Negotiating masculinities: reproductive technologies, biosocial exclusion and men’s engagements in Turkey

References

• Acar, F., & Altunok, G. (2013). The ‘politics of intimate’ at the intersection of neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism in contemporary Turkey. Women’s Studies International Forum, 41(1), 14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2012.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Açıksöz, S. C. (2012). Sacrifcial limbs of sovereignty: Disabled veterans, masculinity, and nationalist politics in Turkey. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 26(1), 4–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1387.2011.01194.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Açıksöz, S. C. (2015). In vitro nationalism: masculinity, disability, and assisted reproduction in War-Torn Turkey. In G. Özyegin (Ed.), Gender and sexuality in Muslim cultures (pp. 19–35). Surrey: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Açıksöz, S. C., & Korkman, Z. (2013). Masculinized power, Queered Resistance. Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/masculinized-power-queered-resistance
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. (2010). From communities of practice to epistemic communities: Health mobilizations on the Internet. Sociological Research Online, 15(2), 10. doi: 10.5153/sro.2152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeling, R., & Waggoner, M. R. (2013). More and less than equal: How men factor in the reproductive equation. Gender & Society, 27(6), 821–842. doi: 10.1177/0891243213484510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altinay, A. G. (2004). The myth of the military-nation militarism, gender, and education in Turkey. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Babül, E. (2017). Bureaucratic Intimacies: Translating Human rights in Turkey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, L. W. (2014). Conceiving masculinity: Male infertility, medicine, and identity. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. (2000). The Elusive embryo: How women and Men Approach New reproductive technologies. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A. V. (2015). Overcoming (and maintaining) reproductive difference: Similarities in the gendered experience of infertility. Qualitative Sociology, 38, 439–458. doi: 10.1007/s11133-015-9315-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. V. (2016). ‘I don’t consider a cup performance; I consider it a test’: Masculinity and the medicalisation of infertility. Sociology of Health & Illness, 38(5), 706–720. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. R., & de Kok, B. (2018). Reproductive desires and disappointments. Medical Anthropology, 37(2), 91–100. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2017.1416609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boratav, H. B., Fisek, G. O., & Ziya, H. E. (2014). Unpacking masculinities in the context of social change: Internal complexities of the identities of married Men in Turkey. Men and Masculinities, 17(3), 299–324. doi: 10.1177/1097184X14539511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boratav, H. B., Fisek, G. O., & Ziya, H. E. (2017). Erkekliğin Türkiye Halleri. Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Bozok, M. (2018). Türkiye’de Ataerkillik, Kapitalizm ve Erkeklik İlişkilerinde Biçimlenen Babalık. Fe Dergi, 10(2), 31–42. URL: http://cins.ankara.edu.tr/20_4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, T., & Pascoe, C. J. (2014). Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities. Sociology Compass, 8(3), 246–258. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12134
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities. Cambridge, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culley, L., Hudson, N., & Lohan, M. (2013). Where are all the men? The marginalization of men in social scientific research on infertility. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 27(3), 225–235. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, C. (1986). The meaning of paternity and the virgin birth debate. Man, 21(3), 494–513.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, C. (1991). The seed and the soil: Gender and cosmology in Turkish village society. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demircioğlu, M. (2015). Achieving procreation: Childlessness and IVF in Turkey. New York, NY: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, A., Lomas, T., Ghobara, T., & Hartshorne, G. (2017). ‘It’s like taking a bit of masculinity away from you’: Towards a theoretical understanding of men’s experiences of infertility. Sociology of Health and Illness, 39, 878–892. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudgeon, M. R., & Inhorn, M. C. (2003). Gender, masculinity, and reproduction: Anthropological perspectives. International Journal of Men’s Health, 2(1), 31–56. doi: 10.3149/jmh.0201.31
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, S. (1998). The relationship between fertility issues and sexual problems in Men. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 7(3), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Erol, M., & Özbay, C. (2013). ‘I haven’t died yet’: Navigating masculinity, aging and andropause in Turkey. In A. Kampf, B. L. Marshall, & A. Petersen (Eds.), Aging men, masculinities and modern medicine (pp. 156–171). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. (2013). Biological relations: IVF, stem cells, and the future of kinship. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2006 [1967]). The discovery of grounded Theory Strategies for Qualitative research. New Burnswick: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, H., (2009). The sex in the sperm. Male infertility and its challenges to masculinity in an Israeli-Jewish context. In M. C. Inhorn et al. (Ed.), Reconceiving the second Sex: Men, masculinity, and reproduction (pp. 203–225). New York, NY: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, M. C. (2014). Alternative cultures of masculinity: An anthropological Approach. In À Carabí, & J. M. Armengol (Eds.), Alternative masculinities for a changing world (pp. 51–63). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gürtin, Z. B. (2016). Patriarchal pronatalism: Islam, Secularism and the conjugal Confines of Turkey’s IVF boom. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society Online, 2, 39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2016.04.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanna, E., & Gough, B. (2016). Emoting infertility online: A qualitative analysis of men’s forum Posts. Health, 20(4), 363–382. doi: 10.1177/1363459316649765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, embodied and Everyday. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, L., & Miller, T. (2013). Mapping men’s anticipations and experiences in the reproductive realm: (In)fertility Journeys. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 27(3), 244–252. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst, H. A., & Miller, D. (eds.). (2012). Digital anthropology. New York, NY: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C. (2003). Local babies, global science: Gender, religion, and in vitro fertilization in Egypt. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C. (2012). The New Arab Man: Emergent masculinities, technologies, and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C., Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T., Goldberg, H., & Mosegaard, M. L. C. (eds.). (2009). Reconceiving the second Sex: Men, masculinity, and reproduction. New York, NY: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M., & Wentzell, E. (2011). Embodying emergent masculinities: Men engaging with reproductive and sexual health technologies in the Middle East and Mexico. American Ethnologist, 38(4), 801–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. (2019). The New politics of fatherhood: Men’s Movements and masculinities. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, S. M. (2006). Making technology Familiar: Orthodox Jews and infertility support, advice, and Inspiration. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 30(4), 467–480. doi: 10.1007/s11013-006-9029-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampf, A. (2013). Tales of healthy Men: Male reproductive bodies in biomedicine from ‘lebensborn’ to sperm Banks. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 17(1), 20–36. doi: 10.1177/1363459312447251
   Google Scholar
• Kandiyoti, D. (2016). Locating the politics of gender: Patriarchy, neo-liberal governance and Violence in Turkey. Research and Policy on Turkey, 1(2), 103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Knecht, M., Klotz, M., & Beck, S. (eds.). (2012). Reproductive technologies as global form. Ethnographies of knowledge, practices, and Transnational encounters. Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Korkman, Z. K. (2016). Politics of Intimacy in Turkey: Just a Distraction from ‘real’ politics? Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 12(1), 112–121. doi: 10.1215/15525864-3422611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkut, U., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2016). The discursive governance of population politics: The Evolution of a Pro-birth regime in Turkey. Social Politics, 26(1), 555–575. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxw003
   Google Scholar
• Leighton, K. (2013). To criticize the right to know we must question the value of genetic relatedness. The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(5), 54–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, B. (2013). Networked masculinities and social Networking sites: A call for the analysis of Men and contemporary digital media. Masculinities and Social Change, 2(3), 245–265. doi: 10.17583/msc.2013.762
   Google Scholar
• Malik, S. H., & Coulson, N. S. (2010). Coping with infertility online: An examination of self-help mechanisms in an online infertility support group. Patient Education and Counseling 81(2), 315–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, A., & Coulson, N. (2008). The male experience of infertility: A thematic analysis of an online infertility support group Bulletin Board. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 26(1), 18–30. doi: 10.1080/02646830701759777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsiglio, W., Lohan, M., & Culley, L. (2013). Framing men’s experience in the procreative realm. Journal of Family Issues, 34(8), 1011–1036. doi: 10.1177/0192513X13484260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen, A. T., Svend, A. M., & Peter, H. (2013). Psychological aspects of male fertility treatment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(9), 1977–1986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, S. (2018). Being a sperm donor: Masculinity, sexuality, and biosociality in Denmark. New York, NY: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, L. J. (2007). Sperm Counts: Overcome by man’s most Precious Fluid. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. M., & Roberts, E. F. S. (2012). Reproductive governance in Latin America. Anthropology and Medicine, 19(2), 241–254. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2012.675046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutlu, B., (2011). ‘Türkiye’de ‘Üremeye Yardımcı’ Teknolojiler: Kadınların Tüp Bebek Anlatıları’. In C. Özbay et al. (Ed.), Neoliberalizm ve Mahremiyet: Türkiye’de Beden, Sağlık ve Cinsellik (pp. 3–93). Istanbul: Metis Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Mutluer, N. (2019). The intersectionality of gender, sexuality, and religion: Novelties and continuities in Turkey during the AKP Era. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 19(1), 99–118. doi: 10.1080/14683857.2019.1578049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbay, C. (2013). Türkiye’de Hegemonik Erkekliği Aramak. Doğu Batı, 63, 185–204.
   Google Scholar
• Özbay, C., (2016). Inarticulate, self-vigilant, and egotistical: Masculinity in Turkish drawn stories. In C. Özbay et al. (Ed.), The making of neoliberal Turkey (pp. 87–110). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Özgüler, C., & Yarar, B. (2017). Neoliberal body politics: Feminist resistance and the abortion law in Turkey. In W. Harcourt (Ed.), Bodies in Resistance: Gender and sexual politics in the Age of Neoliberalism (pp. 133–161). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Özyegin, G., (2018). Rethinking patriarchy through unpatriarchal male desires. In J. W. Messerschmidt et al. (Ed.), Gender reckonings: New social theory and research (pp. 233–253). New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parrott, F. R. (2014). ‘At the hospital I learnt the truth’: Diagnosing male infertility in rural Malawi. Anthropology & Medicine, 21(2), 174–188. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2014.915618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat, N., (2012). Concerned groups in the field of reproductive technologies: A Turkish case study. In M. Knecht et al. (Ed.), Reproductive technologies as global form. Ethnographies of knowledge, practices, and Transnational Encounters (pp. 197–226). Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Polat, N. (2018). Umkämpfte Wege der Reproduktion: Kinderwunschökonomien, Aktivismus und sozialer Wandel in der Türkei. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Polat, N., (in press). Navigating reproductive trajectories: Patriarchal paradoxes, biomedical promises and renegotiation of heterosexual femininities and masculinities. In A. D. Alkan et al. (Ed.), Reproduction, Maternity, sexuality: The politics of the female body in contemporary Turkey. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, A. (2014). The science/fiction of sex: Feminist deconstruction and the vocabularies of heterosex. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. (1996). Essays on the anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reimann, M. (2016). I was with my wife the entire time. Polish men’s narratives of IVF treatment. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society Online, 3, 120–125. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2016.08.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts, E. F. S. (2008). Biology, sociality and reproductive modernity in Ecuadorian in-vitro fertilization: The particulars of place. In S. Gibbon, & C. Novas (Eds.), Biosocialities, genetics, and the social Sciences: Making biologies and identities (pp. 79–97). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., & Novas, C. (2005). Biological Citizenship. In A. Ong, & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 439–463). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, D., & Faircloth, C. (2006). Medicalized masculinities. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sancar, S. (2008). Erkeklik: İmkansız İktidar. Ailede, Piyasada ve Sokakta Erkekler. Istanbul: Metis Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Scheibling, C. (2018). “Real heroes care”: How dad bloggers are reconstructing fatherhood and masculinities. Men and Masculinities, 23(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1177/1097184X18816506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, R. M., & Kazyak, E. (2016). Masculinities in cyberspace: An analysis of portrayals of manhood in men’s rights activist websites. Social Sciences, 5(2), 18. doi: 10.3390/socsci5020018
   Google Scholar
• Sökmen, S. (Ed.). (2004). Introduction: Erkeklik. In Erkeklik. Special issue: Erkeklik (vol. 101, pp. 3–7). Toplum ve Bilim.
   Google Scholar
• Speier, A. R. (2011). Brokers, consumers and the Internet: How North American consumers navigate their infertility Journeys. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 23(5), 592–599. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2005). Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Throsby, K., & Gill, R. (2004). “It’s different for men”: masculinity and IVF. Man and Masculinities, 6(1), 330–348. doi: 10.1177/1097184X03260958
   Google Scholar
• Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T. (2009). “It’s a bit unmanly in a way”: Men and infertility in Denmark. In M. Inhorn, T. T. Tine, G. Helena, M. l, & C. Mosegaard (Eds.), Reconceiving the second sex: Men, masculinity, and reproduction (pp. 226–252). New York, NY: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Yazıcı, B. (2012). The return to the family: Welfare, state, and politics of the family in Turkey. Anthropological Quarterly, 85(1), 103–140. doi: 10.1353/anq.2012.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar