The personal is political … just not always progressive: affective interruptions and their promise for CSMM

References

• Abreu, J. M. (1999). Conscious and nonconscious African American stereotypes: Impact on first impression and diagnostic ratings by therapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 387–393. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.3.387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2010a). Creating disturbance: Feminism, happiness and affective differences. In M. Liljeström & S. Paasonen (Eds.), Working with affect in feminist readings: Disturbing difference (pp. 31–44). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2010b). The promise of happiness. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. (2007). ‘Sensitive and real macho all at the same time': Young heterosexual men and romance. Men and Masculinities, 10(2), 137–152. doi: 10.1177/1097184X05284221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (2009). Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (2006). Fear of small numbers: An essay on the geography of anger. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, L. (2015). 21 things that prove nice guys are the absolute worst. Retrieved April 5, 2016, from https://www.buzzfeed.com/lukebailey/nice-guys
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. (2008). Affect, relationality and the ‘problem of personality’. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(1), 23–47. doi: 10.1177/0263276407085157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, M., & Dupuis-Déri, F. (2012). Masculinism and the antifeminist countermovement. Social Movement Studies, 11(1), 21–39. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2012.640532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blashill, A., & Powlishta, K. (2009). Gay stereotypes: The use of sexual orientation as a cue for gender-related attributes. Sex Roles, 61(11–12), 783–793. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9684-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Branney, P., & White, A. (2008). Big boys don’t cry: Depression and men. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 14, 256–262. doi: 10.1192/apt.bp.106.003467
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, T., & Pascoe, C. J. (2014). Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities. Sociology Compass, 8(3), 246–258. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12134
   Google Scholar
• Brody, L. (1999). Gender, emotion and the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, E., & Zimmer, M. (2016). Internet research ethics. Retrieved March 5, 2017, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-internet-research/
   Google Scholar
• Carrigan, T., Connell, R., & Lee, J. (1985). Toward a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society, 14(5), 551–604. doi: 10.1007/BF00160017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, J., & Seale, C. (2013). Men and emotion talk: Evidence from the experience of illness. Gender and Language, 3(1), 81–113.
   Google Scholar
• Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P. T. (Ed.). (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829–859. doi: 10.1177/0891243205278639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cosmopolitan.com. (2013). Are men becoming more emotional? New research says that men are becoming ‘better and more emotional communicators’, yay. But there’s a downside. Retrieved from http://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/love-sex/relationships/a21281/are-men-becoming-more-emotional/
   Google Scholar
• de Boise, S. (2015). Men, masculinity, music and emotions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• de Boise, S., & Hearn, J. (2017). Are men getting more emotional? Critical sociological perspectives on men, masculinities and emotions. The Sociological Review. doi: 10.1177/0038026116686500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichler, M. (1980). The double standard. New York, NY: St Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eliassi, B. (2015). Constructing cultural otherness within the Swedish welfare state: The cases of social workers in Sweden. Qualitative Social Work, 14(4), 554–571. doi: 10.1177/1473325014559091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English Defence League. (2016). About us. Retrieved November 25, 2016, from http://www.englishdefenceleague.org.uk/mission-statement/
   Google Scholar
• Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the witch: Women, the body and primitive accumulation. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, S. (1970/1979). The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. London: Women’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, M. (2008). Men, sex, and homosociality: How bonds between men shape their sexual relations with women. Men and Masculinities, 10(3), 339–359. doi: 10.1177/1097184X06287761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, S. (2010). Young men in love: The (re)making of heterosexual masculinities through ‘serious’ relationships. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25(2), 206–218. doi: 10.1080/14681991003660260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forth, C. E. (2008). Masculinity in the modern west: Gender, civilization and the body. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Friedan, B. (1963/1979). The feminine mystique. Middlesex: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Galasinski, D. (2004). Men and the language of emotions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• García-Favaro, L., & Gill, R. (2016). ‘Emasculation nation has arrived’: Sexism rearticulated in online responses to lose the lads’ mags campaign. Feminist Media Studies, 16(3), 379–397. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2015.1105840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2016). Post-postfeminism? New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times. Feminist Media Studies, 16(4), 610–630. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2016.1193293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorton, K. (2007). Theorizing emotion and affect: Feminist engagements. Feminist Theory, 8(3), 333–348. doi: 10.1177/1464700107082369
   Google Scholar
• Gotell, L., & Dutton, E. (2016). Sexual violence in the ‘manosphere’: Antifeminist men’s rights discourses on rape. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(2), 65–80. doi: 10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i2.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, M., & Siegworth, G. (Eds.). (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanisch, C. (1969). The personal is political. In S. Firestone & A. Koedt (Eds.), Notes from the second year (pp. 76–78). New York, NY: Radical Feminism.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (1987). The gender of oppression: Men, masculinity and the critique of Marxism. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (1998). The violences of men: How men talk about and how agencies respond to men’s violence to women. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2004). From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist Theory, 5(1), 49–72. doi: 10.1177/1464700104040813
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2015). Men of the world: Genders, globalizations, transnational times. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. (2012). Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 147–161. doi: 10.1177/1464700112442643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, A., & Flores, C. (2016). Simply more than swiping left: A critical analysis of toxic masculine performances on tinder nightmares. New Media & Society. doi: 10.1177/1461444816681540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, M. (2015). Men’s emotions: Heteromasculinity, emotional reflexivity, and intimate relationships. Men and Masculinities, 18(2), 176–192. doi: 10.1177/1097184X14557494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (2004). The will to change: Men, masculinity and love. New York, NY: Washington Square Press.
   Google Scholar
• Illouz, E. (2012). Why love hurts: A sociological explanation. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Independent.co.uk. (2014). Father’s Day 2014: Study shows men are more emotionally sensitive than women – they’re just also better at hiding it. Retrieved December 14, 2016, from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/father-s-day-2014-study-shows-men-are-more-emotionally-sensitive-than-women-they-re-just-also-better-9532945.html
   Google Scholar
• Jane, E. A. (2016). Misogyny online: A short (and brutish) history. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, T., & Klinth, R. (2008). Caring fathers: The ideology of gender equality and masculine positions. Men and Masculinities, 11(1), 42–62. doi: 10.1177/1097184X06291899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jónasdóttir, A., & Ferguson, A. (Eds.). (2013). Love: A question for feminism in the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kalra, V. S. (2009). Between emasculation and hypermasculinity: Theorizing British south Asian masculinities. South Asian Popular Culture, 7(2), 113–125. doi: 10.1080/14746680902920874
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. (Ed). (1995). The politics of manhood: Profeminist men respond to the mythopoetic men’s movement (and the mythopoetic leader’s answer). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. (2007). Racism as adolescent male rite of passage: Ex-Nazis in Scandinavia. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 36(2), 202–218. doi: 10.1177/0891241606298825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. (2013). Angry white men: American masculinity at the end of an era. New York, NY: Nation Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M., & Mahler, M. (2003). Adolescent masculinity, homophobia, and violence: Random school shootings, 1982–2001. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(10), 1439–1458. doi: 10.1177/0002764203046010010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivunen, A. (2010). An affective turn? Reimagining the subject of feminist theory. In M. Liljeström & S. Paasonen (Eds.), Working with affect in feminist readings: Disturbing difference (pp. 8–28). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 205–229. doi: 10.1177/1357034X04042943
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, T., Cartwright, T., Edginton, T., & Ridge, D. (2015). New ways of being a man: ‘Positive’ hegemonic masculinity in meditation-based communities of practice. Men and Masculinities, 19(3), 289–310. doi: 10.1177/1097184X15578531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykke, N. (2016). How is the myth of Swedish gender equality upheld outside Sweden? A case study. In L. Martinsson, G. Griffin, & K. Nygren (Eds.), Challenging the myth of gender equality in Sweden (pp. 117–136). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, sensation, affect. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mellström, U. (2016). In the time of masculinist political revival. NORMA, 11(3), 135–138. doi:10.1080/18902138.2016.1224536
   Google Scholar
• Messner, M., Greenberg, M., & Peretz, T. (2015). Some men: Feminist allies and the movement to end violence against women. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moi, T. (2006). ‘I am not a feminist, but … ’: How feminism became the F-word. PMLA, 121(5), 1735–1741. doi: 10.1632/pmla.2006.121.5.1735
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, L. F., & Robertson, S. (2012). Embodied heterosexual masculinities, part 1: Confluent intimacies, emotions and health. Sociology Compass, 6(2), 134–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00447.x
   Google Scholar
• Montes, V. (2013). The role of emotions in the construction of masculinity. Gender & Society, 27(4), 469–490. doi: 10.1177/0891243212470491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, J. (1998). Masculinity and nationalism: Gender and sexuality in the making of nations. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21(2), 242–269. doi: 10.1080/014198798330007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, R. (2014). Whither critical masculinity studies? Notes on inclusive masculinity theory, postfeminism, and sexual politics. Men and Masculinities, 18(1), 100–120. doi: 10.1177/1097184X14553056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, R. (2015). The work of seduction: Intimacy and subjectivity in the London ‘seduction community’. Sociological Research Online, 20(4). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/20/4/5.html doi: 10.5153/sro.3744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pease, B. (2012). The politics of gendered emotions: Disrupting men’s emotional investment in privilege. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 47(1), 125–142. doi: 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2012.tb00238.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedwell, C., & Whitehead, A. (2012). Affecting feminism: Questions of feeling in feminist theory. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 115–129. doi: 10.1177/1464700112442635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. (2004). Engendering emotions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Poynting, S., & Mason, V. (2007). The resistible rise of Islamophobia. Journal of Sociology, 43(1), 61–86. doi: 10.1177/1440783307073935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probyn, E. (2004). Shame in the habitus. The Sociological Review, 52(2), 224–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00533.x
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reddit commenter. (2016). The red pill. Retrieved January 12, 2017, from https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/5cv5jl/swedish_mayor_rules_to_clean_the_snow_on/
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. (2013). Boys will be boys … won’t they? Change and continuities in contemporary young working-class masculinities. Sociology, 47(4), 671–686. doi: 10.1177/0038038512453791
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S., & Monaghan, L. F. (2012). Embodied heterosexual masculinities, part 2: Foregrounding men’s health and emotions. Sociology Compass, 6(2), 151–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00443.x
   Google Scholar
• Sattel, J. W. (1976). The inexpressive male: Tragedy or sexual politics? Social Problems, 23(4), 469–477. doi: 10.2307/799856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, E. (2003). Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy, performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, L. (1993). Changing men: Masculinities in context. Theory and Society, 22, 625–641. doi: 10.1007/BF00993539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidler, V. (Ed.). (1991). The Achilles heel reader: Men, sexual politics and socialism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seidler, V. (1994). Unreasonable men: Masculinity and social theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seidler, V. (2006). Young men and masculinities: Global cultures and intimate lives. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Seidler, V. J. (2007). Masculinities, bodies, and emotional life. Men and Masculinities, 10(1), 9–21. doi: 10.1177/1097184X07299636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, M., & Travis, J. (2002). Boys don’t cry? Rethinking narratives of masculinity and emotion in the U.S. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, F. (2016). ‘Bitch I said hi’: The bye Felipe campaign and discursive activism in mobile dating apps. Social Media+Society, 2(4). doi: 10.1177/2056305116672889
   Google Scholar
• Stearns, C., & Stearns, P. (1986). Anger: The struggle for emotional control in America’s history. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Telegraph.co.uk. (2010). Men suffer more emotional pain from failed romance, report claims. Retrieved December 12, 2016, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/7814010/Men-suffer-more-emotional-pain-from-failed-romance-report-claims.html
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• White, A., & Peretz, T. (2010). Emotions and redefining black masculinity: Movement narratives of two profeminist organizers. Men and Masculinities, 12(4), 403–424. doi: 10.1177/1097184X08326007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar