ELECTRE I Method Using Hesitant Linguistic Term Sets: An Application to Supplier Selection

References

• I. N. Durbach and T. Stewart, Using expected values to simplify decision making under uncertainty, Omega, vol. 37, n° 2, p. 312–330, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wang and E. Triantaphyllou, Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods, Omega, vol. 36, p. 45–63, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. T. Clemen, Making hard decisions: an introduction to decision analysis, 2nd ed., Belmont: Duxbury Press at Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• A. Hatami-Marbini and M. Tavana, An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment, Omega, vol. 39 , p. 373–386, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott, Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, New York: Springer, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• T. J. Stewart and F. B. Losa, Towards reconciling outranking and value measurement practice, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 145, n° 3, p. 645–659, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Zopounidis and M. Doumpos, Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: a literature review, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 138, n° 2, p. 229–246, 2002. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00243-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Roy and D. Vanderpooten, An overview on The European School of MCDA: emergence, basic features and current work, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 99, n° 1, pp. 26–27, 1997. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00379-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Doumpos, Y. Marinakisa, M. Marinakia and C. Zopounidis, An evolutionary approach to construction of outranking models for multicriteria classification: the case of the ELECTRE TRI method, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 199, n° 2, p. 496–505, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.11.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. J. Andre, I. Herrero and L. Riesgo, Amodified DEA model to estimate the importance of objectives with an application to agricultural economics, Omega, vol. 38, n° 5, p. 371–382, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Hinojosa and A. M. Marmol, Axial solutions for multiple objective linear problems: an application to target setting in DEA models with preferences, Omega, vol. 39, n° 2, p. 159–167, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2010.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. E. Steuer, J. Silverman and A. J. Whisman, A combined Tchebycheff/aspiration criterion vector interactive multi objective programming procedure, Management Science, vol. 39, n° 10, p. 1255–1260, 1993. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Roy, The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods, Theory and Decision, vol. 31, n° 1, p. 49–73, 1991. doi: 10.1007/BF00134132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Paelinck, Qualiflex: a flexible multiple-criteria method, Economic letters, vol. 1, n° 3, p. 193–197, 1978. doi: 10.1016/0165-1765(78)90023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Roubens, Preference relations on actions and criteria in multi-criteria decision making, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 10, n° 1, p. 51–55, 1982. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(82)90131-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Pastijn and J. Leysen, Constructing an outranking relation with oreste, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 12, n° 10–11, p. 1255–1268, 1989. doi: 10.1016/0895-7177(89)90367-1
   Google Scholar
• J. P. Leclercq, Propositions d'extension de la notion de dominance en presence de relations d'ordre sur les pseudo-criteres: MELCHIOR, Revue Belge de Recherche Operationelle de Statistique et d'hformatique, vol. 24, n° 1, p. 32–46, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• B. Matarazzo, Multicriterion analysis of preferences by means of pairwise actions and criterion comparisons (MAPPAC), Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 18, n° 2, p. 119–141, 1986. doi: 10.1016/0096-3003(86)90020-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. C. Vansnick, On the problem of weights in multiple criteria decision making: the non-compensatory approach, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 24, p. 288–294, 1986. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90051-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Benayoun, B. Roy and B. Sussman, ELECTRE: Une méthode pour guider le choix en présence de points de vue multiples, Note de travail 49, SEMA-METRA international, direction scientifique, Paris, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• B. Roy, Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples (la methode ELECTRE), Revue Francaise d'Informatique et de Recherche Operationnelle, vol. 8, p. 57–75, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• B. Roy and P. Bertier, La Methode ELECTRE II: Use Methode de Classement en Presence de Criteres Multiples., Note de Travail No. 142, Direction Scientifique, Group Metra, Paris, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• B. Roy and P. Bertier, La methode ELECTRE II: Une application au mediaplanning, de OR 72, M. Ross, Ed., Amsterdam, North Holland, 1973, pp. 291–302.
   Google Scholar
• B. Roy, Electre III Un algorithme de classements fonde sur une representation floue en presence de criteres multiples, Cahairs du CERO, vol. 20, n° 1, p. 3–24, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• M. Rogers and M. Bruen, A new system for weighting environmental criteria for use within ELECTRE III, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 107, n° 3, p. 552–563, 1998. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00154-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Roy and J. C. Hugonnard, Ranking of suburban line extension alternatives on the Paris metro system by a multicriteria method, Transportation Research, vol. 16A, n° 4, p. 301–312, 1982. doi: 10.1016/0191-2607(82)90057-7
   Google Scholar
• B. Roy and J. C. Hugonnard, Classement des prolongements de lignes de metro en banlieue parisienne (presentation d'une methode multicritere originale), Cahiers du CERO, vol. 24, n° 2,3,4, p. 153–171, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• W. Yu, ELECTRE TRI: Aspects methodologiques et manuel d'utilisation, Document du LAMSADE 74, Universite Paris-Dauphine, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• S. Greco, M. Kadzinski, V. Mousseau and R. Słowinski, ELECTREGKMS: robust ordinal regression for outranking methods, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 214, n° 1, p. 118–135, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. P. Brans and P. Vincke, A preference ranking organization method: the PROMETHEE method for MCDM, Management Science, vol. 31, n° 6, p. 647–656, 1985. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Behzadian, R. B. Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvi and M. Aghdas, PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 200, n° 1, pp. 198–215, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Roy and D. Bouyssou, Aide Multicritere a la Decision: Methodes et Cas, Paris: Economica, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• B. Roy, Partial preference analysis and decision-aid: the fuzzy outranking relation concept, de Conflicting objectives and decisions, New York, Wiley, 1977, pp. 40–75.
   Google Scholar
• J. L. Siskos, J. Lochard and J. Lombardo, A multicriteria decision-making methodology under fuzziness: application to the evaluation of radiological protection in nuclear power plants, TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, vol. 20, p. 261–283, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• M. Sevkli, An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for supplier selection, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 48, n° 12, pp. 3393–3405, 2010. doi: 10.1080/00207540902814355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Ertay and C. Kahraman, Evaluation of design requirements using fuzzy outranking methods, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 22, p. 1229–1250, 2007. doi: 10.1002/int.7001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Vahdani, A. Jabbari, V. Roshanaei and M. Zandieh, Extension of the ELECTRE method for decision-making problems with interval weights and data, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 50 , n° 5-8, p. 793–800, 2010. doi: 10.1007/s00170-010-2537-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Vahdani and H. Hadipour, Extension of the ELECTRE method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets, Soft Computing, vol. 15, p. 569–579, 2011. doi: 10.1007/s00500-010-0563-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Chen, An ELECTRE-based outranking method for multiple criteria group decision making using interval type-2 fuzzy sets, Information Sciences, vol. 263 , p. 1–21, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Devi and P. Yadav S., A multicriteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for plant location selection with ELECTRE method, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 66, p. 1219–1229, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s00170-012-4400-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Vahdani, S. M. Mousavi, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam and H. Hashemi, A new design of the elimination and choice translating reality method for multi-criteria group decision-making in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 37, n° 4, pp. 1781–1799, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.04.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Li, M. Lin and J. Chen, ELECTRE Method Based on Interval-valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Number, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vols. %1 de %2220–223, pp. 2308–2312, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• M. C. Wue and T. Y. Chen, The ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach based on Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, p. 12318–12327, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Torra, Hesitant fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 25, n° 6, p. 529–539, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. M. Rodríguez, L. Martínez, V. Torra, Z. S. Xu and F. Herrera, Hesitant fuzzy sets: state of the art and future directions, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 29, n° 6, p. 495–524, 2014. doi: 10.1002/int.21654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Zadeh, Fuzzy logic=computing with words, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 4, n° 2, pp. 103–111, 1996. doi: 10.1109/91.493904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Herrera, S. Alonso, F. Chiclana and E. Herrera-Viedma, Computing with words in decision making: foundations, trends and prospects, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 8, n° 4, p. 337–364, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s10700-009-9065-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Martínez, D. Ruan and F. Herrera, Computing with words in decision support systems: an overview on models and applications, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 3, n° 4, p. 382–395, 2010. doi: 10.1080/18756891.2010.9727709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. M. Rodriguez, L. Martinez and F. Herrera, Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 20, n° 1, pp. 109–119, 2012. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Liu and R. M. Rodriguez, A fuzzy envelope for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application to multicriteria decision making, Information Sciences, vol. 258, p. 220–238, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.07.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning, Information Sciences, 8, 9, pp. 199–249 (I). 301–357 (II), 43–80 (III), 1975.
   Google Scholar
• C. T. Chen, Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, n° 1, p. 1–9, 2000. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. H. Tsaur, T. Y. Chang and C. H. Yen, The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM, Tourism Management, vol. 23 , p. 107–115, 2002. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00050-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, vol. 8, n° 3, p. 338–353, 1965. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Google Scholar
• R. M. B. B. Rodríguez, H. Bustince, Y. C. Dong, B. Farhadinia, C. Kahraman, L. Martínez, V. Torra, Y. J. Xu, Z. S. Xu and H. F, A Position and Perspective Analysis of Hesitant Fuzzy Sets on Information Fusion in Decision Making. Towards High Quality Progress, Information Fusion, vol. 29, pp. 89–97, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2015.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Filev and R. Yager, On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 94, p. 157–169, 1998. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00254-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. J. Zimmermann, Fuzzy set theory and its applications, 2nd, Ed., Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• D. J. Dubois, Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications, New York: Academic Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• G. J. Klir and B. Yuan, Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications, New York: Prentice-Hall, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• K. P. Yoon and C. L. Hwang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making, An Introduction. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• S. J. Chen and C. L. Hwang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Methods and Applications, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 375, Heidelberg: Springer, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• T. Aouam, S. I. Chang and E. S. Lee, Fuzzy MADM: An outranking method, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 145 , p. 317–328, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00537-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw Hill, 1980.
   Google Scholar