The Cognitive Learning Measure: A Three-Study Examination of Validity

REFERENCES

• Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo ( Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 ( pp. 543–599). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., & Anderson, J. (1982). Affective assessment is necessary and possible. Educational Leadership, 39, 524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew, J., & Taylor, C. (2012). Follow-up evaluation of a course to develop effective communication and relationship skills for palliative care. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 18, 457–463.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aylor, B., & Oppliger, P. (2003). Out-of-class communication and student perceptions of instructor humor orientation and socio-communicative style. Communication Education, 52, 122–134. doi:10.1080/03634520302469
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D. W., DeWalt, D. A., Schillinger, D., Hawk, V., Ruo, B., Bibbins-Domingo, K., … Pignone, M. (2011). “Teach to goal”: Theory and design principles of an intervention to improve heart failure self-management skills of patients with low health literacy. Journal of Health Communication, 16, 73–88. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.604379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baucom, D. H., Atkins, D. C., Hahlweg, K., Engi, J., & Thurrnaier, F. (2006). Long-term prediction of marital quality following a relationship education program: Being positive in a constructive way. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 448–455. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankenstein, F., Dolmans, D. M., Vleuten, C., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Which cognitive processes support learning during small-group discussion? The role of providing explanations and listening to others. Instructional Science, 39, 189–204. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9124-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: MaKay.
   Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2010). Transformational leadership in the classroom: The development and validation of the student intellectual stimulation scale. Communication Reports, 23, 91–105. doi:10.1080/08934215.2010.511399
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). The relationship between students’ reports of learning and their actual recall of lecture. Communication Education, 49, 297–301. doi:10.1080/03634520009379217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. A. (2002) Learning outcomes: The bottom line. Communication Education, 51, 396– 404.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S. J., & Bissell, K. L. (2002). Student self-efficacy in a media writing course. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 56, 19–36. doi:10.1177/107769580205600403
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1995). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. doi:10.1037/h0040957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R.F. (2011). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dobransky, N. D., & Frymier, A. B. (2004). Developing teacher-student relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52, 211–223. doi:10.1080/01463370409370193
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K. (2004). The impact of perceived teacher confirmation on receiver apprehension, motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 53, 1–20. doi:10.1080/0363452032000135742
   Google Scholar
• Fassinger, P. A. (1995). Understanding classroom interaction: Students’ and professors’ contributions to student silence. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 82–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M (2010). Instructor-student and student-student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59, 146–164. doi:10.1080/03634520903564362
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The relationships among perceived instructor rapport, student participation, and student learning outcomes. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 33, 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., Weber, K. D., & Lash, B. (in press). Participation requirements: An instructor strategy to influence student interest and learning. Communication Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133–144. doi:10.1080/01463379409369922
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B. (2005). Students’ classroom communication effectiveness. Communication Quarterly, 53, 197–212. doi:10.1080/01463370500089896
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (1999). The revised learning indicators scale. Communication Studies, 50, 1–12. doi:10.1080/10510979909388466
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A., Shulman, G. M., & Houser, M. (1996). The development of a learner empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45, 181–199. doi:10.1080/03634529609379048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: Tutorial and practical example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., Martin, M. M., & Bolkan, S. (2009). The development and validation of the student communication satisfaction scale. Communication Education, 58, 372–396. doi:10.1080/03634520902755441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The effect of teacher communication and students communication on learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57, 153–179. doi:10.1080/03634520701787777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, J. A., Smythe, M. J., & Communication 451. (2001). Is teacher immediacy actually related to student cognitive learning? Communication Studies, 52, 197–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houser, M. L., & Frymier, A. (2009). The role of student characteristics and teacher behaviors in students’ learner empowerment. Communication Education, 58, 35–53. doi:10.1080/03634520802237383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C-F. (2012). The influence of vocal qualities and conformation on nonnative English speaking teachers on student receiver apprehension, affective learning, and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 61, 4–14. doi:10.1080/0363523.2011.615410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. I. (2009). Connected classroom climate: A validity study. Communication Research Reports, 26, 146–157. doi:10.1080/08824090902861622
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. I., & Mrowka, K. (2010). Generative learning, quizzing and cognitive learning: An experimental study in the communication classroom. Communication Education, 59, 107–123. doi:10.1080/03634520903524739
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. C. (2008). The effects of out-of-class support on student satisfaction and motivation to learn. Communication Education, 57, 373–388. doi:10.1080/03634520801968830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P., & Witt, P. (2009). Teacher immediacy, confidence testing, and the measurement of cognitive learning. Communication Education, 58, 110–123. doi:10.1080/03634520802511233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, J. L., & Martin, M. M. (2002, April). Out-of-class communication: The development and testing of a measure. Paper presented at the Eastern Communication Association Convention, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Konetes, G. D. (2011). Distance education’s impact during economic hardship: How distance learning impacts educational institutions and businesses in times of economic hardship. International Journal of Instructional Media, 38, 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis and scale validation in communication research. Communication Research Reports, 22, 335–338. doi:10.1080/00036810500317730
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T., Hullett, C. R., Turner, M., & Lapinski, M. (2006). The desirability of using confirmatory factor analysis on published scales. Communication Research Reports, 23, 309–314. doi:10.1080/08824090600962698
   Google Scholar
• Mansson, D. H., & Myers, S. A. (2009). A reexamination of Swedish and American college students’ communicative attributes. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 3(8), 9–22. doi:10.1080=17475750903381622
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Mottet, T. P., & Myers, S. A. (2000). Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors and affective and cognitive learning. Psychological Reports, 87, 830–834. doi:PMid:11191397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., & Myers, S. A. (2006). Students’ communication traits and their out-of-class communication with their instructors. Communication Research Reports, 23, 283–289. doi:10.1080/08824090600962599
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Myers, S. A., & Mottet, T. P. (1999). Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 48, 155–164. doi:10.1080/03634529909379163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1994). Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication. In S. Morreale & M. Brooks ( Eds.), 1994 SCA summer conference proceedings and prepared remarks: Assessing college student competence in speech communication. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1992). Increasing teacher influence through immediacy. In V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey ( Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mcdougall, D., & Granby, C. (1996). How expectation of questioning method affects undergraduates’ preparation for class. Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 43–54. doi:10.1080/00220973.1996.9943462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, K. E., & Carrell, L. J. (1999). The impact of gender and immediacy on willingness to talk and perceived learning. Communication Education, 48, 32–40. doi:10.1080/2F03634529909379150
   Google Scholar
• Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A. (2004). The relationship between perceived instructor credibility and college student in-class and out-of-class communication. Communication Reports, 17, 129– 137. doi:10.1080/08934210409389382
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., Martin, M. M., & Knapp, J. L. (2005). Perceived instructor in-class communicative behaviors as a predictor of student participation in out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 53, 437–450. doi:10.1080/01463370500102046
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., & Rocca, K. A. (2007). The relationship between college student class participation and perceived instructor communicator style. Journal of the Speech and Theatre Association of Missouri, 37, 114–127.
   Google Scholar
• Nunn, C. E. (1996). Discussion in the college classroom: Triangulating observational and survey results. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 243–266. doi:10.2307/2F2943844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. (2001). Course participation: An active learning approach employing student documentation. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 187–195. doi:10.1177/2F0273475301233004
   Google Scholar
• Petress, K. (2006). An operational definition of class participation. College Student Journal, 40, 821–823.
   Google Scholar
• Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43–55. doi:10.1080/03634528609388318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1987). Power in the classroom VII: linking behavior alteration techniques to cognitive learning. Communication Education, 36, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, J. I., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1996). Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education, 45, 293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellnow, T. L., & Sellnow, D. D. (2010). The instructional dynamic of risk and crisis communication: Distinguishing instructional messages from dialogue. Review of Communication, 10, 112–126.
   Google Scholar
• Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1996). Students’ out-of-class experiences and the influence of learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Students Development, 37, 149–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59, 1–18. doi:10.1080/03634520903367238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2003). The relationship of interest to internal and external motivation. Communication Research Reports, 20, 376–383. doi:10.1080/08824090309388837
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Corrigan, M., Fornash, B., & Neupauer, N. C. (2003). The effect of interest on recall: An experiment. Communication Research Reports, 20, 116–123. doi:10.1080/08824090309388807
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Cayanus, J. L. (2005). Student interest: A two-study re- examination of the concept. Communication Quarterly, 53, 71–86. doi:10.1080/01463370500055996
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Myers, S. A. (2011). The development and testing of the Instructional Beliefs Model. Communication Education, 60, 51–74. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.491122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Patterson, B. R. (2001). Teacher behavior, student interest, and affective learning: Putting theory to practice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 71–90. doi:10.1080/00909880128101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71, 184– 207. doi:10.1080/036452042000228054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., & Oetzel, J. G. (2006). A cross-cultural test of immediacy-learning models in the Chinese classroom. Communication Education, 55, 313–330. doi:10.1080/03634520600748599
   Google Scholar