REFERENCES
- Allen, E.J., and R.K. Weber. 2014. The library and the web: Graduate students’ selection of open access journals for empirical literature searches. Journal of Web Librarianship 8(3): 243–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2014.927745.
- Anderson, B. 2006. Indexing the Internet. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 25(1): 135–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J103v25n01_07.
- Babson Research Group and the College Board. 2012. Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/changing_course_2012.
- Beel, J., B. Gipp, and E. Wilde. 2010. Academic search engine optimization (ASEO). Journal of Scholarly Publishing 41(2): 176–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jsp.41.2.176.
- Brabazon, T. 2014. The disintermediated librarian and a reintermediated future. The Australian Library Journal 63(3): 191–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2014.932681.
- Burns, C.S. 2014. Academic libraries and open access strategies. Library and Information Science Faculty. Paper 8. http://uknowledge.uky.edu/slis_facpub/8 (accessed June 27, 2014).
- Catalano, A. 2013. Patterns of graduate students’ information seeking behaviour: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Journal of Documentation 69(2): 243–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220411311300066.
- Cothran, T. 2011. Google Scholar acceptance and use among graduate students: A quantitative study. Library and Information Science Research 33(4): 293–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2011.02.001.
- Coto-Solano, R., S. Mornati, T Hedlund, H Francke, and C.G. Saray. 2009. Metadata usage tendencies in Latin American electronic journals. In Rethinking electronic publishing: Innovation in communication paradigms and technologies—Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, 311–344. Milan, Italy: ELPUB.
- Dawson, A., and V. Hamilton. 2006. Optimising metadata to make high-value content more accessible to Google users. Journal of Documentation 62(3): 307–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220410610666484.
- Dixon, L., C. Duncan, J.C. Fagan, M. Mandernach, and S.E. Warlick. 2010. Finding articles and journals via Google Scholar, journal portals, and link resolvers: Usability study results. Reference & User Services Quarterly 50(2): 170–181. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5860/rusq.50n2.170.
- Francke, H. 2008. The state of metadata in open access journals: Possibilities and restrictions. In Sustainability in the age of Web 2.0—Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, 56–67. Toronto, Canada: ELPUB.
- Google Scholar. 2010. Inclusion guidelines for webmasters. http://scholar.google.com/intl/en-US/scholar/inclusion.html.
- Hawking, D., and J. Zobel. 2007. Does topic metadata help with web search? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(5): 613–628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20548.
- Hutchens, C. 2013. Open access metadata: Current practices and proposed solutions. Learned Publishing 26(3): 159–165. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1087/20130302.
- Lagace, N., and G. Tananbaum. 2013. NISO open access metadata and indicators working group: Creating a cross-audience solution. The Serials Librarian 65(2): 123–127. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/0361526X.2013.813892.
- Lewis, D.W. 2012. The inevitability of open access. College and Research Libraries 73(5): 493–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl-299.
- Mercer, H., and S. Dyas-Correia. 2011. Metadata value chain for open-access e-journals. The Serials Librarian 60(1): 234–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2011.556040.
- Onaifo, D., and D. Rasmussen. 2013. Increasing libraries’ content findability on the web with search engine optimization. Library Hi Tech 31(1): 87–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378831311303958.
- Pandita, R. 2013. Growing trend towards open access publishing at global level: An analysis of directory of open access journals (DOAJ). International Research: Journal of Library and Information Science 3(3): 562–578. http://irjlis.com/.
- Rushton, E., and S. Funke. 2011. The goodness in the evil: Why search engine optimization matters to information professionals. Searcher 19(9): 30–35. http://www.infotoday.com/.
- Somerville, M.M., and L.Y. Conrad. 2013. Discoverability challenges and collaboration opportunities within the scholarly communications ecosystem: A SAGE white paper update. Collaborative Librarianship 5(1): 29–41. http://collaborativelibrarianship.org/index.php/jocl/article/view/240/181 (accessed June 27, 2014).
- Walters, W.H., and A.C. Linvill. 2011. Characteristics of open access journals in six subject areas. College & Research Libraries 72(4): 372–392. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl-132.
- Warlick, S.E., and K.T. L. Vaughan. 2007. Factors influencing publication choice: Why faculty choose open access. Biomedical Digital Libraries 4(1): 1–1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-4-1.
- Weber, R.K., and E.J. Allen. 2014. Student-selected journals: An emerging resource. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 14(1): 5–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2013.0043.
- Wu, M.-D., and S.-C. Chen. 2014. Graduate students appreciate Google Scholar, but still find use for libraries. The Electronic Library 32(3): 375–389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EL-08-2012-0102.
- Zhang, J., and A. Dimitroff. 2005. The impact of metadata implementation on webpage visibility in search engine results (Part II). Information Processing and Management 41(3): 691–715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2003.12.002.
- Zhang, J., and I. Jastram. 2006. A study of the metadata creation behavior of different user groups on the Internet. Information Processing & Management 42(4): 1099–1122. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ipm.2005.05.002.