Breeding strategies for enhancing nutrient content and quality in Cucurbitaceae: a review

References

• Abd-Alkarim, E., Y. Bayoumi, E. Metwally, and M. Rakha. 2017. Silicon supplements affect yield and fruit quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown in net houses. Afr. J. Agric. Res 12(31):2518–2523. doi: 10.5897/AJAR2017.12484.
   Google Scholar
• Abdein, M.A.E., H.M.F. Hassan, and H.M. Dalia. 2017. General performance, combining abilities and heritability of yield and yield component traits in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Poir.) at different conditions. Curr. Appl. Sci. Technol 17:121–129.
   Google Scholar
• Abdollahi, M.R., M. Darbandi, Y. Hamid, and M. Majdi. 2015. The influence of phytohormones, wheat ovary co-culture, and temperature stress on anther culture response of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.). Braz. J. Bot. 38(3):447–456. doi: 10.1007/s40415-015-0152-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdollahi, M.R., S. Najafi, H. Sarikhani, and S.S. Moosavi. 2016. Induction and development of anther-derived gametic embryos in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) by optimizing the macronutrient and agar concentrations in culture medium. Turk. J. Biol. 40:571–579. doi: 10.3906/biy-1502-55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdul-Hussain, R.M., K.D. Hassan, and A.H. Al-Mashhadni. 2018. Influence of applying some fertilizer in growth and yield of cucumber grown under non heating greenhouses. Int. Organ. Sci. Res. J. Agric. Vet. Sci. 11:2319–2372. doi: 10.9790/2380-1101020104.
   Google Scholar
• Acquaah, G. 2015. Conventional plant breeding principles and techniques, p. 115–158. In: J.M. Al-Khayri, S.M. Jain, and D.V. Johnson. (eds.). Advances in plant breeding strategies: Breeding, biotechnology and molecular tools. Springer International Publishing, Basel, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22521-0.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, B., M.A.T. Masud, M. Zakaria, M.M. Hossain, and M.A.K. Mian. 2017. Heterosis and combining ability of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. Ex Poir.). J. Agric. Stud. 5:132–139. doi: 10.5296/jas.v5i3.11920URL.
   Google Scholar
• Akrami, M., and A. Arzani. 2019. Inheritance of fruit yield and quality in melon (Cucumis melo L.) grown under field salinity stress. Sci. Rep 9(1):1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43616-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alam, M.F., P.C. Mondol, K.S. Roy, M. Anisuzzaman, M.S. Parvez, S.K. Ray, F. Mahzabin, T. Tanny, and I. Alam. 2019. Determination of apposite plant regeneration protocol for several cucurbits through direct and indirect organogenesis. Hortic. Biotechnol. Res. 5:4–13. doi: 10.25081/hbr.2019.v5.5279.
   Google Scholar
• Amom, T., and P. Nongdam. 2017. The use of molecular marker methods in plants: A review. Int. J. Cur. Res. Rev. 9:1–7. doi: 10.7324/IJCRR.2017.9171.
   Google Scholar
• Anarado, C., C. Anarado, R. Areh, N. Ifoh, E. Eze, and E. Ikeakor. 2019. Iodine fortification study of some common African vegetables. J. Agric. Chem. Environ 8:172–183. 10.4236/ jacen.2019.83014.
   Google Scholar
• Baghel, S.S., U.S. Bose, R. Singh, and S. Singh. 2018. Influence of organic manure with inorganic and bio-fertilizer on growth, flowering, yield and yield attributes of bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria L.). Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci 7:30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bezirganoglu, I. 2017. Tissue culture of Cucumis melo. Agri. Res. Tech: Open Access J. 6:1–2. doi: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2017.06.555682.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, L., S.P. Singh, A.K. Soni, and M.K. Samota. 2017. Combining ability studies in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) for quantitative characters. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci 6(7):4471–4478. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.466.
   Google Scholar
• Bhutia, T.L., A.D. Munshi, T.K. Behera, A.K. Sureja, and S.K. Lal. 2017. Combining ability for yield and yield related traits and its relationship with gene action in cucumber. Indian J. Hort. 74(1):51–55. doi: 10.5958/0974-0112.2017.00013.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortesi, L., and R. Fischer. 2015. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol. Adv. 33(1):41–52. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouis, H., and A. Saltzman. 2017. Improving nutrition through biofortification: A review of evidence from HarvestPlus 2003 through 2016. Glob. Food Secur. 12:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradshaw, J.E. 2016. Plant breeding: Past, present and future. Euphytica 213(3):60–72. doi: 10.1007/s10681-016-1815-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brou, K.F., R.S. Sie, K. Adjoumani, Y.D.M. Saraka, B.A. Kouago, and C.D. Adahi. 2018. Diallel analysis in Citrullus mucosospermus (Fursa) for fruit traits. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 13(38):2006–2015. doi: 10.5897/AJAR2018.13313.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran, J., M. Brumin, D. Wolf, D. Leibman, C. Klap, M. Pearlsman, A. Sherman, T. Arazi, and A. Gal-On. 2016. Development of broad virus resistance in non-transgenic cucumber using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17(7):1140–1153. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Q. Cui, S. Huang, S. Wang, X. Liu, X. Lu, and Y. Tian. 2018b. An EMS mutant library for cucumber. J. Integr. Agri. 17(7):1612–1619. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61765-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K., Y. Wang, R. Zhang, H. Zhang, and C. Gao. 2019. CRISPR/Cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in agriculture. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 29(1):667–697. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100049.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., M. Michalak, and L.B. Agellon. 2018a. Importance of nutrients and nutrient metabolism on human health. Yale J. Biol. Med. 91:95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., F. Luan, X. Wang, P. Gao, Z. Zhu, S. Liu, and Y. Zhang. 2016. Construction of a genetic linkage map of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) using CAPS and SSR markers and QTL analysis for fruit quality traits. Sci. Hortic. 202: 25–31. 10.1016/j.scienta. 2016.01.004. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomicki, G., H. Schaefer, and S.S. Renner. 2019. Origin and domestication of Cucurbitaceae crops: Insights from phylogenies, genomics and archaeology. New Phytol. 226(5):1240–1255. doi: 10.1111/nph.16015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, I.M., M. Thiruvengadam, K. Rekha, and G. Rajakumar. 2016. Elicitation enhanced the production of phenolic compounds and biological activities in hairy root cultures of bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.). Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol 59. ArticleID e160393. doi: 10.1590/1678-4324-2016160393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullis, B., and A. Smith. 2016. The analysis of QTL and QTL × treatment experiments using spatial models for marker effects. National Institute for Applied Statistics Research Australia, University of Wollongong, Sydney, Australia. Working Paper. 24 http://ro.uow. edu.au/niasrawp/45
   Google Scholar
• Darrudi, R., V. Nazeri, F. Soltani, M. Shokrpour, and M.R. Ercolano. 2018. Evaluation of combining ability in Cucurbita pepo L. and Cucurbita moschata Duchesne accessions for fruit and seed quantitative traits. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants. 9:70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmap.2018.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, A. 2013. Genetic engineering for improving quality and productivity of crops. Agric. Food Secur. 2. Article ID15. doi: 10.1186/2048-7010-2-15.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J.P., and C.A. Christensen. 2019. Developing transgenic agronomic traits for crops: Targets, methods and challenges, p. 343–365. In: S. Kumar, P. Barone, and M. Smith (eds.). Transgenic plants. Methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, New York. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8778-8_22.
   Google Scholar
• Davoodi, S., J.A. Olfati, Y. Hamidoghli, and A. Sabouri. 2016. Standard heterosis in cucurbita moschata and cucurbita pepo interspecific hybrids. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 22(4):383–388. doi: 10.1080/19315260.2015.1042993.
   Google Scholar
• Deinychenko, G., and O. Yudicheva. 2016. Studying the accumulation of nitrogenous substances in biofortified pumpkin vegetables. East-Eur. J. Enterp. Technol. 3:40–46. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.69389.
   Google Scholar
• Delgoda, R., and J. Murray. 2017. Evolutionary perspectives on the role of plant secondary metabolites, p. 93–100. In: S. Badal and R. Delgoda (eds.). Pharmacognosy. Elsevier, United Kingdom, London. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802104-0.00007-X.
   Google Scholar
• Devi, N.M., R.V. Prasad, and S. Nukasani. 2018. A review on health benefits and nutritional composition of pumpkin seeds. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 6:1154–1157.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, M.I., M.J. Sousa, R.C. Alves, and C.F.R. Fereira. 2016. Exploring plant tissue culture to improve the production of phenolic compounds: A review. Ind. Crop Prod. 82:9–22. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ene, C.O., P.E. Ogbonna, C.U. Agbo, and U.P. Chukwudi. 2019. Heterosis and combining ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Inf. Process. Agric 6:150–157. 10.1016/j.inpa. 2018.07.008.
   Google Scholar
• Fasahat, P., A. Rajabi, J.M. Rad, and J. Derera. 2016. Principles and utilization of combining ability in plant breeding. Biom. Biostat. Int. J. 4. Article ID0085. doi: 10.15406/bbij.2016.04.00085.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M.G., G.Q. Almeida, H.P. Pessoa, F.D. Dariva, F.O. Dias, and C. Nick. 2019. Selection of squash “Menina Brasileira” carrying the allele “Bush” with high yield potential. Hortic. Bras. 37(1):35–39. doi: 10.1590/S0102-053620190105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, A., E. Aguado, G. Parra, S. Manzano, C. Martínez, Z. Megías, G. Cebrián, J. Romero, S. Beltrán, D. Garrido, et al. 2018. Phenomic and genomic characterization of a mutant platform in Cucurbita pepo. Front. Plant Sci. 9. Article ID1049. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Mas, J., A. Benjak, W. Sanseverino, M. Bourgeois, G. Mir, V.M. Gonzalez, E. Henaff, F. Camara, L. Cozzuto, E. Lowy, et al. 2012. The genome of melon (Cucumis melo L.). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109(29):11872–11877. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205415109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, M., N. Sharma, S. Sharma, P. Kapoor, A. Kumar, V. Chunduri, and P. Arora. 2018. Biofortified crops generated by breeding, agronomy, and transgenic approaches are improving lives of millions of people around the world. Front. Nutr. 5. Article ID12. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giner, A., L. Pascual, M. Bourgeois, G. Gyetvai, P. Rios, B. Picó, C. Troadec, A. Bendahmane, J. Garcia-Mas, and A.M. Martin-Hernandez. 2017. A mutation in the melon vacuolar protein sorting prevents systemic infection of cucumber mosaic virus. Sci. Rep. 7(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10783-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golabadi, M., P. Golkar, and A. Eghtedary. 2015. Combining ability analysis of fruit yield and morphological traits in greenhouse cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Can. J. Plant Sci. 95(2):377–385. doi: 10.4141/CJPS2013-387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golob, A., A. Kroflič, A. Jerše, N.K. Marsic, H. Šircelj, V. Stibilj, and M. Germ. 2020. Response of pumpkin to different concentrations and forms of selenium and iodine and their combinations. Plants 90(7):899. doi:10.3390/plants9070899.
   Google Scholar
• Goulet, B.E., F. Roda, and R. Hopkins. 2017. Hybridization in plants: Old ideas, new techniques. Plant Physiol 173(1):65–78. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, D.R. 2019. An elucidation of over a century old enigma in genetics-heterosis. PLoS Biol. 17(4):e3000215. ArticleID e3000215. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, B.L., and K.M. Olsen. 2010. Genetic perspectives on crop domestication. Trends Plant Sci. 15(9):529–537. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.05.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grumet, R., and M. Colle. 2017. Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) breeding line with young fruit resistance to infection by Phytophthora capsici. Hortsci. 52:922–924. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI11423-16.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, S., J. Zhang, H. Sun, J. Salse, W.J. Lucas, H. Zhang, Y. Zheng, L. Mao, Y. Ren, Z. Wang, et al. 2013. The draft genome of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and resequencing of 20 diverse accessions. Nat. Genet. 45(1):51–58. doi: 10.1038/ng.2470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawrylak-Nowak, B., R. Matraszek, and M. Pogorzelec. 2015. The dual effects of two inorganic selenium forms on the growth, selected physiological parameters and macronutrients accumulation in cucumber plants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 37(2):47. doi: 10.1007/s11738-015-1788-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefferon, K.L. 2016. Can biofortified crops help attain food security. Curr. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2(4):180–185. doi: 10.1007/s40610-016-0048-0.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S., R. Li, Z. Zhang, L. Li, X. Gu, W. Fan, W.J. Lucas, X. Wang, B. Xie, P. Ni, et al. 2009. The genome of the cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. Nat. Genet. 41:1275–1281. doi: 10.1038/ng.475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, S., A.M. Akanda, A. Proya, M.T. Islam, and M.M. Hossain. 2016. Isolation and identification of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from cucumber rhizophere and their effect on plant growth promotion and disease suppression. Front. Mocrobiol 6. ArticleID 1360. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01360l.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, H.A., S.D. Utomo, S.Y. Kwon, S.H. Ha, Y.X. Guo, and P.S. Choi. 2016. Production of transgenic cucumber expressing phytoene synthase-2A carotene desaturase gene. J. Plant Biotechnol. 43(3):341–346. doi: 10.5010/JPB.2016.43.3.341.
   Google Scholar
• Jat, G.S., A.D. Munshi, T.K. Behera, and B.S. Tomar. 2016. Combining ability estimation of gynoecious and monoecious hybrids for yield and earliness in cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 86:399–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, C. 1990. Appendix: An outline classification of the Cucurbitaceae, p. 449–463. In: D.M. Bates, R.W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey (eds.). Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., W. Wang, T. Lian, and C. Zhang. 2017. Manipulation of metabolic pathways to develop vitamin-enriched crops for human health. Front. Plant Sci. 8:937–949. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadu, J.B., M.C. Kaature, P.B. Tapkeer, R.V. Dhopavkar, and M.V.V.I. Annapurna. 2018. . Effect of soil application of potassium and foliar spray of zinc and boron on yield, yield contributing character and quality of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus Thunb.)] in lateritic soils of Konkan. Int. J. Chem. Stud 6:7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kamberoglu, M.A., A.F. Caliskan, and C. Desbiez. 2016. Current status of some cucurbit viruses in Cukurova region (Adana and Mersin provinces) of Turkey and molecular characterization of zucchini yellow mosaic virus isolates. Rom. Biotech. Lett 21:11709–11719. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01604814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karkute, S.G., A.K. Singh, O.P. Gupta, P.M. Singh, and B. Singh. 2017. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome engineering for improvement of horticultural crops. Front. Plant Sci. 8(7):4471–4478. ArticleID 1635. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01635.
   Google Scholar
• Karmakar, P., B.K. Singh, J. Devi, P.M. Singh, and B. Singh. 2016. Genetic improvement for improving nutritional quality in vegetable crops: A review. Veg. Sci. 43:145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Kaźmińska, K., E. Hallmann, A. Rusaczonek, A. Korzeniewska, M. Sobczak, J. Filipczak, and G. Bartoszewski. 2018. Genetic mapping of ovary colour and quantitative trait loci for carotenoid content in the fruit of Cucurbita maxima Duchesne. Mol. Breed. 38(9):114–128. doi: 10.1007/s11032-018-0869-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna, H., M. Alizadeh, D. Singh, U. Singh, N. Chauhan, M. Eftekhari, and R.K. Sadh. 2016. Somaclonal variations and their applications in horticultural crops improvement. Biotechnology. 6:54–72. doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0389-7.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., R. Kumar, D. Kumar, N. Gautam, N. Singh, C. Parkash, and Y.R. Shukla. 2017a. Heterotic potential, potence ratio, combining ability and genetic control of yield and its contributing traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativusL.). New Zeal. J. Crop Hort 45(3):175–190. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., D.P. Mishra, G.C. Yadav, and D.K. Dwivedi. 2017b. Evaluation of F1 hybrids/genotypes of pumpkin for biochemical traits. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 6(5):982–989. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.605.108.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.C., W.K. Lee, A. Ali, M. Kumar, T.J. Yang, and K. Song. 2017. Genome-wide Identification and classification of the AP2/EREBP gene family in Cucurbitaceae species. Plant Breed. Biotech. 5:123–133. doi: 10.9787/PBB.2017.5.2.123.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., Y. Sheng, H. Niu, and Z. Li. 2019. Gene interactions regulating sex determination in Cucurbits. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1231. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01231.
   Google Scholar
• Linnewiel-Hermoni, K., M. Khanin, M. Danilenko, G. Zango, Y. Amosi, J. Levy, and Y. Sharoni. 2015. The anti-cancer effects of carotenoids and other phytonutrients resides in their combined activity. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 572: 28–35. 10.1016/j.abb.2015. 02.018. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2015.02.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., P. Guo, X. Wang, A.R. Davis, A.M. Baloch, and F. Luan. 2015. Mapping of quantitative trait loci for lycopene content and fruit traits in Citrullus lanatus. Euphytica 202(3):411–426. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1308-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H.M., H. Miao, G.L. Tian, T.C. Wehner, X.F. Gu, and S.P. Zhang. 2015. Molecular mapping and candidate gene analysis for yellow fruit flesh in cucumber. Mol. Breed. 35(2):1–8. doi: 10.1007/s11032-015-0263-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma’arup, R., R.M. Trethowan, N.U. Ahmed, H. Bramley, and P.J. Sharp. 2019. Emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccon Schrank) improves water use efficiency and yield of hexaploid bread wheat. Plant Sci. 285:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malav, N., L.Y. Mohan, and I.B. Maurya. 2018. Heterosis and combining ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus. L.). Int. J. Chem. Stud. 6:457–460.
   Google Scholar
• Mandal, M.K., H. Suren, B. Ward, A. Boroujerdi, and C. Kousik. 2018. Different roles of melatonin in plant-host resistance and pathogen suppression in Cucurbits. J. Pineal. Res. 65(3):1–58. doi:10.1111/jpi.12505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manish, K., and K. Manpreet. 2018. Map-based cloning in vegetable crops: A review. Int. J. Genet. 10(4):394–400. doi: 10.9735/0975-2862.10.4.394-400.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, L.H.P., M.T.G. Lopes, H. Noda, P.D.Q.C. Neto, A.L.U. Martins, F.V. de Almeida, and L.C.R. Demosthenes. 2018. Molecular study of the genetic variability of pumpkin landraces from Brazilian Amazon. Agric. Sci. 9:511–523. doi: 10.4236/as.2018.94035.
   Google Scholar
• Megharaj, K.C., P.S. Ajjappalavara, D.C. Revanappa, Manjunathagowda, and J.C. Bommesh. 2017. Sex manipulation in Cucurbitaceous vegetables. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 6:1839–1851. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.227.
   Google Scholar
• Mo, Y., Y. Wang, R. Yang, J. Zheng, C. Liu, H. Li, J. Ma, Y. Zhang, C. Wei, and X. Zhang. 2016. Regulation of plant growth, photosynthesis, antioxidation and osmosis by an Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus in watermelon seedlings under well-watered and drought conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 7:644. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohsin, G.M., M.A.U. Doullah, M. Hasanuzzaman, B.K. Biswas, M.S. Islam, M.S. Rahman, and A.K.M. Aminul Islam. 2017. Combining ability analysis in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch Ex Poir). Contemp. Res. India 7:176–181.
   Google Scholar
• Montero-Pau, J., J. Blanca, C. Esteras, E.M. Martínez-Pérez, P. Gómez, A.J. Monforte, and B. Picó. 2017. An SNP-based saturated genetic map and QTL analysis of fruit-related traits in zucchini using genotyping-by-sequencing. BMC Genomics 18(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3439-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murthy, K.S.R., D. Ravindranath, R.S. Sandhya, and T. Pullaiah. 2013. Ethnobotany and distribution of wild and cultivated genetic resources of Cucurbitaceae in the Eastern Ghats of Peninsular India. Topclass J. Herb. Med. 2:149–158.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeem, M.A., M.A. Nawaz, M.Q. Shahid, Y. Doğan, G. Comertpay, M. Yıldız, R. Hatipoğlu, F. Ahmad, A. Alsaleh, N. Labhane, et al. 2018. DNA molecular markers in plant breeding: Current status and recent advancements in genomic selection and genome editing. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 32(2):261–285. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2017.1400401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeimi, K.M., S.S. Hejazi, E. Elmas, M. Hellström, N.M. Kararoudi, A.M. Padma, D. Lee, and H. Dolatshad. 2018. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas9 gene editing technique in xenotransplantation. Front Immunol 9:1711. 10.3389/fimmu. 2018.01711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagendran, K., S. Mohankumar, R. Aravintharaj, C.G. Balaji, S.K. Manoranjitham, A.K. Singh, A.B. Rai, B. Singh, and G. Karthikeyan. 2017. The occurrence and distribution of major viruses infecting cucurbits in Tamil Nadu state, India. Crop Prot. 99:10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2017.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik, P.R., N. Adivappar, V. Srinivasa, S. Gangaprasad, and S.P. Herle. 2018. Combining ability studies in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 6(2):1389–1393. doi: 10.18782/2320-7051.5257.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento, T., L. Do, F.D.F. Souza, R.D.C. Souza Dias, and E.F. Da Silva. 2019. Watermelon general and specific combining ability. Com. Sci. 10(1):132–140. 10.14295/CS. v10i1.2899 doi:10.14295/cs.v10i1.2899.
   Google Scholar
• Normohamadi, S., M. Solouki, and F. Heidari. 2017. Diversity in cucumber genotypes based on morphological traits and SSR molecular markers. Biosci. Biotech. Res. Asia. 14(2):775–782. doi: 10.13005/bbra/2507.
   Google Scholar
• Ogunbanjo, O.R., O.O. Awotoye, F.M. Jayeoba, and S.M. Jeminiwa. 2016. Nutritional analysis of selected Cucurbitaceae species. Univers. J. Plant Sci. 4(1):1–3. doi: 10.13189/ujps.2016.040101.
   Google Scholar
• Owolabi, I.O., C.T. Yupanqui, and S. Siripongvutikorn. 2018. Enhancing secondary metabolites (Emphasis on phenolics and antioxidants) in plants through elicitation and metabolomics. Pak. J. Nutr 17(9):411–420. doi: 10.3923/pjn.2018.411.420.
   Google Scholar
• Pannell, J. R. 2017. Plant sex determination. Curr. Biol. 27:191–197. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.052.
   Google Scholar
• Pati, K., A.D. Munshi, T.K. Behera, R. Kumar, and P. Karmakar. 2015. Estimating combining ability for yield and yield contributing traits in cucumber. Indian J. Hortic. 72(1):49–53. doi: 10.5958/0974-0112.2015.00009.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawełkowicz, M., L. Pryszcz, A. Skarzyńska, R. K. Wóycicki, K. Posyniak, J. Rymuszka, Z. Przybecki, and W. Pląder. 2019. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals new molecular pathways for cucumber genes related to sex determination. Plant Reprod. 1–24. doi:10.1007/s00497-019-00362-z.
   Google Scholar
• Payel, D., P. Mala, and S. Sunita. 2015. Inter-genus variation analysis in few members of Cucurbitaceae based on ISSR markers. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 29(5):882–886. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2015.1052760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna, S., and S.M. Jain. 2017. Mutant resources and mutagenomics in crop plants. Emirates J. Food Agric. 29:651–657. doi: 10.9755/ejfa.2017.v29.i9.86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna, S.T.R., S.B.G. Ganapathi, and S.M. Jain. 2017. Genetic modifications of horticultural plants by induced mutations and transgenic approach. Acta Hortic. 1187:219–232. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1187.22.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, L., V. Ruggieri, S. Perez, K.G. Alexiou, M. Fernandez, T. Jahrmann, M. Pujol, and J. Garsia-Mas. 2018. QTL mapping of melon fruit quality traits using a high-density GBS-based genetic map. BMC Plant Biol. 18:1–17. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1537-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preciado-Rangel, P., L. Salas-Pérez, M.A. Gallegos-Robles, F.H. Ruiz-Espinoza, A.V. Ayala-Garay, M. Fortis-Hernández, and B. Murillo-Amador. 2018. Increasing doses of potassium increases yield and quality of muskmelon fruits under greenhouse. Hortic. Bras. 36(2):184–188. doi: 10.1590/S0102-053620180206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priecina, L., and D. Karklina. 2015. Composition of major organic acids in vegetables and spices. Proceedings of the Cape Breton University International Conference Proceedings, Prague, Czech Republic. 3:447–454. doi: 10.12955/cbup.v3.637.
   Google Scholar
• Raj, S., and P. Saudagar. 2019. Plant cell culture as alternatives to produce secondary metabolites, p. 265–286. In: M.S. Akhtar and M.K. Swamy (eds.). Natural bio-active compounds. Springer, Gateway East, Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-7438-8_11.
   Google Scholar
• Raman, R. 2017. The impact of genetically modified (GM) crops in modern agriculture: A review. GM Crops Food 8(4):195–208. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2017.1413522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rani, S.J., and R. Usha. 2013. Transgenic plants: Types, benefits, public concerns and future. J. Pharm. Res. 6:879–883. doi: 10.1016/j.jopr.2013.08.008.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, G., P. Behera, T.K. Gaikwad, A.B. Munshi, A. Das, G.S. Jat, and G. Boopalakrishnan. 2018. Mapping and QTL analysis of gynoecy and earliness in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) technology. Front Plant Sci. 9:1–14. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, P.K., G.C. Yadav, D.K. Baranwal, and H.K. Singh. 2015. Genetic estimates and gene action for obtaining promising heterotic hybrids in bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl.]. Int. J. Life Sci. Res 10:801–806.
   Google Scholar
• Renna, M., M. D’Imperio, M. Gonnella, A. Parente, P. Santamaria, and F. Serio. 2020. Barattiere: An Italian local variety of Cucumis melo L. with quality traits between melon and cucumber. Plants. 9(5):578. ArticleID 578. doi:10.3390/plants9050578.
   Google Scholar
• Renner, S.S., and H. Schaefer. 2016. Phylogeny and evolution of the Cucurbitaceae, p. 1–12. In: R. Grumet, N. Katzir, and J. Garcia-Mas (eds.). Genetics and genomics of Cucurbitaceae, plant genetics and genomics: Crops and models. Springer International Publishing, Munich, Germany. doi: 10.1007/7397_2016_14.
   Google Scholar
• Riaz, S., S. Malook, A.H. Shah, M. Sarfaraz, S.M.Z. Kazmi, Z. Abad, S. Jabeen, R.Q. Uz-Zaman, M. Asif, and Q. Ali. 2015. Improvement of secondary metabolites for Cucurbita moschata through tissue culture techniques: An overview. Life Sci. J. 12:94–101.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, S., E.S. de Brito, and S.E. de Oliveira. 2018. Elderberry—Sambucus nigra L., p. 181–185. In: S. Rodrigues, E.S. de Brito, and S.E. de Oliveira (eds.). Exotic fruits. Academic Press, London. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-803138-4.00023-X.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Granados, N. Y., A. Lemhemdi, F. A. Choucha, D. Latrasse, M. Benhamed, A. Boualem, and A. Bendahmane. 2017. Sex determination in Cucumis, p. 307–319. In: R. Grumet, N. Katzir, and J. Garcia-Mas (eds.). Genetics and genomics of Cucurbitaceae. Plant genetics and genomics: Crops and models. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/7397_2016_32.
   Google Scholar
• Rouphael, Y., M.C. Kyriacoub, A.P. Spyridon, S.D. Pascalea, and G. Collad. 2018. Improving vegetable quality in controlled environments. Sci. Hortic. 234:275–289. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, R.M., N.F.D. Melo, M.A.D.J. Fonseca, and M.A.Á. Queiroz. 2017. COMBINING ABILITY OF FORAGE WATERMELON (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) GERMPLASM. Rev. Caatinga. 30(3):768–775. 10.1590/1983 21252017v30n325rc doi:10.1590/1983-21252017v30n325rc.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, S.M., and P.A. Nakata. 2016. The expanding footprint of CRISPR/Cas9 in the plant sciences. Plant Cell Rep. 35(7):1451–1468. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1987-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehgal, D., R. Singh, and V.R. Rajpal. 2016. Quantitative trait loci mapping in plants: Concepts and approaches, p. 31–59. In: V.R. Rajpal, S. Rao, and S. Raina (eds.). Molecular breeding for sustainable crop improvement, sustainable development and biodiversity. Springer International Publishing, Basel, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27090-6_2.
   Google Scholar
• Shashikumar, K.T., and M. Pitchaimuthu. 2016. Heterosis and combining ability analysis of quantitative and qualitative traits in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.). Int. J. Agric Sci. Res 6:341–348.
   Google Scholar
• Shree, S., C.L. Regar, F. Ahmad, V.K. Singh, R. Kumari, and A. Kumari. 2018. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth, yield and quality attributes of hybrid bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 7(4):2256–2266. 10. 20546/ijcmas.2018.704.258 doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.704.258.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, U., C. Praharaj, S. Chaturvedi, and A. Bohra. 2016. Biofortification: Introduction, approaches, limitations, and challenges, p. 3–18. In: U. Singh, C. Praharaj, S. Singh, and N. Singh (eds.). Biofortification of food crops. Springer, New Delhi. doi: 10.1007/978-81-322-2716-8_1.
   Google Scholar
• Standage-Beier, K., N. Brookhouser, P. Balachandran, Q. Zhang, D.A. Brafman, and X. Wang. 2019. RNA-guided recombinase-Cas9 fusion targets genomic DNA deletion and integration. The Clust. Reg. Interspac. Short Palindromiv Repeats J 2:209–222. 10. 1089/crispr.2019.0013.
   Google Scholar
• Talsma, E.F., and H. Pachón. 2017. Biofortification of crops with minerals and vitamins. World Health Organization, Rome. https://www.who.int/elena/titles/bbc/biofortification/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Tamilsevi, N.A., P. Jansirani, and L. Pug. 2015. Estimation of heterosis and combining ability for earliness and yield characters in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. 2017a.Ex. Poir). Afr. J. Agric. Res. 10:1904–1912. doi: 10.5897/AJAR2014.9099.
   Google Scholar
• Tazeb, A. 2017. Plant tissue culture technique as a novel tool in plant breeding: A review article. Am. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 17:111–118. doi: 10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2017.111.118.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, H., S. Sharma, and M. Thakur. 2019. Recent trends in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) research: An overview. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 94:533–547. doi: 10.1080/14620316.2018.1561214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirumurugan, D., A. Cholarajan, S.S.S. Raja, and R. Vijayakumar. 2018. An introductory chapter: Secondary metabolites, secondary metabolites - Sources and applications, p. 3–23. In: R. Vijakumar and S.S.S. Raja (eds.). Secondary metabolites sources and application. IntechOpen, London, United Kingdom. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.79766
   Google Scholar
• Thiruvengadam, M., and I.M. Chung. 2015. Phenolic compound production and biological activities from in vitro regenerated plants of gherkin (Cucumis anguria L.). Elect. J. Biotechnol. 18(4):295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, S., L. Jiang, Q. Gao, J. Zhang, M. Zong, H. Zhang, Y. Ren, S. Guo, G. Gong, F. Liu., et al. 2017. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based gene knockout in watermelon. Plant Cell Rep. 36(3):399–406. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-2089-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velkov, N., N. Tomlekova, and F. Satsu. 2016. Sensitivity of watermelon variety Bojura to mutant agents 60Co and EMS. J. Bio Sci. Biotech. 5:105–110.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., P. Sun, Y. Li, Y. Liu, N. Yang, J. Yu, X. Ma, S. Sun, R. Xia, X. Liu, et al. 2017. An overlooked paleotetraploidization in Cucurbitaceae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35(1):16–26. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., K. Bao, U.K. Reddy, Y. Bai, S.A. Hammar, C. Jiao, T.C. Wehner, A.O. Ramírez-Madera, Y. Weng, R. Grumet, et al. 2018. The USDA cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) collection: Genetic diversity, population structure, genome-wide association studies, and core collection development. Hortic. Res 5(1):64–77. doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0080-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei, Q.Z., W.Y. Fu, Y.Z. Wang, X.D. Qin, J. Wang, J. Li, and J.F. Chen. 2016. Rapid identification of fruit length loci in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based QTL analysis. Sci. Rep. 6:1–11. doi: 10.1038/srep27496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Win, K.T., C. Zhang, R.R. Silva, J.H. Lee, Y.C. Kim, and S. Lee. 2019. Identification of quantitative trait loci governing subgynoecy in cucumber. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132(5):1505–1521. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03295-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., P. Li, C. Zou, Y. Lu, C. Xie, X. Zhang, and M.S. Olsen. 2017. Enhancing genetic gain in the era of molecular breeding. J. Exp. Bot. 68(11):2641–2666. 10.1016/j.scienta.2017. 03.051 doi:10.1093/jxb/erx135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, C.B., C. Wang, L.X. Fan, N. Hao, D.D. Zou, Q. Zhang, H.X. Chen, and T. Wu. 2016. Ethylmethanesulfonate mutagenesis of cucumber for large-scale mutant screens. Pak. J. Bot. 48:2261–2266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zead, H.M.A., R.L. Haiane, S. Petro, I. Chekman, I.A.K. Ihab, M.A.A. Khaldun, and K.M.H. Loay. 2016. Comparative study of amino acid composition in seed, pulp and rind from Citrullus colocynthis fruits. Int. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem. Res. 8:433–437.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, Y.J., Y.Y. Zhou, J.X. Li, T. Yu, T.Q. Wu, J.N. Luo, S.B. Luo, and H.X. Huang. 2017. A high-density linkage map and QTL mapping of fruit-related traits in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.). Sci. Rep. 7(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13216-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou, C.L., L. Mi, X.Y. Hu, and B.H. Zhu. 2017. Evaluation of three pumpkin species: Correlation with physicochemical, antioxidant properties and classification using SPME-GC–MS and E-nose methods. J Food Sci Technol 54(10):3118–3131. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2748-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, W.Y., L. Huang, L. Chen, J.T. Yang, J.N. Wu, M.L. Qu, D.Q. Yao, C.L. Guo, H.L. Lian, H.L. He, et al. 2016. A high-density genetic linkage map for Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.): Based on specific length amplified fragment (SLAF) sequencing and QTL analysis of fruit traits in cucumber. Front. Plt. Sci 7:1–11. 10.3389/fpls. 2016.00437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar