References
- Food and Drug Administration. Health information. https://www.fda.gov/tobaccoproducts/publichealtheducation/healthinformation/default.htm. Updated September 12, 2017. Accessed 07 October 2018.
- Butler KM, Rayens MK, Wiggins AT, Rademacher KB, Hahn EJ. Association of smoking in the home with lung cancer worry, perceived risk, and synergistic risk. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017;44(2):E55–E63. doi:10.1188/17.ONF.E55-E63.
- Lacasse K. Going with your gut: how William James’ theory of emotions brings insights to risk perception and decision making research. New Ideas Psychol. 2017;46:1–7.
- Carter‐Harris L, Ceppa DP, Hanna N, Rawl SM. Lung cancer screening: what do long‐term smokers know and believe? Health Expect. 2017;20(1):59–68. doi:10.1111/hex.12433.
- Kaufman AR, Persoskie A, Twesten J, Bromberg J. A review of risk perception measurement in tobacco control research. Tob Control. 2018;tobaccocontrol-2017-054005. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054005.
- Peters E, Vastfjall D, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Mazocoo K, Dickert S. Numeracy and decision making. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(5):407–413. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x.
- Peters E, Dieckmann N, Dixon A, Hibbard JH, Mertz CK. Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64(2):169–190. doi:10.1177/10775587070640020301.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking and Cancer. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/50th-anniversary/pdfs/fs_smoking_cancer_508.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed April 2, 2019.
- Petrova D, Kostopoulou O, Delaney BC, Cokely ET, Garcia-Retamero R. Strengths and gaps in physicians’ risk communication: a scenario study of the influence of numeracy on cancer screening communication. Medical Decis Making. 2018;38(3):355–365. doi:10.1177/0272989X17729359.
- Garcia-Retamero R, Cokely ET. Communicating health risks with visual aids. Curr Direct Psychol Sci. 2013;22(5):392–399. doi:10.1177/0963721413491570.
- Berman ML, Bickel WK, Harris AC, et al. Consortium on methods evaluating tobacco: research tools to inform FDA regulation of snus. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;20(11):1292–1300. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntx228.
- Weller JA, Dieckmann NF, Tusler M, Mertz CK, Burns WJ, Peters E. Development and testing of an abbreviated numeracy scale: a Rasch analysis approach. J Behav Decis Making. 2013;26(2):198–212. doi:10.1002/bdm.1751.
- Ross K, Stoler J, Carcioppolo N. The relationship between low perceived numeracy and cancer knowledge, beliefs, and affect. Plos One. 2018;13(6):e0198992. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198992.
- Hatsukami DK, Vogel RI, Severson HH, Jensen JA, O’Connor RJ. Perceived health risks of snus and medicinal nicotine products. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(5):794–800. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv200.
- Schwartz LM. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. JAMA. 1997;127:966–972.
- Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making. 2001;21(1):37–44. doi:10.1177/0272989X0102100105.
- Peters E, Hibbard J, Slovic P, Dieckmann N. Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. Health Affairs. 2007;26(3):741–748. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.741.
- Frederick S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. J Econom Pers. 2005;19(4):25–42. doi:10.1257/089533005775196732.