Exploring Peer Interaction Among Multilingual Youth: New Possibilities and Challenges for Language and Literacy Learning

References

• August, D., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language Minority Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ballinger, S. (2017). Examining peer language use and investment in a distinct North American immersion context. International Multilingual Research Journal, 11(3), 184–198. doi:10.1080/19313152.2017.1330066
   Google Scholar
• Bicais, J., & Correia, M. G. (2008). Peer-learning spaces: A staple in English language learners’ tool kit for developing language and literacy. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22(4), 363–375. doi:10.1080/02568540809594633
   Google Scholar
• Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4/5), 585–614. doi:10.1177/1461445605054407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderón, M., Slavin, R., & Sánchez, M. (2011). Effective instruction for English learners. The Future of Children, 21(1), 103–127. doi:10.1353/foc.2011.0007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, D. (2016). Dual language education: Current research perspectives. International Multilingual Research Journal, 10(1), 1–5. doi:10.1080/19313152.2016.1118666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, M. W. (2013). “Rompiendo el silencio”: Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of peer-mediated learning at improving language outcomes for ELLs. Bilingual Research Journal, 36(2), 146–166. doi:10.1080/15235882.2013.814609
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. W. (2014). Speaking to read: Meta-analysis of peer-mediated learning for English language learners. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(3), 358–382. doi:10.1177/1086296X14552179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 9–19. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90013-X
   Google Scholar
• Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56. doi:10.1017/S0267190514000191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Enright, K. A. (2011). Language and literacy for a new mainstream. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 80–118. doi:10.3102/0002831210368989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, P., & Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402–430. doi:10.1093/applin/ami014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• García, O., Flores, N., & Chu, H. (2011). Extending bilingualism in US secondary education: New variations. International Multilingual Research Journal, 5(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/19313152.2011.539486
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 175–199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gort, M. (2015). Transforming literacy learning and teaching through translanguaging and other typical practices associated with “doing being bilingual.” International Multilingual Research Journal, 9(1), 1–6. doi:10.1080/19313152.2014.988030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. doi:10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano‐López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303. doi:10.1080/10749039909524733
   Google Scholar
• Keck, C., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91–131). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kibler, A. (2017). Peer interaction and learning in multilingual settings from a sociocultural perspective: Theoretical insights. International Multilingual Research Journal, 11(3), 199–203. doi:10.1080/19313152.2017.1328970
   Google Scholar
• King, K. A., Bigelow, B., & Hirsi, A. (2017). New to school and new to print: Everyday peer interaction among adolescent high school newcomers. International Multilingual Research Journal, 11(3), 137–151. doi:10.1080/19313152.2017.1328958
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P. (2012). Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 57–72). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141. doi:10.1093/applin/4.2.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407–451). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Beltrán, M. (2009). Cultivating space for the language boomerang: The interplay of two languages as academic resources. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(2), 25–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Beltrán, M. (2010). The two-way language bridge: Co-constructing bilingual language learning opportunities. The Modern Language Journal, 94(2), 254–277. doi:10.1111/modl.2010.94.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Beltrán, M. (2014). “What do you want to say?”: How adolescents use translanguaging to expand learning opportunities. International Multilingual Research Journal, 8(3), 208–230. doi:10.1080/19313152.2014.914372
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Beltrán, M., Daniel, S., Peercy, M. M., & Silverman, R. D. (2017). Developing a zone of relevance: Emergent bilinguals’ use of social, linguistic, and cognitive support in peer-led literacy discussions. International Multilingual Research Journal, 11(3), 152–166. doi:10.1080/19313152.2017.1330061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, R. A., Durán, L, & Hikida, M. (2017). Becoming “Spanish learners”: Identity and interaction among multilingual children in a Spanish-English dual language classroom. International Multilingual Research Journal, 11(3), 167–183. doi:10.1080/19313152.2017.1330065
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6(4), 359–377. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00021-7
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137–168. doi:10.1558/japl.2004.1.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (2003). Audible difference: ESL and social identity in schools. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31. doi:10.2307/3587803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443–456. doi:10.1111/modl.1997.81.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. doi:10.3102/0013189X12441244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, D. (2015). The right to culturally sustaining language education for the new American mainstream: An introduction. International Multilingual Research Journal, 9(4), 221–226. doi:10.1080/19313152.2015.1092849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N. (2014). Peer interaction and second language learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pica, T. (1992). The textual outcomes of native speaker-non-native speaker negotiation. In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet (Eds.), Text and context: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on language study (pp. 198–237). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Pica, T. (2013). From input, output and comprehension to negotiation, evidence, and attention: An overview of theory and research on learner interaction and SLA. In M. P. García Mayo, M. J. Gutiérrez Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 49–69). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534–574. doi:10.3102/0034654307309920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2016). Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(4), 591–626. doi:10.1017/S0272263112000356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. doi:10.1111/lang.2002.52.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337. doi:10.1111/modl.1998.82.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2013). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3218–3225). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. doi:10.1111/jcpp.1976.17.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar