Double cross hybrids could substantially supersede single cross hybrids for yield, fruit quality and tolerance to tomato leaf curl virus disease

References

• Acharya, B., S. Dutta, S. Dutta, and A. Chattopadhyay. 2018. Breeding tomato for simultaneous improvement of processing quality, fruit yield and dual disease tolerance. Int. J. Veg. Sci 24(5):407–423. doi: 10.1080/19315260.2018.1427648.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2006. Nutrient reference values for Australia and New Zealand including recommended dietary intakes. In: Australian national health and medical research council and the New Zealand ministry of health. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R.J. 1978. Issues in diallel analysis. Crop. Sci 18(4):533–536. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183X001800040001x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandillo, N., C. Raghavan, P.A. Muyco, M.A.L. Sevilla, I.T. Lobina, C.J. Dilla-Ermita, C.W. Tung, S. McCouch, M. Thomson, R. Mauleon. 2013. Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations in rice: Progress and potential for genetics research and breeding. Rice 6(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/1939-8433-6-11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banerjee, M.K., and G. Kalloo. 1987. Sources and inheritance of resistance to leaf curl virus in Lycopersicon. Theor. Appl. Genet 73(5):707–710. doi: 10.1007/BF00260780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhalala, K.C., and R.R. Acharya. 2019. Assessment of combining ability using Line × tester analysis over environments in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem 8(3):4478–4485.
   Google Scholar
• Bhutia, N.D., T. Seth, V.D. Shende, S. Dutta, and A. Chattopadhyay. 2015. Estimation of heterosis, dominance effect and genetic control of fresh fruit yield, quality and leaf curl disease severity traits of chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Sci. Hort. 182:47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi-hao, C., L. Jian-jun, W. Yong, and C. Guo-ju. 2009. Inheritance and identification of SCAR marker linked to bacterial wilt-resistance in eggplant. Afr. J. Biotechnol 8(20):5201–5207.
   Google Scholar
• Campanelli, G., S. Sestili, N. Acciarri, F. Montemurro, D. Palma, F. Leteo, and M. Beretta. 2019. Multi-parental advances generation inter-cross population, to develop organic tomato genotypes by participatory plant breeding. Agronomy. 9(3):119. doi:10.3390/agronomy9030119. article number 119.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, I., A. Chattopadhyay, and P. Hazra. 2007. Studies on processing and nutritional qualities of tomato as influenced by genotypes and environment. Veg. Sci 34:26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, A., S. Dutta, P. Dutta, and P. Hazra. 2011. Studies on heterobeltiosis, combining ability and gene action in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Int. J. Pl. Breed 5(2):88–93.
   Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, A., I. Chakraborty, and W. Siddique. 2013. Characterization of determinate tomato hybrids: Search for better processing qualities. J. Food Process. Technol. 4(4): article number 222. doi: 10.4172/2157-7110.1000222.
   Google Scholar
• Dell’Acqua, M., D.M. Gatti, G. Pea, F. Cattonaro, F. Coppens, G. Magris, A.L. Hlaing, H.H. Aung, H. Nelissen, J. Baute 2015. Genetic properties of the MAGIC maize population: A new platform for high definition QTL mapping in Zea mays. Genome Biol. 16(1):1–23. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0716-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dhadde, S.A., R.V. Patil, P.R. Dharmatti, and R. Bhat. 2009. Pooling favorable genes and enhanced heterosis through three way crosses involving potential sour tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) hybrids Karnataka. J. Agril. Sci 22(5):1062–1068.
   Google Scholar
• Falconer, D.S., and F.C. Mackay Trudy. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Ltd, Harlow, England.
   Google Scholar
• Farzane, A., H. Nemati, H. Arouiee, A.M. Kakhki, and N. Vahdati. 2012. The estimate of combining ability and heterosis for yield and yield components in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). J. Biol. Environ. Sci. 6(17):129–134.
   Google Scholar
• Fasahat, P., A. Rajabi, J.M. Rad, and J. Derera. 2016. Principles and utilization of combining ability in plant breeding. Biom. Biostat. Int. J 4:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fei, W.Y., W. Ming, W. DeYuan, and W. Lei. 1998. Studies on heterosis in some processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) lines. Acta Agric. Shanghai 14(3):29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, A.S.T., J.T.V. de Resende, M.V. Faria, J.T. de Paula, K. Schwarz, and D.S. Zanin. 2015. Combining ability and heterosis of relevant fruit traits of tomato genotypes for industrial processing. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol 15 (3):154–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, C.O., and S.S. Eberhart. 1966. Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related population. Biometrics 22(3):439–452. doi: 10.2307/2528181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffing, B. 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust. J. Biol. Sci 9(4):463–493. doi: 10.1071/BI9560463.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, H.K., F.R. Immer, and D.C. Smith. 1965. Methods of plant breeding. McGraw-Hill, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Hazra, P., A. Chattopadhyay, K. Karmakar, and S. Dutta. 2011. Modern technology in vegetable production. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, G.E. 1964. Polygalacturonase in normal and abnormal tomato fruit. Biochem. J 92(2):324–332. doi: 10.1042/bj0920324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh, B.L., J.D. Ehlers, B.E. Huang, M. Muñoz-Amatriaín, S. Lonardi, J.R.P. Santos, A. Ndeve, B.J. Batieno, O. Boukar, N. Cisse 2018. A multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) population for genetic analysis and improvement of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). Plant J. 93(6):1129–1142. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M.R., S. Ahmad, and M.M. Rahman. 2012. Heterosis and qualitative attributes in winter tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) hybrids Bangladesh. J. Agril. Res 37(1):39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Izge, A.U., and Y.M. Garba. 2012. Combining ability for fruit worm resistance in some commercially grown tomatoes in lake alau near maiduguri and hong in Adamawa state, Nigeria. J. Environ. Issu. Agric. Develop. Count 4(1):38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, N.F. 1970. A diallel selective mating system for cereal breeding 1. Crop. Sci 10(6):629–635. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1970.0011183X001000060006x.
   Google Scholar
• Kover, P.X., W. Valdar, J. Trakalo, N. Scarcelli, I.M. Ehrenreich, M.D. Purugganan, C. Durrant, and R. Mott. 2009. A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross to finemap quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000551. pgen.1000551 doi: 10.1371/journal.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., M.K. Mishra, J. Singh, G.K. Rai, M. Verma, and M. Rai. 2006. Studies on yield and quality traits in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Veg. Sci 33:126–132.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., K. Srivastava, N.P. Singh, N.K. Vasistha, R.K. Singh, and M.K. Singh. 2013. Combining ability analysis for yield and quality traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. Agric. Sci 5(2):213–218.
   Google Scholar
• Kumari, A., B.B. Grewal, M.K. Banerjee, and A. Kumari. 1998. Assessment of physico-chemical characteristics of different tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes. Veg. Sci 25:127–130.
   Google Scholar
• Makesh, S., M. Puddan, S. Ashok and, and M. Rizwana Banu. 2002. Heterosis studies for quality and yield in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Adv. Plant. Sci 15(11):597–601.
   Google Scholar
• Mangino, G., A. Arrones, M. Plazas, T. Pook, J. Prohens, P. Gramazio, and S. Vilanova. 2022. Newly developed MAGIC population allows identification of strong associations and candidate genes for anthocyanin pigmentation in eggplant. Front. Plant Sci 13. article number 847789. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.847789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mather, K., and J.L. Jinks. 1982. Biometrical genetics. The study of continuous variation. 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall Ltd, London, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Matos, R., J.T.V. de Resende, A.R. Zeist, L.E. Corte, P.R. Da-Silva, and D.M. Zeffa. 2021. Performance of the double-cross tomato hybrids from a partial diallel. Ciênc. Agrotec. 45:1–13. doi: 10.1590/1413-7054202145027320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney, H.H., and R.J. Davis. 1925. Influence of soil temperature and moisture on infection of wheat seedling by Helminthosporium sativum. J. Agric. Res 26:195–217.
   Google Scholar
• Pandiarana, N., A. Chattopadhyay, T. Seth, V.D. Shende, S. Dutta, and P. Hazra. 2015. Heterobeltiosis, potence ratio and genetic control of processing quality and disease severity traits in tomato New Zeal. J. Crop. Hort. Sci 43(4):282–293. doi: 10.1080/01140671.2015.1083039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual, L., N. Desplat, B.E. Huang, A. Desgroux, L. Bruguier, J.-P. Bouchet, Q.H. Le, B. Chauchard, P. Verschave, and M. Causse. 2015. Potential of a tomato MAGIC population to decipher the genetic control of quantitative traits and detect causal variants in the resequencing era. Plant Biotechnol J 13(4):565–577. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira da Costa, J.H., G.R. Rodríguez, D.R. Liberatti, S.L. Mahuad, E. Marchionni Basté, L.A. Picardi, R. Zorzoli, and G.R. Pratta. 2016. Tomato second cycle hybrids as a source of genetic variability for fruit quality traits. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol 16(4):289–297. doi: 10.1590/1984-70332016v16n4a44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranganna, S. 1986. Manual for analysis of fruits and vegetable products. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd, New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Sadasivam, S., and A. Manickam. 2008. Biochemical methods. 3rd ed., 155pp. New Age International (P) Limited Publishers, New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Saeed, A., N. Hasan, A. Shakeel, M.F. Saleem, N.A. Khan, K. Ziaf, R.A.M. Khan, and N. Saeed. 2014. Genetic analysis to find suitable parents for development of tomato hybrids. Life Sci. J 11:30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Sajjan, M.N. 2001. Heterosis, combining ability, RAPD analysis and resistance breeding for leaf curl virus and wilt in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharward, India, MS (Agri.) Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Salimath, P.M., and P.N. Bahl. 1985. Heterosis and combining ability for earliness in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Indian. J. Genet 45:97–100.
   Google Scholar
• Samineni, S., S.B. Sajja, B. Mondal, U. Chand, M. Thudi, R.K. Varshney, and P.M. Gaur. 2021. MAGIC lines in chickpea: Development and exploitation of genetic diversity. Euphytica 217(7):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10681-021-02874-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhar, L., B.G. Prakash, P.M. Salimath, P. Channayya Hiremath, O. Sridevi, and A.A. Patil. 2010. Implications of heterosis and combining ability among productive single cross hybrids in tomato Electron. J. Plant Breed 1(4):706–711.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, B.B., V.K. Sharma, M.K. Dhakar, and S. Punetha. 2013. Combining ability and gene action studies for horticultural traits in garden pea: A review. Afr. J. Agric. Res 8:4718–4725.
   Google Scholar
• Shende, V.D., T. Seth, S. Mukherjee, and A. Chattopadhyay. 2012. Breeding tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) for higher productivity and better processing qualities SABRAO. J. Breed. Genet 44(2):302–321.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R.F., and B.D. Chaudhary. 1985. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Stadlmeier, M., L. Hartl, and V. Mohler. 2018. Usefulness of a multiparent advanced generation intercross population with a greatly reduced mating design for genetic studies in winter wheat. Front. Plant Sci 9. article number 1825. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thamburaj, S. 1998. Breeding for high quality vegetable. National symposium on emerging scenario in vegetable research and development. 12–14. December 1998. Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi, India.
   Google Scholar