The Viability of Using Rapid Judgments as a Method of Deception Detection

References

• Aamodt, M. G., & Custer, H. (2006). Who can best catch a liar? Forensic Examiner, 15, 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Akehurst, L., Bull, R., Vrij, A., & Kohnken, G. (2004). The effects of training professional groups and lay persons to use criteria-based content analysis to detect deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 877–891. doi:10.1002/acp.1057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anolli, L., Balconi, M., & Ciceri, R. (2003). Linguistic styles in deceptive communication: Dubitative ambiguity and elliptic eluding in packaged lies. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 687–710. doi:10.2224/sbp.2003.31.7.687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anolli, L., & Ciceri, R. (1997). The voice of deception: Vocal strategies of naive and able liars. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 259–284. doi:10.1023/A:1024916214403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciuli, J., Mallard, D., & Villar, G. (2010). ‘Um, I can tell you’re lying’: Linguistic markers of deception versus truth-telling in speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 397–411. doi:10.1017/S0142716410000044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baesler, E. J., & Burgoon, J. K. (1987). Measurement and reliability of nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 205–233. doi:10.1007/BF00987254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, Jr., C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234. doi:10.1207/pspr.2006.10.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, R. (1989). Can training enhance the detection of deception. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility Assessment. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Deception: Strategic and nonstrategic communication. In J. A. Daly, & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 191–224). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., & Dunbar, N. E. (2016). Accuracy of distinguishing truth from lie. In J. A. Hall, M. S. Mast, & T. V. West (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Perceiving Others Accurately (pp. 71–97). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., Levine, T., Nunamaker, J. F., Metaxas, D., & Park, H. S. (2009, August 6). Rapid noncontact credibility assessment: Credibility Assessment Research Initiative. Final Report to the Counter-intelligence Field Activity (Contract No. H9C 104-07-C-0011), Unpublished report to funding agency.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., & Newton, D. A. (1991). Applying a social meaning model to relational message interpretations of conversational involvement: Comparing observer and participant perspectives. Southern Journal of Communication, 56(2), 96–113.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., & Qin, T. (2006). The dynamic nature of deceptive verbal communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 76–96. doi:10.1177/0261927X05284482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dando, C. J., & Bull, R. (2011). Maximising opportunities to detect verbal deception: training police officers to interview Tactically. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8, 189–202. doi:10.1002/jip.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2004). Discerning lies from truths: Behavioral cues to deception and the indirect pathway of intuition. In P. A. Granhag, & L. A. Stromwall (Eds.), The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts (pp. 15–40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrick, D. C., Elkins, A. C., Burgoon, J. K., Nunamaker Jr., J. F., & Zeng, D. D. (2010). Border security credibility assessments via heterogeneous sensor fusion. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 25, 41–49. doi:10.1109/MIS.2010.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driskell, J. E. (2012). Effectiveness of deception detection training: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 713–731. doi:10.1080/1068316x.2010.535820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, N. E., Jensen, M. J., Kelley, K. M., Robertson, K. J., Bernard, D. R., Adame, B., & Burgoon, J. K. (2015). Effects of veracity, modality and sanctioning on credibility assessment during mediated and unmediated interviews. Communication Research, 42, 649–674. doi:10.1177/0093650213480175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, N. E., Jensen, M. L., Tower, D. C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2014). Synchronization of nonverbal behaviors in detecting mediated and non-mediated deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38, 355–376. doi:10.1007/s10919-014-0179-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, N. E., Ramirez, A., Jr., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). The effects of participation on the ability to judge deceit. Communication Reports, 16, 23–33. doi:10.1080/08934210309384487
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., O’Sullivan, M., & Frank, M. G. (1999). A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10, 263–266. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, A., & Stone, J. (2011, January). The effect of cognitive dissonance on argument language and vocalics. Paper presented at the Jensen, M., Meservy, T., Burgoon, J., and Nunamaker, J., Report of the HICSS-43 Symposium on Credibility Assessment and Information Quality in Government and Business, Kauai, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Balanced incomplete block designs for inter-rater reliability studies. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 105–112. doi:10.1177/014662168100500115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, M. G., & Feeley, T. H. (2003). To catch a liar: Challenges for research in lie detection training. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 58–75. doi:10.1080/00909880305377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, G., George, J., Marett, K., & Keane, B. (2011). Reviewers and the detection of deceptive information in recorded interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 252–269. doi:10.1111/jasp.2011.41.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Deception Research Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60–74. doi:10.1177/0022022105282295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gödert, H. W., Gamer, M., Rill, H. G., & Vossel, G. (2005). Statement validity assessment: Inter-rater reliability of criteria‐based content analysis in the mock‐crime paradigm. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 225–245. doi:10.1348/135532505X52680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griesel, D., Ternes, M., Schraml, D., Cooper, B. S., & Yuille, J. C. (2013). The ABC’s of CBCA: Verbal credibility assessment in practice. In B. S. Cooper, D. Griesel, & M. Ternes (Eds.), Applied Issues in Investigative Interviewing, Eyewitness Memory, and Credibility Assessment (pp. 293–323). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. L., Fillmore, D. G., & Griffith, J. D. (2009). Indirect detection of deception: Looking for change. Current Research in Social Psychology, 14, 134–142.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F., Jr. (2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 643–659. doi:10.1037/a0023589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Vrij, A. (2004). Police officers’ lie detection accuracy: Interrogating freely versus observing video. Police Quarterly, 7, 429–456. doi:10.1177/1098611104264748
   Google Scholar
• Hauch, V., Blandón-Gitlin, I., Masip, J., & Sporer, S. L. (2015). Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 307–342. doi:10.1177/1088868314556539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauch, V., Sporer, S. L., Michael, S. W., & Meissner, C. A. (2014). Does training improve the detection of deception? A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 43, 283–343. doi:10.1177/0093650214534974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. L., Bessarabova, E., Adame, B., Burgoon, J. K., & Slowik, S. M. (2011). Deceptive Language by Innocent and Guilty Criminal Suspects: The Influence of Dominance, Question, and Guilt on Interview Responses. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30, 357–375. doi:10.1177/0261927X11416201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. L., Lowry, P., Burgoon, J., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (2010). Technology Dominance in Complex Decision Making: The Case of Aided Credibility Assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 175–202. doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222270108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. L., Lowry, P. B., & Jenkins, J. L. (2011). Effects of automated and participative decision support in computer-aided credibility assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 201–234. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222280107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. L., Meservy, T. O., Burgoon, J. K., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2010). Automatic, multimodal evaluation of human interaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19, 367–389. doi:10.1007/s10726-009-9171-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., & Bond, C. F. (2014). Direct and indirect measures of lie detection tell the same story: A reply to ten Brinke, Stimson, and Carney (2014). Psychological Science, 25, 1960–1961. doi:10.1177/0956797614536740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., Shaw, A., & Shulman, H. C. (2010). Increasing deception detection accuracy with strategic questioning. Human Communication Research, 36, 216–231. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01374.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masip, J., Alonso, H. N., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2009). Training to detect what? The biasing effects of training on veracity judgments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1282–1296. doi:10.1002/acp.1535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masip, J., Sporer, S. L., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2005). The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11, 99–122. doi:10.1080/10683160410001726356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meservy, T. O. (2010). CBAS 2.0: Software Tools to Code Human Nonverbal Behavior. Center for Identification Technology Research Spring Conference, Skaneateles, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Pollina, D. A., Dollins, A. B., Senter, S. M., Krapohl, D. J., & Ryan, A. H. (2004). Comparison of polygraph data obtained from individuals involved in mock crimes and actual criminal investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1099–1105. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., Woodworth, M., & Birt, A. (2000). Truth, lies, and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 643–658. doi:10.1023/A:1005500219657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockwell, P., Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1997). Measurement of deceptive voices: Comparing acoustic and perceptual data. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 471–484. doi:10.1017/S0142716400010948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer, S. L., & Schwandt, B. (2006). Paraverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 421–446. doi:10.1002/acp.1190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer, S. L., & Schwandt, B. (2007). Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 1–34. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.13.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steller, M., & Koehnken, G. (1989). Criteria-based statement analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217–245). New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Street, C. N., & Richardson, D. C. (2015). The focal account: Indirect lie detection need not access unconscious, implicit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21, 342–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Brinke, L., Stimson, D., & Carney, D. R. (2014). Some evidence for unconscious lie detection. Psychological Science, 25, 1098–1105. doi:10.1177/0956797614524421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Gurtner, A., Bizzari, L., Spychiger, M., Breuer, M., & Marsch, S. U. (2009). Explicit reasoning, confirmation bias, and illusory transactive memory: A simulation study of group medical decision making. Small Group Research, 40, 271–300. doi:10.1177/1046496409332928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volbert, R., & Steller, M. (2014). Is this testimony truthful, fabricated, or based on false memory? European Psychologist, 19, 207–220. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2001). Implicit lie detection. The Psychologist, 14, 58–60.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2004). Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 159–181. doi:10.1348/1355325041719356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults. Human Communication Research, 30, 8–41. doi:10.1111/hcre.2004.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Edward, K., & Bull, R. (2001a). Stereotypical verbal and nonverbal responses while deceiving others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 899–909. doi:10.1177/0146167201277012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Edward, K., & Bull, R. (2001b). Police officer’s ability to detect deceit: The benefits of indirect deception detection. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 185–196. doi:10.1348/135532501168271
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Evans, H., Akehurst, L., & Mann, S. (2004). Rapid judgements in assessing verbal and nonverbal cues: Their potential for deception researchers and lie detection. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 283–296. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., & Graham, S. (1997). Individual differences between liars and the ability to detect lies. Expert Evidence, 5, 144–148. doi:10.1023/A:1008835204584
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2011). Outsmarting the liars: Toward a cognitive lie detection approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 28–32. doi:10.1177/0963721410391245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., & Heaven, S. (1999). Vocal and verbal indicators of deception as a function of lie complexity. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 203–215. doi:10.1080/10683169908401767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 2–60.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R. (1985). Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In A. W. Seigman, & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 129–148). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar