Argument and Ethnopolitical Conflict

REFERENCES

• Arreguin-Toft , I. 2007 . How the weak win wars—a theory of asymmetric conflict . International Security , 26 : 93 – 128 .
   Google Scholar
• Bohman , J. 2007 . Political communication and the epistemic value of diversity: Deliberation and legitimation in media societies . Communication Theory , 17 : 348 – 355 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brahm, E. (2003). Conflict stages. In G. Burgess & H. Burgess (Eds.), Beyond intractability. Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Available from http://www. beyondintractability.org/essay/conflict_stages/
   Google Scholar
• Brass , P. 1996 . “ Ethnic groups and ethnic identity formation ” . In Ethnicity , Edited by: Hutchinson , J. and Smith , A. 85 – 90 . Oxford, , England : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. 1989 . Manual for coding conversational argument , Unpublished manuscript, Pennsylvania State University .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Brossmann , J. E. , Brossmann , B. G. and Weger , H. 1995 . Toward a theory of minimally rational argument: Analyses of episode-specific effects of argument structures . Communication Monographs , 62 : 183 – 212 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis , D. G. 2006 . Transforming conflict: Communication and ethnopolitical conflict , Boulder, CO : Rowman and Littlefield .
   Google Scholar
• Ellis , D. G. and Maoz , I. 2002 . Cross-cultural argument interactions between Israeli-Jews and Palestinians . Journal of Applied Communication Research , 30 : 181 – 194 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis , D. G. and Maoz , I. 2007 . Online argument between Israeli Jews and Palestinians . Human Communication Research , 33 : 291 – 309 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-White , F. 2001 . Are ethnic groups biological species to the human brain? Essentialism in human cognition of some social groups . Current Anthropology , 42 : 515 – 554 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas , J. 1984 . The theory of communicative action. Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society , Edited by: McCarthy , T. Boston : Beacon Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hertz-Lazarowitz , R. and Eden , D. 2002 . “ Israel: Empowering Arab and Jew—school leadership in Acre ” . In Peace education , Edited by: Salomon , G. and Nevo , B. 209 – 216 . Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Huspek , M. 2007 . Normative potentials of rhetorical action within deliberative democracies . Communication Theory , 37 : 356 – 366 .
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs , S. and Jackson , S. 1983 . Strategy and structure in conversational influence attempts . Communication Monographs , 50 : 285 – 304 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz , I. and Ellis , D. G. 2001 . Going to ground: Argument in Israeli-Jewish and Palestinian encounter groups . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 34 : 399 – 419 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz , I. and Ellis , D. G. 2006 . “ Facilitating groups in severe conflict: The case of transformational dialogue between Israeli-Jews and Palestinians ” . In Facilitating group communication in context: Innovations and applications with natural groups , Edited by: Frey , L. 183 – 203 . Cresskill, NJ : Hampton Press .
   Google Scholar
• Maoz , I. and Ellis , D. G. 2008 . Intergroup communication as a predictor of Jewish-Israeli agreement with integrative solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: The mediating effects of out-group trust and guilt . Journal of Communication , 58 : 490 – 507 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin , G. 2006 . Understanding terrorism: Challenges, perspectives, and issues , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• McAuley , J. W. , McGlynn , C. and Tonge , J. 2008 . Conflict resolution in asymmetric and symmetric situations. Northern Ireland as a case study . Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict , 1 : 88 – 102 .
   Google Scholar
• Mutz , D. C. 1998 . Impersonal influence , Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Mutz , D.C. 2006 . Hearing the other side , Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Perelman , C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca , L. 1969 . The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation , Edited by: Wilkinson , J. and Weaver , P. Notre Dame, IN : University of Notre Dame Press . (Original work published 1958)
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew , T. F. . Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research . Paper presented to Contact 50 Conference . South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew , T. F. and Tropp , L. R. 2000 . “ Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings ” . In Reducing prejudice and discrimination , Edited by: Oskamp , S. 93 – 114 . Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew , T. F. and Tropp , L. R. 2006 . A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 90 : 751 – 783 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn , D. , Wilkenfeld , J. , Smarick , K. and Asal , A. 2006 . Power play: Mediation in symmetric and asymmetric international crises . International Interactions , 32 : 441 – 470 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls , J. 1999 . A theory of justice , Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Schudson , M. 1997 . Why conversation is not the soul of democracy . Critical Studies in Mass Communication , 14 : 297 – 309 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. and Lemus , D. R. 2005 . “ Argument quality in group deliberation: A structurational approach and quality of argument index ” . In Critical problems in argumentation , Edited by: Willard , C. A. 203 – 215 . Washington, DC : National Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro , I. 2003 . The state of democratic theory , Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Simon , H. 1983 . Models of bounded rationality , Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2004). Group judgments: Deliberation, statistical means, and information markets. University of Chicago Public Law Working Paper No. 72. Available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=578301
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin , S. 1958 . The uses of argument , Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Wittes , T. C. 2005 . “ Conclusion: Culture as an intervening variable ” . In How Israelis and Palestinians negotiate , Edited by: Wittes , T. C. 133 – 148 . Washington, DC : United States Institute of Peace .
   Google Scholar