A Qualitative Examination of Withdrawing Sexual Consent, Sexual Compliance, and Young Women’s Role as Sexual Gatekeepers

References

• Andrejek, N., Fetner, T., & Heath, M. (2022). Climax as work: Heteronormativity, gender labor, and the gender gap in orgasms. Gender & Society, 36(2), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211073062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archard, D. (1998). Sexual consent. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Basile, K. C. (1999). Rape by acquiescence: The ways in which women “give in” to unwanted sex with their husbands. Violence against Women, 5(9), 1036–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1077801299005009004
   Google Scholar
• Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2019). Agency is everywhere, but agency is not enough: A conceptual analysis of young women’s sexual agency. Journal of Sex Research, 56(4-5), 462–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1578330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Eliseo-Arras, R. K. (2008). The making of unwanted sex: Gendered and neoliberal norms in college women’s unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 45(4), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802398381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A. (2007). Spontaneous’ sexual consent: An analysis of sexual consent literature. Feminism & Psychology, 17(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507072914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A. (2014). Rethinking the concept of consent for anti-sexual violence activism and education. Feminism & Psychology, 24(3), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514539652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A., Senn, C. Y., & McCaw, J. (2014). Navigating ambivalence: How heterosexual young adults make sense of desire differences. Journal of Sex Research, 51(7), 765–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.792327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkett, M., & Hamilton, K. (2012). Postfeminist sexual agency: Young women’s negotiations of sexual consent. Sexualities, 15(7), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712454076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmody, M. (2006). Preventing adult sexual violence through education? Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 18(2), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2006.12036393
   Google Scholar
• Carmody, M. (2009). Conceptualising the prevention of sexual assault and the role of education. ACSSA Issues, 10, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cavazos-Rehg, P. A., Krauss, M. J., Spitznagel, E. L., Schootman, M., Bucholz, K. K., Peipert, J. F., Sanders-Thompson, V., Cottler, L. B., & Bierut, L. J. (2009). Age of sexual debut among US adolescents. Contraception, 80(2), 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2009.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, E., Corona, E., & Ford, J. V. (2021). Advancing sexual pleasure as a fundamental human right and essential for sexual health, overall health and well-being: An introduction to the special issue on sexual pleasure. International Journal of Sexual Health, 33(4), 473–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2021.2015507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, N. E., Krishnakumar, A., & Leone, J. M. (2015). Re-examining issues of conceptualizations of willing consent: The hidden role of coercion in experiences of sexual acquiescence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(11), 1828–1846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514549050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crimes Amendment Act (2005). Section 128A C.F.R.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, J. N., & Burnett, S. (2017). Affirmative consent: What do college student leaders think about “yes means yes” as the standard for sexual behavior? American Journal of Sexuality Education, 12(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2017.1328322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darden, M. C., Ehman, A. C., Lair, E. C., & Gross, A. M. (2019). Sexual compliance: Examining the relationships among sexual want, sexual consent, and sexual assertiveness. Sexuality & Culture, 23(1), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9551-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dripps, D. A. (1992). Beyond rape: An essay on the difference between the presence of force and the absence of consent. Columbia Law Review, 92(7), 1780–1809. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouin, M., & Tobin, E. (2014). Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: Relations with attachment and sexual motivations. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar, T., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1993). Expectations for sexual interaction: A cognitive test of the sequencing of sexual communication behaviors. Health Communication, 5(4), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc0504_1
   Google Scholar
• Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (2016). Do men and women differ in their perceptions of women’s and men’s saying “no” when they mean “yes” to sex?: An examination between and within gender. Sexuality & Culture, 20(2), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9330-1
   Google Scholar
• Fahs, B., Swank, E., & Shambe, A. (2020). “I just go with it”: Negotiating sexual desire discrepancies for women in partnered relationships. Sex Roles, 83(3-4), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01098-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantasia, H. C. (2011). Really not even a decision anymore: Late adolescent narratives of implied sexual consent. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 7(3), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-3938.2011.01108.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ford, J. V. (2021). Unwanted sex on campus: The overlooked role of interactional pressures and gendered sexual scripts. Qualitative Sociology, 44(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-020-09469-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Transaction Publishers. Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, T., Stephenson, R., Freeland, R., Finneran, C., & Hadley, C. (2016). ‘Struggling to be the alpha’: Sources of tension and intimate partner violence in same-sex relationships between men. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 18(8), 875–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2016.1144791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A. J., & Crockett, E. E. (2016). When sex isn’t the answer: Examining sexual compliance, restraint, and physiological stress. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 31(3), 1–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2016.1154142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haydon, A. A., Herring, A. H., Prinstein, M. J., & Halpern, C. T. (2012). Beyond age at first sex: Patterns of emerging sexual behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(5), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, S., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1999). “By the semi-mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. The Journal of Sex Research, 36(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1998). The male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality and power. Tufnell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, T. P. (2005). Understanding sexual consent: An empirical investigation of the normative script for young heterosexual adults. In M. Cowling & P. Reynolds (Eds.), Making sense of sexual consent (pp. 207–225). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hust, S. J. T., Rodgers, K. B., & Bayly, B. (2017). Scripting sexual consent: Internalized traditional sexual scripts and sexual consent expectancies among college students. Family Relations, 66(1), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, K. A. (2019). Global perspectives on the #MeToo movement: From ‘big noise’ to ‘discrete oblivion’? Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 10(3), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc.10.3.153_2
   Google Scholar
• Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, N. K., & Barata, P. C. (2020). The intersections of normative heterosexuality and sexual violence: University men’s talk about sexual behavior in intimate relationships. Sex Roles, 83(5–6), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01110-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., & Humphreys, T. P. (2014). Sexual consent on college campuses: Implications for sexual assault prevention education. The Health Education Monograph Series, 31(2), 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Manning, J., & Hunt, M. (2018). Sexual consent in and out of the bedroom: Disjunctive views of heterosexual college students. Women's Studies in Communication, 41(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2018.1470121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Marcantonio, T. L., & Hunt, M. E. (2017). College students’ sexual consent communication and perceptions of sexual double standards: A qualitative investigation. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 49(4), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. Journal of Sex Research, 50(6), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.700739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Peterson, Z. D., Sanders, S. A., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014). Gender differences in heterosexual college students’ conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.792326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., Sanders, S., Peterson, Z. D., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014). Consenting to sexual activity: The development and psychometric assessment of dual measures of consent. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(3), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0225-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J., & Schneider, M. E. (2015). (Hetero)sexual compliance with unwanted casual sex: Associations with feelings about first sex and sexual self-perceptions. Sex Roles, 72(9–10), 451–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0467-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J., & Tirone, V. (2009). Women’s sexual compliance with male dating partners: Associations with investment in ideal womanhood and romantic well-being. Sex Roles, 60(5–6), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9566-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J., & Tirone, V. (2010). Going along with it: Sexually coercive partner behavior predicts dating women’s compliance with unwanted sex. Violence against Women, 16(7), 730–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210374867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, V., Imhoff, R., Reininger, K. M., & Briken, P. (2019). Perceptions of sexual script deviation in women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(2), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1280-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levand, M. A. (2020). Consent as cross-cultural communication: Navigating consent in a multicultural world. Sexuality & Culture, 24(3), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09667-7
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, B. M., Nield, J. A., & Lapane, K. L. (2015). Age at first intercourse and subsequent sexual partnering among adult women in the United States, a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1458-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mallory, A. B., Stanton, A. M., & Handy, A. B. (2019). Couples’ sexual communication and dimensions of sexual function: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 56(7), 882–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1568375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcantonio, T. L., Jozkowski, K. N., & Lo, W.-J. (2018). Beyond “just saying no”: A preliminary evaluation of strategies college students use to refuse sexual activity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(2), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1130-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marecek, J., Finn, S. E., & Cardell, M. (1982). Gender roles in the relationships of lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 8(2), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1300/j082v08n02_06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, K., Corona-Vargas, E., & Cruz, M. (2021). Integrating sexual pleasure for quality and inclusive comprehensive sexuality education. International Journal of Sexual Health, 33(4), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2021.1921894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, J. (1996). Why when she says no she doesn’t mean maybe and doesn’t mean yes: A critical reconstruction of consent, sex and the law. Legal Theory, 2(3), 175–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325200000483
   Google Scholar
• Meston, C. M., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2007). Such a tease: Intentional sexual provocation within heterosexual interactions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(4), 531–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9167-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1988). Men's self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551398
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., Humphreys, T. P., Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4-5), 457–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1146651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlenhard, C. L., & Rodgers, C. S. (1998). Token resistance to sex: New perspectives on an old stereotype. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00167.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, S. H. (2018). Heterosexual men’s sexual desire: Supported by, or deviating from, traditional masculinity norms and sexual scripts? Sex Roles, 78(1–2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0766-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, L. F., & Allgeier, E. R. (1998). Feigning sexual desire: Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 35(3), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz, R. (2019). Explicit, voluntary, and conscious: Assessment of the importance of adopting an affirmative consent definition for sexual assault prevention programming on college campuses. Journal of Health Communication, 24(9), 728–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1666939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman, S. L. (2003). Predicting men’s rape perceptions based on the belief that “no” really means “yes”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(4), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01919.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). Conceptualizing the “wantedness” of women's consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: Implications for how women label their experiences with rape. Journal of Sex Research, 44(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490709336794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. (2000). Flirting with Danger: Young Women’s Reflections on Sexuality and Dominance. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, B., & Becker, P. (2018). Exploring definitions and prevalence of verbal sexual coercion and its relationship to consent to unwanted sex: Implications for affirmative consent standards on college campuses. Behavioral Sciences, 8(8), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8080069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn-Nilas, C., & Kennett, D. J. (2018). Reasons why undergraduate women comply with unwanted, non-coercive sexual advances: A serial indirect effect model integrating sexual script theory and sexual self-control perspectives. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(5), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1427039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network. (2022). Understanding consent. https://www.rainn.org/understanding-consent
   Google Scholar
• Reis, J., de Oliveria, L., Oliveira, C., & Nobre, P. (2021). Psychosocial and behavioral aspects of women’s sexual pleasure: A scoping review. International Journal of Sexual Health, 33(4), 494–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2021.1910890
   Google Scholar
• Rollston, R., Wilkinson, E., Abouelazm, R., Mladenov, P., Horanieh, N., & Jabbarpour, Y. (2020). Comprehensive sexuality education to address gender-based violence. Lancet, 396(10245), 148–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31477-X
   Google Scholar
• Ronis, S. T., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2011). A longitudinal analysis of predictors of male and female adolescents’ transitions to intimate sexual behavior. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 49(3), 321–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaluk, J. K., Todd, L. M., Milhausen, R., & Lachowsky, N. J. (2014). Dominant heterosexual sexual scripts in emerging adulthood: Conceptualizations and measurement. Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.745473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotland, R. L., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Women’s “token resistant” and compliant sexual behaviors are related to uncertain sexual intentions and rape. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295213004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S., Hatfield, E., Cortese, A., Potapova, E., & Levitskaya, A. (1994). Token resistance to sexual intercourse and consent to unwanted intercourse: College students' dating experiences in three countries. Journal of Sex Research, 31(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499409551739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spriggs, A. L., & Halpern, C. T. (2008). Sexual debut timing and depressive symptoms in emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(9), 1085–1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9303-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, B. N. (2014). Masculine status, sexual performance, and the sexual stigmatization of women. Symbolic Interaction, 37(3), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannier, S. A., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2010). Sex without desire: Characteristics of occasions of sexual compliance in young adults’ committed relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 47(5), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903132051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, K., Honickman, S., Valdespino-Hayden, Z., & Lowe, S. R. (2019). Dual measures of sexual consent: A confirmatory factor analysis of the internal consent scale and external consent scale. The Journal of Sex Research, 56(6), 802–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1581882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R. (1996). A comment on consent, sex, and rape. Legal Theory, 2(3), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325200000501
   Google Scholar
• Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13(4), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480705278729
   Google Scholar
• Willis, M., Blunt-Vinti, H., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2019). Associations between internal and external sexual consent in a diverse national sample of women. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, M., Fu, T.-C., Jozkowski, K. N., Dodge, B., & Herbenick, D. (2022). Associations between sexual precedent and sexual compliance: An event-level examination. Journal of American College Health, 70(1), 107–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1726928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, M., Hunt, M., Wodika, A., Rhodes, D. L., Goodman, J., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2019). Explicit verbal sexual consent communication: Effects of gender, relationship status, and type of sexual behavior. International Journal of Sexual Health, 31(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2019.1565793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, M., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2019). Sexual precedent’s effect on sexual consent communication. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(6), 1723–1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1348-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. A., Sarvet, A., Walsh, K., Wall, M., Ford, J. V., Gilbert, L., Santelli, J., Hirsch, J. S., Khan, S., & Mellins, C. A. (2020). The situational contexts of sexual experiences among urban college students: An event-based analysis. International Journal of Sexual Health, 32(3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2020.1772440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar