704
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Inclusion and budget cuts – The contours of educational psychology in the marketplace

&

References

  • AinscowM. (1999). Understanding the development of inclusive schools. London: Falmer Press.
  • AinscowM., BoothT., & DysonA. (2006). Improving schools, developing inclusion. London: Routledge.
  • ArnesenA. L., & LundahlL. (2006). Still social and democratic? Inclusive education policies in the Nordic welfare states. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 285–300.
  • BowlbyJ. (1953). Child care and the growth of love. London: Penguin Books.
  • DanzigerK. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.
  • DaviesB., & BanselP. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259.
  • DennisR. (2004). So far so good? A qualitative case study exploring the implementation of consultation in schools. Educational Psychology in Practice, 20(1), 17–29.
  • DysonA. (1999). Inclusion and inclusions: Theories and discourses in inclusive education. In H.Daniels & P.Garner (Eds.), World yearbook of education 1999: Inclusive education (pp. 36–53). London: Kogan.
  • Economy (2008). Oxford English Dictionary (2008): The definitive record of the English language. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • EgelundN. (2011). Folkeskolens udfordringer[Challenges to public school]. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
  • FarrellP. (2004). School psychologists: Making inclusion a reality for all. School Psychology International, 25, 5–19.
  • FarrellP. (2006). Developing inclusive practices among educational psychologists: Problems and possibilities. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XXL(3), 293–304.
  • FarrellP. (2009). The developing role of school and educational psychologists in supporting children, schools and families. Papeles del Psicólogico, 30(1), 74–85.
  • FarrellP. (2010). School psychology: Learning lessons from history and moving forward. School Psychology International, 31(6), 581–598.
  • ForlinC. (2010). The role of the school psychologist in inclusive education for ensuring quality learning outcomes for all learners. School Psychology International, 31, 617–630.
  • GiorgiA. (1994). A phenomenological perspective on certain research methods. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 25, 190–220.
  • HansenM. N. (2011). Et paradigmeskifte i PPR? Et mixed-method studie af praksis og tankeformer i pædagogisk-psykologiske vurderinger af børn [A paradigm shift in educational psychology practice?]. Master Thesis, Aalborg University, Denmark.
  • HansenK. V., SchiøttzL., PedersenG., LentzJ., & AhrensborgR. (2002). Temanummer: Konsultation – et udviklingsprojekt på PPR i København. [Development of consultation]. Pædagogisk Psykologisk Rådgivning, 1, 5–117.
  • JohannessonI. A., LindbladS., & SimolaH. (2002). An inevitable progress? Educational restructuring in Finland, Iceland and Sweden at the turn of the millennium. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46(3), 325–339.
  • KvaleS. (1976). The psychology of learning as ideology and technology. Behaviorism, 4, 97–116.
  • KvaleS. (2003). The church, the factory and the market: Scenarios for psychology in a postmodern age. Theory & Psychology, 13(5), 579–603.
  • KvaleS., & BrinkmanS. (2009). InterViews. Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • LeadbetterJ. (2006). Investigating and conceptualising the notion of consultation to facilitate multi-agency work. Educational Psychology in Practice, 22(1), 19–31.
  • LentzJ., BundgaardC., & RasmussenO. V. (2010). Uddannelse af PPR i consultative praksisformer i Københavns Kommune. [Consultative education in the municipality of Copenhagen]. Pædagogisk Psykologisk Tidsskrift, 47(5), 396–408.
  • LundH. H. (2012). Inklusionens økonomi er en spareøvelse [The economy of inclusion is a saving exercise]. Dansk Pædagogisk Tidsskrift, 4(12), 17–22.
  • MeyersA. B., MeyersJ., GraybillE. C., ProctorS. L., & HuddlestonL. (2012). Ecological approaches to organizational consultation and systems change in educational settings. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 22, 106–124.
  • NielsenK. (2006). Learning to do things with things: Apprenticeship in bakery as economy and social practice. In A.Costall & O.Dreier (Eds.), Doing things with things. Abingdon: Ashgate.
  • NielsenK., & TanggaardL. (2011). Pædagogisk psykologi – en grundbog[Educational psychology – a textbook]. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
  • PedersenO. K. (2011). Konkurrencestaten[The competition state]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
  • PedersenM. (2012). The tyranny of scarcity: Learning and economy at the construction site. Journal of Education and Work, 1–17. doi:10.1080/13639080.2012.751092.
  • PolkinghorneD. (2000). Psychological inquiry and the pragmatic and the hermeneutic traditions. Theory and Psychology, 10, 453–479.
  • SheridanS., WelchM., & OrmeS. F. (1996). Is consultation effective? A review of outcome research. Remedial and Special Education, 17(6), 341–354.
  • SommerD. (1992). Children's living conditions, secular changes and childhood mythology. Educare in Europe, Report of the Conference held in Denmark, UNESCO.
  • StrandH. (2005). Nye tanke- og praksisformer i PPR-arbejdet [New thoughts and practices in educational psychology practice]. Pædagogisk psykologisk rådgivning, 5–6, 695–709.
  • SzuleviczT. (2013a). Forståelsen af indlæringsvanskeligheder og implikationer for PPR-praksis. [The understanding of learning disabilities and implications for educational psychology practice]. Pædagogisk-Psykologisk Tidsskrift, 50(1), 39–50.
  • SzuleviczT. (2013b). Hvori består det psykologiske i pædagogisk-psykologi? [What is psychological about educational psychology?]. Psyke & Logos, 34, 463–480.
  • TanggaardL. (2006). Læringsbaner i PPR [Learning trajectories in educational counseling]. Temahæfteserie: Pædagogisk Psykologisk Rådgivning. Årgang43(5), 459–473.
  • ThomasG. (1997). Inclusive schools for an inclusive society. British Journal of Special Education, 24(3), 103–107.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.