Neuroscience and Communication

REFERENCES

• Beatty, M. J., Heisel, A. D., Pascual-Ferra, P., & Berger, C. R. (2015). Electroencephalographic analysis in communication science: Testing two competing models of message production. Communication Methods and Measures,9(1–2), 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook O’Donnell, M., & Falk, E. B. (2015). Linking neuroimaging with functional linguistic analysis to understand processes of successful communication. Communication Methods and Measures,9(1–2), 55–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N. (1995). An evolutionary psychology of Gricean cooperation. Special issue: Approaches to natural language texts. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 14(1–2), 167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N. (1991). The biological origins of automated patterns of human interaction. Communication Theory, 1(1), 4–35.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. New York, NY: Rand McNally College.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, B., & Ressler, K. (2014). Parental olfactory experience influences behavior and neural structure in subsequent generations. Nature Neuroscience, 17, 89–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysinger, W. S., & Ruckmick, C. A. (1933). Emotional responses of children to the motion picture situation. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, E. B., Berkman, E. T., & Lieberman, M. D. (2012). From neural responses to population behavior: Neural focus group predicts population-level media effects. Psychological Science, 23(5), 439–445. doi:10.1177/0956797611434964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, E. B., Cascio, C. N., & Coronel, J. C. (2015). Neural prediction of communication-relevant outcomes. Communication Methods and Measures,9(1–2), 30–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, E. B., Morelli, S. A., Welborn, B. L., Dambacher, K., & Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Creating buzz: the neural correlates of effective message propagation. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1234–1242. doi:10.1177/0956797612474670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. (2014). Humans are people, too: Nurturing an appreciation for nature in communication research. Review of Communication Research, 2, 1–29. doi:10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2014.02.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. (2011). Endocrinology in communication research. Communication Research Reports, 28, 369–372.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A., McNamara, D. S., & Rus, V. (2012). Computational modeling of discourse and conversation. In M. J. Spivey, M. Joanisse, & K. McRea (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 558–572). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, M. D. (1996). The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, D. R. (2001). Epilogue: Analogy as the core of cognition. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 499–538). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koruth, K. J., Lang, A., Potter, R. F., & Bailey, R. L. (2015). A comparative analysis of dynamic and static indicators of parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system activation during TV viewing. Communication Methods and Measures,9(1–2), 78–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (1994). Measuring psychological responses to media. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C., & Holler, J. (2014). The origin of human multi-modal communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369(1651), article number 20130302. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollick, A. S., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2007). Ape gestures and language evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(19), 8184–8189. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702624104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherry, J. L. (2004). Media effects theory and the nature/nurture debate: A historical overview and directions for future research. Media Psychology, 6, 83–109. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0601_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. (1996). Hardwired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Journal of Communication, 46, 32–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Lang, A., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2011). Motivational processing and choice behavior during television viewing: An integrative dynamic approach. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 71–93. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01527.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Solloway, T., Tchernev, J. M., & Barker, B. (2012). Dynamic motivational processing of anti-marijuana messages: Coactivation begets attention. Human Communication Research, 38(4), 485–509. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01431.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R., Mangus, J. J., & Huskey, R. Brain imaging in communication research: A practical guide to understanding and evaluating fMRI studies. Communication Methods and Measures,9(1–2), 5–29.
   Google Scholar