Introducing a Software-Based Method to Assess and Manipulate Visual Attention: Feasibility and Initial Validation

REFERENCES

• Barber, P. J., & Legge, D. (1976). Perception and information. London, United Kingdom: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H. (1986). Causes of sexual dysfunction—the role of anxiety and cognitive interference. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(2), 140–148. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.54.2.140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, E., Dorr, M., Böhme, M., Gegenfurtner, K., & Martinetz, T. (2006, February). Guiding the mind’s eye: improving communication and vision by external control of the scanpath. In Electronic Imaging 2006 (p. 60570D). Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, M., Dorr, M., Krause, C., Martinetz, T., & Barth, E. (2006). Eye movement predictions on natural videos. Neurocomputing, 69(16), 1996–2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, R. A. (1984). The human interface: Where people and computers meet. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2008). Breaking through fast-forwarding: Brand information and visual attention. Journal of Marketing, 72(6), 31–48. doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.6.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buquet, C., Charlier, J. R., & Paris, V. (1988). Museum application of an eye tracker. Medical Biomedical Engineering Computing, 26, 277–281. doi:10.1007/BF02447081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51(13), 1484–1525. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, L. (2007). Eye tracking methodology; Theory and practice. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 10(2), 217–220.
   Google Scholar
• Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43(4), 859–880. doi:10.1080/14640749108400960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M. C., Anderson, J. R., & Sohn, M. H. (2001, March). What can a mouse cursor tell us more? Correlation of eye/mouse movements on web browsing. Paper presented at the CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15, 736–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., Laan, E., &Grimbos, T. (2010). Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 5–56. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9556-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchowski, A. T. (2002). A breadth-first survey of eye tracking applications. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computing, 34(4), 455–470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice. London, United Kingdom: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Duchowski, A. T., Cournia, N., & Murphy, H. (2004).Gaze-contingent displays: A review. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(6), 621–634. doi:10.1089/cpb.2004.7.621
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duchowski, A. T., & Vertegaal, R. (2000). Eye-based interaction in graphical systems: Theory and practice. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2000 Course Notes #5.
   Google Scholar
• Duck, J. M., Gregson, R. A. M., Jones, E. B. J., Noble, G., & Noy, M. (1988). Children’s visual attention to “Playschool”: A time series analysis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 40, 413–421.
   Google Scholar
• Ebsworth, M., & Lalumière, M. (2012). Viewing time as a measure of bisexual sexual interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 161–172. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9923-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual review of psychology, 48(1), 269–297. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., & Collins, J. F. (1969). Temporal course of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80(2p1), 254–261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eriksen, C. W., & Rohrbaugh, J. W. (1970). Some factors determining efficiency of selective attention. The American Journal of Psychology, 330–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fjeld, M., Ironmonger, N., Voorhorst, F., Bichsel, M., & Rauterberg, M. (1999). Camera control in a planar, graspable interface. Proceedings of the 17th IASTED International Conference on Applied Informatics, 242–245.
   Google Scholar
• Geer, J. H., Lapour, K. J., & Jackson, S. R. (1993). The information processing approach to human sexuality. The structure of emotion: Psychophysiological, cognitive, and clinical aspects, 139–155.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, S., & Reeves, B. (1993). The effects of scene changes and semantic relatedness on attention to television. Communication Research, 20(2), 155–175. doi:10.1177/009365093020002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, A. M., McElree, B., & Carrasco, M. (2009). On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention: A speed accuracy trade-off analysis. Journal of Vision, 9(3), 1–10. doi:10.1167/9.3.30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2001). Bubbles: A technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vision Research, 41(17), 2261–2271. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00097-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, D. W., & Ji, Q. (2010). In the eye of the beholder: A survey of models for eyes and gaze. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32, 478–500. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2009.30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatada, T., Sakata, H., & Kusaka, H. (1980). Psychophysical analysis of the “sensation of reality” induced by a visual wide-field display. Smpte Journal, 89(8), 560–569.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., & Hollingsworth, A. (1998). Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance while reading and while watching dynamic scenes (pp. 269–293). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 1–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, A. R., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Covert and overt voluntary attention: Linked or independent? Cognitive Brain Research, 18(1), 102–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Israel, E., & Strassberg, D. S. (2009).Viewing time as an objective measure of sexual interest in heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 551–558. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9246-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40(10–12), 1489–1506. doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00163-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(3), 194–203. doi:10.1038/35058500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, E. (2002). Psychophysiological measures of sexual arousal. In M. W. Wiederman & B. E. Whitley (Eds.), Handbook for conducting research on human sexuality (3rd ed., pp. 139–171). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward an information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 37(2), 8–23.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, E., Goodrich, D., Petrocelli, J., & Bancroft, J. (2009).Psychophysiological response patterns and risky sexual behavior in heterosexual and homosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 538–550. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9432-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, E., Prause, N., & Geer, J. (2007). The sexual response. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 245–266). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002).The Sexual Inhibition (SIS) and Sexual Excitation (SES) scales: II. Predicting psychophysiological response patterns. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 127–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., Costello, P., Fang, F., Huang, M., & He, S. (2006). A gender- and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attentional effect of invisible images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(45), 17048–17052. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605678103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1968). Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. Psychological Bulletin, 70(6, Pt.1), 404–425. doi:10.1037/h0026731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchla, R. A. (1992). Attention. Annual Review Psychology, 43, 711–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröse, B. J., & Julesz, B. (1989). The control and speed of shifts of attention. Vision Research, 29(11), 1607–1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land M., & Hayhoe M. (2001). In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Research, 41, 3559–3566. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00102-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (1990). Involuntary attention and physiological arousal evoked by structural features and emotional content in TV commercials. Communication Research, 17(3), 275–299. doi:10.1177/009365090017003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46–70. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., Zhou, S., Schwartz, N., Bolls, P. D., & Potter, R. F. (2000). The effects of edits on arousal, attention and memory for television messages: When an edit is an edit can an edit be too much? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(1), 94–109. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4401_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennie, P. (2003). The cost of cortical computation. Current Biology, 13(6), 493–497. doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00135-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, S., Liu, T., & Carrasco, M. (2009). How spatial and feature-based attention affect the gain and tuning of population responses. Vision Research, 49(10), 1194–1204. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch, E. P., & Anderson, D. R. (1979). The relationship of visual attention to children’s comprehension of television. Child Development, 50(3), 722–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavissakalian, M., Blanchard, E. B., Abel, G. G., & Barlow, D. H. (1975).Responses to complex erotic stimuli in homosexual and heterosexual males. British Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 252–257. doi:10.1192/bjp.126.3.252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, R. B., & Appelbaum, M. I. (1973). Bias in the analysis of repeated-measures designs: Some alternative approaches. Child Development, 44, 401–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science, 229, 782–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morimoto, C. H., & Mimica, M. R. (2005). Eye gaze tracking techniques for interactive applications. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 98(1), 4–24. doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2004.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 315–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29(11), 1631–1647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. G., & Kaiser, M. K. (1985). MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer. Psychological Bulletin, 97(2), 316–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, A., Hamm, A., & Hugdahl, K. (2000). Cognition and the autonomic nervous system: Orienting, anticipation, and conditioning. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 533–575). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oster, P. J., & Stern, J. A. (1980). Measurement of eye movement: Electrooculography. In I. Martin, & P. Venables (Eds.), Techniques in psychophysiology (pp. 275–309). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Parkhurst, D., Law, K., & Niebur, E. (2002). Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42(1), 107–123. doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00250-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, Z. D., Janssen, E., & Laan, E. (2009). Women’s sexual responses to heterosexual and lesbian erotica: The role of stimulus intensity, affective reaction, and sexual history. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 880–897. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9546-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponseti, J., & Bosinski, H. A. (2010). Subliminal sexual stimuli facilitate genital response in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(5), 1073–1079. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9587-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, A., & Ball, L. J. (2006). Eye tracking in human computer interaction and usability research: Current status and future prospects. In C. Ghaoui (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human computer interaction. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1992). Eye movements and scene perception. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 342–376. doi:10.1037/h0084328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, B., Lang, A., Kim, E. Y., & Tatar, D. (1999). The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal. Media Psychology, 1(1), 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Rullo, J. E., Strassberg, D. S., & Israel, E. (2010). Category-specificity in sexual interest in gay men and lesbians. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 874–879. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9497-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto, K., Aoyama, S., Asahara, S., Yamashita, K., & Okada, A. (2008, January). Relationship between viewing distance and visual fatigue in relation to feeling of involvement. In Computer-human interaction (pp. 232–239). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sakheim, D. K., Barlow, D. H., Beck, J. G., & Abrahamson, D. J. (1985). A comparison of male heterosexual and male homosexual patterns of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 21, 183–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson, L., & Janssen, E. (2014) Sexual and affective responses to same- and opposite-sex stimuli in heterosexual and homosexual men: Assessment and manipulation of visual attention. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(5), 917–930. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0221-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad, M. I., & Mehmood, S. (2010). Control of articulated robot arm by eye tracking. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlsakrona, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, G., & Melchner, M. J. (1978). The attention operating characteristic: Examples from visual search. Science, 202, 315–318.
   Google Scholar
• Stephane, A. L. (2011). Eye tracking from a human factors perspective. In G. A. Boy (Ed.), The handbook of human-machine interaction: A human-centered design approach (pp. 339–365). Surrey, United Kingdom: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (1993).Visual selective attention: A theoretical analysis. ActaPsychologica, 83, 93–154. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(93)90042-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tollison, C. D., Adams, H. E., & Tollison, J. W. (1979).Cognitive and physiological indices of sexual arousal in homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual males. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 1, 305–314. doi:10.1007/BF01321372
   Google Scholar
• Verma, M., & McOwan, P. W. (2009). Generating customised experimental stimuli for visual search using genetic algorithms shows evidence for a continuum of search efficiency. Vision Research, 49(3), 374–382. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertegaal, R., Mamuji, A., Sohn, C., & Cheng, D. (2005). Media eyepliances: Using eye tracking for remote control focus selection of appliances. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2005 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1861–1864. doi:10.1145/1056808.1057041
   Google Scholar
• Vig, E., Dorr, M., & Barth, E. (2009). Efficient visual coding and the predictability of eye movements on natural movies. Spatial Vision, 22(5), 397–408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Villanueva, J., Cabeza, A., Goni, R., & Echeto, S. (2004). Robust algorithm for pupil-glint vector detection in a video-oculography eyetracking system. In ICPR Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 4, 941–944.
   Google Scholar
• von Helmholtz, H. (1866). Handbuch der physiologischen optik. Leipzig, Germany: Voss.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, C., & Mikaelian, H. H. (1987). An evaluation of an eye tracker as a device for computer input. In J. M. Carroll & P. P. Tanner (Eds.), CHI + GI 1987 Conference Proceedings, SIGCHI Bulletin, ACM, 183–188. doi:10.1145/29933.275627
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2006). On the costs and benefits of faces and words: Process characteristics of feature search in highly meaningful stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 755–779. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). Opinion: What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6), 495–501. doi:10.1038/nrn1411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarbus, A. L. (1967).Eye movements during perception of complex objects. In L. A. Riggs (Ed.), Eye movements and vision (pp. 171–196). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yantis, S. (1998). Control of visual attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 223–256). East Sussex, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yegiyan, N. S., & Lang, A. (2010). Processing central and peripheral detail: How content arousal and emotional tone influence encoding. Media Psychology, 13(1), 77–99. doi:10.1080/15213260903563014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar