Intersectionality and social justice in programs for boys and men

References

• Alcalde, M. C. (2014). An intersectional approach to Latino anti-violence engagement. Culture, Society and Masculinities, 6(1), 35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, J. A. (2018). Masculinity as cruel optimism. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 13(3-4), 175–190.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2018). APA guidelines for psychological practice with boys and men. Author. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/about/policy/psychological-practice-boys-men-guidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anwaruddin, S. (2016). Why critical literacy should turn to ‘the affective turn’: Making a case for critical affective literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 381–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. (2002). Trauma trails, recreating song lines: The transgenerational effects of trauma in indigenous Australia. North Melbourne: Spinifex Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. (1998). Privilege: Expanding on Marilyn Frye's “oppression”. Journal of Social Philosophy, 29, 104–119.
   Google Scholar
• Bandy, T. (2012). What works for male children and adolescents: Lessons from experimental evaluations of programs and interventions. Fact Sheet. Publication# 2012-22. Child Trends.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, L. (2020). Men who hate women. London: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berik, G., & Kongar, E. (2021). The Routledge handbook of feminist economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boler, M. (1997). The risks of empathy: Interrogating multiculturalism's gaze. Cultural Studies, 11(2), 253–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, E. A., Carlson, J., Fraguela-Rios, C., Kimball, E., Neugut, T. B., Tolman, R. M., & Edleson, J. L. (2013, January 16). Context, challenges, and tensions in global efforts to engage men in the prevention of violence against women: An ecological analysis. Men and Masculinities, 16(2), 228–251. doi:10.1177/1097184X12472336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, C., Kenway, J., & McLeod, J. (2000). Gender debates we still have to have. The Australian Educational Researcher, 27(3), 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2009). Foreword: Emerging intersections—building knowledge and transforming institutions. In B. T. Dill, & R. E. Zambrana (Eds.), Emerging intersections (pp. vi–xii). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. St. Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (2000). The men and the boys. St. Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
   Google Scholar
• Cutuli, J. J., Alderfer, M., & Marsac, M. (2019). Introduction to the special issue: Trauma-informed care for children and families. Psychological Services, 16(1), 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boise, S., & Hearn, J. (2017). Are men getting more emotion? Critical sociological perspectives on men, masculinities and emotions. The Sociological Review, 65(4), 779–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dharani, B., Vergo, O., & April, K. (2021). An intersectional approach to hegemonic masculinity and internal hegemony: A thematic analysis in South African men. Journal of Gender Studies, 30(3), 329–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill, B. T., & Zambrana, R. E. (2009). Critical thinking about inequality: An emerging lens. In B. T. Dill, & R. E. Zambrana (Eds.), Emerging intersections (pp. 1–21). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, S. L., Fleming, P. J., & Colvin, C. J. (2015, October 16). The promises and limitations of gender-transformative health programming with men: Critical reflections from the field. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(sup2), S128–S143. doi:10.1080/13691058.2015.1035751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Else-Quest, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Intersectionality in quantitative psychological research: I. Theoretical and epistemological issues. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enns, C., & Sinacore, A. (Eds.). (2005). Teaching and social justice: Integrating multicultural and feminist theories in the classroom. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). The role of men in gender equality: European strategies & insights. Luxembourg: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M., Haussegger, V., Halupka, M., & Rowe, P. (2018). From girls to men: Social attitudes to gender equality issues in Australia. 50/50 by 2030 Foundation (University of Canberra).
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M. (2010). Filling the glass: Gender perspectives on families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 420–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitz-Gibbon, K. (2020). Federal budget 2020: A funding fail for women on all fronts. Retrieved from https://lens.monash.edu/@politics-society/2020/10/08/1381494/federal-budget-2020-a-funding-fail-for-women-on-all-fronts
   Google Scholar
• Flood, M. (2019). Engaging men and boys in violence prevention. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2009a). Feminism, capitalism and the cunning of history. New Left Review, 56(March-April). Retrieved from http://newleftreview.org/II/56/nancy-fraser-feminism-capitalism-and-the-cunning-of-history
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2009b). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world (Vol. 31). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hankivsky, O. (2012). Women’s health, men’s health, and gender and health: Implications of intersectionality. Social Science & Medicine, 74(11), 1712–1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland, K., & McCready, S. (2007). Working with young Men. In M. Flood, J. Kegan Gardiner, B. Pease, & K. Pringle (Eds.), International encyclopedia of men and masculinities (pp. 654–656). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. (2012). Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, M. (2017). Problematizing military masculinity, intersectionality and male vulnerability in feminist critical military studies. Critical Military Studies, 3(2), 182–199.
   Google Scholar
• Hill-Collins, P., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Maiden: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, M. (2010). The emotionalization of reflexivity. Sociology, 44(1), 139–154.
   Google Scholar
• Holter, Ø, Svare, H., & Egeland, C. (2009). Gender equality and quality of life: A Norwegian perspective. Helsinki: The Nordic Gender Institute (NIKK).
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, E, Bassuk, E, & Olivet, J. (2010). Shelter from the storm: Trauma-informed care in homelessness services settings. The Open Health Services and Policy Journal, 3(2), 80–100.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado, A., & Sinha, M. (2008). More than men: Latino feminist masculinities and intersectionality. Sex Roles, 59(5-6), 337–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICRW. (2018). Gender equity and male engagement: It only works when everyone plays. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jewkes, R., Flood, M., & Lang, J. (2015). From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: A conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. The Lancet, 385(9977), 1580–1589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. (2012). Educating for diversity and social justice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. (2020). Engaging boys and young men in gender transformation: The possibilities and limits of a pedagogy of empathy. NORMA: Nordic Journal for Masculinity Studies, 15(2), 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Keddie, A., & Bartel, D. (2021). The affective intensities of gender transformative work: an actionable framework for facilitators working with boys and young men. Journal of Men and Masculinities, 24(5), 740–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A., & Mills, M. (2007). Teaching boys: Developing classroom practices that work. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Kelbert, A., & Hossain, N. (2014). Poor man's patriarchy: Gender roles and global crises. IDS Bulletin, 45(1), 20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenway, J., Kraack, A., & Hickey-Moody, A. (2006). Masculinities beyond the metropolis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. S. (2013). Angry White Men: American masculinity at the end of an era. New York, NY: Nation Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kukar, P. (2016). ‘The very unrecognizability of the other’. Edith Stein, Judith Butler, and the pedagogical challenge of empathy. Philosophical Inquiry in Education, 24(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, P. (1989, July/August). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Peace and Freedom.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, P. (2012). Reflections and future directions for privilege studies. Journal of Social Issues, 68(1), 194–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MenEngage Alliance. (2017). MenEngage global alliance strategic plan 2017–2020. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Messerschmidt, J. W. (2018). Hegemonic masculinity: Formulation, reformulation, and amplification. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Messner, M. A. (1997). Politics of masculinities: Men in movements. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Messner, M. A., Greenberg, M. A., & Peretz, T. (2015). Some men: Feminist allies and the movement to end violence against women. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M. (2003). Shaping the boys’ agenda: The backlash blockbusters. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7(1), 57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J. C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliffe, J. L., Rossnagel, E., Bottorff, J. L., Chambers, S. K., Caperchione, C., & Rice, S. M. (2020). Community-based men’s health promotion programs: Eight lessons learnt and their caveats. Health Promotion International, 35(5), 1230–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Our Watch. (2019). Men in focus: Unpacking masculinities and engaging men in the prevention of violence against women. Melbourne: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pease, B. (2012). Interrogating privileged subjectivities: Reflections on writing personal accounts of privilege. In M. Livholts (Ed.), Emergent writing methodologies in feminist studies (pp. 71–82). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pease, B. (2020). The rise of angry white men: Resisting populist masculinity and the backlash against gender equality. In C. Noble & G. Ottman (Eds.), The challenge of right-wing nationalist populism for social work (pp. 55–68). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peretz, T. (2017). Engaging diverse men: An intersectional analysis of men’s pathways to antiviolence activism. Gender & Society, 31(4), 526–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Promundo-US and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. (2018). Manhood 2.0: A curriculum promoting a gender-equitable future of manhood. Washington, DC: Promundo and University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Promundo-US & Plan International Canada. (2020). Role of facilitation in Gender transformative programs that engage men and boys. Washington, DC: Promundo.
   Google Scholar
• SDC. (2019). Engaging men and boys for gender transformation. Bern: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. (2021). Working-class masculinities in higher education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, E., Heise, L., & McLean, L. (2018, September 2). The doing and undoing of male household decision-making and economic authority in Rwanda and its implications for gender transformative programming. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 20(9), 976–991. doi:10.1080/13691058.2017.1404642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strid, S., Walby, S., & Armstrong, J. (2013). Intersectionality and multiple inequalities: Visibility in British policy on violence against women. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 20(4), 558–581.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. (2017). Masculinities in contemporary American culture: An intersectional approach to the complexities and challenges of male identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waling, A. (2019a). White masculinity in contemporary Australia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waling, A. (2019b). Rethinking masculinity studies: Feminism, masculinity, and poststructural accounts of agency and emotional reflexivity. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 27(1), 89–107.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver-Hightower, M. (2003). The ‘boy turn’ in research on gender and education. Review of Educational Research, 73(4), 471–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, L., Flood, M., Boutilier, S., Goulet, S., & Dozois, E. (2020). Supporting best practices: Guidelines for funding programs that engage and mobilize men and boys in violence prevention. Shift: The Project to End Domestic Violence and Alberta Council of Women’s Shelters.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2013). Critical pedagogy and emotion: Working through ‘troubled knowledge’ in posttraumatic contexts. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 176–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar