Methodological disruptions: interviewing domestically violent men across a ‘gender divide’

References

• Adams, P. J., Towns, A., & Gavey, N. (1995). Dominance and entitlement: The rhetoric men use to discuss their violence towards women. Discourse & Society, 6, 387–406. doi:10.1177/0957926595006003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. L., & Umberson, D. (2001). Gendering violence: Masculinity and power in men's accounts of domestic violence. Gender & Society, 15, 358–380. doi:10.1177/089124301015003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, M. (2002). Feminist research with non-feminist and anti-feminist women: Meeting the challenge. Feminism & Psychology, 12, 55–77. doi:10.1177/0959353502012001010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonzaier, F. (2005). The relational construction of woman abuse: Narratives of gender, subjectivity and violence in South Africa (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Cape Town, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Boonzaier, F. (2008). ‘If the man says you must sit, then you must sit’: The relational construction of woman abuse: Gender, subjectivity and violence. Feminism & Psychology, 18, 183–206. doi:10.1177/0959353507088266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonzaier, F. (2014). Talking against dominance. South African women resisting dominant discourse in narratives of violence. In M. N. Lafrance & S. McKenzie-Mohr (Eds.), Creating counter-stories: Women voicing resistance (pp. 102–120). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boonzaier, F., & van Schalkwyk, S. (2011). Narrative possibilities: Poor women of color and the complexities of intimate partner violence. Violence against Women, 17, 267–286. doi:10.1177/1077801210397796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchbinder, E., & Eisikovits, Z. (2004). Between normality and deviance: The breakdown of batterers' identity following police intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 443–467. doi:10.1177/0886260503262082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burman, E. (1994). Interviewing. In P. Banister, E. Burman, I. Parker, M. Taylor, & C. Tindall (Eds.), Qualitative methods in Psychology: A research guide (pp. 49–71). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. (2002). Emotionally involved: The impact of researching rape. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowburn, M. (2013). Men researching violent men: Epistemologies, ethics and emotions in qualitative research. In B. Pini & B. Pease (Eds.), Men, masculinities and methodologies (pp. 183–196). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299. doi:10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Davison, K. G. (2007). Methodological instability and the disruption of masculinities. Men and Masculinities, 9, 379–391. doi:10.1177/1097184X05284995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Rey, C. (1997). South African feminism, race and racism. Agenda, 13(32), 6–10. doi:10.2307/4066146
   Google Scholar
• Durfee, A. (2011). ‘I'm not a victim, she's an abuser’: Masculinity, victimization, and protection orders. Gender & Society, 25, 316–334. doi:10.1177/0891243211404889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, K. J. (1999). Reproducing criminal types. Cognitive treatment for violent offenders in prison. Sociological Quarterly, 40, 435–453. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1999.tb01728.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, M. B. (1997). Making sense: Interviewing and narrative representation. In M. M. Gergen & S. N. Davis (Eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender. A reader (pp. 99–116). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, H. (1998). Constructing the ‘other’ through talk. Feminism & Psychology, 8, 530–536. doi:10.1177/0959353598084018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gailey, J. A., & Prohaska, A. (2011). Power and gender negotiations during interviews with men about sex and sexually degrading practices. Qualitative Research, 11, 365–380. doi:10.1177/1468794111404315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavey, N. (1989). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis. Contributions to feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 459–475. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb01014.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottzén, L. (2013). Encountering violent men. Strange and familiar. In B. Pini & B. Pease (Eds.), Men, masculinities and methodologies (pp. 197–208). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (1998). The violences of men. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hydén, M. (1994). Woman battering as marital act. The construction of a violent marriage. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hydén, M. (2014). The teller-focused interview: Interviewing as relational practice. Qualitative Social Work. doi:10.1177/1473325013506247
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K. (2006). From encounter to text: Collecting data in qualitative research. In M. T. Blanche, K. Durrheim, & D. Painter (Eds.), Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences (pp. 285–319). Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. M., & Renzetti, C. M. (1993). The problems of researching sensitive topics: An overview and introduction. In C. M. Renzetti & R. M. Lee (Eds.), Researching sensitive topics (pp. 3–13). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research – Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, M. (2003). Narrative psychology and narrative analysis. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology. Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 95–112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 58–72). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, D. (1998). A post-structuralist review of the theoretical literature surrounding wife abuse. Violence against Women, 4, 457–490. doi:10.1177/1077801298004004005
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I. (2005). Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research. New York, NY: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Presser, L. (2005). Negotiating power and narrative in research: Implications for feminist methodology. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 2067–2090. doi:10.1086/428424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ptacek, J. (1990). Why do men batter their wives? In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 133–157). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reitz, R. R. (1999). Batterers' experiences of being violent. A phenomenological study. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(1), 143–165. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00348.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. (1990). Divorce talk. Women and men make sense of personal relationships. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. (2000). Ethical issues and researching sensitive topics: Mature women and ‘bulimia’. Feminism & Psychology, 10, 531–537. doi:10.1177/0959353500010004015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shefer, T. (1999). Discourses of heterosexual subjectivity and negotiation (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of the Western Cape, Bellville.
   Google Scholar
• Stamp, G. H., & Sabourin, T. C. (1995). Accounting for violence: An analysis of male spouse abuse narratives. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 284–307. doi:10.1080/00909889509365432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, N. (2002). Interviewer and interviewee relationships between women. Sociology, 36, 703–721. doi:10.1177/0038038502036003011
   Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. T. (2004). Monsters and victims: Male felons' accounts of intimate partner violence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 555–576. doi:10.1177/0265407504045887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar