What We Can Do and Cannot Do with Topic Modeling: A Systematic Review

References

• Albalawi, R., Yeap, T. H., & Benyoucef, M. (2020). Using topic modeling methods for short-text data: A comparative analysis. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3(July), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00042
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al-Rawi, A., Chun, W. H. K., & Amer, S. (2021). Vocal, visible and vulnerable: Female politicians at the intersection of islamophobia, sexism and liberal multiculturalism. Feminist Media Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1922487
   Google Scholar
• Andrzejewski, D., & Zhu, X. (2009). Latent Dirichlet allocation with topic-in-set knowledge. In Proceedings of the NAACL 2009 Workshop on Semi-supervised Learning for NLP (pp. 43− 48). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Assenmacher, D., Clever, L., Frischlich, L., Quandt, T., Trautmann, H., & Grimme, C. (2020). Demystifying social bots: On the intelligence of automated social media actors. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 205630512093926. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120939264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baden, C., Pipal, C., Schoonvelde, M., & van der Velden, M. A. C. G. (2022). Three gaps in computational text analysis methods for social sciences: A research agenda. Communication Methods and Measures, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.2015574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechmann, A., & Nielbo, K. L. (2018). Are we exposed to the same “news” in the news feed? Digital Journalism, 6(8), 990–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1510741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2006). Dynamic topic models. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on machine learning (pp. 113–120). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2007). A correlated topic model of science. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 1(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-AOAS114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(4–5), 993–1022. http://www.crossref.org/deleted_doi.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, J., Hale, S., Ganesh, B., Bulovsky, A., Margetts, H., & Howard, P. (2020). Does campaigning on social media make a difference? Evidence from candidate use of twitter during the 2015 and 2017 U.K. elections. Communication Research, 47(7), 988–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219872394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, B. C., & Britt, R. K. (2021). From waifus to whales: The evolution of discourse in a mobile game-based competitive community of practice. Mobile Media and Communication, 9(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920934509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceron, A., Gandini, A., & Lodetti, P. (2020). Still ‘fire in the (full) belly’? Anti-establishment rhetoric before and after government participation. Information, Communication & Society, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1776373
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J., Boyd-Graber, J., Gerrish, S., Wang, C., & Blei, D. M. (2009). Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22 - Proceedings of the 2009 Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 288–296.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C., & Sältzer, M. (2020). Oolong: An R package for validating automated content analysis tools. Journal of Open Source Software, 5(55), 12461. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02461
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Zhang, H., Liu, R., Ye, Z., & Lin, J. (2019). Experimental explorations on short text topic mining between LDA and NMF based schemes. Knowledge-Based Systems, 163, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, C., Conijn, R., Schaafsma, J., & Antheunis, M. (2020). For whom the gamer trolls: A study of trolling interactions in the online gaming context. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(6), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghani, M., Sagae, K., Sachdeva, S., & Gratch, J. (2014). Analyzing political rhetoric in conservative and liberal weblogs related to the construction of the “ground zero mosque. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2013.826613
   Google Scholar
• Denny, M. J., & Spirling, A. (2018). Text preprocessing for unsupervised learning: Why it matters, when it misleads, and what to do about it. Political Analysis, 26(2), 168–189. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2017.44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. NAACL HLT 2019 - 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Proceedings of the Conference, Minneapolis, United States, 1, 4171–4186.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., Nag, M., & Blei, D. (2013). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding. Poetics, 41(6), 570–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erčulj, V. I., & Žiberna, A. (2021). The role of online social support in patients undergoing infertility treatment–A comparison of pregnant and non-pregnant members. Health Communication, 37(14), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1915517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faisal, A., & Peltoniemi, M. (2015). Establishing video game genres using data-driven modeling and product databases. Games and Culture, 13(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015601541
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, A. F., Bandyopadhyay, S., Louçã, J., & Manjaly, J. (2019). Caste in the news: A computational analysis of Indian newspapers. Social Media and Society, 5(4), 205630511989605. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119896057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist. The American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrish, S., & Blei, D. M. (2010). A language-based approach to measuring scholarly impact. ICML 2010 - Proceedings, 27th International Conference on Machine Learning, Haifa, Israel, 10, 375–382.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S., Su, M. -H., Abhishek, A., Suk, J., Tong, C., Kamath, K., Hills, O., Correa, T., Garlough, C., Borah, P., & Shah, D. (2022). Covering #metoo across the news spectrum: Political accusation and public events as drivers of press attention. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(1), 158–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220968081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, J. (2010). A Bayesian hierarchical topic model for political texts: Measuring expressed agendas in senate press releases. Political Analysis, 18(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpp034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, J., Roberts, M. E., & Stewart, B. M. (2021). Machine learning for social science: An agnostic approach. Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-053119-015921
   Google Scholar
• Grimmer, J., Roberts, M. E., & Stewart, B. (2022). Text as data: A new framework for machine learning and the social sciences. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grootendorst, M. (2022, March 11). Bertopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure. Retrieved November 7, 2022, from https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.05794
   Google Scholar
• Guo, L. (2019). Media agenda diversity and intermedia agenda setting in a controlled media environment: A computational analysis of China’s online news. Journalism Studies, 20(16), 2460–2477. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1601029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurajala, S., Dhaniyala, S., & Matthews, J. N. (2019). Understanding public response to air quality using tweet analysis. Social Media and Society, 5(3), 205630511986765. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119867656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Hannigan, T., Haans, R. F. J., Vakili, K., Tchalian, H., Glaser, V. L., Wang, M., Kaplan, S., & Jennings, P. D. (2019). Topic modeling in management research. The Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 586–632. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isoaho, K., Gritsenko, D., & Mäkelä, E. (2021). Topic modeling and text analysis for qualitative policy research. Policy Studies Journal, 49(1), 300–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobi, C., Van Atteveldt, W., & Welbers, K. (2016). Quantitative analysis of large amounts of journalistic texts using topic modelling. Digital Journalism, 4(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1093271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, O., Hall-Phillips, A., Chung, T. L., & Cho, H. (2019). Are you connected through consumption? The role of hashtags in political consumption. Social Media and Society, 5(4), 205630511988342. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119883427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, J., Rauchfleisch, A., & Bourassa, N. (2020). Connecting the (far-)right dots: A topic modeling and hyperlink analysis of (far-)right media coverage during the US elections 2016. Digital Journalism, 8(3), 422–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1682629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kargar, S., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2019). State-aligned trolling in Iran and the double-edged affordances of Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1506–1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818825133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Baden, C., & Yarchi, M. (2020). Interpretative polarization across platforms: How political disagreement develops over time on Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp. Social Media and Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120944393
   Google Scholar
• Koltsova, O., & Koltcov, S. (2013). Mapping the public agenda with topic modeling: The case of the Russian LiveJournal. Policy and Internet, 5(2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI331
   Google Scholar
• Koltsova, O., & Shcherbak, A. (2015). ‘LiveJournal Libra!’: The political blogosphere and voting preferences in Russia in 2011–2012. New Media & Society, 17(10), 1715–1732. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814531875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppers, L., Rieger, J., Boczek, K., & von Nordheim, G. (2021). Tosca: Tools for statistical content analysis. Retrieved January 15, 2013, from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tosca/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Krotz, F. (2007). The meta-process of mediatization as a conceptual frame. Global Media and Communication, 3(3), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665070030030103. 030030103.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, K. H., Chadha, M., & Wang, F. (2019). Proximity and networked news public: Structural topic modeling of global Twitter conversations about the 2017 Quebec mosque shooting. International Journal of Communication, 13(24), 2652–2675.
   Google Scholar
• Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A. L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M., Roy, D., & Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Computational social science. Science, 323(5915), 721–723. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, F., Eberl, J. -M., Eisele, O., Heidenreich, T., Galyga, S., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2021). Building the Bridge: Topic modeling for comparative research. Communication Methods and Measures, 16(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.1965973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, S. (2018). A ghost in the machine: Tracing the role of “the digital” in discursive processes of cybervictimisation. Discourse & Communication, 12(5), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318766936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., & Pan, J. (2020). Capturing clicks: How the Chinese government uses clickbait to compete for visibility. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1765914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, D., Baden, C., Stoltenberg, D., De Vries-Kedem, M., & Waldherr, A. (2022). Machine translation vs. multilingual dictionaries assessing two strategies for the topic modeling of multilingual text collections. Communication Methods and Measures, 16(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.1955845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, D., Waldherr, A., Miltner, P., Wiedemann, G., Niekler, A., Keinert, A., Pfetsch, B., Heyer, G., Reber, U., Häussler, T., Schmid-Petri, H., & Adam, S. (2018). Applying LDA topic modeling in communication research: Toward a valid and reliable methodology. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(2–3), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1430754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, D. B. (2019). Computational contributions: A symbiotic approach to integrating big, observational data studies into the communication field. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1639144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKernan, B. (2019). Digital texts and moral questions about immigration: Papers, please and the capacity for a video game to stimulate sociopolitical discussion. Games and Culture, 16(4), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019893882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, S., & Åkerlund, M. (2018). Standing up for Sweden? The racist discourses, architectures and affordances of an anti-immigration Facebook group. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(6), 332–353. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, J. W., & Bogdanov, P. (2013). Introduction-Topic models: What they are and why they matter. Poetics, 41(6), 545–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, J., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., & van Es, B. (2018). Do not blame it on the algorithm: An empirical assessment of multiple recommender systems and their impact on content diversity. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 959–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, L. K. (2020). Computational grounded theory: A methodological framework. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, L. K., Burk, D., Knudsen, M., & McCall, L. (2018). The future of coding: A comparison of hand-coding and three types of computer-assisted text analysis methods. Sociological Methods & Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118769114
   Google Scholar
• Ophir, Y., Walter, D., Arnon, D., Lokmanoglu, A., Tizzoni, M., Carota, J., D'Antiga, L., & Nicastro, E. (2021). The framing of COVID-19 in Italian media and its relationship with community mobility: A mixed-method approach. Journal of Health Communication, 26(3), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1899344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantti, M., Nelimarkka, M., Nikunen, K., & Titley, G. (2019). The meanings of racism: Public discourses about racism in Finnish news media and online discussion forums. European Journal of Communication, 34(5), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119874253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadouka, M. E., Evangelopoulos, N., & Ignatow, G. (2016). Agenda setting and active audiences in online coverage of human trafficking. Information, Communication & Society, 19(5), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1139615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patty, J. W., & Penn, E. M. (2014). Analyzing big data: Social choice and measurement. PS - Political Science and Politics, 48(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514001814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöyhtäri, R., Nelimarkka, M., Nikunen, K., Ojala, M., Pantti, M., & Pääkkönen, J. (2021). Refugee debate and networked framing in the hybrid media environment. International Communication Gazette, 83(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519883520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, K. M., Monroe, B. L., Colaresi, M., Crespin, M. H., & Radev, D. R. (2010). How to analyze political attention with minimal assumptions and costs. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00427.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, U. (2019). Overcoming language barriers: Assessing the potential of machine translation and topic modeling for the comparative analysis of multilingual text corpora. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(2), 102–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1555798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2019). Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using siamese BERT-networks. EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019 - 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference, 3982–3992. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d19-1410
   Google Scholar
• Rhidenour, K. B., Blackburn, K., Barrett, A. K., & Taylor, S. (2021). Mediating medical marijuana: Exploring how veterans discuss their stigmatized substance use on Reddit. Health Communication, 00(00), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1886411
   Google Scholar
• Righi, R., Samoili, S., López Cobo, M., Vázquez-Prada Baillet, M., Cardona, M., & De Prato, G. (2020). The AI techno-economic complex system: Worldwide landscape, thematic subdomains and technological collaborations. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101943
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Airoldi, E. M. (2016). A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(515), 988–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1141684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles, J. M., Velez, D., De Marco, S., Rodríguez, J. T., & Gomez, D. (2020). Affective homogeneity in the Spanish general election debate. A comparative analysis of social networks political agents. Information, Communication & Society, 23(2), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1499792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen, L., Trilling, D., & Liotsiou, D. (2020). Delighting and detesting engagement: Emotional politics of junk news. Social Media and Society, 6(4), 205630512097203. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120972037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. (2018). Social theory after the internet: Media, technology and globalization. UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Z. M., & Soffer, O. (2020). From weekly to daily: Computational analysis of periodical time cycles. Journalism Studies, 21(14), 1952–1972. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1807394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, T., Kang, K., Choo, J., & Reddy, C. K. (2018). Short-text topic modeling via non-negative matrix factorization enriched with local word-context correlations. The Web Conference 2018 - Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2018, 1105–1114. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186009
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M., Welbers, K. C., Kroon, A., & Trilling, D. (2022). Linked in the dark: A network approach to understanding information flows within the Dutch Telegramsphere. Information, Communication & Society, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2133549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Gleason, L. S. (2012). Contributing to theory and knowledge in quantitative communication science. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(4), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.732626
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N., & Graham, T. (2019). Mapping the anti-vaccination movement on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 22(9), 1310–1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1418406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, S., Posch, L., Bleier, A., & Strohmaier, M. (2017). When populists become popular: Comparing Facebook use by the right-wing movement Pegida and German political parties. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1365–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Y., Hu, J., & Lee, D. K. L. (2020). Delineating the transnational network agenda-setting model of mainstream newspapers and Twitter: A machine-learning approach. Journalism Studies, 21(15), 2113–2134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1812421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweitzer, M. D., & Shulman, H. C. (2018). The effects of metacognition in survey research: Experimental, cross-sectional, and content-analytic evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(4), 745–768. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2010). Overview of Contemporary Issues in Mixed Methods Research. Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed., pp. 1–44). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193
   Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., Medeiros, M., Cotter, K., Chen, Y., Rodgers, K., Bae, A., & Baykaldi, S. (2020). Platform civics: Facebook in the local information infrastructure. Digital Journalism, 8(10), 1231–1257. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1842776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törnberg, A., & Törnberg, P. (2016). Combining CDA and topic modeling: Analyzing discursive connections between islamophobia and anti-feminism on an online forum. Discourse & Society, 27(4), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516634546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tresch, A., & Feddersen, A. (2019). The (in)stability of voters’ perceptions of competence and associative issue ownership: The role of media campaign coverage. Political Communication, 36(3), 394–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1542416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Atteveldt, W., & Peng, T. Q. (2018). When communication meets computation: Opportunities, challenges, and pitfalls in computational communication science. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(2–3), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1458084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer, T. G. L. A. (2018). Public frame building: The role of source usage in times of crisis. Communication Research, 45(6), 956–981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Velden, M., Schumacher, G., & Vis, B. (2018). Living in the past or living in the future? Analyzing parties’ platform change in between elections, the Netherlands 1997–2014. Political Communication, 35(3), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1384771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vayansky, I., & Kumar, S. A. P. (2020). A review of topic modeling methods. Information Systems, 94, 101582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2020.101582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Nordheim, G., Boczek, K., & Koppers, L. (2018). Sourcing the sources: An analysis of the use of twitter and Facebook as a journalistic source over 10 years in the New York Times, the guardian, and Süddeutsche Zeitung. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1490658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vulić, I., De Smet, W., Tang, J., & Moens, M. F. (2015). Probabilistic topic modeling in multilingual settings: An overview of its methodology and applications. Information Processing & Management, 51(1), 111–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2014.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlström, M., Törnberg, A., & Ekbrand, H. (2020). Dynamics of violent and dehumanizing rhetoric in far-right social media. New Media & Society, 23(11), 146144482095279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820952795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldherr, A., Geise, S., Mahrt, M., Katzenbach, C., & Nuernbergk, C. (2021). Toward a stronger theoretical grounding of computational communication science. Computational Communication Research, 3(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5117/ccr2021.02.002.wald
   Google Scholar
• Walter, D., & Ophir, Y. (2020). Strategy framing in news coverage and electoral success: An analysis of topic model networks approach. Political Communication, 38(6), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1858379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, K., Liu, F., Mou, Y., Wu, Y., Zeng, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (2020). Using machine learning to learn machines: A cross-cultural study of users’ responses to machine-generated artworks. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(4), 566–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1835136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, A., Choi, I. M., Abeliuk, A., & Saffer, A. (2021). The influence of interdependence in networked publics spheres: How community-level interactions affect the evolution of topics in online discourse. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(3), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, X., Guo, J., Lan, Y., & Cheng, X. (2013). A biterm topic model for short texts. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, (pp. 1445–1456).
   Google Scholar
• Yan, P., Schroeder, R., & Stier, S. (2021). Is there a link between climate change scepticism and populism? An analysis of web tracking and survey data from Europe and the US. Information, Communication & Society, 0(0), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1864005
   Google Scholar
• Yarchi, M., Baden, C., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2020). Political polarization on the digital sphere: A cross-platform, over-time analysis of interactional, positional, and affective polarization on social media. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1785067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying, L., Montgomery, J. M., & Stewart, B. M. (2021). Topics, concepts, and measurement: A crowdsourced procedure for validating topics as measures. Political Analysis, 30(4), 570–589. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2021.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, J., Chan, C. H., & Fu, K. W. (2017). How social media construct “truth” around crisis events: Weibo’s rumor management strategies after the 2015 Tianjin blasts. Policy and Internet, 9(3), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, J., Chan, C., & Schäfer, M. S. (2020). Contested Chinese dreams of AI? Public discourse about artificial intelligence on WeChat and People’s daily online. Information, Communication & Society, 25(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1776372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. (2018). Visualization, technologies, or the public? Exploring the articulation of data-driven journalism in the Twittersphere. Digital Journalism, 6(6), 737–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1340094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Q., Qin, Z., & Wan, T. (2011). Topic modeling of Chinese language using character-word relations. In International Conference on Neural Information Processing (pp. 139–147). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Zhan, M., & Jie, C. (2018). Examining multiplicity and dynamics of publics’ crisis narratives with large-scale twitter data. Public Relations Review, 44(4), 619–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, P., & Shahin, S. (2020). Live tweeting live debates: How twitter reflects and refracts the US political climate in a campaign season. Information, Communication & Society, 23(3), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1503697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar