861
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Examining cooperation with the police in a national security environment

Pages 163-183 | Received 24 Oct 2015, Accepted 03 Jan 2016, Published online: 16 Oct 2016

References

  • Abetz, E. (2003). Let’s look out for Australia: Protecting our way of life from a possible terrorist threat. North Ryde: NSW PMP Print. Retrieved from http://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/Mediaandpublications/Documents/national-security-press-advertisement-lets-look-out-for-australia.PDF
  • Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (2009). Statistical methods for the social sciences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Australian Government. (n.d.). Australian national security: The national security hotline. Retrieved from http://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/WhatAustraliaisdoing/Pages/TheNationalSecurityHotline.aspx
  • Bayley, D., & Shearing, C. (2001). The new structure of policing: Description, conceptualization, and research. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
  • Bayley, D.H., & Weisburd, D. (Eds.). (2011). Cops and spooks: The role of the police in counterterrorism. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Bradford, B., & Jackson, J. (2010a). Cooperating with the police: Social control and the reproduction of police legitimacy. (SSRN Working Paper Series). doi:10.2139/ssrn.1640958
  • Bradford, B., & Jackson, J. (2010b). What is trust and confidence in the police? Policing, 4(3), 241–248. doi:10.1093/police/paq020
  • Carr, P.J. (2003). The new parochialism: The implications of the Beltway Case for arguments concerning informal social control. American Journal of Sociology, 108(6), 1249–1291. doi: 10.1086/377517
  • Cherney, A., & Hartley, J. (2015). Community engagement to tackle terrorism and violent extremism: Challenges, tensions and pitfalls. Policing and Society, 25, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/10439463.2015.1089871
  • Cherney, A., & Murphy, K. (2013). Policing terrorism with procedural justice: The role of police legitimacy and law legitimacy. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 46, 403–421. doi:10.1177/0004865813485072
  • Choolun, N. (2009). Lost in translation? An examination of court interpreting in Australia. Queensland Law Student Review, 21, 21–31.
  • Christopher, C. (2015, February 23). Terrorism: Considering the threat in Australia. Security Solutions Magazine.
  • Correia, M.E. (2000). Citizen involvement: How community factors affect progressive policing. Paper presented at the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), Washington, DC.
  • Crenshaw, M. (2010). The consequences of counterterrorism. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Defence Science and Technology Organisation. (2010). Counter-terrorism white paper. Canberra: Australian Government. Retrieved from http://www.dsto.defence.gov.au/attachments/counter-terrorism-white-paper.pdf
  • Drakulich, K.M., & Crutchfield, R.D. (2013). The role of perceptions of the police in informal social control: Implications for the racial stratification of crime and control. Social Problems, 603, 383–407.
  • Elliott, I., Thomas, S.D., & Ogloff, J.R. (2012). Procedural justice in contacts with the police: The perspective of victims of crime. Police Practice and Research, 13(5), 437–449. doi:10.1080/15614263.2011.607659
  • Hawdon, J.E., Ryan, J., & Griffin, S.P. (2003). Policing tactics and perceptions of police legitimacy. Police Quarterly, 64, 469–491. doi:10.1177/1098611103253503
  • Head, M. (2002). Counter-terrorism laws: A threat to political freedom, civil liberties and constitutional rights. Melbourne University Law Review, 26, 666–689.
  • Hocking, J. (2003). Counter-terrorism and the criminalisation of politics: Australia's new security powers of detention, proscription and control. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 49, 355–371. doi: 10.1111/1467-8497.00291
  • Hocking, J. (2004). Terror laws: ASIO, counter-terrorism and the threat to democracy. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
  • Hough, M. (Ed.). (2007). Policing, new public management and legitimacy in Britain. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Hough, M., Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Myhill, A., & Quinton, P. (2010). Procedural justice, trust, and institutional legitimacy. Policing, 1–8. Retrieved from http://policing.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2010/07/04/police.paq027.full.pdf+html
  • Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Taber, C., & Lahav, G. (2005). Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 593–608. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0092-58532820050729493A33C5933ATAASOA3E2.0.CO%3B2-2 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00144.x
  • Huq, A.Z., & Muller, C. (2008). The war on crime as precursor to the war on terror. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 36, 215–229. Retrieved from http://ac.els-cdn.com.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/S1756061608000438/1-s2.0-S1756061608000438-main.pdf?_tid=2fdce574-f5b5-11e2-a4f0- doi: 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2008.08.007
  • Kam, C., & Franzese Jr., R. (2007). Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Kim, M., & de Guzman, M. (2012). Where we are: Era of homeland security policing, community oriented policing, or both? Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Conference, Chicago, IL.
  • Koschade, S. (2006). A social network analysis of Jemaah Islamiyah: The applications to counterterrorism and intelligence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29(6), 559–575. doi: 10.1080/10576100600798418
  • Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Lynch, A., McGarrity, N., & Williams, G. (2015). Inside Australia's anti-terrorism laws and trials. Sydney: NewSouth Publishing.
  • Maguire, E.R., & King, W.R. (2004). Trends in the policing industry. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 15–41. doi:10.1177/0002716204262960
  • Mazerolle, L., Antrobus, E., Bennett, S., & Tyler, T. (2013). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51(1), 33–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00289.x
  • Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 245–274. doi:10.1007/s11292-013-9175-2
  • McCulloch, J., & Pickering, S. (2009). Pre-crime and counter-terrorism imagining future crime in the ‘war on terror’. British Journal of Criminology, 49(5), 628–645. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azp023
  • Michaelsen, C. (2005). Antiterrorism legislation in Australia: A proportionate response to the terrorist threat? Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 28, 321–339. doi: 10.1080/10576100590950138
  • Moore, M. (1997). Legitimizing criminal justice policies and practices. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 66(10), 14–21.
  • Murphy, K. (2009). Legitimacy. In A. Wakefield & J. Fleming (Eds.), Sage dictionary of policing (pp. 190–193). London: Sage.
  • Murphy, K. (2011). The relationship between procedural justice, emotions and resistance to authority: An empirical study. In S. Karstedt, I. Loader, & H. Strang (Eds.), Emotions, crime and justice (pp. 211–234). Oxford: Hart.
  • Murphy, K. (2013). Procedural justice, legitimacy and effective policing. In D. Weisburd & G. Burinsma. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 4024–4034). Verlag: Springer.
  • Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2010). Policing ethnic minority groups with procedural justice. Alfred Deakin Research Institute Working Paper(2).
  • Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2011). Fostering cooperation with the police: How do ethnic minorities in Australia respond to procedural justice-based policing? Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44, 235–257. doi: 10.1177/0004865811405260
  • Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2012). Understanding cooperation with the police in a diverse society. British Journal of Criminology, 52, 181–201. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azr065
  • Murphy, K., Cherney, A., Wickes, R., Mazerolle, L., & Sargeant, E. (2012). The community capacity survey – face-to-face ethnic minority interviews: Methodology and preliminary findings. Brisbane: The ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security, the University of Queensland.
  • Murphy, K., Hinds, L., & Fleming, J. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 182, 136–155. doi:10.1080/10439460802008660
  • Murphy, K., Mazerolle, L., & Bennett, S. (2014). Promoting trust in police: Findings from a randomised experimental field trial of procedural justice policing. Policing and Society, 24(4), 405–424. doi: 10.1080/10439463.2013.862246
  • Murphy, K., Tyler, T.R., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law? Regulation & Governance, 3, 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01043.x
  • Nellis, A. (2009). Gender differences in fear of terrorism. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 25(3), 322–340. doi:10.1177/1043986209335012
  • Oliver, W. (2006). The fourth era of policing: Homeland security. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 20(1–2), 49–62. doi:10.1080/13600860600579696
  • Oliver, W. (2009). Policing for homeland security: Policy & research. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 253–260. doi:10.1177/0887403409337368
  • Pickering, S., Wright-Neville, D., McCulloch, J., & Lentini, P. (2007). Counter-terrorism policing and culturally diverse communities. Australian Research Council Linkage Project Final Report (pp. 9–125). Melbourne: Monash University.
  • Porter, L.E., & Kebbell, M.R. (2011). Radicalization in Australia: Examining Australia's convicted terrorists. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 18, 212–231. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2010.482953
  • Ransley, J., & Mazerolle, L. (2008). Policing in an era of uncertainty. Police Practice and Research, 10(4), 365–381. doi:10.1080/15614260802586335
  • Reisig, M.D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M.G. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1005–1028. doi: 10.1177/0093854807301275
  • Reisig, M.D., & Correia, M.E. (1997). Public evaluations of police performance: An analysis across three levels of policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 20, 311–325. doi: 10.1108/13639519710169153
  • Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S.W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5328.918
  • Silver, E., & Miller, L. (2004). Sources of informal social control in Chicago neighborhoods. Criminology, 42, 551–584. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00529.x
  • Skogan, W.G. (2006). Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Policing & Society, 16(02), 99–126. doi: 10.1080/10439460600662098
  • Skogan, W.G. (2009). Concern about crime and confidence in the police: Reassurance or accountability? Police Quarterly, 12(3), 301–318. doi:10.1177/1098611109339893
  • Spalek, B., & Imtoual, A. (2007). Muslim communities and counter-terror responses: “Hard” approaches to community engagement in the UK and Australia. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 27, 185–202. doi:10.1080/13602000701536117
  • Stephenson, P. (2009). Typologies of security: Indigenous and Muslim Australians in the post-9/11 imaginary. Journal of Australian Studies, 33, 473–488. doi:10.1080/14443050903308691
  • Stewart, D., & Morris, R. (2009). A new era of policing? An examination of Texas police chiefs’ perceptions of homeland security. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(3), 290–309. doi:10.1177/0887403408337225
  • Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T.R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37, 513–548. doi: 10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
  • Tyler, T.R. (1988). What is procedural justice-criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law and Society Review, 22, 103–135. doi: 10.2307/3053563
  • Tyler, T.R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357. doi: 10.1086/652233
  • Tyler, T.R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 84–99. doi: 10.1177/0002716203262627
  • Tyler, T.R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Tyler, T.R. (2012). Chapter 15: Toughness vs. Fairness: Police policies and practices for managing the risk of terrorism. In C. Lum & L.W. Kennedy (Eds.), Evidence- based counterterrorism policy (pp. 353–363). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Tyler, T.R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–276.
  • Tyler, T.R., & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Tyler, T.R., Schulhofer, S., & Huq, A.Z. (2010). Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counterterrorism policing: A study of Muslim Americans. Law & Society Review, 44, 365–402. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00405.x
  • Williams, G. (2011). Decade of Australian anti-terror laws. Melbourne University Law Review, 35, 1136–1176.
  • Wilner, A.S., & Dubouloz, C. (2010). Homegrown terrorism and transformative learning: An interdisciplinary approach to understanding radicalization. Global Change, Peace & Security, 22(1), 33–51. doi:10.1080/14781150903487956
  • Wu, A.D., & Zumbo, B.D. (2008). Understanding and using mediators and moderators. Social Indicators Research, 87(3), 367–392. doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9143-1

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.