Building Positive Learning Experiences through Pedagogical Research Guide Design

References

• Alverson, J., Schwartz, J., Brunskill, A., & Lefager, J. (2015). Creating audience and environment-friendly research guides: Findings from a user study. Paper presented at the 2015 Association of College and Research Libraries Conference, Portland, OR, March 25–28. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2015/Alverson_Schwartz_Brunskill_Lefager.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Association of College & Research Libraries. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency
   Google Scholar
• Association of College & Research Libraries. (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
   Google Scholar
• Babich, N. (2016). Progress trackers in UX design – UX planet. UX Planet, Retrieved from https://uxplanet.org/progress-trackers-in-ux-design-4319cef1c600
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R. L. (2014). Designing LibGuides as instructional tools for critical thinking and effective online learning. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(3–4), 107–117.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., … Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielat, V., Befus, R., & Arnold, J. (2013). Integrating LibGuides into the teaching-learning process. In A. W. Dobbs, R. L. Sittler, & D. Cook (Eds.), Using LibGuides to enhance library services (pp. 121–142). Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Blummer, B. A., & Kritskaya, O. (2009). Best practices for creating an online tutorial: A literature review. Journal of Web Librarianship, 3(3), 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Bose, S., Saha, U., Kar, D., Goswami, S., Nayak, A. K., & Chakrabarti, S. (2017). RSentiment: A tool to extract meaningful insights from textual reviews. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing: Selected Papers from the International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technologies, CSIT 2016, Lviv, Ukraine, September 6–10. 516: 259–268. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3156-4
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, A. (2014). LibGuides and web-based library guides in comparison: Is there a pedagogical advantage? Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(2), 147–171. doi:10.1080/19322909.2014.903709
   Google Scholar
• Brazzeal, B. (2006). Research guides as library instruction tools. Reference Services Review, 34(3), 358–367.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J., & Bawden, D. (2005). Is Google enough? Comparison of an internet search engine with academic library resources. Aslib Proceedings, 57(6), 498–512. doi:10.1108/00012530510634235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, P.-S. (2012). Bibliometric characteristics of political science research in Germany. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland-Innes, M., & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 269–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, D. L. (2002). Engagement, excitement, anxiety, and fear: Learners’ experiences of starting an online course. Distance Education, 16(4), 205–226.
   Google Scholar
• Einbinder, S. D. (2014). Reducing research anxiety among MSW students. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 34(1), 2–16. doi:10.1080/08841233.2013.863263
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, L. (2003). Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(3), 379–383.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibbons, S. (2003). Building upon the MyLibrary concept to better meet the information needs of college students. D-Lib Magazine, 9(3). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march03/gibbons/03gibbons.html
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, A. C., & Westbrock, T. (2010). Reaching out with LibGuides: Establishing a working set of best practices. Journal of Library Administration, 50(5–6), 638–656.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwell, S. (2016). Using the I-LEARN model for information literacy instruction. Journal of Information Literacy, 10(1), 67–85. doi:10.11645/10.1.2045
   Google Scholar
• Hemmig, W. (2005). Online pathfinders: Toward an experience-centered model. Reference Services Review, 33(1), 66–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, A. (2015). LibGuides. Pedagogy to oppress. Hybrid Pedagogy, 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.hybridpedagogy.com/journal/libguides-pedagogy-to-oppress/
   Google Scholar
• Hintz, K., Farrar, P., Eshghi, S., Sobol, B., Naslund, J.-A., Lee, T., … McCauley, A. (2010). Letting students take the lead: A user-centered approach to evaluating subject guides. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 5(4), 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M. (2001). An influence of positive affect on decision making in complex situations: theoretical issues with practical implications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(2), 75–85. doi:10.1207/S15327663JCP1102_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, P. (2014). The importance of emotion in design. The Next Web. Retrieved from https://thenextweb.com/dd/2014/02/25/importance-emotion-design.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Baylor, A. L., & Shen, E. (2007). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The impact of agent emotion and gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 220–234. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00210.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kracker, J. (2002). Research anxiety and students’ perceptions of research: An experiment. Part I. Effect of teaching Kuhlthau’s ISP Model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4), 282–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kracker, J., & Wang, P. (2002). Research anxiety and students’ perceptions of research: An experiment. Part II. Content analysis of their writings on two experiences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4), 295–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C. (1983). The research process: Case studies and interventions with high school seniors in advanced placement English classes using Kelly's theory of constructs (doctoral dissertation). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladner, B., Beagle, D., James, R. S., & Steele, L. (2004). Rethinking online instruction: From content transmission to cognitive immersion. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 43(4), 337–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leighton, H. V., & May, D. (2013). The library course page and instruction: Perceived helpfulness and use among students. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 18(2), 127–138.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. J. (2010). Cognitive load theory and library research guides. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 15(1), 53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, B. J., Arnold, J. L., & Rawson, J. (2013). Using LibGuides to promote information literacy in a distance education environment. In A. W. Dobbs, R. L. Sittler, & D. Cook (Eds.), Using LibGuides to Enhance Library Services (pp. 221–237). Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mattson, I. A. B. (2013). Untapped potential: A study of academic online legal research guides. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 32(4), 247–273.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Karla, J. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505824
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., Yukie, T., Robert, M., & Marianne, B. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellon, C. A. (1986). Library anxiety: A grounded theory and its development. College & Research Libraries, 47(2), 160–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mombelli, S. (2016). Is 2016 the year that emotional design is taken seriously? The Userzoom Blog. Retrieved from http://www.userzoom.co.uk/blog/future-of-ux/2016-year-emotional-design-taken-seriously.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (2012). How many test users in a usability study? Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-many-test-users/
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D., & Nielsen, J. (2017). The definition of user experience (UX). Nielsen Norman Group, Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/definition-user-experience/
   Google Scholar
• Ossola, A. (2014). How scientists are learning to write. The Atlantic, Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/12/how-scientists-are-learning-to-write/383685/
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, D. (2011). Subject guides in academic libraries: A user-centered study of uses and perceptions. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 35(4), 436–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1/2), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanastasiou, E. C., & Zembylas, M. (2008). Anxiety in undergraduate research methods courses: Its nature and implications. International Journal of Research and Methods in Education, 3(2), 155–167.
   Google Scholar
• Pendell, K., & Armstrong, A. (2014). Psychology guides and information literacy: The current landscape and a proposed framework for standards-based development. Reference Services Review, 42(2), 293–304.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, R. W. (2000). Perceptual user interfaces: Affective perception. Communications of the ACM, 43(3), 50–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittsley, K. A., & Memmot, S. (2012). Improving independent student navigation of complex educational web sites: An analysis of two navigation design changes in LibGuides. Information Technology and Libraries, 31(3), 52–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintel, D. F. (2016). LibGuides and usability: What our users want. InfoToday, 36, 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Reeb, B., & Gibbons, S. (2004). Students, librarians, and subject guides: Improving a poor rate of return. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4(1), 123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, M., Naser, Z.-M., & Shiraz, I. R. A. N. (2013). The relationship between research self-efficacy, research anxiety and attitude toward research: A study of agricultural graduate students. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 3(5), 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, L., Wang, M., & Shen, R. (2009). Affective e-Learning: Using emotional data to improve learning in pervasive learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 176–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinkinson, C., Alexander, S., Hicks, A., & Kahn, M. (2012). Guiding design: Exposing librarian and student mental models of research guides. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 12(1), 63–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2017). What is user experience? What makes a good UX Design. Prototypr, Retrieved from https://blog.prototypr.io/what-is-user-experience-what-makes-a-good-ux-design-b404bb933bd0.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M. (2008). 21st century readers’ aids: Past history and future directions. Journal of Web Librarianship, 2(4), 511–523. doi:10.1080/19322900802473886
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, M. M., & Vuotto, F. (2005). If you build it with them, they will come: Digital research portal design and development strategies. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 10(1), 77–94.
   Google Scholar
• Sonsteby, A., & DeJonghe, J. (2013). Usability testing, user-centered design, and LibGuides subject guides: A case study. Journal of Web Librarianship, 7(1), 83–94. doi:10.1080/19322909.2013.747366
   Google Scholar
• Springshare (2018). LibGuides community. Retrieved from https://community.libguides.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford Humanities Center (2018). How is humanities research conducted? Retrieved from http://shc.stanford.edu/how-humanities-research-conducted
   Google Scholar
• Stone, S. M., Lowe, M. S., & Maxson, B. K. (2018). Does course guide design impact student learning? College & Undergraduate Libraries, 25(3). doi:10.1080/10691316.2018.1482808
   Google Scholar
• Strutin, M. (2018). Making research guides more useful and more well used. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 7(6), 151. doi:10.5062/F4M61H5K
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312.
   Google Scholar
• TeachingWorks (2018). High-leverage practices. Retrieved from http://www.teachingworks.org/work-of-teaching/high-leverage-practices.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. (2003). Information literacy meeting of experts. Report sponsored by the US National Commission of Libraries and Information Science and the National Forum on Information literacy with the support of UNESCO, Prague, Czech Republic, September 20–23. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/themes/info_lit_meeting_prague_2003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B., Fuchs, C., & Todman, A. (2015). Static vs. dynamic tutorials: Applying usability principles to evaluate online point-of-need instruction. Information Technology and Libraries, 34(4), 30–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• User Experience Basics. (2017). usability.gov. Retrieved from https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/user-experience.html
   Google Scholar
• Vileno, L. (2007). From paper to electronic, the evolution of pathfinders: A review of the literature. Reference Services Review, 35(3), 434–451. doi:10.1108/00907320710774300.
   Google Scholar
• Wiebe, T. J. (2016). The information literacy imperative in higher education. Liberal Education, 101/102 (4/1). Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/liberaleducation/2015-2016/fall-winter/wiebe
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S., McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., & Ortega, T. (2016). Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning. Stanford Digital Repository. Retrieved from http://purl.stanford.edu/fv751yt5934
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2008). Adult learners’ emotions in online learning. Distance Education, 29(1), 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M., Theodorou, M., & Pavlakis, A. (2008). The role of emotions in the experience of online learning: challenges and opportunities. Educational Media International, 45(2), 107–117.
   Google Scholar