP Data Quality Control in a National Beef and Dairy Cattle System and Highly Accurate SNP Based Parentage Verification and Identification. Front Genet. 9:84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuillan R, Leutenegger A, Abdel-Rahman R, Franklin C, Pericic M, Barac-Lauc L, Smolej-Narancic N, Janicijevic B, Polasek O, Tenesa A, et al. 2008. Runs of homozygosity in European populations. Am J Hum Genet. 83:359–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mészáros G, Boison SA, Pérez O'Brien AM, Ferenčaković M, Curik I, Da Silva MVB, Utsunomiya YT, Garcia JF, Sölkner J. 2015. Genomic analysis for managing small and endangered populations: a case study in Tyrol Grey cattle. Front Genet. 6:173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuwissen THE. 2009. Genetic management of small populations: a review. Acta Agric Scand Sect Anim Sci. 59:71–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravčíková N, Kasarda R. Kadlečík 2017. The degree of genetic admixture within species from genus Cervus. Agric For. 63:137–143.
   Google Scholar
• Moravčíková N, Kasarda R, Vostrý L, Krupová Z, Krupa E, Lehocká K, Olšanská B, Trakovická A, Nádaský R, Židek R, et al. 2019. Analysis of selection signatures in the beef cattle genome. Czech J Anim Sci. 64:491–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• More M, Gutiérrez G, Rothschild M, Bertolini F, de León FAP. 2019. Evaluation of SNP genotyping in alpacas using the bovine HD genotyping beadchip. Front Genet. 10:361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat. 106:283–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuditschko M, Khatkar MS, Raadsma HW. 2012. NetView: a high-definition network-visualization approach to detect fine-scale population structures from genome-wide patterns of variation. PLoS One. 7:e48375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pembleton LW, Cogan NO, Forster JW. 2013. StAMPP: an R package for calculation of genetic differentiation and structure of mixed-ploidy level populations. Mol Ecol Resour. 13:946–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peripolli E, Munari DP, Silva MVGB, Lima ALF, Irgang R, Baldi F. 2017. Runs of homozygosity: current knowledge and applications in livestock. Anim Genet. 48:255–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peripolli E, Stafuzza NB, Munari DP, Lima ALF, Irgang R, Machado MA, Panetto JCDC, Ventura RV, Baldi F, da Silva MVGB. 2018. Assessment of runs of homozygosity islands and estimates of genomic inbreeding in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle. BMC Genomics. 19:34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics portions from molecular data. Mol Biol E. 15:1298–1311.
   Google Scholar
• Purfield DC, Berry DP, McParland S, Bradley DG. 2012. Runs of homozygosity and population history in cattle. BMC Genet. 13:70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qanbari S, Pimentel EC, Tetens J, Thaller G, Lichtner P, Sharifi AR, Simianer H. 2010. The pattern of linkage disequilibrium in German Holstein cattle. Anim Genet. 41:346–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargolzaei M, Schenkel FS, Jansen GB, Schaeffer LR. 2008. Extent of linkage disequilibrium in Holstein cattle in North America. J Dairy Sci. 91:2106–2117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki S, Yoshinari K, Uchiyama K, Takeda M, Kojima T. 2018. Relationship between call rate per individual and genotyping accuracy of bovine single-nucleotide polymorphism array using deoxyribonucleic acid of various qualities. Anim Sci J. 89:1533–1539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szmatoła T, Gurgul A, Ropka-Molik K, Jasielczuk I, Ząbek T, Bugno-Poniewierska M. 2016. Characteristics of runs of homozygosity in selected cattle breeds maintained in Poland. Livest Sci. 188:72–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro MA, Villanueva B, Fernández J. 2014. Genomics applied to management strategies in conservation programmes. Livest Sci. 166:48–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uimari P, Tapio M. 2011. Extent of linkage disequilibrium and effective population size in Finnish Landrace and Finnish Yorkshire pig breeds. J Anim Sci. 89:609–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 38:1358–1370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright S. 1940. Breeding structure of populations in relation to speciation. Am Nat. 74:232–248.
   Google Scholar
• Zavarez LB, Utsunomiya YT, Carmo AS, Neves HHR, Carvalheiro R, Ferenčaković M, Pérez O'Brien AM, Curik I, Cole JB, Van Tassell CP, et al. 2015. Assessment of autozygosity in Nellore cows (Bos indicus) through high-density SNP genotypes. Front Genet. 6:5–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar