Intentions to Use Emergency Contraception: The Role of Accurate Knowledge and Information Source Credibility

References

• American Academy of Pediatrics. Emergency contraception. Pediatrics. 2005;116:1038–1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greydanus DE, Rimsza ME, Matytsina L. Contraception for college students. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2005;52:135–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College Health Association. American College Health Association–National College Health Assessment II: Reference Group Executive Summary Spring 2014. Hanover, MD: American College Health Association; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Trussell J, Raymond EG, Cleland K. Emergency contraception: a last chance to prevent unintended pregnancy. http://ec.princeton.edu/questions/ec-review.pdf. Published February 2014. Updated February 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fok WK, Blumenthal PD. Update on emergency contraception. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28:522–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer RG, Thompson E. Knowledge and attitudes about emergency contraception in university students. Coll Stud J. 2003;37:523–531.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett PO, Mitchell CP, Taylor JS, et al. Emergency contraception: knowledge and perceptions in a university population. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006;18:161–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey MT. Female college students’ knowledge, perceptions, and use of emergency contraception. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2009;38:399–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller LM. College student knowledge and attitudes toward emergency contraception. Contraception. 2011;83:68–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollen CJ, Miller MK, Hayes KL, Barg FK. Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about emergency contraception: a survey of female adolescents seeking care in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29:469–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehan Mackin M, Clark MK, McCarthy AM, et al. Knowledge and use of emergency contraception in college women. West J Nurs Res. 2015;37:462–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett KP, Widman L, Francis DB, et al. Emergency contraception: sources of information and perceptions of access among young adults. Women Health. 2015;56:668–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan C. The persuasiveness of source credibility: a critical review of five decades’ evidence. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2004;34:243–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang HS, Moneyham L. Use of emergency contraceptive pills and condoms by college students: a survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45:775–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher JD, Fisher WA. The information, motivation, behavioral skills model. In: DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler MC (eds.). Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002:21–64.
   Google Scholar
• Choukas-Bradley S, Nesi J, Widman L, Noar SM. Examining the roles of self-objectification and appearance expectations in young women’s indoor tanning behavior. Sex Roles. 2018:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Choukas-Bradley S, Nesi J, Widman L, Higgins MK. Camera-ready: Young women’s appearance-related social media consciousness. Psychol Pop Media Culture. 2018:in press.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan L, Wallace JB. For freshmen, campus life poses new risks. New York Times. August 17, 2016. https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/08/17/for-freshmen-campus-life-poses-new-risks/. Accessed April 10, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Harper CC, Ellertson CE. The emergency contraceptive pill: a survey of knowledge and attitudes among students at Princeton University. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:1438–1445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr. 2009;76:408–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behav Res. 2004;39:99–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer MD, Thompson WE. The distribution of products of independent random variables. SIAM J Appl Math. 1966;14:511–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40:879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahratian A, Patel DA, Wolff K, et al. College students’ perceptions of emergency contraception provision. J Womens Health. 2008;17:103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher KM, Updegraff JA. Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med. 2012;43:101–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins DN, Bradford WD. The effect of changes in state and federal policy for nonprescription access to emergency contraception on youth contraceptive use: a difference‐in‐difference analysis across New England states. Contemp Econ Policy. 2015;33:405–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar