Academic-intelligence relationships: opportunities, strengths, weaknesses and threats

References

• Association of American Universities. (2018). Associations express concerns with disbanding of FBI higher education board. https://www.aau.edu/key-issues/associations-express-concerns-disbanding-fbi-higher-education-board
   Google Scholar
• Bruneau, T. C. (2001). Controlling intelligence in new democracies. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 14(3), 323–341.
   Google Scholar
• Burris, W. C. (1993). The uses of history in intelligence analysis. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 6(3), 297–301.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, W., Berdini, E., Mandel, D. R., & Tetlock, P. E. (2018). Restructuring structured analytic techniques in intelligence. Intelligence and National Security, 33(3), 337–356.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. M. (2014). Intelligence collection. Los Angeles: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthart, S. J. (2017). An evidence-based evaluation of 12 core structured analytic techniques. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 30(2), 368–391.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthart, S. J. (2019). From laboratory to the WMD Commission: How academic research influences intelligence agencies. Intelligence and National Security, 34(6), 818–832.
   Google Scholar
• Dhami, M. K., Belton, I. K., & Mandel, D. R. (2019). The ‘analysis of competing hypotheses’ in intelligence analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(6), 1080–1090.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, R. (2019). The crisis of university research. In The American scholar (pp. 48–49). Autumn.
   Google Scholar
• Gearon, L. F. (Ed.). (2020). The Routledge international handbook of universities, security and intelligence studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Golden, D. (2017). Spy schools: How the CIA, FBI, and Foreign intelligence secretly exploit America’s Universities. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. K. (1990). Challenges of strategic intelligence. Intelligence and National Security, 5(3), 215–225.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. K. (2020). American universities, the CIA, and the teaching of national security intelligence. In L. F. Gearon (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of universities, security and intelligence studies (pp. 81–93). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Landon-Murray, M. (2011). Social science and intelligence analysis: The role of intelligence education. Journal of Applied Security Research, 6(4), 491–528.
   Google Scholar
• Landon-Murray, M. (2013–2014). Moving U.S. academic intelligence education forward: A literature inventory and agenda. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 26(4), 744–776.
   Google Scholar
• Landon-Murray, M., & Caceres-Rodriguez, R. (2020). Building research partnerships to bridge gaps between the study of organizations and the practice of intelligence. The International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs, (Online first), 1–21. doi:10.1080/23800992.2020.1831340
   Google Scholar
• Landon-Murray, M., & Coulthard, S. (2020). Intelligence studies programs as US public policy: A survey of IC CAE grant recipients. Intelligence and National Security, 35(2), 269–282.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, S. (2004). A look at intelligence analysis. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 17(2), 231–264.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, S. (2018). Why are state secrets protected from disclosure? The discourse of secret keepers. The International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs, 20(3), 204–229.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel, D. R. (2020). The occasional maverick of analytic tradecraft. Intelligence and National Security, 35(3), 438–443.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B. (2010). Soldiers, scholars, and spies: Combining smarts and secrets. Armed Forces & Society, 36(4), 695–715.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). A decadal survey of the social and behavioral sciences: A research agenda for advancing intelligence analysis. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfaff, T., & Tiel, J. R. (2004). The ethics of Espionage. Journal of Military Ethics, 3(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Phythian, M. (Ed.). (2013). Understanding the intelligence cycle. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shulsky, A. N., & Schmitt, G. J. (2002). Silent warfare: Understanding the world of intelligence (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Brassey’s.
   Google Scholar
• United States. (2008). Intelligence community directive number 205: Analytic outreach. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• United States. (2013). Joint publication 2.0: Joint intelligence. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• United States. (2019). How China operates on university campuses. Washington, D.C.: National Counterintelligence and Security Center.
   Google Scholar
• US Congress. (2002). (Testimony of Lieutenant General Michael V. Hayden USAF). Statement for the Record by Lieutenant General Michael V. Hayden, USAF, Director. National Security Agency/Chief, Central Security Service Before the Joint Inquiry of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, K. M., & Dennis, M. A. (2018). Tacit knowledge, secrecy, and intelligence assessments: STS interventions by two participant observers. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(5), 834–863.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, K. M., Jameson, J. K., Tyler, B. B., Joines, S., Evans, B. M., & Rendon, H. (2017). The importance of organizational innovation and adaptation in building academic-industry-intelligence collaboration: Observations from the laboratory for analytic sciences. The International Journal of Intelligence, Security, and Public Affairs, 19(3), 171–196.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, R. (1999). The end of privacy: How total surveillance is becoming a reality. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar