Using the Conversation Argument Coding Scheme to Examine Interpersonal Conflict: Insights and Challenges

REFERENCES

• Bach , G. R. and Wyden , P. 1972 . The intimate enemy: How to fight fair in love and marriage , New York : Avon Books .
   Google Scholar
• Brashers , D. E. , Adkins , M. and Meyers , R. A. 1994 . “ Argumentation and computer-mediated group decision making ” . In Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups , Edited by: Frey , L. R. 263 – 282 . Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. 1992 . Manual for coding conversational arguments , Unpublished manuscript .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Brossmann , J. E. , Brossmann , B. G. and Weger , H. Jr. 1995 . Toward a theory of minimally rational argument. Analyses of episode-specific effects of argument structures . Communication Monographs , 62 : 183 – 212 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. and Sillars , A. 1992 . “ Argument in satisfied and dissatisfied married couples ” . In Readings in argumentation , Edited by: Benoit , W. L. , Hample , D. and Benoit , P. J. 737 – 764 . New York : Foris .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. and Spitzberg , B. H. 1987 . Appropriateness and effectiveness perceptions of conflict strategies . Human Communication Research , 14 : 93 – 118 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Weger , H. and Stafford , L. 1991 . Couples' argument sequences and their associations with relational characteristics . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 55 : 159 – 179 .
   Google Scholar
• Caughlin , J. P. and Vangelisti , A. L. 2006 . “ Conflict in dating and marital relationships ” . In The SAGE handbook of conflict communication: Integrating theory, research, and practice , Edited by: Oetzel , J. G. and Ting-Toomey , S. 129 – 158 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Ellis , D. G. and Maoz , I. 2007 . Online argument between Israeli Jews and Palestinians . Human Communication Research , 33 : 291 – 309 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottman , J. M. 1994 . What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes , Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero , L. K. , Andersen , P. A. and Afifi , W. A. 2007 . Close encounters: Communication in relationships , 2nd , Los Angeles : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Hample , D. 2005 . Arguing: Exchanging reasons face to face , Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Infante , D. A. , Chandler , T. A. and Rudd , J. E. 1989 . Test of an argumentative skill deficiency model of interpersonal violence . Communication Monographs , 56 : 163 – 177 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson , A. J. . Public issue versus personal issue arguments: Factors which affect public issue arguments in friendships . Paper presented to the Interpersonal Communication Division of the International Communication Association for their annual meeting at Acapulco . Mexico. June ,
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , A. J. 2002 . Beliefs about arguing: A comparison of public issue and personal issue arguments . Communication Reports , 15 : 99 – 112 .
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , A. J. , Brown , K. and Wittenberg , E. M. 2005 . “ Type of argument and argument composition ” . In Critical problems in argumentation , Edited by: Willard , C. A. 577 – 586 . Washington, DC : National Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Knapp , M. L. , Daly , J. A. , Albada , K. F. and Miller , G. R. 2002 . “ Background and current trends in the study of interpersonal communication ” . In Handbook of interpersonal communication , Edited by: Knapp , M. L. and Daly , J. A. 3 – 20 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Legge , N. J. 1992 . “What did you mean by that?”: The functions of perceptions in interpersonal argument . Argumentation and Advocacy , 29 : 41 – 60 .
   Google Scholar
• Lemus , D. R. , Seibold , D. R. , Flanagin , A. J. and Metzger , M. J. 2004 . Argument and decision making in computer-mediated groups . Journal of Communication , 54 : 302 – 320 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine , T. R. and Boster , F. J. 1996 . The impact of self and others' argumentativeness on talk about controversial issues . Communication Quarterly , 44 : 345 – 358 .
   Google Scholar
• Miller , G. R. and Steinberg , M. 1975 . Between people: A new analysis of interpersonal communication , Chicago : Science Research Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Miller , K. 2002 . Communication theories: Perspectives, processes, and contexts , New York : McGraw Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Newell , S. E. and Stutman , R. K. . Interpersonal disagreement: The study of social confrontation . Argument in transition: Proceedings of the third SCA/AFA conference on argumentation . Annandale, VA. Edited by: Zarefsky , D. , Sillars , M. O. and Rhodes , J. Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D. J. 1977 . Two concepts of argument . Journal of the American Forensic Association , 13 : 121 – 128 .
   Google Scholar
• Poole , M. S. , Seibold , D. R. and McPhee , R. D. 1996 . “ The structuration of group decisions ” . In Communication and group decision-making , 2nd , Edited by: Hirokawa , R. Y. and Poole , M. S. 114 – 146 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Putnam , L. L. 2006 . “ Definitions and approaches to conflict and communication ” . In The SAGE handbook of conflict communication: Integrating theory, research, and practice , Edited by: Oetzel , J. G. and Ting-Toomey , S. 1 – 32 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Roloff , M. E. and Ifert , D. E. 1998 . Antecedents and consequences of explicit agreements to declare a topic taboo in dating relationships . Personal Relationships , 5 : 191 – 206 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roloff , M. E. and Soule , K. P. 2002 . “ Interpersonal conflict: A review ” . In Handbook of interpersonal communication , Edited by: Knapp , M. L. and Daly , J. A. 475 – 528 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt , J. 2007 . Blogging practices: An analytical framework . Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 12 : 1409 – 1427 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. , McPhee , R. D. , Poole , M. S. , Tanita , N. and Canary , D. J. 1981 . “ Argument, group influence, and decision outcomes ” . In Dimensions of argument: Proceedings from the second summer conference on argumentation , Edited by: Ziegelmuller , G. and Rhodes , J. 663 – 692 . Annandale, VA : Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. and Meyers , R. A. 2007 . Group argument: A structuration perspective and research program . Small Group Research , 38 : 312 – 336 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semic , B. A. and Canary , D. J. 1997 . Trait argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and minimally rational argument: An observational analysis of friendship discussions . Communication Quarterly , 45 : 355 – 378 .
   Google Scholar
• Stewart , C. O. , Setlock , L. D. and Fussell , S. R. 2007 . Conversational argumentation in decision making: Chinese and U. S. participants in face-to-face and instant-messaging interactions . Discourse Processes , 44 : 113 – 139 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapp , R. and Hoff , N. 1985 . A model of serial argument in interpersonal relationships . Journal of the American Forensic Association , 22 : 1 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• Vuchinich , S. 1987 . Starting and stopping spontaneous family conflicts . Journal of Marriage and the Family , 49 : 591 – 601 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuchinich , S. , Emery , R. E. and Cassidy , J. 1988 . Family members as third parties in dyadic family conflict: Strategies, alliances, and outcomes . Child Development , 59 : 1293 – 1302 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther , J. B. 2006 . “ Nonverbal dynamics in computer-mediated communication, or and the net 's with you, and you alone ” . In The SAGE handbook of nonverbal communication , Edited by: Manusov , V. and Peterson , M. L. 461 – 480 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Weger , H. Jr. and Canary , D. J. . A closer look at argument in romantic dyads . Argument in controversy: Proceedings of the SCA/AFA seventh conference on argumentation . Annandale, VA. Edited by: Parson , D. W. pp. 211 – 216 . Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Wilson , S. R. 1990 . Development and test of a cognitive rules model of interaction goals . Communication Monographs , 57 : 81 – 103 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson , S. R. 1995 . Elaborating the cognitive rules model of interaction goals: The problem of accounting for individual differenced in goal formation . Communication Yearbook , 18 : 3 – 25 .
   Google Scholar
• Xenos , M. 2008 . New mediated deliberation: Blog and press coverage of the Alito nomination . Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 13 : 485 – 503 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar