A segment-based approach to the analysis of project evaluation problems by hesitant fuzzy sets

References

• J. C. R. Alcantud, R. de Andr´es Calle, and M. J. Torrecillas. Hesitant fuzzy worth: an innovative ranking methodology for hesitant fuzzy subsets. Applied Soft Computing, 38(1):232 – 243, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.09.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Altuntas and T. Dereli. A novel approach based on DEMATEL method and patent citation analysis for prioritizing a portfolio of investment projects. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(3):1003 – 1012, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Asosheh, S. Nalchigar, and M. Jamporazmey. Information technology project evaluation: An integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(8):5931 – 5938, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Buyukozkan and O. Feyzioglu. A fuzzy-logicbased decision-making approach for new product development. International Journal of Production Economics, 90(1):27 – 45, 2004. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00330-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Calvo, A. Koles´arov´a, M. Komorn´ıkov´a, and R. Mesiar. Aggregation operators: Basic concepts, issues and properties. In Tomasa Calvo, Gaspar Mayor, and Radko Mesiar, editors, Aggregation Operators: New Trends and Applications, volume 97 of Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, pages 3–104. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• A. F. Carazo, T. G´omez, J. Molina, A. G. Hern´andez- D´ıaz, F. M. Guerrero, and R. Caballero. Solving a comprehensive model for multiobjective project portfolio selection. Computers & Operations Research, 37(4):630 – 639, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2009.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. H. Chen, A. H. I. Lee, and Y. Tong. Prioritization and operations NPD mix in a network with strategic partners under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(2):337 – 346, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Chen, J. Liu, H.Wang, and J. C. Augusto. Ordering based decision making - a survey. Information Fusion, 14(4):521 – 531, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2012.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Chen, J. Liu, H. Wang, and J. C. Augusto. A group decision making model for partially ordered preference under uncertainty. Information Fusion, (forthcoming), 2015.
   Google Scholar
• T-A. Chiang and Z. H. Che. A fuzzy robust evaluation model for selecting and ranking NPD projects using bayesian belief network and weight-restricted DEA. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(11):7408 – 7418, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y-C. Chiu, B. Chen, J. Z. Shyu, and G-H. Tzeng. An evaluation model of new product launch strategy. Technovation, 26(11):1244 – 1252, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Da and Y. Xu. Evaluation on functions of urban waterfront redevelopment based on proportional 2-tuple linguistic. International Journal of Computational IntelligenceSystems, 7(4):796–808, 2014. doi: 10.1080/18756891.2014.960293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Espinilla, R de Andr´es Calle, F. J. Mart´ınez Mimbrera, and L. Mart´ınez. A 360-degree performance appraisal model dealing with heterogeneous information and dependent criteria. Information Sciences, 222:459–471, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.08.015
   Google Scholar
• M. Fabala et al. Functional analysis and infinitedimensionalgeometry. Springer, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• B. Farhadinia. A novel method of ranking hesitant fuzzy values for multiple attribute decision-making problems. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28:752–767, 2013. doi: 10.1002/int.21600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Grattan-Guinness. Fuzzy membership mapped onto intervals and many-valued quantities. MathematicalLogic Quarterly, 22:149–160, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• C-C. Huang, P-Y. Chu, and Y-H. Chiang. A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection. Omega, 36(6):1038 – 1052, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kacprzyk and H. Nurmi. Group decision making under fuzziness. In R. Slowinski, editor, Fuzzy sets inDecision Analysis, Operations research and Statistics, pages 103–136. Springer, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• C. Kahraman and I. Kaya. A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Systems with Applications, 37:6270– 6281, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. P. Lawson, P. J. Longhurst, and P. C. Ivey. The application of a new research and development project selection model in SMEs. Technovation, 26(2):242 – 250, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Li and Y. Dong. Multi-attribute group decision making methods with proportional 2-tuple linguistic assessments and weights. International Journalof Computational Intelligence Systems, 7(4):758–770, 2014. doi: 10.1080/18756891.2014.960232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Liao and Z. Xu. Satisfaction degree based interactive decision making under hesitant fuzzy environment with incomplete weights. International Journalof Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 22(04):553–572, 2014. doi: 10.1142/S0218488514500275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. J. Liberatore. An expert support system for R&D project selection. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 11(0):260 – 265, 1988. doi: 10.1016/0895-7177(88)90495-5
   Google Scholar
• J. Lin and Y. Jiang. Some hybrid weighted averaging operators and their application to decision making. InformationFusion, 16:18 – 28, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• S-S. Liu and C-J. Wang. Optimizing project selection and scheduling problems with time-dependent resource constraints. Automation in Construction, 20(8):1110 – 1119, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.D. Luce and H. Raiffa. Games and Decisions: Introductionand Critical Survey. Dover Publications, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• L.L. Machacha and P. Bhattacharya. A fuzzy-logicbased approach to project selection. EngineeringManagement, IEEE Transactions on, 47(1):65–73, Feb 2000. doi: 10.1109/16.817568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.J. Maddox. Elements of functional analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• A. L. Medaglia, D. Hueth, J. C. Mendieta, and J. A. Sefair. A multiobjective model for the selection and timing of public enterprise projects. Socio-EconomicPlanning Sciences, 42(1):31 – 45, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2006.06.009
   Google Scholar
• S. C. Onar, B. Oztaysi, and C. Kahraman. Strategic decision selection using hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS and interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: A case study. InternationalJournal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 7(5):1002–1021, 2014. doi: 10.1080/18756891.2014.964011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Palomares, F. J. Estrella, L. Mart´ınez, and F. Herrera. Consensus under a fuzzy context: Taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Information Fusion, 20:252 –271, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2014.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. M. Rodr´ıguez, B. Bedregal, H. Bustince, Y.C. Dong, B. Farhadinia, C. Kahraman, L. Mart´ınez, V. Torra, Y.J. Xu, Z.S. Xu, and F. Herrera. A position and perspective analysis of hesitant fuzzy sets on information fusion in decision making. towards high quality progress. Information Fusion, 29:89 – 97, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2015.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.M. Rodr´ıguez, L. Mart´ınez, and F. Herrera. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEETransactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20(1):109–119, 2012. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.M. Rodr´ıguez, L. Mart´ınez, V. Torra, Z. S. Xu, and F. Herrera. Hesitant fuzzy sets: state of the art and future directions. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 29:495–524, 2014. doi: 10.1002/int.21654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Santhanam and G. J. Kyparisis. A decision model for interdependent information system project selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 89(2):380 – 399, 1996. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)00257-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Suzumura. Rational Choice, Collective Decisionsand Social Welfare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• T. Tanino. Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 12(2):117–131, 1984. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(84)90032-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Torra. Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal ofIntelligent Systems, 25(6):529–539, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. A. Tsamboulas. A tool for prioritizing multinational transport infrastructure investments. Transport Policy, 14(1):11–26, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• H. Wang. Extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their aggregation in group decision making. InternationalJournal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 8(1):14–33, 2015. doi: 10.1080/18756891.2014.964010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wang and W-L. Hwang. A fuzzy set approach for R&D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model. Omega, 35(3):247 – 257, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J-J. Wang, Y-Y. Jing, C-F. Zhang, G-H.Shi, and X-T. Zhang. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system. Energy Policy, 36(10):3823–3832, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.Wei, Z. Ren, and R. M. Rodr´ıguez. A hesitant fuzzy linguistic TODIM method based on a score function. International Journal of Computational IntelligenceSystems, 8(4):701–712, 2015. doi: 10.1080/18756891.2015.1046329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Xia and Z. Xu. Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. International Journal ofApproximate Reasoning, 52:395–407, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2010.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Xia, Z. Xu, and N. Chen. Some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22:259–279, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s10726-011-9261-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Xu. Hesitant Fuzzy Sets Theory, volume 314 of Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Springer International Publishing, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Xu and M. Xia. Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 181:2128–2138, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.01.028
   Google Scholar
• Z. Xu and M. Xia. On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information. InternationalJournal of Intelligent Systems, 26:410–425, 2011. doi: 10.1002/int.20474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Yue. Group decision making with multi-attribute interval data. Information Fusion, 14(4):551–561, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Zadeh. Outline of a new approach to analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Transactionson Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3:28–44, 1973. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1973.5408575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Zhang and Z. Xu. The TODIM analysis apapproach based on novel measured functions under hesitant fuzzy environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 61(0):48 – 58, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Zhang and Z. Xu. Hesitant fuzzy QUALIFLEX approach with a signed distance-based comparison method for multiple criteria decision analysis. ExpertSystems with Applications, 42(2):873 – 884, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Zhang, Z. Xu, and H. Wang. Heterogeneous multiple criteria group decision making with incomplete weight information: A deviation modeling approach. Information Fusion, (forthcoming), 2015.
   Google Scholar
• X. Zhou and Q. Li. Multiple attribute decision making based on hesitant fuzzy Einstein geometric aggregation operators. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 52:Article ID 745617, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Zhu and Z. Xu. Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Transactionson Fuzzy Systems, 22(1):35–45, 2014. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2245136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.Pei and L. Yi. A note on operations of hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Computational IntelligenceSystems, 8(2):226–239, 2015. doi: 10.1080/18756891.2015.1001947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar