‘The grade alone provides no learning’: investigating assessment literacy among Norwegian physical education teachers

References

• Aasen, P. (2012). Accountability under ambiguity. Dilemmas and contradictions in education. In A. L. Østern, K. Smith, T. Ryghaug, T. Krüger, & M. B. Postholm (Eds.), Teacher education research between national identity and global trends (pp. 77–92). Trondheim: Akademika.
   Google Scholar
• Annerstedt, C., & Larsson, S. (2010). ‘I have my own picture of what the demands are … ’ Grading in Swedish PEH – Problems of validity, comparability and fairness. European Physical Education Review, 16(2), 97–115. doi: 10.1177/1356336X10381299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnesen, T. E., Nilsen, A. K., & Leirhaug, P. E. (2013). ‘Den læreplanen som ikkje kan tilpassast mi undervisning, finst ikkje.’ Vurdering og undervisning i kroppsøving etter Kunnskapsløftet [Assessment and teaching in physical education after the reform the Knowledge Promotion]. Tidsskriftet FOU i praksis, 7(3), 9–32.
   Google Scholar
• Backman, E., & Larsson, L. (Eds.). (2013). I takt med tiden? Perspektiv på idrottslärarutbildningen i Skandinavien [Fit for the time? Perspectives on the physical education teacher education in Scandinavia]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R., & Adamson, B. (Eds.). (2011). Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5(1), 7–73. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capel, S., & Whitehead, M. (Eds.). (2013). Debates in physical education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K., Hay, P., & Tinning, R. (2011). Understanding the pedagogic discourse of assessment in Physical Education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2(1), 3–19. doi:10.1080/18377122.2011.9730340
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, T., & Renwick, K. (2014). Critical health literacies? Introduction. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 5, 197–199. doi:10.1080/18377122.2014.940807
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, F. (2011). ‘Are PE teacher identities fit for postmodern schools or are they clinging to modernist notions of professionalism?’ A case study of Norwegian PE teacher students’ emerging professional identities. Sport, Education and Society, 16(2), 201–222. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2011.540425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freebody, P., & Luke, A. (2003). Literacy as engaging with new forms of life: The ‘four roles’ models. In G. Bull & M. Anstey (Eds.), The literacy lexicon (2nd ed., pp. 51–66). Frenchs Forest, Australia: Prentice Hall, Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Georgakis, S., & Wilson, R. (2012). Australian physical education and school sport: An exploration into contemporary assessment. Asian Journal of Exercise & Sport Science, 9(1), 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Græsholt, S. A. (2011). Elevvurdering og vurderingskultur i kroppsøving [Assessment culture in physical education] (Unpublished master's thesis). The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, P. (2006). Assessment for learning in physical education. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), The handbook of physical education (pp. 312–325). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, P., & Penney, D. (2013). Assessment in physical education. A sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jonskås, K. (2010). En kunnskapsoversikt over FOU-arbeid innen kroppsøvingsfaget i Norge fra januar 1978 – desember 2010 [An overview of research in physical education in Norway from January 1978 to December 2010]. Oslo: Norges Idrettshøgskole.
   Google Scholar
• Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2014). Assessment for education: Standards, judgement and moderation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leirhaug, P. E., & MacPhail, A. (2015). ‘It's the other assessment that is the key’: Three Norwegian physical education teachers’ engagement (or not) with assessment for learning. Sport, Education and Society, 20(5), 624–640. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2014.975113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P. (2011). Focus group methodology. Principles and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• López-Pastor, V. M., Kirk, D., Lorente-Catalán, E., MacPhail, A., & Macdonald, D. (2013). Alternative assessment in physical education: A review of international literature. Sport, Education and Society, 18, 57–76. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2012.713860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moen, K. M., & Green, K. (2014). Neither shaking nor stirring: A case-study of reflexivity in Norwegian physical education teacher education. Sport, Education and Society, 19(4), 415–434. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2012.670114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palm, T. (2014). Assessing with Foucalt (Unpublished master's thesis). The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, A., & Tritter, J. (2006). Focus group method and methodology: Current practice and recent debate. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 29(1), 23–37. doi: 10.1080/01406720500537304
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory Into Practice, 48, 4–11. doi: 10.1080/00405840802577536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prøitz, T. S., & Borgen, J. S. (2010). Rettferdig standpunktvurdering – det (u)muliges kunst? Læreres setting av standpunktkarakter i fem fag i grunnopplæringen [Fair grading – An (im)possible art?]. Report no. 16/2010. Oslo: NIFU STEP.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., & Crossouard, B. (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1): 1–20. doi: 10.1080/03054980701476386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redelius, K., Fagrell, B., & Larsson, H. (2009). Symbolic capital in physical education: To be, to do or to know? That is the gendered question. Sport, Education and Society, 14(2), 245–260. doi: 10.1080/13573320902809195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redelius, K., & Hay, P. (2009). Defining, acquiring and transacting cultural capital through assessment in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 15(3), 275–294. doi: 10.1177/1356336X09364719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandvik L. V., Engvik G., Fjørtoft, H., Langseth, I.D., Aaslid, B.E., Mordal, S., & Buland, T. (2012). Vurdering i skolen. Intensjoner og forståelser [Assessment in school. Intentions and understanding]. Research report. Trondheim: NTNU, SINTEF. Retrieved December 14, 2012, from www.udir.no/Upload/Rapporter/2012/fivis.pdf?epslanguage=no
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svennberg L., Meckbach J., & Redelius, K. (2014). Exploring PE teachers’ ‘gut-feelings’: An attempt to verbalise and discuss teachers’ internalised grading criteria. European Physical Education Review, 20(2), 199–214. doi: 10.1177/1356336X13517437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2011). Grunnlagsdokument: Satsingen Vurdering for læring 2010–2014 [Background document: Assessment for learning 2010–2014]. Oslo: Utdanningsdirektoratet. Retrieved June 18, 2013, from www.udir.no/PageFiles/Vurdering%20for%20laring/Dokumenter/Nasjonal%20satsing/2/Grunnlagsdokument%20for%20satsingen%20Vurdering%20for%20l%c3%a6ring%20okt%20%2020111.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vinje, E. (2008). Osloundersøkelsen om vurdering i kroppsøving. Nøtterøy: Ped-media AS.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, P., & Lee, M. A. (2005). Peer-assisted learning in physical education: A review of theory and research. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24(3), 205–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M. (2010). Physical literacy throughout the life course. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus group methodology: A review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1(3), 181–203. doi: 10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J., Adie, L., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Conceptualising teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform. The Australian Educational Researcher, 40(2), 241–256. doi:10.1007/s13384-013-0089-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar