Effect of different growth stages of rapeseed (brassica rapa L.) on nutrient intake and digestibility, nitrogen balance, and rumen fermentation kinetics in sheep diets

References

• AOAC 1990. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed. Washington, DC, USA: Association of Official Analytic Chemist.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC 1997. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed.Arlington, VA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Barry TN. 2013. The feeding value of forage brassica plants for grazing ruminant livestock. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 181(1-4):15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastida Garcia JL, González-Ronquillo M, Domínguez Vara IA, Romero-Bernal J, Castelán Ortega O. 2011. Effect of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) level on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation and in vitro gas production in sheep fed maintenance diets. Anim Sci J. 82(5):654–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blümmel M, Steingaβ H, Bec Ker K. 1997. The relationship between in vitro gas production, in vitro microbial biomass yield and 15N incorporation and its implications for the prediction of voluntary feed intake of roughages. Br J Nutr. 77(6):911–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown PD, Tokuhisa JG, Reichelt M, Gershenzon J. 2003. Variation of glucosinolate accumulation among different organs and developmental stages of Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochem. 62(3):471–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bye R, Linares E. 2000. Los quelites, plantas comestibles de México: una reflexión sobre el intercambio cultural. CONABIO. Biodiversitas. 31:11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cartea ME, Velasco P, Obregón S, Padilla G, de Haro A. 2008. Seasonal variation in glucosinolate content in Brassica oleracea crops grown in northwestern Spain. Phytochemistry. 69(2):403–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapoutot P, Sauvant D. 1997. Nutritive value of raw and extruded pea-rapeseed blends for ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 65(1-4):59–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONAGUA 2015. Comisión nacional del agua. Informe (2015) Sistema Nacional de Información del Agua (SINA). http://www.conagua.gob.mx/Contenido.aspx?n1=3&n2=60&n3=60. [Accessed on 5th of august 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Espinoza-Canales A, Gutiérrez-Bañuelos H, Sánchez-Gutiérrez RA, Muro-Reyes A, Gutiérrez-Piña FJ, Corral-Luna A. 2017. Calidad de forraje de canola (Brassica napus L.) en floraciones temprana y tardía bajo condiciones de temporal en Zacatecas. RMCP. 8(3):243–248.
   Google Scholar
• France J, Dhanoa MS, Theodorou MK, Lister SJ, Davies DR, Isac DA. 1993. Model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. J Theo Biol. 163(1):99–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Ronquillo M, Fondevila M, Barrios Urdaneta A, Newman Y. 1998. In vitro gas production from buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) fermentation in relation to the cutting interval, the level of nitrogen fertilisation and the season of growth. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 72(1-2):19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur R, Garcia SC, Fulkerson WJ. 2009. Feeding time and sequence of forage rape and maize silage does not affect digestibility and rumen parameters in sheep. Anim Prod Sci. 49(4):318–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur R, Garcia SC, Fulkerson WJ, Barchia IM. 2011. Degradation kinetics of leaves, petioles and stems of forage rape (Brassica napus) as affected by maturity. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 168(3-4):165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig RT, Hammac WA, Pan WL. 2011. Canola growth, development, and fertility. Washington State University Extension. Pullman, W.A. USA. 8pp.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Jaworski N, Rojas O, Stein H-H. 2016. Energy concentration and amino acid digestibility in high protein canola meal, conventional canola meal, and in soybean meal fed to growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 212:52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkar HP, Ankers P. 2014. Towards sustainable animal diets: a survey-based study. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 198:309–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens DR. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: Collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 85:1217–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohn T, Cutting B, Ernst B, Hamburger M. 2007. Extraction and analysis of intact glucosinolates-a validated pressurized liquid extraction/liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry protocol for Isatis tinctoria, and qualitative analysis of other cruciferous plants. J Chromatogr A. 1166(1-2):142–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newkirk RW, Classen HL, Scott TA, Edney MJ. 2003. The digestibility and content of amino acids in toasted and non-toasted canola meals. Can J Anim Sci. 83(1):131–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. 2007. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids and new world camelids. The National Academies Press. Washington, D.C. USA. 392 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Nousiainen J, Shingfield KJ, Huhtanen P. 2004. Evaluation of milk urea nitrogen as a diagnostic of protein feeding. J Dairy Sci. 87(2):386–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oba M, Allen MS. 1999. Evaluation of the importance of the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber from forage: effects on dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 82(3):589–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS, Statistical Analysis System Institute 1999. Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Seguel G, Keim JP, Vargas-Bello-Pérez E, Geldsetzer-Mendoza C, Ibáñez RA, Alvarado-Gilis C. 2020. Effect of forage brassicas in dairy cow diets on the fatty acid profile and sensory characteristics of Chanco and Ricotta cheeses. J Dairy Sci. 103(1):228–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RH. 1978. S-methylcysteine sulphoxide, the brassica anaemia factor (a valuable dietary factor for man?). Vet Res Commun. 2(1):47–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Pacheco D, Luo D. 2016. Forage brassica: a feed to mitigate enteric methane emissions? Anim Prod Sci. 56(3):451–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun XZ, Waghorn GC, Hoskin SO, Harrison SJ, Muetzel S, Pacheco D. 2012. Methane emissions from sheep fed fresh brassicas (Brassica spp.) compared to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Anim Feed Sci Tech. 176(1-4):107–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki C, Ohnishi-Kameyama M, Sasaki K, Murata T, Yoshida M. 2006. Behavior of glucosinolates in pickling cruciferous vegetables. J Agric Food Chem. 54(25):9430–9436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, McAllan AB, France J. 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 48(3-4):185–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas VM, Katz RJ, Auld DL, Peterson CL. 1984. Value of mechanically extracted rape and safflower oilseed meals as protein supplements for growing lambs. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 11(4):269–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi MK, Mishra AS. 2007. Glucosinolates in animal nutrition: A review. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 132(1-2):1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi MK, Santra A, Chaturvedi OH, Karim SA. 2004. Effect of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on ruminal fluid pH, feed intake, nutrient utilization and growth of lambs fed high concentrate diets. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 111(1-4):27–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaca García VM, Martínez Villanueva JJ, González Huerta A, Morales Rosales EJ, Zamudio González B, Gutiérrez Rodríguez F. 2014. Compactación de un vertisol bajo tres sistemas de labranza en maíz (Zea mays L.). Rev Mex Cienc Agríc. 5(8):1495–1507.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods of dietary, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74(10):3583–3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieyra-Odilon L, Vibrans H. 2001. Weeds as crops: The value of maize field weeds in the valley of Toluca. Econ Bot. 55(3):426–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent IC, Thompson J, Hill R. 1990. The voluntary feed intake and weight gain of lambs given compound concentrate feeds containing rapeseed meal with a range of glucosinolate contents. Proc Br Soc Anim Prod (1972)). 1990:142–142.
   Google Scholar
• Williams SRO, Moate PJ, Deighton MH, Hannah MC, Wales WJ, Jacobs JL. 2016. Milk production and composition, and methane emissions from dairy cows fed lucerne hay with forage brassica or chicory. Anim Prod Sci. 56(3):304–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman J. 2018. Editorial: Digestibility and degradability in animal nutrition studies. J Agric Sci. 156(10):1161–1162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WRB 2006. International Union of Soil Science – International Soil Reference and Information Centre and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IUSS Working Group WRB. IUSS-ISRIC and FAO). 2006. World reference base for soil resources. A framework for international classification, correlation and communication. 2nd edition. World Soil Res Rep No. 103. Rome, Italy. 114 p.
   Google Scholar