Unpacking complex language ideologies toward heritage language maintenance: a case of Chinese migrant families in the US

References

• Abdullahi, S. B., & Li, W. (2021). Living with diversity and change: Intergenerational differences in language and identity in the Somali community in Britain. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 47(269), 15–45. doi:10.1515/ijsl-2020-0007
   Google Scholar
• Arnaus, G. L. (2022). Spanish and German as heritage and majority languages in early multilingual acquisition: Family language policies and other child-external factors for heritage language competence. International Journal of Multilingualism, 19(2), 210–232. doi:10.1080/14790718.2022.2040511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, S. (2013). Reconstructing heritage language: Resolving dilemmas in language maintenance for Sri Lankan Tamil migrants. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 39(222), 131–155. doi:10.1515/ijsl-2013-0035
   Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, S. (2019). Changing orientations to heritage language: The practice-based ideology of Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora families. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 45(255), 9–44. doi:10.1515/ijsl-2018-2002
   Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, S. (2021). Rethinking mobility and language: From the global south. The Modern Language Journal, 105(2), 570–582. doi:10.1111/modl.12726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantone, K. F., & Wolf-Farré, P. (2022). Implications between education and familial policies: An introduction. International Journal of Multilingualism, 19(2), 187–189. doi:10.1080/14790718.2022.2047978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, H., & Zheng, Y. (2021). Ethnicity is in the blood, not in the language: Exploring Korean-Chinese bilingual families’ multilingual planning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–18. doi:10.1080/01434632.2020.1868480
   Google Scholar
• Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. (2009). Invisible and visible language planning: Ideological factors in the family language policy of Chinese immigrant families in Quebec. Language Policy, 8(4), 351–375. doi:10.1007/s10993-009-9146-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. (2016). Conflicting language ideologies and contradictory language practices in Singaporean multilingual families. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(7), 694–709. doi:10.1080/01434632.2015.1127926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. (2018). Family language policy. In J. W. Tollefson & M. Pérez-Milans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning (pp. 420–441). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curdt-Christiansen, X. L., & La Morgia, F. (2018). Managing heritage language development: Opportunities and challenges for Chinese, Italian and Pakistani Urdu-speaking families in the UK. Multilingua, 37(2), 177–200. doi:10.1515/multi-2017-0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Costa, C. I. (2018). From Dili to Dungannon: An ethnographic study of two multilingual migrant families from Timor-Leste. International Journal of Multilingualism, 15(3), 276–290. doi:10.1080/14790718.2018.1477289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, A. (1999). Environmental factors in early bilingual development: The role of parental beliefs and attitudes. In L. Plonsky & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Studies on language acquisition (pp. 75–96). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110807820
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, E. J., Li, Z., Zafar, A. M., & Wu, C. -H. (2016). Language policy in multilingual contexts: Revisiting Ruiz’s “language-as-resource” orientation. Bilingual Research Journal, 39(3–4), 200–212. doi:10.1080/15235882.2016.1224988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid, Z., & Sallabank, J. (2021). Language attitudes and language practices of the Lebanese community in the UK. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 47(269), 179–202. doi:10.1515/ijsl-2020-0008
   Google Scholar
• Eisenchlas, S. A., & Schalley, A. C. (2020). Making sense of “home language” and related concepts. In A. Schalley & S. Eisenchlas (Eds.), Handbook of home language maintenance and development: Social and affective factors (pp. 17–37). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, J. (2013). Language maintenance, language shift, and reversing language shift. In T. K. Bhatia & W. C. Ritchie (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (pp. 466–494). Chichester, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gharibi, K., & Seals, C. (2020). Heritage language policies of the Iranian diaspora in New Zealand. International Multilingual Research Journal, 14(4), 287–303. doi:10.1080/19313152.2019.1653746
   Google Scholar
• Gu, M. M., & Han, Y. (2021). Exploring family language policy and planning among ethnic minority families in Hong Kong: Through a socio-historical and processed lens. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(4), 466–486. doi:10.1080/14664208.2020.1748371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, G. (2019). “丧偶式育儿”话语中的母职困境与性别焦虑 [Maternal Dilemma and Gender Anxiety in the Discourse of ‘Widowed Child-Rearing’]. Social Sciences of Beijing, 33(10), 117–128. doi:10.13262/j.bjsshkxy.bjshkx.191012
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, T., & Lee, J. S. (2018). Understanding the complexities of transnational family language policy. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(10), 882–894. doi:10.1080/01434632.2018.1454454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, A. (2015). Native-speakerism: Taking the concept forward and achieving cultural belief. In A. Swan, P. Aboshiha, & A. Holliday (Eds.), (En)countering native-speakerism (pp. 11–25). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hult, F. M., & Hornberger, N. H. (2016). Revisiting orientations in language planning: Problem, right, and resource as an analytical heuristic. The Bilingual Review/La Revista Bilingüe, 33(3), 30–49. https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/476
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. W., & Davis, S. E. (2022). ‘So, mein Deutsch ist schlecht … ’: Echoes of societal attitudes and education language policies within the family language policies of second- and third-generation German speakers in Newcastle, Australia. International Journal of Multilingualism, 19(2), 233–250. doi:10.1080/14790718.2022.2037609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, J. Y. (2021). Negotiating language ideologies: Pre-service teachers’ perspectives on multilingual practices in mainstream education. International Journal of Multilingualism, 18(3), 421–434. doi:10.1080/14790718.2019.1612903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen, R. V. (2021). ‘Then suddenly I spoke a lot of Spanish’–Changing linguistic practices and heritage language from adolescents’ points of view. International Multilingual Research Journal, 15(2), 105–125. doi:10.1080/19313152.2020.1821320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Källkvist, M., & Hult, F. M. (2020). Multilingualism as problem or resource? Negotiating space for languages other than Swedish and English in university language planning. In M. Kuteeva, K. Kaufhold, & N. Hynninen (Eds.), Language perceptions and practices in multilingual universities (pp. 57–84). Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, H. -S. (2015). Korean families in America: Their family language policies and home-language maintenance. Bilingual Research Journal, 38(3), 275–291. doi:10.1080/15235882.2015.1092002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, K. A., Fogle, L., & Logan‐terry, A. (2008). Family language policy. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(5), 907–922. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00076.x
   Google Scholar
• Kroskrity, P. V. (2010). Language ideologies–Evolving perspectives. Society and Language Use, 7(3), 192–205. doi:10.1075/hoph.7.13kro
   Google Scholar
• Kubota, R. (2011). Questioning linguistic instrumentalism: English, neoliberalism, and language tests in Japan. Linguistics and Education, 22(3), 248–260. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2011.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Kubota, R. (2022). Racialised teaching of English in Asian contexts: Introduction. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 36(1), 1–6. doi:10.1080/07908318.2022.2048000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Gao, X. (2020). Commodification of the Chinese language: Investigating language ideology in the Irish media. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(5), 512–531. doi:10.1080/14664208.2020.1741236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., & Zhu, H. (2019). Imagination as a key factor in LMLS in transnational families. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 45(255), 73–107. doi:10.1515/ijsl-2018-2004
   Google Scholar
• Mason, S., & Hajek, J. (2020). Language education and language ideologies in Australian print media. Applied Linguistics, 41(2), 215–233. doi:10.1093/applin/amy052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173 Retrieved Apr 10, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Mesthrie, R., & Leap, W. L. (2000). Language contact I: Maintenance, shift and death. In R. Mesthrie, J. Swann, A. Deumert, & L. L. William (Eds.), Introducing sociolinguistics (pp. 248–278). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T., Birch, M., Mauthner, M., & Jessop, J. (2012). Ethics in qualitative research. Newbury Park, California: Sage. doi:10.1093/applin/amy052
   Google Scholar
• Obojska, M. A. (2019). Trilingual repertoires, multifaceted experiences: Multilingualism among Poles in Norway. International Multilingual Research Journal, 13(4), 257–276. doi:10.1080/19313152.2019.1611337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palviainen, Å., & Bergroth, M. (2018). Parental discourses of language ideology and linguistic identity in multilingual Finland. International Journal of Multilingualism, 15(3), 262–275. doi:10.1080/14790718.2018.1477108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsrud, B., Zilliacus, H., & Ekberg, L. (2020). Spaces for multilingual education: Language orientations in the national curricula of Sweden and Finland. International Multilingual Research Journal, 14(4), 304–318. doi:10.1080/19313152.2020.1714158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potowski, K. (2013). Language maintenance and shift. In R. Bayley, R. Cameron, & C. Lucas (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 30–51). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15–34. doi:10.1080/08855072.1984.10668464
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, R. (2010). Reorienting language-as-resource. In J. E. Petrovic (Ed.), International perspectives on bilingual education: Policy, practice, and controversy (pp. 155–172). North Carolina, USA: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schalley, A. C., & Eisenchlas, S. A. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of home language maintenance and development: Social and affective factors (Vol. 18). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, M. S., & Karayayla, T. (2020). The roles of age, attitude, and use in first language development and attrition of Turkish–English bilinguals. Language Learning, 70(1), 54–84. doi:10.1111/lang.12361
   Google Scholar
• Selvi, A. F. (2019). Qualitative content analysis. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 440–452). New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sevinç, Y. (2016). Language maintenance and shift under pressure: Three generations of the Turkish immigrant community in the Netherlands. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 42(242), 81–117. doi:10.1515/ijsl-2016-0034
   Google Scholar
• Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2006). Language policy and linguistic human rights. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 273–291). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2012). Indigenousness, human rights, ethnicity, language and power. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 38(213), 87–104. doi:10.1515/ijsl-2012-0008
   Google Scholar
• Spolsky, B. (2012). Family language policy–the critical domain. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(1), 3–11. doi:10.1080/01434632.2011.638072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmy, S. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 128–148. doi:10.1017/S0267190510000085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2020). World Population Prospect 2019. Retrieved Jan 21, 2022, from https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau.(2015). American Community Survey. Retrieved Jan 20 2022, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs.
   Google Scholar
• Valdés, G. (2017). From language maintenance and intergenerational transmission to language survivance: Will “heritage language” education help or hinder? International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 43(243), 67–95. doi:10.1515/ijsl-2016-0046
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2017). Family language policy by Hakkas in Balik Pulau, Penang. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 43(244), 87–118. doi:10.1515/ijsl-2016-0058
   Google Scholar
• Wee, L. (2003). Linguistic instrumentalism in Singapore. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 24(3), 211–224. doi:10.1080/01434630308666499
   Google Scholar
• Woolard, K. A. (2020). Language ideology. The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, 1–21. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415
   Google Scholar
• Yakushkina, M. (2021). A quantitative approach to heritage language use and symbolic transnationalism. Evidence from the Cuban-American population in Miami. International Multilingual Research Journal, 15(2), 194–210. doi:10.1080/19313152.2020.1852513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, J., Turner, M., & Bonar, G. (2022). Ethnic minority language policies and practices in China: Revisiting Ruiz’s language orientation theory through a critical biliteracy lens. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. doi:10.1080/01434632.2022.2050915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar