8,465
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Game Sense as a model for delivering quality teaching in physical education

, &

References

  • Apple, M. (2002). Power, meaning and identity: Essays in critical educational studies. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Ball, S. (2006). Educational policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.
  • Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18, 5–8.
  • Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (2008, May 16). Teaching games for understanding – Do current developments reflect original intentions? Paper presented at the 4th International TGfU Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Chen, W. (2001). Description of an expert teacher's constructivist-oriented teaching: Engaging students' critical thinking in learning creative dance. Research Quarterly Exercise & Sport, 72, 366–375. doi:10.1080/02701367.2001.10608973
  • Chen, S., & Light, R. (2006). “I thought I'd hate cricket but I love it”: Year six students' responses to Game Sense. Special issue on Youth Sport in Australia and New Zealand. Change: Transformations Education, 9(1), 49–58.
  • Chen, W., & Rovegno, I. (2000). Examination of expert and novice teachers' constructivist-oriented teaching practices using a movement approach to elementary physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 71, 357–372. doi:10.1080/02701367.2000.10608919
  • Department of Education and Children's Services, South Australia. (2010). South Australian teaching for effective learning: A resource for developing quality teaching and learning in South Australia. Government of South Australia, Curriculum services, Teaching for effective learning team, Adelaide. Retrieved from http://www.learningtolearn.sa.edu.au/tfel/files/links/DECS_SA_TfEL_Framework_gu_1.pdf.
  • Department of Education and Training, Victoria. (2005). Professional learning in effective schools: The seven principles of highly effective professional learning. Leadership and Teaching Development Branch, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.sofweb.vic.edu.au/edulibrary/public/teachlearn/teacher/ProfLearningInEffectiveSchools.pdf.
  • DeVries, R., & Zan, B. (1996). A constructivist perspective on the role of the sociomoral atmosphere in promoting children's development. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (pp. 103–123). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
  • Dewey, J. (1916/1997). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1936/1986). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. In J. Boydson (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953 (vol. 8, pp. 105–352). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Díaz-Cueto, M., Hernández-Álvarez, J., & Castejón, F. (2010). Teaching games for understanding to in-service physical education teachers: Rewards and barriers regarding the changing model of teaching sport. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 378–398.
  • Forrest, G., Webb, P., & Pearson, P. (2006, October 1–4). Teaching games for understanding (TGfU): A model for pre-service teachers. Conference proceedings for ICHPER 1st Oceania Congress, Wellington New Zealand. Retrieved from http//:www.penz.org/i/memo_022406.pdf.
  • Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (pp. 8–33). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
  • Fry, J. M., & McNeill, M. C. (2011). “In the Nation's good”: Physical education and school sport in Singapore. European Physical Education Review, 17, 287–300. doi:10.1177/1356336X11416730
  • Fry, J., Tan, C., McNeill, M., & Wright, S. (2010). Children's perspectives on conceptual games teaching: A value-adding experience. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 15(2), 139–158. doi:10.1080/17408980902813927
  • Gréhaigne, J. F., Richard, J. F., & Griffin, L. L. (2005). Teaching and learning team sports and games. New York, NY: Routledge & Falmer.
  • Griffin, L. L., Mitchell, S. A., & Oslin, J. L. (1997). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Harvey, S. (2009). A study of interscholastic soccer players perceptions of learning with Game Sense. Asian Journal of Exercise and Sports Science, 6(1), 1–10.
  • Harvey, S., Cushion, C., & Massa-Gonzalez, A. (2010). Learning a new method: Teaching games for understanding in the coaches' eyes. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15, 361–382. doi:10.1080/17408980903535818
  • Howarth, K. (2000). Context as a factor in teachers' perceptions of the teaching of thinking skills in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 19, 270–286.
  • Jarrett, K. (2011). “Undergraduate sports students' perceptions of a change to game sense pedagogy. Asian Journal of Exercise and Sports Science, 8(1). Retrieved from http://js.sagamorepub.com/ajess/article/view/2453
  • Kirk, D., & MacPhail, A. (2002). Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the Bunker–Thorpe model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 177–192.
  • Kirk, D. (2010). Towards a socio-pedagogy of sports coaching In J. Lyle & C. Cushion (Eds.), Sport Coaching: Professionalisation and Practice. Edinburgh: Elsevier.
  • Launder, A. G. (2001). Play practice: The games approach to teaching and coaching sports. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Light, R. (2004). Coaches' experiences of game sense: Opportunities and challenges. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 9(2), 115–131. doi:10.1080/1740898042000294949
  • Light, R. (2008). ‘Complex' learning theory in physical education: An examination of its epistemology and assumptions about how we learn. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27(1), 21–37.
  • Light, R. L. (2012). Game Sense: Pedagogy for performance, participation and enjoyment. London: Routledge.
  • Light, R., & Fawns, R. (2003). Knowing the game: Integrating speech and action in games teaching through TGfU. Quest, 55, 161–176. doi:10.1080/00336297.2003.10491797
  • Light, R., & Georgakis, S. (2005). Taking away the scary factor: Female pre-service primary school teachers' responses to game sense pedagogy in physical education. Higher Education in a Changing World, 28, 260–266.
  • Light, R., & Wallian, N. (2008). A constructivist approach to teaching swimming. Quest, 60, 387–404. doi:10.1080/00336297.2008.10483588
  • Liu, R., Li, C., & Cruz, A. (Eds.). (2006). Teaching Games for Understanding in the Asia-Pacific Region. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education.
  • Mahlo, F. (1974). Acte tactique en jeu [ Tactical action in play]. Paris: Vigot.
  • Martin, A., & Gaskin, C. (2004). An integrated approach to coaching athletics. In R. Light, K. Swabey, & R. Brooker (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd international conference: Teaching sport and physical education for understanding (pp. 62–69). University of Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.conferences.unimelb.edu.au/sport/proceedings/PROCEEDINGS.pdf#page=62.
  • McNeill, M. C., Fry, J. M., & Md Hairil, B. J. (2011). Motivational climate in games concept lessons. The ICHPERD-SD Journal of Research in Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport and Dance, 6(1), 34–39.
  • McNeill, M., Fry, J., Wright, S., Tan, C., & Rossi, T. (2008). Structuring time and questioning to achieve tactical awareness in games. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 13, 231–249. doi:10.1080/17408980701345766
  • McNeill, M., Fry, J., Wright, S., Tan, C., Tan, S., & Schempp, P. (2004). In the local context: Singaporean challenges to teaching games on practicum. Sport, Education & Society, 9(1), 3–32. doi:10.1080/1357332042000175791
  • Memmert, D. (2006). Developing creative thinking in a gifted sport enrichment program and the crucial role of attention processes. High Ability Studies, 17(1), 101–115. doi:10.1080/13598130600947176
  • Memmert, D., & Harvey, S. (2010). Identification of non-specific tactical tasks in invasion games. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15, 287–305. doi:10.1080/17408980903273121
  • Newmann, F. M., & Associates. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (2003a). Quality teaching in NSW public schools: A classroom practice guide. Ryde, NSW: Author.
  • New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (2003b). Quality teaching in NSW public schools: A discussion paper. Ryde, NSW: Author.
  • New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (2003c). Quality teaching in NSW public schools: An annotated bibliography. Ryde, NSW: Author.
  • Pearson, P., Webb, P., & McKeen, K. (2006). Linking teaching games for understanding (TGfU) and Quality Teaching (QT). In Proceedings of 3rd international conference: Teaching games for understanding, Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong.
  • Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study. (2001). The Queensland school reform longitudinal study final report. Brisbane: Education Queensland.
  • Roberts, J. (2011). Teaching games for understanding: The difficulties and challenges experienced by participation cricket coaches. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 16(1), 33–48.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Suzuki, N. ( 2014). The challenge for radical curricula innovation in teaching ball games in Japan. In R. L. Light, J. Quay, S. Harvey, & A. Mooney (Eds.), Contemporary developments in games teaching (pp. 57–70). London & New York: Routledge.
  • Vande Broek, G., Boen, F., Claessens, M., Feys, J., & Ceux, T. (2011). Comparison of three instructional approaches to enhance tactical knowledge in volleyball among university students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 375–392.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Werner, P., Thorpe, R., & Bunker, D. (1996). Teaching games for understanding, evolution of a model. Journal of Physical Education & Dance, 67(1), 28–33.
  • Wright, J., & Forrest, G. (2007). A social semiotic analysis of knowledge construction and games centred approaches to teaching. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 12, 273–287. doi:10.1080/17408980701610201
  • Wright, S. C., McNeill, M. C., & Fry, J. M. (2009). The tactical approach to teaching games from a teaching, learning and mentoring perspective. Sport, Education & Society, 14, 223–244. doi:10.1080/13573320902809153

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.