Biology and Brains — Methodological Innovations in Communication Science: Introduction to the Special Issue

REFERENCES

• Afifi, T., & Floyd, K. (Eds.). (in press). Biology and physiology in communication [Special Issue]. Communication Monographs.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D.R., Bryant, J., Murray, J.P., Rich, M., Rivkin, M.J., & Zillmann, D. (2006). Brain imaging—a new approach to studying media processes and effects. Media Psychology, 8, 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, M. J., McCroskey, J. C., & Heisel, A. D. (1998). Communication apprehension as temperamental expression: A communibiological paradigm. Communication Monographs, 65, 197–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, M., McCroskey, J.C., & Floyd, K. (2008). Biological dimensions of communication: Perspectives, methods, and research. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boren, J. P., & Veksler, A. E. (2011). A decade of research exploring biology and communication. Communication Research Trends, 30(4), 2–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. (1996). Why biological explanation? Journal of Communication, 46, 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. (2006). Physiology and human relationships: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(2), 187–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. (2011). Endocrinology in communication research. Communication Research Reports, 28, 369–372.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. (2014). Humans are people, too: Nurturing an appreciation for nature in communication research. Review of Communication Research, 2, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (2012). There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson, M., & Stacks, D.W. (2010). Biological views of communication. The Review of Communication, 10(4), 263–275.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (Ed.) (1994). Measuring psychological responses to media. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2013). Discipline in crisis? The shifting paradigm of mass communication research. Communication Theory, 23(1), 10–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., & Ewoldsen, D. (2013). Beyond effects: Conceptualizing communication as dynamic, complex, nonlinear, and fundamental. In S. Allan (Ed.), Rethinking communication. Keywords in communication research (pp. 109–120). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loving, T.J., & Campbell, L. (2006). Mind–body connections in personal relationships: What close relationships researchers have to offer. Personal Relationships, 18(2), 165–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomin, R., DeFries, J.C., Knopik, V.S., & Neiderhiser, J.M. (2012). Behavioral genetics. New York, NY: Worth.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, R. F., & Bolls, P. (2011). Psychophysiological measurement and meaning: Cognitive and emotional processing of media. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ravaja, N. (2004). Contributions of psychophysiology to media research: Review and recommendations. Media Psychology, 6, 193–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherry, J. L. (2004). Media effects theory and the nature/nurture debate: A historical overview and implications for future research. Media Psychology, 6, 83–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symonds, D. (1992). On the use and misuse of Darwinism in the study of human behavior. In J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 137–159). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S. I., & Davies, P. C. W. (2012). The algorithmic origins of life. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10, 20120869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, W. (2008). The mathematics of communication. In C. D. Mortensen, (Ed.), Communication theory (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. (Original work published 1949)
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (Ed.). (in press). Brain, mind, and media: Neuroscience meets media psychology [Special Issue]. Journal of Media Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (Ed.). (2015). Biology and brains: Methodological innovations in communication science [Special Issue]. Communication Methods and Measures.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R., Sherry, J., & Mathiak, K. (2008). The neurophysiological perspective in mass communication research: Theoretical rationale, methods, and applications. In M. J. Beatty, J. C. McCroskey, & K. Floyd (Eds.), Biological dimensions of communication: Perspectives, methods, and research (pp. 41–71). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar