‘I want to own myself:’ digital bordering, migrant masculinities, and the politics of refusal

References

• Affleck, W., Thamotharampillai, U., Jeyakumar, J., & Whitley, R. (2018). “If one does not fulfil his duties, he must not be a man”: Masculinity, mental health and resilience amongst Sri Lankan Tamil refugee Men in Canada. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 42(4), 840–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, J. A. (2018). Masculinity as cruel optimism. Norma, 13(3-4), 175–190.
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, C. (2022). Experimentality, surplus data and the politics of debilitation in borderzones. Geopolitics, 27(1), 26–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artero, M., & Fontanari, E. (2021). Obstructing lives: local borders and their structural violence in the asylum field of post-2015 Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(3), 631–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassar, L. (2022). Migrant visits over time: Ethnographic returning and the technological turn. Global Networks.
   Google Scholar
• Belloni, M. (2020). When the phone stops ringing: On the meanings and causes of disruptions in communication between Eritrean refugees and their families back home. Global Networks, 20(2), 256–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia, M., & Canning, V.2021). Stealing time: Migration, temporalities and state violence. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Bhungalia, L. (2020). Laughing at power: Humor, transgression, and the politics of refusal in Palestine. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 38(3), 387–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biner, ZÖ, & Biner, Ö. (2021). Introduction: On the politics of waiting. Social Anthropology, 29(3), 787–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccagni, P. (2017). Aspirations and the subjective future of migration: Comparing views and desires of the “time ahead” through the narratives of immigrant domestic workers. Comparative Migration Studies, 5(1), 1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cabot, H. (2014). On the doorstep of Europe: Asylum and citizenship in Greece. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Genova, N. (2002). Migrant “illegality” and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 419–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eide, E. (2019). The cell phone as a co-traveller: Refugees and the multi-functions of cell phones. Inclusive consumption: Immigrants’ access to and use of public and private goods and services. Oslo: Oslo Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, M. (2015). “Here, Man Is nothing!”. Men and Masculinities, 18(4), 468–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hage, G. (2009). Waiting out the crisis: On stuckedness and governmentality. Anthropological Theory, 5(1), 463–475.
   Google Scholar
• Ingvars, ÁK, & Gíslason, I. V. (2018). Moral mobility. Men and Masculinities, 21(3), 383–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaji, R. (2009). Masculinity on unstable ground: Young refugee men in Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of Refugee Studies, 22(2), 177–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilkey, M., Plomien, A., & Perrons, D. (2014). Migrant men's fathering narratives, practices and projects in national and transnational spaces: Recent Polish male migrants to London. International Migration, 52(1), 178–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukreja, R. (2021). Migration has stripped US of our manhood: Contradictions of failed masculinity among South Asian male migrants in Greece. Men and Masculinities, 24(2), 307–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latonero, M., & Kift, P. (2018). On digital passages and borders: Refugees and the new infrastructure for movement and control. Social Media+ Society, 4(1), 2056305118764432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, L. (2011). Is Europe turning into a ‘technological fortress’? Innovation and technology for the management of EU’s external borders: Reflections on FRONTEX and EUROSUR. In Regulating technological innovation (pp. 131–151). London.: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McGranahan, C. (2016). Refusal and the gift of citizenship. Cultural Anthropology, 31(3), 334–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedelcu, M., & Soysüren, I. (2022). Precarious migrants, migration regimes and digital technologies: the empowerment-control nexus. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(8), 1821–1837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newhouse, L. S. (2021). On not seeking asylum: Migrant masculinities and the politics of refusal. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 120, 176–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar, A. (2019). Policing migration and racial technologies. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(4), 938–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar, A. (2020). Borders as mirrors: Racial hierarchies and policing migration. Critical Criminology, 28(2), 175–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasse-Freeman, E. (2022). Resistance/refusal: Politics of manoeuvre under diffuse regimes of governmentality. Anthropological Theory, 22(1), 102–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prothmann, S. (2018). Migration, masculinity and social class: Insights from Pikine, Senegal. International Migration, 56(4), 96–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pustułka, P., Struzik, J., & Ślusarczyk, M. (2015). Caught between breadwinning and emotional provisions - the case of Polish migrant fathers in Norway. Studia Humanistyczne AGH, 14(2).
   Google Scholar
• Scheel, S. (2019). Autonomy of migration?: Appropriating mobility within biometric border regimes. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shield, A. D. (2019). Immigrants on Grindr: Race, sexuality and belonging online. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. (2014). Mohawk interruptus: Political life across the borders of settler states. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sobo, E. J. (2016). Theorizing (vaccine) refusal: through the looking glass. Cultural Anthropology, 31(3), 342–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M. (2019). Refugees’ debit cards, subjectivities, and data circuits: Financial-humanitarianism in the Greek migration laboratory. International Political Sociology, 13(4), 392–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckett, A. (2020). Rules, paper, status: Migrants and precarious bureaucracy in contemporary Italy. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Houtum, H. (2021). Beyond ‘borderism’: Overcoming discriminative B/ordering and othering. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 112(1), 34–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio, F., & Gerard, A.2018). Entrapping asylum seekers: Social, legal and economic precariousness. Springer.
   Google Scholar