Mixed methods research in sport marketing

References

• Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(8), 8–22. doi: 10.1177/2345678906290531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2008). An expanded typology for classifying mixed methods research into design. The mixed methods reader. In V. L. P. Clark & J. W. Creswell (Eds.), The mixed methods reader (pp. 159–197). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, K., & Johnson, L. W. (2004). Pricing a sporting club membership package. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 13(2), 113–116.
   Google Scholar
• Danylchuk, K. E., & MacIntosh, E. (2009). Food and non-alcoholic beverage sponsorship of sporting events: The link to the obesity issue. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 18(2), 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1155–1179. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, D. C., Mahoney, D. F., & Havitz, M. E. (2003). Sport consumer behavior: Assessment and direction. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12, 200–205.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier, R., & Hansen, H. (1993). Female spectators: Marketing implications for professional golf events. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 2(4), 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Geng, L. Z., Burton, R., & Blakemore, C. (2002). Sport sponsorship in China: Transition and evolution. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 11(1), 20–32.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J., Caracelli, V., & Graham, W. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. doi: 10.3102/01623737011003255
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, G. P., Simmons, J. M., Hambrick, M. E., & Greenwell, T. C. (2011). Spectator support: Examining the attributes that differentiate niche from mainstream sport. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 20(1), 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G. (2013). Describing mixed methods research: An alternative to typologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 141–151. doi: 10.1177/1558689812461179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, H., & Gauthier, R. (1993). Spectators’ views of LPGA golf events. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 2(1), 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, D., & Grimmer, M. (2005). The mix of qualitative and quantitative research in major marketing journals’. European Journal of Marketing, 41(1/2), 58–70. doi: 10.1108/03090560710718111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, W., Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V., Petska, K., & Creswell, J. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in Counselling Psychology. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R., & Reilly, T. (2011). Mixed methods designs in marketing research. Qualitative Market Research, 14(1), 7–26. doi: 10.1108/13522751111099300
   Google Scholar
• James, J., Breezeel, G. S., & Ross, S. (2001). A two-stage study of the reasons to begin and continue tailgating. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 10(4), 212–222.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Ketchen, D. J., Boyd, B. K., & Bergh, D. D. (2008). Research methodology in strategic management. Past accomplishments and future challenges. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 643–658. doi: 10.1177/1094428108319843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D., & Li, X. R. (2013). Introduction to the special issue on advancing research methods in marketing: Editorial. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1243–1244. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzma, J. R., Shanklin, W. L., & McCally, J. F. (1993). Number one principle for sporting events seeking corporate sponsors: Meet benefactor's objectives. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 2(3), 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, H. H., Trail, G., & James, J. D. (2007). The mediating role of perceived value: Team identification and purchase intention of team-licensed apparel. Journal of Sport Management, 21(4), 540–554. doi: 10.1123/jsm.21.4.540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lough, N., & Brann, M. (2011). Sport Marketing Quarterly's top 20 in 20 years. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 20(4), 219–226.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, H., & Stavros, C. (2007). A defection analysis of lapsed season ticket holders: A consumer and organizational study. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 16(4), 218–229.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. A., Milne, G. R., & Hong, J. (2002). Motivational factors for evaluating sport spectator and participant markets. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 11(2), 100–113.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, V., Poole, S., Seibold, R., & Associates (2010). Advancing research in organizational communication through quantitative methodology. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 4–58. doi: 10.1177/0893318910390193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina-Azorin, J. (2011). The use and added value of mixed methods in management research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(1), 7–24. doi: 10.1177/1558689810384490
   Google Scholar
• Molina-Azorin, J. (2012). Mixed methods research in strategic management: Impact and applications. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 33–56. doi: 10.1177/1094428110393023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (2007). Paradigms and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76. doi: 10.1177/2345678906292462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed methods design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, K. (2010). Mixed methods. In V. D. Miller, M. S. Poole, D. R. Seibold, and Associates, Advancing research in organizational communication through quantitative methodology, Management Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 4–58.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, I., & Benz, C. R. (1998). Qualitative–quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, P., Miloch, K., & Laucella, P. (2007). Strategic sport communication. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Peetz, T., & Reams, L. (2011). A content analysis of sport marketing quarterly: 1992–2011. Sports Marketing Quarterly, 20(4), 209–218.
   Google Scholar
• Plano Clark, V., & Creswell, J. (2008). The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Plano Clark, V. L. (2010). The adoption and practice of mixed methods: U.S. trends in federally funded health-related research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 428–440. doi: 10.1177/1077800410364609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27(3), 258–284. doi: 10.1080/00909889909365539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prayag, G., & Grivel, E. (2014). Motivation, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions: Segmenting youth participants at the Interamnia World Cup 2012. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 23(3), 148–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quarterman, J., Pitts, B. G., Jackson Jr, E. N., Kim, K., & Kim, J. (2005). Statistical data analysis techniques employed in Sports Marketing Quarterly: 1992 to 2004. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 14(4), 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Rohm, A. J., Milne, G. R., & McDonald, M. A. (2006). A mixed-method approach for developing market segmentation typologies in the sports industry. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 15, 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd, A., & Johnson, R. (2010). A call for more mixed methods in sport management research. Sport Management Review, 13(1), 14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2009.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Sack, A. L., & Fried, G. (2001). Pitching women's tennis to corporate sponsors: A case study of Pilot Pen Tennis. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 10(2), 68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, B., Smith, A. C. T., & Nicholson, M. (2003). Sport consumer typologies: A critical review. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12, 206–216.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Washington, DC: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2012). Common “core” characteristics of mixed methods research: A review of critical issues and call for greater convergence. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 774–788. doi: 10.1177/0002764211433795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Roest, J. W., Spaaij, R., & van Bottenburg, M. (2015). Mixed methods in emerging academic subdisciplines: The case of sport management. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(1), 70–90. doi: 10.1177/1558689813508225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, P., Clavio, G., Lovell, M. D., & Blaszka, M. (2013). Differences in event brand personality between social media users and non-users. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 22(4), 214–223.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2006). Mixed methods research: Are the methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel? Research in the Schools, 13(1), 41–47.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar