‘Nothing about us without us': co-production ingredients for working alongside stakeholders to develop mental health interventions

References

• Australian Government National Mental Health Commission. (2021). Consumer and carer engagement. A practical guide. Australian Government National Mental Health Commission. https://www.mentalhealthcommission.gov.au/getmedia/afef7eba-866f-4775-a386-57645bfb3453/NMHC-Consumer-and-Carer-engagement-a-practical-guide
   Google Scholar
• Batterham, P. J., & Calear, A. L. (2017). Preferences for internet-based mental health interventions in an adult online sample: Findings from an online community survey. JMIR Mental Health, 4(2), Article e26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmark, M., Bejerholm, U., & Markström, U. (2019). Implementation of evidence-based interventions: Analysing critical components for sustainability in community mental health services. Urban Social Work in Mental Health, 17(2), 129–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettis, A. H., Coiro, M. J., England, J., Murphy, L. K., Zelkowitz, R. L., Dejardins, L., … Compas, B. E. (2017). Comparison of two approaches to prevention of mental health problems in college students: Enhancing coping and executive function skills. Journal of American College Health, 65(5), 313–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaz, A., Biri, D., & McKevitt, C. (2016). Rethinking the relationship between science and society: Has there been a shift in attitudes to patient and public involvement and public engagement in science in the United Kingdom? Health Expectations, 19(3), 592–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. H., & Chen, P. J. (2015). MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains. Computers & Education, 86, 55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consumer and Community Involvement Program. (2020). About us. https://cciprogram.org/about-us/.
   Google Scholar
• Cypress, B. S. (2017). Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: Perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization, and recommendations. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 36(4), 253–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, N. (2019). Appreciating collaborative service improvement – a case study on using appreciative inquiry methodology in co-production in mental health. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 23(3), 105–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundy, A., Keetharuth, A. D., Barber, R., Carlton, J., Connell, J., Buck, E. T., … Brazier, J. (2019). Public involvement in health outcomes research: Lessons learnt from the development of the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measures. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(1), Article 60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han, J., Batterham, P., Calear, A., Wu, Y., Zue, J., & van Spijker, B. (2018). Development and pilot evaluation of an online psychoeducational program for suicide prevention among university students: A randomised controlled trial. Internet Interventions, 12, 111–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Happell, B., Bennetts, W., Platania-Phung, C., & Tohotoa, J. (2015). Exploring the scope of consumer participation in mental health nursing education: Perspectives from nurses and consumers. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 52(3), 169–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happell, B., Scholz, B., Gordon, S., Bocking, J., Ellis, P., Roper, C., … Platania-Phung, C. (2018). “I don't think we've quite got there yet”: The experience of allyship for mental health consumer researchers. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 25(8), 453–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, G. (2018). The potential for coproduction to add value to research. Health Expectations, 21(4), 693–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S., Wei, Y., & Kutcher, S. (2019). Addressing mental health literacy in a UK university campus population: Positive replication of a Canadian intervention. Health Education Journal, 78(5), 537–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, H., Slade, M., Bates, P., Munday, E., & Toney, R. (2018). Best practice framework for patient and public involvement (PPI) in collaborative data analysis of qualitative mental health research: Methodology development and refinement. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), 213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones, M., Ferguson, M., Walsh, S., Marsh, M., Cronin, K., & Procter, N. (2018). Perspectives of rural health and human service practitioners following suicide prevention training programme in Australia: A thematic analysis. Health and Social Care in the Community, 26(3), 356–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacic, V., & Zimmermann, F. (2017). Suicide Prevention for children and adolescents: Talk to me! A New Initiative of the National Suicide Prevention Program, Germany. Paper presented at: International Conference on Health Promoting Hospitals and Health Services. Apr 12-14; Vienna (Austria).
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, N., & Carr, S. (2018). ‘Outside the original remit’: Co-production in UK mental health research, lessons from the field. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 27, 1273–1281. doi:10.1111/inm.12499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, P. G., Moore, J. T., Putter, S. E., Chen, P. Y., Cigularov, K. P., Baker, A., & Quinnett, P. (2014). Feasibility of a web-based gatekeeper training: Implications for suicide prevention. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 44(5), 510–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, M., Broden, Z. V. R., & Newton, E. (2015). On the brink of genuinely collaborative care: Experience-based co-design in mental health. Qualitative Health Research, 25(11), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, M., Nicholas, J., & Christensen, H. (2016). A systematic assessment of smartphone tools for suicide prevention. Plos One, 11(4), Article e0152285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative data analysis; conceptual and practical considerations. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 20(2), 133–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council. (2016). Statement on Consumer and Community Involvement in Health and Medical Research. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/statement-consumer-and-community-involvement-health-and-medical-research.
   Google Scholar
• O'Leary, K., Schueller, S. M., Wobbrock, J. O., & Pratt, W. (2018, April 21). “Suddenly, we got to become therapists for each other” Designing peer support chats for mental health [Conference paper]. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., Kothari, A., & Mays, N. (2019). The dark side of coproduction: Do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Research Policy and Systems, 17(1), 33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. (2020). NVivo [Computer software]. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., & Kalathil, J. (2019). Power, privilege and knowledge: The untenable promise of Co-production in mental “health”. Frontiers in Sociology, 4(57), doi:10.3389/fsoc.2019.00057
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santos, K. D. S., Ribeiro, M. C., Queiroga, D. E. U. D., Silva, I. A. P. D., & Ferreira, S. M. S. (2020). The use of multiple triangulations as a validation strategy in a qualitative study. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 25(2), 655–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharp, K. M., & Sanders, M. L. (2019). What is a theme? Teaching thematic analysis in qualitative communication research methods. Communication Teacher, 33(2), 117–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. L., Beans, J. A., Comtois, K. A., & Hiratsuka, V. Y. (2019). Lived experiences of Suicide risk and resilience among Alaska native and American Indian people. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20), 3953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade, M., Trivedi, P., Chandler, R., & Leamy, M. (2016). Developing involvement during a programme of recovery research. The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 11(4), 244–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slay, J., & Stephens, L. (2013). Co-production in mental health: A literature review. London: New economics foundation. http://b.3cdn.net/nefoundation/ca0975b7cd88125c3e_ywm6bp3l1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., Gill, L., Gibson, A., Byng, R., & Quinn, C. (2018). Engaging “seldom heard” groups in research and intervention development: Offender mental health. Health Expectations, 21(6), 1104–1110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, Article 148. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wadams, M., & Park, T. (2018). Qualitative research in correctional settings: Researcher bias, western ideological influences, and social justice. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 14(2), 72–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western Australian Association for Mental Health. (2017). Lived experience partnership payments. https://waamh.org.au/assets/policies/lived-experience-participation-payments.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Western Australian Health and Translation Network. (2020). Consumer and Community Involvement Program (CCI Program). https://wahtn.org/platforms/consumer-community-involvement-program.
   Google Scholar