Evaluating the Understandability and Actionability of Online Information on Anemia in Japanese

References

• GBD 2021 Anaemia Collaborators. Prevalence, years lived with disability, and trends in anaemia burden by severity and cause, 1990–2021: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Haematol. 2023;10(9):e713–e734. doi:10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00160-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health. Labour and welfare. National Health and Nutrition Survey. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/kenkou_eiyou_chousa.html. Published October 11, 2021. Accessed September 5, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Di Renzo GC, Spano F, Giardina I, et al. Iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy. Womens Health. 2015;11(6):891–900. doi:10.2217/whe.15.35.
   Google Scholar
• Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, et al. Health information on the internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA. 2001;285(20):2612–2621. doi:10.1001/jama.285.20.2612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure E, Ng J, Vitzthum K, Rudd R. A mismatch between patient education materials about sickle cell disease and the literacy level of their intended audience. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;13(E64):150478. doi:10.5888/pcd13.150478.
   Google Scholar
• Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Int Med. 2011;155(2):97–107. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcanjo FP, Arcanjo CP, Santos PR. Schoolchildren with learning difficulties have low iron status and high anemia prevalence. J Nutr Metab. 2016;2016:7357136. doi:10.1155/2016/7357136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakayama K, Osaka W, Togari T, et al. Comprehensive health literacy in Japan is lower than in Europe: a validated Japanese-language assessment of health literacy. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):505. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1835-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure E, Ng J, Vitzthum K, Rudd R. A mismatch between patient education materials about sickle cell disease and the literacy level of their intended audience. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;13:E64. doi:10.5888/pcd13.150478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alwani MM, Campa KA, Svenstrup TJ, Bandali EH, Anthony BP. An appraisal of printed online education materials on spasmodic dysphonia. J Voice. 2021;35(4):.e659.651–.e659.659. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneyderman M, Davis R, Snow G, Dhar S, Akst LM. Zenker’s diverticulum: readability and quality of online written education materials. Dysphagia. 2022;37(6):1461–1467. doi:10.1007/s00455-022-10406-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan V, Chandy Z, Hseih A, Bui TL, Verma SP. Readability and understandability of online vocal cord paralysis materials. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154(3):460–464. doi:10.1177/0194599815626146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen BJ, Spink, Spink A. How are we searching the World Wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs. Inf Process Manag. 2006;42(1):248–263. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2004.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(3):395–403. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furukawa E, Okuhara T, Okada H, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Japanese version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(23):15763. doi:10.3390/ijerph192315763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baur C, Prue C. The CDC clear communication index is a new evidence-based tool to prepare and review health information. Health Promot Pract. 2014;15(5):629–637. doi:10.1177/1524839914538969.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marinho A, Baur C, Costa LEO, et al. Some psychometric properties of the Brazilian CDC clear communication index. Health Lit Res Pract. 2022;6(2):e84–e87. doi:10.3928/24748307-20220315-01.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goto A, Lai AY, Kumagai A, et al. Collaborative processes of developing a health literacy toolkit: a case from Fukushima after the nuclear accident. J Health Commun. 2018;23(2):200–206. doi:10.1080/10810730.2018.1423650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J. Readability research for Japanese language education. Waseda Stud Jpn Lang Educ. 2016; 21:1–16
   Google Scholar
• Lee J, Sunakawa Y, Hori K, Hasebe Y. jReadability PORTAL. http://jreadability.net. Accessed September 5, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet: caveant lector et viewor–let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244–1245. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, et al. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):2070–2077. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furukawa E, Okuhara T, Okada H, et al. Evaluating the understandability and actionability of online educational videos on pre‐dialysis chronic kidney disease. Nephrology. 2023;28(11):620–628. doi:10.1111/nep.14226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health Commission for Health Education Credentialing. Health education specialist practice analysis II 2020. https://www.nchec.org/. Accessed October 17, 2023.
   Google Scholar