The ability of psychologists, lawyers and psychology students to predict children's performance in memory and suggestibility experiments

References

• BjorklundD. F., BjorklundB. R., Douglas BrownR., & CasselW. S. (1998). Children's susceptibility to repeated questions: How misinformation changes children's answers and their minds. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 99–111.
   Google Scholar
• BruckM., CeciS. J., FrancoeurE., & BarrR. (1995). “I hardly cried when I got my shot!” – Influencing children's reports about a visit to their pediatrician. Child Development, 66, 193–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BruckM., CeciS. J., FrancouerE., & RenickA. (1995). Anatomically detailed dolls do not facilitate preschoolers’ reports of a pediatric examination involving genital touching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 95–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BruckM., CeciS. J., & HembrookeH. (2002). The nature of children's true and false narratives. Developmental Review, 22, 520–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CeciS. J., & BruckM. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CeciS. J., & BruckM. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children's testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• CederborgA-C., OrbachY., SternbergK. J., & LambM. E. (2000). Investigative interviews of child witnesses in Sweden. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1613–1621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DaviesG. M., WestcottH. L., & HoranN. (2000). The impact of questioning style on the content of investigative interviews with suspected child sexual abuse victims. Psychology, Crime and Law, 6, 81–97. doi:10.1080/10683160008410834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DawesR. (1994). House of cards – Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• EdwardsW., & von WinterfeldtD. (1986). On cognitive illusions and their implications. Southern California Law Review, 59, 401–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EisenM. L., GoodmanG. S., QinJ., DavisS., & CraytonJ. (2007). Maltreated children's memory: Accuracy, suggestibility, and psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1275–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EndresJ., PoggenpohlC., & ErbenC. (1999). Repetitions, warnings and video: Cognitive and motivational components in preschool children's suggestibility. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 129–146.
   Google Scholar
• EversonM. D., BoatB. W., SherriesB., & RobertsonK. R. (1996). Beliefs among professionals about rates of false allegations of child sexual abuse. Journal of interpersonal violence, 4, 541–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnilä-TuohimaaK. (2009). Expertise and decision making among clinicians in investigations of alleged sexual abuse. Doctoral Dissertation, Turun Yliopisto, Turku.
   Google Scholar
• Finnilä-TuohimaaK., SanttilaP., SainioM., NiemiP., & SandnabbaK. (2005). Connections between experience, beliefs, scientific knowledge, and self-evaluated expertise among investigators of child sexual abuse in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarbH. N. (1989). Clinical judgment, clinical training, and professional experience. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 387–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarvenS., WoodJ. M., MalpassR. S., & ShawJ. S.III (1998). More than suggestion: The effect of interviewing techniques from the McMartin preschool case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 347–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoodmanG. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: A modern history and contemporary commentary. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 811–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GroveW. M., ZaldD. H., LebowB. S., SnitzB. E., & NelsonC. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KassinS. M., EllsworthP., & SmithV. L. (1989). The “general acceptance” of psychological research on eyewitness testimony. American Psychologist, 44, 1089–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KassinS. M., TubbV. A., HoschH. M., & MemonA. (2001). On the “general acceptance” of eyewitness testimony research: A new survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 56, 405–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KorkmanJ. (2006). How (not) to interview children – Interviews with young children in sexual abuse investigations in Finland. Doctoral Dissertation, Åbo Akademi Universtiy, Turku.
   Google Scholar
• KorkmanJ., SanttilaP., & SandnabbaN. K. (2006). Dynamics of verbal interaction between interviewer and child in interviews with alleged victims of sexual abuse. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 109–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KorkmanJ., SanttilaP., WesteråkerM., & SandnabbaK. (2008). Interviewing techniques and follow-up questions in child sexual abuse interviews. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 108–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KoveraM. B., & BorgidaE. (1997). Expert testimony in child sexual abuse trials: The admissibility of psychological science. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, S105–S129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LambM. E., SternbergK. J., OrbachY., HershkowitzI., HorowitzD., & EsplinP. W. (2002). The effects of intensive training and ongoing supervision on the quality of investigative interviews with alleged sex abuse victims. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 114–125.
   Google Scholar
• LeichtmanM. D., & CeciS. J. (1995). The effects of stereotypes and suggestions on preschoolers’ reports. Developmental Psychology, 31, 568–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MagnussenS., AnderssonJ., CornoldiC., De BeniR., EndestadT., GoodmanG. S., & …ZimmerH. (2006). What people believe about memory. Memory, 14, 595–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffB. D., & KoveraM. B. (2007). Estimating the effects of misleading information on witness accuracy: Can experts tell jurors something they don't already know?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 849–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MelinderA., GoodmanG. S., EilertsenD. E., & MagnussenS. (2004). Beliefs about child witnesses: A survey of professionals. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 347–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorisonS., & GreeneE. (1992). Juror and expert knowledge of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 595–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OtgaarH., CandelI., MerckelbachH., & WadeK. A. (2009). Abducted by a UFO: Prevalence information affects young children's false memories for an implausible event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Övreeide (2003). Yrkesetik i psykologiskt arbete. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• PezdekK., & HodgeD. (1999). Planting false childhood memories in children: The role of event plausibility. Child Development, 70, 887–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PipeM-A., LambM. E., OrbachY., & EsplinP. W. (2004). Recent research on children's testimony about experienced and witnessed events. Developmental Review, 24, 440–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PooleD. A., & LindsayD. S. (1995). Interviewing preschoolers: Effects of nonsuggestive techniques, parental coaching, and leading questions on reports of nonexperienced events. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 129–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PooleD. A., & LindsayD. S. (2001). Children's eyewitness reports after exposure to misinformation from parents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 27–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PooleD. A., & WhiteL. T. (1991). Effects of questions repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27, 975–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PooleD. A., & WhiteL. T. (1993). Two years later: Effects of question repetition and retention interval on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 29, 844–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrincipeG. P., KanayaT., CeciS. J., & SinghM. (2006). Believing is seeing: How rumors can engender false memories in preschoolers. Psychological Science, 17, 243–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QuasJ. A., GoodmanG. S., BidroseS., PipeM-E., CrawS., & AblinD. S. (1999). Emotion and memory: children's long-term remembering, forgetting, and suggestibility. Journal of experimental child psychology, 72, 235–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QuasJ. A., ThompsonW. C., & Clarke-StewartK. A. (2005). Do jurors “know” what isn't so about child witnesses?Law and Human Behavior, 29, 425–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RudyL., & GoodmanG. S. (1991). Effects of participation on children's reports: Implications for testimony. Developmental Psychology, 27, 527–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SaywitzK. J., GoodmanG. S., NicholasE., & MoanS. F. (1991). Children's memory of a physical examination involving genital touch: Implications for reports of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 682–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe ClevelandE., & ReeseE. (2008). Children remember early childhood: Long-term recall across the offset of childhood amnesia. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 127–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van AbbemaD. L., & BauerP. J. (2005). Autobiographical memory in middle childhood: Recollections of the recent and distant past. Memory, 13, 829–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WrightD. B., HanoteauF., ParkinsonC., & TathamA. (2010). Perceptions about memory reliability and honesty for children of 3–18 years old. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 195–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar