A Hybrid Multicriteria Decision Making Methodology Based on Type-2 Fuzzy Sets For Selection Among Energy Storage Alternatives

References

• T. Kousksou, P. Bruel, A. Jamil, T. Elrhaflki and Y. Zeraouli, Energy storage: Applications and challenges, Solar Energy Materials&Solar Cells, (120) (2014) 59–80.
   Google Scholar
• A. Bagdanavicius and N. Jenkins, Exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a Compressed Air Energy Storage combined with a district energy system, Energy Conversion and Management (77) (2014) 432–440.
   Google Scholar
• S. Sundararagavan and E. Baker, Evaluating energy storage technologies for wind power integration, Solar Energy (86) (2012) 2707–2717.
   Google Scholar
• A. Arabali, M. Ghoirani and M.E.-Amoli, Cost analysis of a power system using probabilistic optimal power flow with energy storage integration and wind generation, Electrical Power and Energy Systems (53) (2013)832–841.
   Google Scholar
• B. Vahdani, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, S. Meysam Mousavi and A. Ghodratnama, Soft computing based on new interval-valued fuzzy modified multi-criteria decision-making method, Applied Soft Computing (13) (2013) 165–172.
   Google Scholar
• S.D. Pohekar and M. Ramachandran, Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—;A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, (8) (2004) 365–381.
   Google Scholar
• S.-C. Hsu, Tien-Chin Wang, (2001). Solving multi-criteria decision making with incomplete linguistic preference relations, Expert Systems with Applications 38, 10882–10888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Krohling and T.T.M. de Souza, Combining prospect theory and fuzzy numbers to multi-criteria decision making, Expert Systems with Applications 39 (2012)11487–11493.
   Google Scholar
• İ. Kaya, Evaluation of outsourcing alternatives under fuzzy environment for waste management, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 60 (2012) 107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.N. Kamik and J.M. Mendel, Operations on type-2 fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 122 (2001) 327–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hu , Y. Zhang, X. Chenand Y. Liu, Multi-criteria decision making method based on possibility degree of interval type-2 fuzzy number, Knowledge-Based Systems 43 (2013) 21–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Chen, T.N. Cong, W. Yang, C. Tan, Y. Li and Y. Ding, Progress in electrical energy storage system: A critical review, Progress in Natural Science 19 (2009) 291–312.
   Google Scholar
• A. Chatzivasileiadi, E. Ampatzi and İ. Knight, Characteristics of electrical energy storage technologies and their applications in buildings, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 25 (2013) 814–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.L. Ferreira, R. Garde, G. Fulli, W. Kling and J.P. Lopes, Characterisation of electrical energy storage Technologies, Energy 53 (2013) 288–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Karellas, N. Tzouganatos, Comparison of the performance of compressed-air and hydrogen energy storage systems: Karpathos island case study, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 29 (2014) 865–882.
   Google Scholar
• S.M. Schoenung, Characteristics and Technologies for Long-vs. Short-Term Energy Storage, A Study by the DOE Energy Storage Systems Program, SANDIA REPORT, Unlimited Release Printed March 2001.
   Google Scholar
• J.M. Mendel and R.I.B. John, Type-2 Fuzzy Sets Made Simple, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 10(2) (2002) 117–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Mendel, R.I. John, F.L. Liu. Interval type-2 fuzzy logical systems made simple, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 14(6) (2006) 808–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.-M. Chen, L.-W. Lee, Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method, Expert Systems with Applications 37 (2010) 2790–2798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.W. Lee and S.M. Chen, Fuzzy multiple attribute group decision-making based on the extension of TOPSIS method and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. In Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on machine learning and cybernetic (2008) 3260–3265,
   Google Scholar
• T. Daim, X. Li, J. Kim, S. Simms S. Evaluation of energy storage technologies for integration with renewable electricity: Quantifying expert opinions, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, (3) (2012)29–49.
   Google Scholar
• M. Kiliç, İ. Kaya. Investment project evaluation by a decision making methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets. Applied Soft Computing, 27 (2015) 399–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Çebi, İ. Otay. Multi-Criteria and Multi-Stage Facility Location Selection under Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Environment: A Case Study for a Cement Factory. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 8:2 (2015), 330–344,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Erdogan, İ. Kaya. An integrated multi-criteria decision making methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets for selection among energy alternatives in Turkey. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2015) (in press).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Kahraman, B. Öztayşi, İ.U. San, E. Turanoglu. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowledge-Based Systems 59 (2014) 48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T-Y. Chen. An ELECTRE-based outranking method for multiple criteria group decision making using interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 263 (2014) 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Abdullah, L. Najib. A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 41 (2014) 3297–3305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T-Y. Chen, C-H. Chang, J-F. R. Lu. The extended QUALIFLEX method for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and applications to medical decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(2013) 615–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kiliç, İ. Kaya. The prioritisation of provinces for public grants allocation by a decision-making methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets. Urban Studies, 2015 1–20, doi: 10.1177/0042098014566370.
   Google Scholar
• İ Kaya. The process incapability index under fuzziness with an application for decision making. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 7(1) (2014), 114–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Erdogan, İ. Kaya. Evaluating of altemative-fUel busses for public transporta-tion in Istanbul using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS, Journal of Multiple Valued Logic and Soft Computing, (2015) (in press).
   Google Scholar