Development and Validation of a Facebook Relational Maintenance Measure

REFERENCES

• Alexa.com. The top 500 sites on the web. Retrieved from http://www.alexa.com/topsites
   Google Scholar
• Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.63.4.596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, J. (2012, November). Pew internet: Social networking. The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/March/Pew-Internet-Social-Networking-full-detail.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, E. M., & Marmo, J. (2010). Relational maintenance strategies on Facebook. The Kentucky Journal of Communication. Retrieved from http://kycommunication.com/jenniferpdf/Bryant.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, E. M., & Marmo, J. (2012). The rules of Facebook friendship: A two-stage examination of interaction rules in close, casual, and acquaintance friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 1013–1035. doi:10.1177/0265407512443616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, E. M., Marmo, J., & Ramirez, A. (2011). A functional approach to social networking sites. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 320). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1994). Maintaining relationships through strategies and routine interaction. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 6–23). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., Stafford. L., Hause, K. S., & Wallace, L. A. (1993). An inductive analysis of relational maintenance strategies: Comparisons among lovers, relatives, friends, and others. Communication Research Reports, 10, 5–14. doi:10.1080/08824099309359913
   Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., Stafford, L., & Semic, B. A. (2002). A panel study of the associations between maintenance strategies and relational characteristics. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 395–406. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00395.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, A. B., Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 10. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7
   Google Scholar
• Cowden, K. R. (2012, November). The relational maintenance function of Facebook status updates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, E., & Wright, K. B. (2012). Computer-mediated relational development and maintenance on Facebook. Communication Research Reports, 29, 119–129.doi:10.1080/08824096.r.667777
   Google Scholar
• Dainton, M. (2013). Relationship maintenance on Facebook: Development of a measure, relationships to general maintenance, and relational satisfaction. College Student Journal, 47, 113–122.
   Google Scholar
• Dainton, M., & Aylor, B. (2002). Routine and strategic maintenance efforts: Behavioral patterns, variations associated with relational length, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 69, 52–66. doi:10.1080/03637750216533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A-K., & Hughs, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 83–108. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindia, K. (2003). Definitions and perspectives on relational maintenance communication. In D. J. Canary & M. Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 1–28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2013). Social media update. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Social-Media-Update.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, C. (2007, January). Digital relationships in the ‘MySpace’ generation: Results from a qualitative study. Paper presented at the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Waikoloa, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13, 873–892. doi:10.1177/1461444810385389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relational maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 855–870. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facebook.com. About Facebook: Press room. Retrieved from http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011, June). Social networking sites and our lives. In The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-networks.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., Scarpello, V. (2004) Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205. doi:10.1177/109442810423675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8, 125–147.
   Google Scholar
• Houser, M. L., Fleuriet, C., & Estrada, D. (2012). The cyber factor: An analysis of relational maintenance through the use of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research Reports, 29, 34–43. doi:10.1080/08824096.2011.639911
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M. (2010). Assessing the measurement invariance of relational maintenance behavior when face-to-face and online. Communication Research Reports, 27, 30–37.doi:10.1080/08824090903526620
   Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M., Mazer, J. P., DeGroot, J. M., Meyer, K. R., Yuping, M., & Swafford, B. (2011). Attitudes toward online social connection and self-disclosure as predictors for Facebook communication and relational closeness. Communication Research, 28, 27–53. doi:10.1177/0093650210365537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M., Stassen-Ferrara, H. M., & Dowd, M. M. (2013). Comparing equity and self-expansion theory approaches to relational maintenance. Personal Relationships, 20, 38–51. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01395.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, M., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U., Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2012). Parents, teens, and online privacy. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Teens-and-Privacy.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Marmo, J., & Bryant, E. M. (2010, November). Using Facebook to maintain friendships: Examining the differences between acquaintances, casual friends, and close friends. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association Convention, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, B. (2013). Sharing, caring, and surveilling: An actor-partner interdependence model investigation of Facebook relational maintenance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 863–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwan, B., & Guerrero, L. K. (2012). Increasing perceived friendship network resources through relational maintenance: A study of newly-formed college friendships. Communication Studies, 4, 421–440. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011639433
   Google Scholar
• Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 141–151.doi:10.2307/351302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, P. B. (2000). What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26, 403–431.doi:10.1093/hcr/26.3.403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, D. L., & Clark, E. M. (2006). How do friendship maintenance behaviors and problem-solving styles function at the individual and dyadic levels. Personal Relationships, 13, 333–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, D. L., Clark, E. M., & Kelly, C. M. (2004). Friendship maintenance: An analysis of individual and dyad behaviors. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 413–44. doi:10.1521/jcsp.23.3.413.35460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, V. H., Singh, S. N., Mishra, S., & Donovan, D. T. (2007). Parallel analysis engine to aid determining number of factors to retain. Retrieved from http://ires.ku.edu/˜smishra/parallelengine.htm
   Google Scholar
• Rabby, M. K. (2007). Relational maintenance and the influence of commitment in online and offline relationships. Communication Studies, 3, 315–337. doi:10.1080/10510970701518405
   Google Scholar
• Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development and deterioration of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, L. (2011). Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: Critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 278–303. doi:10.1177/0265407510378125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender, and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, S. T., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Relational maintenance and CMC. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 98–118). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Veksler, A. E., & Eden, J. (2008, November). Do you like me? Check yes or no: Further conceptualizing the differences between love and liking in the context of relational unrequitedness. Poster presented at the National Communication Association Convention, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Boyd, S. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In C. A. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology arid society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 53–188). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Ramirez Jr., A. (2009). New technologies and new direction in online relating. In S. Smith & S. Wilson (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication (pp. 264–284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar