Metrics of News Audience Polarization: Same or Different?

References

• Abramowitz, A., & Saunders, K. (2005). Why can’t we all just get along? The reality of a polarized America. The Forum, 3(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1076
   Google Scholar
• Abramowitz, A., & Saunders, K. (2008). Is polarization a myth? The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, K., Johansson, J., Johansson, B., & Shehata, A. (2021). Maintenance and reformation of news repertoires: A latent transition analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990211019750
   Google Scholar
• Bachl, M. (2017). Selective exposure and hostile media perceptions during election campaigns. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(2), 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 408–446. https://doi.org/10.1086/590649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.5823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, L., Kruikemeier, S., de Vreese, C., & Chialvo, D. R. (2016). Nation binding: How public service broadcasting mitigates political selective exposure. PLoS One, 11(5), e0155112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E., & Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of Western media systems. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csárdi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Systems, 1695(5), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, J., Iyengar, S., Brink Lund, A., & Salovaara-Moring, I. (2009). Media system, public knowledge and democracy: A comparative study. European Journal of Communication, 24(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323108098943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilliplane, S., Goldman, S. K., & Mutz, D. C. (2013). Televised exposure to politics: New measures for a fragmented media environment. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgerly, S. (2015). Red media, blue media, and purple media: News repertoires in the colorful media landscape. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.998220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, M. G., & Borgatti, S. P. (2013). The dual-projection approach for two-mode networks. Social Networks, 35(2), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Bail, C. A., Cikara, M., Ditto, P. H., Iyengar, S., Klar, S., Mason, L., McGrath, M. G., Nyhan, B., Rand, D. G., Skitka, L. J., Tucker, J. A., van Bavel, J. J., Wand, C. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2020). Political sectarianism in America. Science, 370(6516), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe1715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2005). Culture war? Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. P., & Levendusky, M. (2006). Disconnected: The political class versus the people. In P. S. Nivola & D. W. Brady (Eds.), Red and blue nation? Characteristics and causes of America’s polarized politics (pp. 49–71). Hoover Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Are news audiences increasingly fragmented? A cross-national comparative analysis of cross-platform news audience fragmentation and duplication. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., Cornia, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). How polarized are online and offline news audiences? A comparative analysis of twelve countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(2), 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219892768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). More diverse, more politically varied: How social media, search engines and aggregators shape news repertoires in the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211027393
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. B., & Dale, R. (2013). Assessing bimodality to detect the presence of a dual cognitive process. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0225-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2014). The statistical crisis in science: Data-dependent analysis—a “garden of forking paths”—explains why many statistically significant comparisons don’t hold up. American Scientist, 102(6), 460–466. https://doi.org/10.1511/2014.111.460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799–1839. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. K., Mutz, D. C., & Dilliplane, S. (2013). All virtue is relative: A response to prior. Political Communication, 30(4), 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.819540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhardt, G. J., Ehrenberg, A. S. C., & Collins, M. A. (1975). The television audience: Patterns of viewing. Lexington Books
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511790867
   Google Scholar
• Harder, J. A. (2020). The multiverse of methods: Extending the multiverse analysis to address data-collection decisions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(5), 1158–1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620917678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, C., & Poole, K. T. (2014). The polarization of contemporary American politics. Polity, 46(3), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1057/pol.2014.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J. (2009). Putting polarization in perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 413–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jürgens, P., Stark, B., & Magin, M. (2020). Two half-truths make a whole? On bias in self-reports and tracking data. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319831643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalogeropoulos, A., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2019a). News brand attribution in distributed environments: Do people know where they get their news? New Media and Society, 21(3), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818801313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalogeropoulos, A., Suiter, J., Udris, L., & Eisenegger, M. (2019b). News media trust and news consumption: Factors related to trust in news in 35 countries. International Journal of Communication, 13, 3672–3693. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/10141/2745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ksiazek, T. B., Kim, S. J., & Malthouse, E. C. (2019). Television news repertoires, exposure diversity, and voting behavior in the 2016 US election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(4), 1120–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018815892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaCour, M. (2015). A balanced news diet, not selective exposure: Evidence from a direct measure of media exposure. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–18. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?Abstract_id=2110621
   Google Scholar
• Lelkes, Y. (2016). Mass polarization: Manifestations and measurements. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. (2013). How partisan media polarize America. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226069159.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Majó-Vázquez, S., Nielsen, R. K., & González-Bailón, S. (2019). The backbone structure of audience networks: A new approach to comparing online news consumption across countries. Political Communication, 36(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1546244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangold, F., Vogelgesang, J., & Scharkow, M. (2017). Nachrichtennutzung in Deutschland: Eine nutzerzentrierte repertoireanalyse [News use in Germany: A user-centric repertoire analysis]. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-704
   Google Scholar
• Mangold, F., & Bachl, M. (2018). New news media, new opinion leaders? How political opinion leaders navigate the modern high-choice media environment. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 896–919. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangold, F., & Scharkow, M. (2020). How do filtering choices impact the structures of audience networks? A simulation study using data from 26 countries. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1724274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangold, F., Stier, S., Breuer, J., & Scharkow, M. (2021). The overstated generational gap in online news use? A consolidated infrastructural perspective. New Media & Society, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821989972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masur, P. K., & Scharkow, M. (2020). Specr: Conducting and visualizing specification curve analyses [R package]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=specr
   Google Scholar
• Merkley, E. (2020). Polarization eh? Ideological divergence and partisan sorting in the Canadian mass public. OSF Preprints, 1–27. https://osf.io/cnzer
   Google Scholar
• Mourão, R. R., Thorson, E., Chen, W., & Tham, S. M. (2018). Media repertoires and news trust during the early Trump administration. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1945–1956. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukerjee, S., Majó-Vázquez, S., & González-Bailón, S. (2018). Networks of audience overlap in the consumption of digital news. Journal of Communication, 68(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukerjee, S., Yang, T., & González-Bailón, S. (2019). What counts as a weak tie? A comparison of filtering techniques for weighted networks. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–30. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3368603
   Google Scholar
• Nechushtai, E. (2018). From liberal to polarized liberal? Contemporary US news in Hallin and Mancini’s typology of news systems. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218771902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. L., & Webster, J. G. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117729314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Levy, D. A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2016). Digital news report 2016. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/digital-news-report-2016
   Google Scholar
• Orben, A., Dienlin, T., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(21), 10226–10228. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1902058116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, D. A., Davidson, B. I., Sewall, C. J., Fisher, J. T., Mieczkowski, H., & Quintana, D. S. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(11), 1535–1547. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01117-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfister, R., Schwarz, K. A., Janczyk, M., Dale, R., & Freeman, J. (2013). Good things peak in pairs: A note on the bimodality coefficient. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(700), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00700
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139878425
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2009). Improving media effects research through better measurement of news exposure. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharkow, M. (2016). The accuracy of self-reported Internet use: A validation study using client log data. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1118446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharkow, M. (2019). The reliability and temporal stability of self-reported media exposure: A meta-analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1594742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharkow, M., Mangold, F., Stier, S., & Breuer, J. (2020). How social network sites and other online intermediaries increase exposure to news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(6), 2761–2763. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918279117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2019). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics for all plausible specifications. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2694998
   Google Scholar
• Skovsgaard, M., Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2016). Opportunity structures for selective exposure: Investigating selective exposure and learning in Swedish election campaigns using panel survey data. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(4), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216658157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, S., Breuer, J., Siegers, P., & Thorson, K. (2020). Integrating survey data and digital trace data. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319843669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, S., Mangold, F., Scharkow, M., & Breuer, J. (2022). Post post-broadcast democracy? News exposure in the age of online intermediaries. American Political Science Review, 116(2), 768–774. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421001222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., Falasca, K., & Kruikemeier, S. (2018). The mix of media use matters: Investigating the effects of individual news repertoires on offline and online political participation. Political Communication, 35(3), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1385549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swart, J., Peters, C., & Broersma, M. (2017). Navigating cross-media news use: Media repertoires and the value of news in everyday life. Journalism Studies, 18(11), 1343–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1129285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taneja, H. (2016). Using commercial audience measurement data in academic research. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(2–3), 176–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taneja, H., Wu, A. X., & Edgerly, S. (2018). Rethinking the generational gap in online news use: An infrastructural perspective. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1792–1812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817707348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trilling, D., & Schönbach, K. (2013). Patterns of news consumption in Austria: How fragmented are they? International Journal of Communication, 7, 929–953. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1769/894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., De Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
   Google Scholar
• Van Kempen, H. (2007). Media-party parallelism and its effects: A cross-national comparative study. Political Communication, 24(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701471674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J. G., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012). The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01616.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J. G., & Taneja, H. (2018). Building and interpreting audience networks: A response to Mukerjee, Majo-Vazquez & Gonzalez-Bailon. Journal of Communication, 68(3), E11–E14. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E., Ksiazek, T. B., & Holbert, R. L. (2016). Partisan enclaves or shared media experiences? A network approach to understanding citizens’ political news environments. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 60(2), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1164170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welbers, K., & van Atteveldt, W. (2016). Corpustools: Managing, querying and analyzing tokenized text [R package]. http://github.com/kasperwelbers/corpustools
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., & Grolemund, G. (2017). R for data science: Import, tidy, transform, visualize, and model data. O’Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Wonneberger, A., Schoenbach, K., & van Meurs, L. (2011). Interest in news and politics—or situational determinants? Why people watch the news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(3), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016629372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonneberger, A., & Irazoqui, M. (2017). Explaining response errors of self-reported frequency and duration of TV exposure through individual and contextual factors. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016629372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, E. J., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2011). The duality of structure in China’s national television market: A network analysis of audience behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(2), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.570825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar