An action research and scaffolding based approach for maritime design education: a contribution towards shaping ships for people

References

• Abeysiriwardhane, A., M. Lützhöft, and H. Enshaei. 2014. “Human Factors for Ship Design; Exploring the Bottom Rung.” Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects Part C1: International Journal of Marine Design 156 (1): 153–159.
   Google Scholar
• Abeysiriwardhane, A., M. Lützhöft, and E. S. Petersen. 2017. “Human Centered Design Knowledge for Maritime Designers; Enough Preaching, Time to Practice.” National Maritime Intelligence-Integration Office (NMIO) - Technical Bulletin 12. http://nmio.ise.gov/Media/techbulletin/.
   Google Scholar
• Abeysiriwardhane, A., M. Lützhöft, E. S. Petersen, and H. Enshaei. 2015a. “Future Ship Designers and Context of Use; Setting the Stage for Human Centred Design.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Marine Design 2015, London, UK. https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84945557836&origin=inward&txGid=b464c163523547ee26568de3ba78e160.
   Google Scholar
• Abeysiriwardhane, A., M. Lützhöft, E. S. Petersen, and H. Enshaei. 2015b. “Investigate and Stimulate Future Maritime Designers’ Context of Use Knowledge: A Workshop Approach.” Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects Part C1: International Journal of Marine Design 157: 179–193.
   Google Scholar
• Abeysiriwardhane, A., M. Lützhöft, E. S. Petersen, and H. Enshaei. 2016. “Incorporate Good Practice into Ship Design Process; Future Ship Designers Meet End Users.” Paper presented at the ERGOSHIP 2016: Shaping Shipping for People Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Abeysiriwardhane, A., M. Lützhöft, E. S. Petersen, and H. Enshaei. 2017. “Human Centred Design Knowledge into Maritime Engineering Education; Theoretical Framework.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 21 (2): 49–60. doi:10.1080/22054952.2017.1287038.
   Google Scholar
• Altrichter, H., and P. Posch. 1989. “Does the ‘Grounded Theory’ Approach Offer a Guiding Paradigm for Teacher Research?” Cambridge Journal of Education 19 (1): 21–31. doi:10.1080/0305764890190104.
   Google Scholar
• Ary, D., L. C. Jacobs, C. K. Sorensen, and D. Walker. 2013. Introduction to Research in Education. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L. 2004. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, L., and O. Borch. 2004. “Choosing PBL Paradigms: Experiences and Methods of Two Universities.” Paper presented at the 15th Annual Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Toowoomba, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. 1975. “From Communication to Language - A Psychological Perspective.” Cognition 3 (3): 255–287. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(74)90012-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education Knowledge and Action Research. Londin: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaplin, N., and J. Nurser. 2007. “Launching the Tamar.” Royal Academy of Engineering 33: 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Check, J., and R. K. Schutt. 2011. Research Methods in Education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• CyClaDes. 2014. “Crew Centred Design and Operation of Ships and Ship Systems.” http://www.cyclades-project.eu/CyClaDes/index.xhtml.
   Google Scholar
• EBDIG. 2014. “Lifelong Learning Programme.” http://ebdig.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Eberlein, T., J. Kampmeier, V. Minderhout, R. S. Moog, T. Platt, P. Varma-Nelson, and H. B. White. 2008. “Pedagogies of Engagement in Science.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 36 (4): 262–273. doi:10.1002/bmb.20204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, J. 1991. Action Research for Educational Change. Philadelphia, PA: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gosser, D., M. S. Cracolice, J. A. Kampmeier, V. Roth, V. S. Strozak, and P. Varma-Nelson. 2001. Peer-Led Team Learning: A Guidebook. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, K., and G. L. Anderson. 2005. The Action Research Dissertation: A Guide for Students and Faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D. 1985. A Teacher’s Guide to Classroom Research. 5th ed. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karol, R., and B. Nelson. 2011. New Product Development for Dummies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 1987. The Action Research Planner. 3rd ed. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 1988. The Action Research Reader. 3rd ed. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, C., and S. Houison-Craufurd. 2000. “Managing Human Error in Maritime Activities.” Paper presented at the Human Factors in Ship Design and Operation, Royal Institute of Naval Architects, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. Y., N. Ku, and J. H. Cha. 2013. “Undergraduate Courses for Enhancing Design Ability in Naval Architecture.” International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 5 (3): 364–375. doi:10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. 1946. “Action Research and Minority Problems.” In Resolving Social Conflicts and Field Theory in Social Sciences. 1st ed., edited by G. W. Lewin, 34–46. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lützhöft, M., E. S. Petersen, and A. Abeysiriwardhane. 2017. “The Psychology of Ship Architecture and Design.” In Maritime Psychology: Research in Organisational and Health Behavior at Sea. 1st ed., edited by M. MacLachlan, 69–98. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mallam, S. 2016. “Distributed Participatory Design in Multidisciplinary Engineering Projects: Investigating a Sustainable Approach for Ship Design and Construction.” Doctor of Philosophy, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• McCartan, S., D. Harris, B. Verheijden, M. Lundh, M. Lützhöft, D. Boote, K. Norby, et al. 2014. “European Boat Design Innovation Group; The Marine Design Manifesto.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Marine Design 2014, Royal Institute of Naval Architects, Coventry, UK.
   Google Scholar
• McCartan, S., L. Moody, and D. McDonagh. 2011a. “An Emotional Design Approach to Luxury in Superyacht Interior Design.” Paper presented at the Design, Construction and Operation of Super and Mega Yachts, Royal Institute of Naval Architects, Genoa, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• McCartan, S., L. Moody, and D. McDonagh. 2011b. “An Emotional Design Approach to Luxury in the Design of a 40 ft Sailing Yacht.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Marine Design, Royal Institute of Naval Architects, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• McCartan, S., R. Verheijden, J. Roy, and C. Nuvolari-Duodo. 2013. “Design-Driven Innovation of a High Speed Art Deco Superyacht Coastal Cruiser for the Chinese Market.” Paper presented at the Design, Construction and Operation of Super and Mega Yachts, Royal Institute of Naval Architects, Genoa, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• McLernon, T., and D. Hughes. 2006. “A Model to Help Engineering Students to Learn Independently.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Innovation, Good Practice and Research in Engineering Education, Liverpool, England.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., and J. Whitehead. 2002. Action Research: Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. H. 2003. “Project-Based Coursework in a Naval Architecture Curriculum.” Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee.
   Google Scholar
• Monchy, M. M., and B. D. Smit. 2015. “Landlubber to Seaman-An Industrial Design Approach in the Process of Getting Highly Specialised Onshore Personnel to Work Offshore.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Marine Design 2015, Royal Institute of Naval Architects, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J. A. 2013. A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning: Theory and Practice. Albingdon: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Myles, H. 2016. “Understanding the Human Element in Ship Design.” Alert! The International Maritime Human Element Bulletin 40: 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• NI. 2015. “Alert! The International Maritime Human Element Bulletin.” Improving awareness of the human element in the maritime industry, Issues 1 to 40. http://www.he-alert.org/.
   Google Scholar
• NOPSEMA. 2015. Human Factors in Engineering and Design (N-06300-IP1508).
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, E. S. 2012. “Engineering Usability.” Doctor of Philosophy, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, E. S., J. M. Nyce, and M. Lützhöft. 2011. “Ethnography Re-Engineered: The Two Tribes Problem.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 12 (6): 496–509. doi:10.1080/1463922X.2010.504284.
   Google Scholar
• Rothblum, A. M. 2000. Human Error and Marine Safety. http://bowles-langley.com/wp-content/files_mf/humanerrorandmarinesafety26.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sagor, R. 1993. How to Conduct Collaborative Action Research. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Seoul National University. 2000. “Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering.” http://ship.snu.ac.kr/index.php?mid=E_Curriculum.
   Google Scholar
• The Nautical Institute. 2015. Improving Ship Operational Design. 2nd ed. London: The Nautical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• The University of British Columbia. 2000. “Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Ship Design Project.” http://name.engineering.ubc.ca/.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., D. Harte, and D. Pointing. 2013. “Developing Student Skills through Industry-Aligned and Team-Focussed Design Projects.” Paper presented at the Education and Professional Development of Engineers in the Maritime Industry, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, O. 2011. “The Human Element Competency Required for Design Appraisal.” Paper presented at the Human Factors in Ship Design and Operation, Royal Institute of Naval Architects, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. 1990. Basic Content Analysis. Newburry Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., J. S. Bruner, and G. Ross. 1976. “The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17 (2): 89–100. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonoozi, F., M. Narayan, and J. E. Becvar. 2012. “Foundation of the Leaders, by the Leaders, and for the Leaders.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference, The Peer-Led Team Learning International Society, New York. doi:10.1007/s10490-017-9548-6.
   Google Scholar