The Motivational Impact of Wearable Healthy Lifestyle Technologies: A Self-determination Perspective on Fitbits With Adolescents

References

• Dudley D, Goodyear VA, Baxter D. Quality and health-optimizing physical education: using assessment at the health and education nexus. J Teach Phys Educ. 2016;35:324–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq MA, Parkinson KN, Adamson AJ, et al. Timing of the decline of physical activity in childhood and adolescence: Gatehead Millennium Cohort Study. Br J Sports Med. Published Online: March 13, 2017 (doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096933).
   Google Scholar
• Husson H, Tirilis D. School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(1):CD007651.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. Sporting Future: a new strategy for an active nation. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/486622/Sporting_Future_ACCESSIBLE.pdf. Published December 17, 2015. Accessed December 12, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Quality Physical Education (QPE) Guidelines for Policy-Makers. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen I, Leblanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:40. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmons BW, Leblanc AG, Carson V, et al. Systematic review of physical activity and health in the early years (aged 0–4 years). Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37:773–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubans DR, Smith JJ, Peralta LR, et al. A school-based intervention incorporating smartphone technology to improve health-related fitness among adolescents: rationale and study protocol for the NEAT and ATLAs 2.0 cluster randomised controlled trial and dissemination study. Br Med J Open. 2016;6:e010448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt M, Sarmiento OL, Montes F, et al. The implications of megatrends in information and communication technology and transportation for changes in global physical activity. Lancet. 2012;380:282–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung AE, Skinner AC., Hasty SE, et al. Tweeting for Health: a novel mHealth intervention using fitbits and Twitter to foster healthy lifestyles. Clin Pediatr. 2016;56:26–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton D. Data assemblages, sentient schools and digitized health and physical education (response to Gard). Sports Educ Soc. 2015;20:122–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich E, Miah A. Mobile, wearable and ingestible health technologies: towards a critical research agenda. Health Sociol Rev. 2017;26:84–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zach S, Raviv T, Meckel Y. Using information communication technologies (ICTs) for motivating female adolescents to exercise/run in their leisure time. Comput Human Behav. 2016;60:593–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depper A, Howe PD. Are we fit yet? English adolescent girls’ experiences of health and fitness apps. Health Sociol Rev. 2017;26:98–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewallen J, Behm-Morawitz E. Pinterest or Thinterest?: social comparison and body image on social media. Social Media & Society. 2016;2:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silk M, Millington B, Rich E, et al. (Re-)thinking digital leisure. Leisure Studies. 2016;35:712–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson B. Algorithmic skin: health-tracking technologies, personal analytics and the biopedagogies of digitized health and physical education. Sports Educ Soc. 2015;20:133–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckle S. Alone Together: Why We Expect More From Technology and Less From Each Other. New York, NY: Basic Books; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wartella E, Rideout V, Zupancic H, et al. Teens, Health and Technology: A National Survey. http://cmhd.northwestern.edu. Published June 2015. Accessed December 12, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Casey A, Goodyear VA, Armour KA. Rethinking the relationship between pedagogy, technology and learning in health and physical education. Sports Educ Soc. 2017;22:288–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dute DJ, Bemelmans WJE, Breda J. Using mobile apps to promote a healthy lifestyle among adolescents and students: a review of the theoretical basis and lessons learned. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2016;4(2):e39. doi:10.2196/mhealth.3559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki JE, Hickey A, Mavilia M, et al. Validation of the Fitbit wireless activity tracker for prediction of energy expenditure. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12:149–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brice MR, Ball JW, McClaran S. Technology and physical activity motivation. Int J Sports Exerc Psychol. 2016;14:295–304.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer SE, Ching CC, Breen H, et al. Wearing, thinking, and moving: testing the feasibility of fitness tracking with urban youth. Am J Health Educ. 2016;47:8–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis ZH, Lyons EJ, Jarvis JM, et al. Using an electronic activity monitor system as an intervention modality: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:585. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1947-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgers N, McNarry MA, Mackintosh K. Feasibility and effectiveness of using wearable activity trackers in youth: a systematic review. J Med Int Res Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;3(4):e129. doi:10.2196/mhealth.6540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiel R, Kaps A, Bieber G. Electronic health technology for the assessment of physical activity and eating habits in children and adolescents with overweight and obesity IDA. Appetite. 2012;58:432–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerner C, Haerens L, Kirk D. Body image in physical education: current knowledge and future directions. Eur Phys Educ Rev. Published Online: February 13, 2017 (doi:10.1177/1356336X17692508).
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berghe L, Vansteenkiste M, Cardon G, et al. Research on self-determination theory in physical education. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 2014;19:97–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baert H, Winiecki T, Madden M, et al. Tom: using digital technology in physical education to transform pedagogy. In: Casey A, Goodyear VA, Armour KM, eds. Digital Technologies and Learning in Physical Education: Pedagogical Cases. London, UK: Routledge; 2016:191–212.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear VA, Blain D, Quarmby T, et al. Dylan: the use of “mobile” “apps” within a tactical inquiry approach. In: Casey A, Goodyear VA, Armour KM, eds. Digital Technologies and Learning in Physical Education: Pedagogical Cases. London, UK: Routledge; 2016:13–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in exercise and sport. In: Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, eds. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Exercise and Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2007:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira PJ, Carraca EV, Markland D, et al. Exercise, physical activity and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:78. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Connell JP. Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57:749–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haerens L, Kirk D, Cardon G, et al. Motivational profiles for secondary school physical education and its relationship to the adoption of a physically active lifestyle among university students. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2010;16(2):117–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behaviour. New York, NY: Plenum; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Owen KB, Smith J, Lubans DR, et al. Self-determined motivation and physical activity in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2014;67:270–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aelterman N, Vansteenkiste M, Van Keer H, et al. Development and evaluation of a training on need-supportive teaching in physical education: qualitative and quantitative findings. Teach Educ. 2013;32:305–320.
   Google Scholar
• Vallerand RJ. Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In: Zanna MP. eds. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1997:271–360.
   Google Scholar
• Vansteekiste M, Niemiec CP, Soenens B. The development of the five mini-theories of self determination theory: an historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. In: Urdan TC, Karabenick SA, eds. Advances in Motivation and Achievement: The Decade Ahead. Bingley, UK. Emerald Publishing; 2010:105–165.
   Google Scholar
• DeCharms R. Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behaviour. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner EA, Belmont MJ. Motivation in the classroom: reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. J Educ Psychol. 1993;85:571–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull. 1995;117:497–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11:227–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve J, Jang H. What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. J Educ Psychol. 2006;98:209–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koka A, Hein V. The effect of perceived teacher feedback on intrinsic motivation in physical education. Int J Sports Exerc Psychol. 2005;36(2):91–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierens L, Vansteenkiste M, Goossens L, et al. The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. Br J Educ Psychol. 2009;79:57–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. Handbook of Self-determination Research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ntoumanis N. A prospective study of participation in optimal school physical education based on self-determination theory. J Educ Psychol. 2005;75:411–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicase V, Cogerino G, Bois J, et al. Students’ perceptions of teacher feedback and physical competence in physical education classes: gender effects. J Teach Phys Educ. 2006;25:36–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemmich JN, Lambiase MJ, McCarthy TF, et al. Autonomy supportive environments and mastery as basic factors to motivate physical activity in children: a controlled laboratory study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie M, Mageau GA, Koestner R. What makes for pleasant social interaction? Motivational dynamics of interpersonal relations. J Soc Psychol. 2008;148:523–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Solomon MA, Kosma M, et al. Need support, need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation and physical activity participation among middle school students. J Teach Phys Educ. 2011;30:51–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand RJ, Losier G. An integrative analysis on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. J Appl Sport Psychol. 1999;11:142–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear VA Social media, apps and wearable technologies: navigating ethical dilemmas and procedures. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2017;9:285–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubans DR, Morgan PJ. Evaluation of an extra-curricular school sport program promoting lifestyle and lifetime activity. J Sport Sci. 2008;26:519–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markland D, Tobin V. A modification to the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. J Sports Exerc Psychol. 2004;26:191–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnell KE, Wilson PM, Zumbo BDM, et al. Psychological need satisfaction in exercise scale: an investigation of measurement invariance. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2012;16:219–236.
   Google Scholar
• Macphail A. Nominal group technique: a useful method for working with young people. Br Educ Res J. 2001;27(2):161–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke S. Rethinking “validity” and “trustworthiness” in qualitative inquiry. In: Smith B, Sparks A. eds. Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. London, UK: Routledge; 2016:330–339.
   Google Scholar
• Smith B, Tomason JR, Latimer-Cheung AE, et al. Narrative as a knowledge translation tool for facilitating impact: translating physical activity knowledge to disabled people and health professionals. Health Psychol. 2015;34:303–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand RJ, Gauvin LI, Halliwell WR. Effects of zero-sum competition on children’s motivation and perceived competence. J Soc Psychol. 1986;126:465–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markland D, Ingledew DK. Exercise participation motives: a self-determination theory perspective. In: Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NL, eds. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Exercise and Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2007:23–34.
   Google Scholar