617
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Staging the Robot: Performing Techno-Politics of Innovation for Care Robotics in Japan

ORCID Icon
Pages 196-213 | Received 30 Jan 2023, Accepted 06 Dec 2023, Published online: 18 Jan 2024

References

  • AARP. 2022. “The Aging Readiness and Competitiveness Report: Japan.” Link at https://www.aarpinternational.org/file%20library/arc/countries/full%20reports/arc-report—japan.pdf. Last accessed on November 21, 2023.
  • Alač, M., J. Movellan, and F. Tanaka. 2011. “When a Robot is Social: Spatial Arrangements and Multimodal Semiotic Engagement in the Practice of Social Robotics.” Social Studies of Science 41 (6): 893–926. doi:10.1177/0306312711420565.
  • Asia Pacific. 2020. “Advancing AI Ethics in Japan: A Q&A with Dr. Arisa Ema, Professor at University of Tokyo.” February 25, 2020. Author: Dongwoo Kim. Retrieved from https://www.asiapacific.ca/publication/advancing-ai-ethics-japan-qa-dr-arisa-ema-professor. Last accessed on November 21, 2023.
  • Barry, A., T. Osborne, and N. Rose, eds. 1996. Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bischof, A. 2017. “Soziale Maschinen Bauen: Epistemische Praktiken Der. Sozialrobotik.” In Science Studies. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.
  • Breazeal, C. 2002. Designing Sociable Robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Burchell, G. 1996. “Liberal Government and Techniques of the Self.” In Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government, edited by Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne, and Nikolas Rose, 19–36. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Chita-Tegmark, M., and M. Scheutz. 2020. “Assistive Robots for the Social Management of Health: A Framework for Robot Design and Human-Robot Interaction Research.” International Journal of Social Robotics, doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00634-z. Last accessed on November 21, 2023.
  • De Togni, G. 2021. Fall-out from Fukushima: Nuclear Evacuees Seeking Compensation and Legal Protection After the Triple Meltdown. London: Routledge (Nissan Institute/Routledge Japanese Studies Series).
  • Forman, R., R. Atun, M. McKee, and E. Mossialos. 2020. “12 Lessons Learned from the Management of the Coronavirus Pandemic.” Health Policy, doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.008. Last accessed on November 21, 2023.
  • Frumer, Y. 2018. “Cognition and Emotions in Japanese Humanoid Robotics.” History and Technology 34 (2): 157–183. doi:10.1080/07341512.2018.1544344
  • Goffman, E. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. NYC: Doubleday.
  • Hori, R. S. 2020. “Progress and Problems of Gender Equality in Japanese Academia and Geosciences.” Advances in Geosciences 53: 195–203. doi:10.5194/adgeo-53-195-2020.
  • Hornyak, T. N. 2006. Loving the Machine. Tokyo: Kodansha International.
  • Hülsken-Giesler, M. 2017. “Mimesis in Nursing Practice: The Hermeneutical Potential of the Body to Understand Patients’ Lived Experiences.” In Critical Approaches in Nursing Theory and Nursing Research. Implications for Nursing Practice, edited by Thomas Foth, Dave Holmes, Manfred Hülsken-Giesler, Susanne Kreutzer, and Hartmut Remmers, 151–168. Göttingen: V&R Unipress (V&R academic, Band 14).
  • IFR (International Federation of Robotics). 2022. “Japan is World’s number one Robot Maker.” March 10, 2022. Retrieved from https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/japan-is-worlds-number-one-robot-maker. Last accessed on November 21, 2023.
  • Kidd, C. D., and C. Breazeal. 2007. “A Robotic Weight Loss Coach.” In Proceedings of the 22nd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol 2, 1985–1986. AAAI Press. Retrieved from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1619797.1619992. Last accessed on November 21, 2023.
  • Kim, S. H. 2015. “Social Movements and Contested Sociotechnical Imaginaries in South Korea.” In Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, edited by S. Jasanoff, and S. Kim, 152–173. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Kim, M. S., and E. J. Kim. 2012. “Humanoid Robots as ‘‘The Cultural Other’’: Are we Able to Love our Creations?” In AI & Society 28: 309–318. doi:10.1007/s00146-012-0397-z
  • Kolling, T., S. Baisch, A. Schall, S. Selig, S. Rühl, Z. Kim, H. Rossberg, et al. 2016. “What Is Emotional About Emotional Robotics?” In Emotions, Technology, and Health, edited by S. Y. Tettegah, and Y. E. Garcia, 85–103. London: Elsevier Inc. Academic Press.
  • Lammer, L., A. Huber, A. Weiss, and M. Vincze. 2014. “Mutual Care: How Older Adults React When They Should Help Their Care Robot.” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on New Frontiers in Human–Robot Interaction, 1–8. London, UK: Routledge. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/73965. Last accessed on January 3, 2024.
  • Lara, J. S., J. Casas, A. Aguirre, M. Munera, M. Rincon-Roncancio, B. Irfan, E. Senft, T. Belpaeme, and C. A. Cifuentes. 2017. “Human-robot Sensor Interface for Cardiac Rehabilitation.” International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), 1013–1018. IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009382.
  • Latour, B. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lipp, B. 2022. “Robot Dramas: Investigating Frictions between Vision and Demonstration in Care Robotics.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, doi:10.1177/01622439221120118.
  • Möllers, N. 2016. “Shifting in and Out of Context: Technoscientific Drama as Technology of the Self.” Social Studies of Science 46 (3): 351–373. doi:10.1177/0306312716638951.
  • Neven, L. 2011. “Representations of the Old and Ageing in the Design of the New and Emerging: Assessing the Design of Ambient Intelligence Technologies for Older People.” (PhD Thesis). University of Twente.
  • Nye, J. 2017. “Soft Power: The Origins and Political Progress of a Concept.” Palgrave Communications 3: Article Number: 17008. doi:10.1057/palcomms.2017.8. Last accessed on November 21, 2023.
  • O’Malley, P. 1998. “Indigenous Governance.” In Governing Australia: Studies in Contemporary Rationalities of Government, edited by Mitchell Dean, and Barry Hindess, 156–172. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Pineau, J., M. Montemerlo, M. Pollack, N. Roy, and S. Thrun. 2003. “Towards Robotic Assistants in Nursing Homes: Challenges and Results.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42 (3-4): 271–281. doi:10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00381-0.
  • Pols, J. 2012. “Care at a Distance. On the Closeness of Technology.” Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Available online at: http://www.doabooks.org/doab?func=fulltext&rid=14635. Last accessed on November 21, 2023.
  • Pols, J., and I. Moser. 2009. “Cold Technologies Versus Warm Care? On Affective and Social Relations with and Through Care Technologies.” ALTER, European Journal of Disability Research 3 (3): 159–178. doi:10.1016/j.alter.2009.01.003
  • Robinson, H., B. MacDonald, and E. Broadbent. 2014. “The Role of Healthcare Robots for Older People at Home: A Review.” International Journal of Social Robotics 6 (4): 575–591. doi:10.1007/s12369-014-0242-2.
  • Rose, N. 1996. “Governing ‘Advanced’ Liberal Democracies.” In Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government, edited by Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne, and Nikolas Rose, 37–64. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Sparrow, R., and L. Sparrow. 2006. “In the Hands of Machines? The Future of Aged Care.” Minds and Machines 16 (2): 141–161. doi:10.1007/s11023-006-9030-6.
  • Šabanović, S. 2014 June. “Inventing Japan’s ‘Robotics Culture’: The Repeated Assemble of Science, Technology, and Culture in Social Robotics.” Social Studies of Science 44 (3): 342–367. doi:10.1177/0306312713509704
  • Tamura, T., S. Yonemitsu, A. Itoh, D. Oikawa, A. Kawakami, Y. Higashi, T. Fujimoto, and K. Nakajima. 2004. “Is an Entertainment Robot Useful in the Care of Elderly People with Severe Dementia?” Journal of Gerontology 59A (1): 83–85.
  • Treusch, P. 2015. “Robotic Companionship: The Making of Anthropomatic Kitchen Robots in Queer Feminist Technoscience Perspective.” Diss., TEMA—The Department of Thematic Studies, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Turkle, S. 2007. “Introduction: The Things That Matter.” In Evocative Objects: Things We Think With, edited by Sherry Turkle, 3–10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Turkle, S. 2011. Alone Together. Why we Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Vallès-Peris, N., and M. Domènech. 2020. “Roboticists’ Imaginaries of Robots for Care: The Radical Imaginary as a Tool for an Ethical Discussion.” Engineering Studies 12 (3): 157–176. doi:10.1080/19378629.2020.1821695.
  • Wada, K., and T. Shibata. 2007. “Living with Seal Robots: Its Sociophysical and Physiological Influences on the Elderly at a Care House.” IEEE Transactions on Robotics 23 (5): 972–980. doi:10.1109/TRO.2007.906261. Last accessed on November 21, 2023.
  • White, D. 2022. Administering Affect: Pop-Culture Japan and the Politics of Anxiety. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Wright, J. 2018. “Tactile Care, Mechanical Hugs: Japanese Caregivers and Robotic Lifting Devices.” Asian Anthropology 17 (1): 24–39. doi:10.1080/1683478X.2017.1406576. Last accessed on November 21, 2023.
  • Wright, J. 2019. “Robots vs Migrants? Reconfiguring the Future of Japanese Institutional Eldercare.” Critical Asian Studies 51 (3): 331–354. doi:10.1080/14672715.2019.1612765
  • Yúdice, G. 2004. The Expediency of Culture: Uses of Culture in the Global Era. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Ziemke, T. 2001. “Are Robots Embodied?” Semantic Scholar. Retrieved from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Are-Robots-Embodied-Ziemke/ce66e4006c9948b7ed080c239540dfd0746ff639. Last accessed on November 21, 2023.