Area studies and the disciplines: Japanese Studies and anthropology in comparative perspective

References

• Akiwowo, A. (1999). Indigenous sociologies: Extending the scope of the argument. International Sociology, 14(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580999014002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alatas, S. F. (2005). Indigenization: Features and problems. In J. van Bremen, E. Ben-Ari, & S. Farid Alatas (Eds.), Asian anthropology (pp. 227–244). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Asquith, P. (2000a). Introduction: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on the marginalization of Japanese scholarship. Ritsumeikan Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 6, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Asquith, P. (2000b). The right to differ, but how to be understood? Challenges to presenting and critiquing Japanese disciplinary perspectives. Ritsumeikan Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 6, 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Avdinli, E., & Mathews, J. (2000). Are the Core and Periphery Irreconcilable? The curious world of publishing in contemporary international relations. International Studies Perspectives, 1(3), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/1528-3577.00028
   Google Scholar
• Barshay, A. E. (1996). Toward a history of social sciences in Japan. Positions, 4(2), 217–251. https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-4-2-217
   Google Scholar
• Basedau, M., & Kollner, P. (2006). Area studies and comparative area studies: Opportunities and challenges for GIGA German institute for global and area studies – a discussion paper. GIGA German Institute for Global and Area.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, R. H. (1997). Area studies and the discipline: A useful controversy? PS: Political Science and Politics, 30(2), 166–169. https://www.jstor.org/stable/420485?seq=1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, R. H., Greif, A., Levi, M., & Rosenthal, J.-L. (1998). Analytical narratives. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ari, E. (1998). Colonialism, anthropology and the politics of professionalization: An argumentative afterword. In J. van Bremen & A. Shimizu (Eds.), Anthropology and colonialism: The Japanese and Dutch experience in East and South-East Asia (pp. 384–411). University of Hawaii Press and London: Curzon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ari, E. (2005). Asian anthropologies and anthropologies in Asia: An introductory essay. In J. van Bremen, E. Ben-Ari, & S. F. Alatas (Eds.), Asian anthropology (pp. 3–40). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ari, E. (2017). Peripheriality and provinciality in Japanese studies: The case of the english using world. In N. Guo (Ed.), Japanese studies around the world 2017 (pp. 35–43). International Research Center for Japanese Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bennet, J. W., & Naga, M. (1953). The Japanese critique of the methodology of benedict’s “Chrysanthemum and the Sword”. American Anthropologist, 55(3), 404–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bestor, T. C., Steinhoff, P. G., & Lyon Bestor, V. (Eds.). (2003). Doing fieldwork in Japan. University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blagojevic, M., & Yair, G. (2010). The catch-22 syndrome of social scientists in the semi-periphery: Exploratory sociological observations. Sociologija, 52(4), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1004337B
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, C. (2004). The Asian studies “Crisis”: Putting cultural studies into Asian Studies and Asia into cultural studies. International Journal of Asian Studies, 1(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479591404000087
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. (2007). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, H. (1993). Some metasociological notes on the sinicization of sociology. International Sociology, 8(1), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858093008001006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, E. A. (2010). Immigration and citizenship in Japan. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Cumings, B. (1997). Boundary displacement: Area studies and international studies during and after the cold war. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 29(1), 6–26. Retrieved March 8, 2013, from http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/cumings2.htm
   Google Scholar
• Dirks, N. B. (2003). South Asia studies: Futures past. In D. Szanton (Ed.), The politics of knowledge: Area studies and the disciplines. University of California Press. Retrieved February 25, 2013, from http://uoit.ca/sas/Economic%20Growth/southasianstudies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dirlik, A. (2005). Asia Pacific studies in an age of global modernity inter-Asia. Cultural Studies, 6(2), 158–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirlik, A., Li, G., & Yen, H. (Eds.). (2012). Sociology and anthropology in twentieth-century China: Between universalism and indigenism. Chinese University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eades, J. S. (2000). Why don’t they write in English?” Academic modes of production and academic discourses in Japan and the West. Ritsumeikan Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 6, 58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Faure, D. (2001). Higher education reforms and intellectual schizophrenia in Hong Kong. Ritsumeikan Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 8, 80–85.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, R. (2010). The institutionalization of African studies in the United States: Origin, consolidation and transformation. Revista Brasileira De Historia, 30(59), 71–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1980). Negara: The theatre state in nineteenth-century Bali. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerholm, T., & Hannerz, U. (1982). Introduction: The shaping of national anthropologies. Ethnos, 1–2(1–2), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.1982.9981229
   Google Scholar
• Goto-Jones, C. (2007). What is modern Japan studies? Towards a constructive critique of epistemic violence. University of Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997). Discipline and practice: “the field” as site, method, and location in anthropology. In A. Gupta & J. Ferguson (Eds.), Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science (pp. 1–46). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Tarrow, S. (1988, January 23). Globalization and area studies: When is too broad too narrow? Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/GlobalizationArea/99332
   Google Scholar
• Hamaguchi, E. (1985). A contextual model of the Japanese: Toward a methodological innovation in Japan studies. Journal of Japanese Studies, 11(2), 289–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/132562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamel, R. E. (2007). The dominance of english in the international scientific periodicals literature and the future of language use in science. AILA Review, 20, 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.20.06ham
   Google Scholar
• Haney, D. P. (2008). The Americanization of social science. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hook, G., Gilson, J., Hughes, C. W., & Dobson, H. (2012). Japan’s international relations: Politics, economics and security. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. (2012). A teachable moment: “Explaining” Asia in the Asian century. Global Asia. 7(2). Retrieved March 3, 2013. https://globalasia.org/v7no2/feature/a-teachable-moment-explaining-asia-in-the-asian-century_kanishka-jayasuriya
   Google Scholar
• Kato, E. (2014). Bridging over troubled waters? A native feminist anthropologist’s thoughts on “bridging” inside and outside of anthropological studies of Japan. Japan Review of Cultural Anthropology, 15, 81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kellner, D. (2001). Cultural studies and social theory: A critical intervention. In G. Ritzer & B. Smart (Eds..), Handbook of social theory. Sage. Retrieved September 4, 2013, from http://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/culturalstudiessocialtheory.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. D. (1997). A manifesto (of sorts) for area studies. The Journal of the International Institute, 4(3). Retrieved February 20, 2013, from http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jii/4750978.0004.302?rgn=main;view=fulltext
   Google Scholar
• Kent, P. (1999). Japanese perceptions of the ‘Chrysanthemum and the Sword’. Dialectical Anthropology, 24(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007082930663
   Google Scholar
• Komai, H. (2001). Foreign migrants in contemporary Japan. Trans Pacific.
   Google Scholar
• Kuper, A. (1973). Anthropologists and anthropology: The British school 1922–1972. Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Kuwayama, T. (2000). Native” anthropologists: With special reference to Japanese studies inside and Outside of Japan. Ritsumeikan Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 6, 7–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kuwayama, T. (2004). Native anthropology: The Japanese challenge to Western academic hegemony. Trans Pacific Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuwayama, T. (2017). Japanese anthropology, neoliberal knowledge structuring, and the rise of audit culture: Lessons from the academic world system. Asian Anthropology, 16(3), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/1683478X.2017.1346891
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, R. (1998). Globalization and the future of culture areas: Melanesianist anthropology in transition. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27(1), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.427
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Murphy-Shigematsu, S., & Befu, H. (2006). Japan’s diversity dilemmas: Ethnicity, citizenship, and education. iUniverse.
   Google Scholar
• Linke, U. (1990). Folklore, anthropology, and the government of social life. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 32(1), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500016352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludden, D. (1997) The territoriality of knowledge and the history of area studies. Retrieved February 28, 2013, from http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~dludden/areast1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, C. J. H. (2004). What is the use of area studies. International Institute for Asian Studies Newsletter. 35, 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, G. (2004). On the tension between Japanese and American anthropological depictions of Japan. In S. Yamashita, J. Bosco, & J. S. Eades (Eds.), The making of anthropology in East and Southeast Asia (pp. 114–135). Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, G. (2008). Why Japanese anthropology is ignored beyond Japan. Asian Anthropology, 16(3), 53–69.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, G. (2016). Between world anthropology and world anthropologies: An American anthropologist in East Asia as Gatekeeper/ Interpreter. American Anthropologist, 118(4), 845–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVeigh, B. (2002). Japanese higher education as Myth. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2005). Can’t publish and be damned. Anthropology Matters Journal, 7(2), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Morris-Suzuki, T. (2000). Anti-area studies. Communal/Plural, 1(8), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13207870050001439
   Google Scholar
• Murphy-Shigematsu, S., & Blake Williams, D. (2008). Transcultural Japan: At the borderlands of race, gender and identity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Okano, K., & Sugimoto, Y. (Eds.). (2018). Rethinking Japanese studies: Eurocentrism and the Asia-Pacific region. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oppermann, K., & Spencer, A. (2008). Don’t mention the war or the world cup: A report on a British-German IR conference. Zeitschrift fur Internationale Beziehungen, 15(2), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2008-2-303
   Google Scholar
• Pieke, F. (2005). Beyond orthodoxy: Social and cultural anthropology in the People’s Republic of China. In J. van Bremen, E. Ben-Ari, & S. Farid Alatas (Eds.), Asian anthropology (pp. 59–79). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, G. (2010). The Japanese professor: An ethnography of a university faculty. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Prager, M. (1998). Crossing borders, healing wounds: The Leiden school of structural anthropology and the colonial encounter, 1917–1949. In J. van Bremen & A. Shimizu (Eds.), Anthropology and colonialism in Asia: Comparative and historical perspectives (pp. 326–361). University of Hawaii Press and London: Curzon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinanola, A. (2011). On the brink of scientific revolution: Problematizing the sciencehood of area studies. PEAR Yonsei Journal Fo International Studies, 2(1), 117–129.
   Google Scholar
• Ramstedt, M. (2005). Anthropology and the Nation-State: Applied anthropology in Indonesia. In J. van Bremen, E. Ben-Ari, & S. F. Alatas (Eds.), Asian anthropology (pp. 201–224). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryang, S. (2004a). Chrysanthemum’s strange life: Ruth benedict in postwar Japan (Occasional Paper 32), Japan Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ryang, S. (2004b). Japan and national anthropology: A critique. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, Y. (2010). Are Asian sociologies possible? Universalism versus particularism. In M. Burawoy, M. Chang, & M. F. Hsieh (Eds.), Facing and unequal world: Challenges of a global sociology. (Vol. 2 pp. 192–200). Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica.
   Google Scholar
• Schott, T. (1998). Ties between center and periphery in the scientific world-system: Accumulation of Rewards, dominance and self-reliance in the center. Journal of World-Systems Research, 4, 112–144. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.1998.148
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Benjamin, I. (1989). Presidential Address: Area Studies as a Critical Discipline. The Journal of Asian Studies, 40(1): 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shamoon, D. (2013). Introduction to special collection. EJCJS, 13(2). Retrieved September 8, 2013, from http://www.japanesestudies.org.uk/ejcjs/vol13/iss2/shamoon.html
   Google Scholar
• Shenkar, M. (2012). The politicization of Israel studies. Ben-Gurion University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shimizu, A. (2000). The world system of local systems: National anthropologies in the West and Japan. Ritsumeikan Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 6, 101–116.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. (2000). The discipline of international relations: Still and American social science? British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2(3), 374–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00042
   Google Scholar
• Steinhoff, P. (2013, March 14–15). Debunking the Myth: Japanese studies is actually alive and well in the United States [ Paper presentation]. Paper Presented at a conference on Engaging with Japanese Studies: Revisiting the Question of ‘Why Japan Matters’. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhoff, P.(2012). Cross-purposes or complementarity? Changing relationships between area studies and the disciplines. In W. Glover (Ed.), Relevant/obsolete? Rethinking area studies in the U.S. academy. International institute series (Vol. 1). University of Michigan International Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sugimoto, Y. (2013, March 14–15). Changing models of Japanese studies: Reflections on future directions [ Paper presentation]. Paper Presented at a conference on Engaging with Japanese Studies: Revisiting the Question of ‘Why Japan Matters’. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Szanton, David, L. (2003). he Origin, Nature, and Challenges of Area Studies in the United States. In Szanton, David L. (Ed.) The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines. http://repositories.cdlib.org/uciaspubs/editedvolumes/3/.AccessedMay32011
   Google Scholar
• Tachimoto, N. (1995). Global area studies with special reference to Malay or Maritime world. Southeast Asian Studies, 33(3), 469–483.
   Google Scholar
• Takayama, K.. (2011). A comparativist’s predicament of writing about “other” education: A Self-reflective, critical review of studies of Japanese education. Comparative Education, 47(4) 1–22. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03050068.2011.561542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teichler, U. (2019). The academics and their institutional environment in Japan – A view from outside. Contemporary Japan, 31(2), 234–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/18692729.2019.1586295
   Google Scholar
• Teti, A. (2007). The middle east and the disciplinary (Re)production of knowledge. In B. Ozden, S. De Mul, & S. Van Wichelen (Eds.), Trajectories of commitment and complicity (pp. 81–101). Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. G. (1997). Academic outlaws: Queer theory and cultural studies in the academy. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tsutsui, W. (2013). Teaching history and/of/for Japanese popular culture. ECJCS, 13(2). Retrieved September 8, 2013, from https://www.japanesestudies.org.uk/ejcjs/vol13/iss2/tsutsui.html
   Google Scholar
• Van Bremen, J. (2000). Open gateways and blind alleys: Disciplinary perspectives and their effects upon international discourses in anthropology. Ritsumeikan Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 6, 34–49.
   Google Scholar
• Van Bremen, J., & Shimizu, A. (Eds.). (1998). Anthropology and colonialism in Asia: Comparative and historical perspectives. University of Hawaii Press and London: Curzon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veric, C. S. (2019). The rise of Filipino postcolonial knowledge: Philippine studies, the institute of Philippine culture, and the Ateneo de Manila University press. Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints, 67(3), 521–556. https://doi.org/10.1353/phs.2019.0025
   Google Scholar
• Waever, O. (1998). The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations. International Organization, 52(4), 687–727. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. (1997). The unintended consequences of cold war area studies. In A. Schiffrin (Ed.), The cold war and the university (pp. 195–232). Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Wojcicka, S. J., & Lessinger, J. (1994, October). The academic sweatshop: Changes in capitalist infrastructure and the part-time academic. Anthropology Today, 5, 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Xiaoying, Q. (2012). A case study of globalized knowledge flows: Guanxi in social science and management theory. International Sociology, 27(6), 707–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580912453729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita, S., Bosco, J., & Eades, J. S. (Eds.). (2004). The making of anthropology in East and Southeast Asia. Berghahn.
   Google Scholar