Using Multiple Coding Schemes to Understand Argument in In the Jury Room

REFERENCES

• Brossman , B. G. and Canary , D. J. 1990 . An observational analysis of argument structures: The case of Nightline . Argumentation , 4 : 199 – 212 .
   Google Scholar
• Burnett , A. B. and Badzinski , D. M. 2000 . An exploratory study of argument in the jury decision-making process . Communication Quarterly , 48 : 380 – 396 .
   Google Scholar
• Burnett , A. B. and Badzinski , D. M. 2005 . Judge nonverbal communication on trial: Do jurors notice? . Journal of Communication , 55 : 209 – 224 .
   Google Scholar
• Burnett , A. , Ocana , A. and Shumate , M. . Jury argument patterns . Paper presented at the National Communication Association convention . Chicago, IL. November ,
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Brossmann , B. G. and Seibold , D. R. 1987 . Argument structures in decision-making groups . The Southern Speech Communication Journal , 53 : 18 – 37 .
   Google Scholar
• Canary , D. J. , Tanita-Ratledge , N. and Seibold , D. R. . Argument and group decision making: Development of a coding scheme . Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention . Louisville, KY. November ,
   Google Scholar
• Cline , R. J. and Cline , T. R. 1980 . A structural analysis of risky-shift and cautious-shift discussions: The diffusion-of-responsibility theory . Communication Quarterly , 28 : 26 – 36 .
   Google Scholar
• Guetzkow , H. 1950 . Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data . Journal of Clinical Psychology , 60 : 47 – 58 .
   Google Scholar
• Kalven , H. and Zeisel , H. 1966 . The American jury , Boston : Little, Brown .
   Google Scholar
• Landis , J. R. and Koch , G. G. 1977 . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data . Biometrics , 33 : 159 – 174 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. . Argument and group decision making research: Implications and applications . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association . Atlanta, GA. November ,
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. and Brashers , D. E. 1995 . “ Multi-stage versus single-stage coding of small group argument: A preliminary comparative assessment ” . In Argumentation and values: Proceedings of the ninth SCA/AFA conference on argumentation , Edited by: Jackson , S. 93 – 100 . Annandale, VA : Speech Communication Association .
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. and Brashers , D. E. 1998 . Argument in group decision making: Explicating a process model and investigating the argument-outcome link . Communication Monographs , 65 : 261 – 281 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. , Brashers , D. E. and Jerzak , J. . Majority/minority influence: Identifying argumentative patterns and predicting argument-outcome links . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association . New York.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers , R. A. , Seibold , D. R. and Brashers , D. 1991 . Argument in initial group decision-making discussions: Refinement of a coding scheme and a descriptive quantitative analysis . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 55 : 47 – 68 .
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D. J. 1977 . Two concepts of argument . Journal of the American Forensic Association , 13 : 121 – 128 .
   Google Scholar
• Pettus , A. B. 1990 . The verdict is in: A study of jury decision making factors, moment of personal decision, and jury deliberations — from the jurors' point of view . Communication Quarterly , 38 : 83 – 97 .
   Google Scholar
• Rieke , R. D. and Stutman , R. K. 1990 . Communication in legal advocacy , Columbia : University of South Carolina Press .
   Google Scholar
• Saks , M. J. 1997 . What do jury experiments tell us about how juries (should) make decisions? . Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal , 6 : 1 – 53 .
   Google Scholar
• Seibold , D. R. and Meyers , R. A. 2007 . Group argument: A structuration perspective and research program . Small Group Research , 38 : 312 – 336 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semic , B. A. and Canary , D. J. 1997 . Trait argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and minimally rational argument: An observational analysis of friendship discussions . Communication Quarterly , 45 : 355 – 378 .
   Google Scholar
• Wheelan , S. A. , Verdi , A. F. and McKeage , R. 1994 . The group development observation system: Origins and applications , Philadelphia : PEP Press .
   Google Scholar